On Friday, 29. January 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Jan Wagner wrote:
> > I stumbled upon the same problem on backporting. From my point of view,
> > user of you package don't have the track down the versioned build-dep of
> > the packages.
>
> From my point of
Hi Mehdi,
On Saturday 30 January 2010 14:47:34 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > Who should do backports in your eyes? Debian Developers? Maintainers?
> > Nobody?
>
> Certainly, not users. And, let's make that clear: it's not "in my eyes".
> Ask other DDs or DMs about this particular question if you want to
On Monday 01 February 2010 10:39:50 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Jan Wagner wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 January 2010 14:47:34 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >> Certainly, not users. And, let's make that clear: it's not "in my eyes".
> >> Ask other DDs or DMs abo
Hi Stéphane,
On Monday 01 February 2010 11:54:49 Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Did you try to remove the
> versioned dependency?
no I didn't, cause I was realizing that the package I was trying to backport
will lead me into dependency hell due backporting lablgtk2. :) So I decided
that the headache
On Monday 01 February 2010 14:28:12 Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> What is the package you are trying to backport, by the way?
It was mldonkey.
With kind regards, Jan.
--
Never write mail to , you have been warned!
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+
severity 521198 important
tags 521198 + wontfix
thanks
On Friday 07 May 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Suhosin is now installed and enabled by default. So "1. if anybody
> installes a php security module, the documentation should be read" no
> longer applies.
php5-suhosin is actually installed
Hi Paul,
thanks for reporting the problem.
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 18:38:33 Paul Slootman wrote:
> >From /usr/share/nagios-plugins/templates-basic/disk.cfg :
>
> # 'ssh_disk' command definition
> define command{
> command_namessh_disk
> command_line/usr/lib/nagios/plugins
Hi Paul,
On Thursday 20 May 2010 11:46:42 Paul Slootman wrote:
> I didn't try ssh_disk_4.
this works here out of the box.
> > Could you please try the following:
> >
> > command_line/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_by_ssh -H '$HOSTADDRESS$'
> > -C '/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk -w '\''$ARG
Hi Ralf,
On Saturday, 22. August 2009, Ralf Becker wrote:
> Independent of how EGroupware is maintained in Debian in future, I'm
> happy to work closer together with Debian Security Team, to get earlier
> information about exploits in embedded code and coordinate security fixes.
>
> If I'm going
Package: gallery2
Version: 2.3.1.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Hi Michael,
you fixed #528115 anyhow. But I can't find any informations about how to
generate the orig.tar.gz (via README.source [1]) nor can I find any
inforamtion how you modified the following files:
gallery2-2.3.1.dfsg/MANIFEST
ga
Hi there,
On Saturday, 27. February 2010, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> When starting Apache after removing php5-suhosin, the following warning is
> written to error.log:
>
> PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
> '/usr/lib/php5/20090626+lfs/suhosin.so' -
> /usr/lib/php5/20090626
Hi Helmut,
thanks for your bugreport.
On Tuesday, 9. February 2010, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The nagios-plugins-standard package pulls in tons of dependencies that
> are completely useless to me. This is the depends header:
When the package was created, there was no automatically installation of
Hi Vladimir,
On Friday, 31. July 2009, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:32:05PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> > Simulation may eliminate error, but script itself output image, that
> > breaking by invalid output. suhosin.disable.display_errors don't help
where did you f
Hi Gabriele,
On Tuesday 27 April 2010 22:28:49 you wrote:
> Here we are:
>
> r...@transylvania:~ 0 510# cat
> /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5]
> [raid4]
> md8 : active raid5 sdc1[0] sde1[3]
> sdd1[1]
> 1757831936 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 64k c
Hi Faidon,
On Wednesday, 17. March 2010, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> I'm not sure if you follow upstream's list so I'll repeat some stuff
> anyway.
I did, with half of an eye. :)
> Some months ago I contacted some of the original authors about the
> licensing mess. The main author, Cengiz Alaetti
Hi Glennie,
thanks for your bug report.
On Friday 19 March 2010 09:43:19 Glennie Vignarajah wrote:
> The new version(1.4.14-2) of nagios-plugins-standard depends on
> postfix, sendmail-bin, exim4-daemon-heavy or exim4-daemon-light. But
> there are MTA like (nullmailer, courier-mta or ssmtp ; i
Hi Christoph,
thanks for your report.
On Friday 19 March 2010 12:21:18 Christoph Martin wrote:
> If you have a status like the following:
[...]
> check_linux_raid will return no Warning state but Ok state. This is
> because the script wants to see an empty line after each md block,
> which is not
Hi Glennie,
On Friday 19 March 2010, Glennie Vignarajah wrote:
> And, if you move the list of supported MTA from Recommends to Suggests,
> this will work in my case, but hosts where Install-Suggests is set to
> "true" will still have the issue, no?
they will have, but in this case they changed th
Hi Vladimir,
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 16:02:21 Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> I have found the source of problem. It is chain of errors. It is right
> that imagepstext() fail. Why? Because it take boolean "FALSE" instead of
> image resource as first parameter. This value is returned by
> imagecreate(
the patch attached
--- check_linux_raid 2010-04-27 08:50:47.0 +0200
+++ check_linux_raid.orig 2010-04-08 23:20:00.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-#!/usr/bin/perl
-# nagios: -epn
+#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# Copyright (c) 2002 ISOMEDIA, Inc.
# originally written by Steve Milton
@@ -80,7 +79,6
Hi Gabriele,
thanks for reporting the problem.
On Saturday 24 April 2010 21:24:51 Gabriele Tozzi wrote:
> check_linux_raid gives the following error when ran from nagios:
> **ePN /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_linux_raid: "Use of
> uninitialized value within %status in pattern match (m//) at
> (ev
1.0 in debian/source/format
+ * Add $remote_fs as dependency for Required-Start and Required-Stop in the
+init script, removed $local_fs, which is implicit
+
+ -- Jan Wagner Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:19:52 +0200
+
smstools (3.1.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
diff -Nur
# Forwarded to upstream
tags 489974 + upstream
forwarded 489974
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1510712&group_id=29880&atid=397599
thanks
Hi Paul,
On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> A patch for this is available in the upstream tracker (1510712) [1]
>
Hi David,
On Saturday 31 January 2009 13:48, David Perfors wrote:
> When configuring Nagios to check with the check_nt plugin (for example
> check_nt!CPULOAD!-l 5,80,90) Nagios is reporting that the -l
> parameter is missing. Looking in the nt,cfg file it looks like only
> the CPULOAD is inserted
On Sunday 01 February 2009 01:53, Jan Wagner wrote:
> On Saturday 31 January 2009 13:48, David Perfors wrote:
> > When configuring Nagios to check with the check_nt plugin (for example
> > check_nt!CPULOAD!-l 5,80,90) Nagios is reporting that the -l
> > parameter is missing.
Hi David,
On Sunday 01 February 2009 09:53, you wrote:
> Thanks for the tip, that is a possibility, but when someone is
> following the documentation it is confusing that it doesn't work like
> they say:
>
> (http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/monitoring-windows.html)
>
> "Add the following se
Package: nagios-snmp-plugins
Version: 1.1.1-5
Severity: serious
While looking at the ubuntu bugs for the package just for fun, I noticed[1]
that I use /usr/share/nagios-plugins/dpkg/functions (which is shiped with
nagios-plugins-basic) in postinst of nagios-snmp-plugins.
If nagios-plugins-basic is
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE
Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
# Fail2Ban configuration file
#
# Author: Jan Wagner
#
# $Revision: 551 $
#
[Definition]
# O
# Fixed upstream
tags 502529 + patch
thanks
Here is the patch, in case anybody will fix it in unstable. As it is planed to
release 1.4.14 soon, I intend to fix it with packaging the next upstream
version when lenny is out of the door. This fix is a bit too late for it.
With kind regards, Jan.
-
Hi Bastian,
On Thursday 05 February 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 11:37:45PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Maybe you could link us to the check or even send it to the bugreport?
>
> Can you please take a look in you own source package? The plugins dir is
> full of wonderfull t
iases in apache.conf (Closes: #511327)
+
+ -- Jan Wagner Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:10:28 +0100
+
ipplan (4.86a-6) unstable; urgency=low
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Roberto,
On Saturday 14 February 2009, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:22:37PM +0100, alessandro -oggei- ogier wrote:
> > Package: shorewall
> > Version: 4.0.15-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Hi, a new line if now out (4.2.x), which also support ipv6.
> > Can u please c
Hi there,
On Tuesday 17 February 2009, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> No progress so far. I must admit that I have not put in that much effort on
> it either.
dito! I'm open to include any usefull patch regarding this. Dunno how to solve
the whole problem, maybe with a package just including the file?
Hi Frode,
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Frode Jemtland wrote:
> I have updated my server from Etch to Lenny, and notices that I still need
> to hack the nagios-plugins script check_mrtg.
>
> The problem is the same as described in bug #335871.
>
> The package that is in Lenny is nagios-plugins-1.4.12.
Package: nagiosgrapher
Version: 1.7.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi Hendrik,
after installing latest package, I get the following error from logrotate:
error: nagiosgrapher:1 duplicate log entry
for /var/log/nagiosgrapher/ngraph.log
Looking deeper into it:
# ls -la /etc/logrotate.d/*grapher
-rw-r--r-
retitle 516097 Please implement --ignore-inaccessible
severity 516097 wishlist
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> on etch:
>
> wea...@simona:~$ /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk 90 95 | tr ';' '\n' |
> grep test /mnt/test/mountpoint 86396 MB (60% inode=98%)
> 60476 /mnt/test/m
On Saturday 21 February 2009, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Since the sid/squeeze version could be downloaded and directly installed
> with 'dpkg -i', it is probably not suitable for upload to the official
> bpo.
Point taken, since arch is all. But maybe you will ask the ftp-masters of bpo
for an e
Hi Onkar,
is there any process? :)
On Saturday 27 December 2008, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> 1. I need sponsorship to the update of libcommons-jexl-java. The
> updated packaging lies in pkg-java svn.
Maybe you should write about this issue to
pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org ?
> 2. I wil
Hi Justin,
thanks for your bugreport.
On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Package: nagios-plugins-basic
> Version: 1.4.11-2ubuntu2.1
> Severity: normal
Looks like you are using a Debian derivate, but that shouldn't be a problem.
:)
> Can crash in 2 ways:
>
> - if -H $host is not
Hi Olivier,
On Friday 28 March 2008 14:59, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Then, the docs could be :
> 2) activate mod_actions (a2enmod actions)
> 3) Add the following to /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.conf
> Action application/x-httpd-php /cgi-bin/php5
> 4) Reload apache's configuration (/etc/
Hi Andreas,
thanks for the report.
On Sunday 30 March 2008 16:48, Andreas Fleckl wrote:
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 4.0
> APT prefers stable
> APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (650, 'testing')
> Architecture: x86_64
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-vse
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: fixed Bug#473416: policyd-weight: The following packages will be
upgraded:
Date: Monday 31 March 2008 10:40
From: Andreas Fleckl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andreas Fleckl wrote:
tags 603427 + pending patch
thanks
On Sunday, 14. November 2010, you wrote:
> Package: ipplan
> Version: 4.92a-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
> upgrade t
nfig_syntax.dpatch to fix broken default config
* Only call postinst and config if we install the package or on
dpkg-reconfigure
-- Jan Wagner Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:00:25 +0100
diffstat:
README.Debian | 15 +++---
changelog | 2
Hi Lars,
On Monday, 3. May 2010, Lars Volker wrote:
> I've uploaded the new packages to m-d-n and I'd be glad, if one of you
> could have a look at them. Especially I'm looking forward to hear from
> Peter again.
even if it would be too late for squeeze, is there any progress on the
packaging? I
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
could you please add the following into Packages-arch-specific:
"%ndoutils: !kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386"
"%nagios3: !kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386"
The reason behind that is #590552, which prevents building nagios3 on
kfreebsd-* and it doesn't
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
could you please remove ndoutils from kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386:
The reason behind that is #590552, which prevents building nagios3 on
kfreebsd-* and it doesn't look like we get that fixed in squeeze.
Unfortunately nagios3 blocks[1] ndoutils
Package: roundcube
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: important
Looking into the package source indicates that the SQL-Databases aren't
upgraded as well.
$ ls -la debian/sql/*/0.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 waja waja 426 Feb 15 2009 debian/sql/mysql/0.1.1-1
-rw-r--r-- 1 waja waja 750 Aug 17 2008 debian/sql/mysql/0.
Hi Vincent,
On Tuesday 09 November 2010 19:29:49 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Only 0.3-stable updates are missing, right? The update only updates
> indexes. I don't remember why I did not put this upgrade. But there is
> no missing table, right?
actually not. I just realized the general problem
On Thursday 20 May 2010 13:48:27 christ...@hilbert.alphasky.net wrote:
> the following script:
>
> # cat test.php
> ini_set("memory_limit", "256M");
> echo "foobar\n";
> ?>
>
> executed on the command line with the following parameters
>
> # php5 --define memory_limit=-1 --define suhosin.memory_li
Hi Massimo,
thanks for your bugreport.
On Friday 04 June 2010 09:17:16 Massimo Modica wrote:
> mt_srand(2010);
> for($i=0;$i<10;$i++) echo mt_rand(0,10)."-";
> ?>
>
> should output identical sequences on each run.
>
> But it gives different sequences in this setup:
> - lenny amd64
> - php5-suhos
On Thursday 19 August 2010 21:15:03 Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I just realized that when installing php5-cli, the php5 cron job
> executes and causes an error mail to be sent by cron every 30 minutes,
> which is highly annoying. A similar issue caused by gd was already
> reported in #592472.
As you
severity 563090 minor
thanks
Hi Justin,
On Wednesday, 30. December 2009, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
> Its behavior depends on its invocation name, but that's not apparent from
> documentation and only executable is available in a default install.
>
> just...@justinp:~/src/nagios-plugins-1.4.12/plugi
Hi there,
On Tuesday, 10. November 2009, Petr Salinger wrote:
> it seems that the nagios related packages need an ping command available.
> They choose iputils-ping, which is rather linux specific.
> Could be possible to switch (at least on non-linux)
> to inetutils-ping (already available) or fpi
Package: centerim
Version: 4.22.9-1
Severity: important
Hi there,
while trying to backport the package to lenny, the following occured:
configure.ac:8: error: Autoconf version 2.62 or higher is required
aclocal.m4:592: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE is expanded from...
configure.ac:8: the top level
autom4te:
Hi Petr,
many thanks for your answer.
On Monday, 11. January 2010, Petr Salinger wrote:
> You can of course conditionalize build-dependencies and dependencies based
> on architecture. This way configuration on linux could remain the same
> (no regression) and on previously uninstallable architect
severity 498812 minor
thanks
On Saturday 13 September 2008 16:02:53 Bastian Blank wrote:
> check_apt currently bails out with the apt version in lenny:
[...]
> | E: Failed to write temporary StateFile /var/lib/apt/extended_states.tmp
> | APT WARNING: 5 packages available for upgrade (0 critical up
Hi there,
On Tuesday, 17. November 2009, you wrote:
> I gave the installation permisson to download MIBs, but it was in no way
> clear to me that this process would take several hours on a fast
> connection.
>
> Please provide a significantly more clear warning on how long this process
> takes.
tags 557666 + pending
thanks
Hi Jan,
On Monday, 23. November 2009, Jan Krajdl wrote:
> In perl module /usr/share/perl5/ipv4pack.pm is error in function
> normalizerange. Function try if IPv4 address range starts with 10 or 127
> and then returns error that is a private range. But the same regexp
On Wednesday, 18. November 2009, you wrote:
> I made test on HP DL160 G6 and works without problem. Please add support
> for this NIC in next official release of kernel package.
maybe you could also consider the solution from
http://blog.waja.info/2009/11/18/dkms-rocks/
With kind regards, Jan.
-
Hi Siegfried,
On Sunday, 23. November 2008, Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals"
>
> * Package name: julius
> Version : 4.0.2
> Upstream Author : The Julius Team
> * URL : http://julius
Hi Siegfried,
On Thursday, 29. October 2009, you wrote:
> 2009/10/29 Jan Wagner :
> > any process here?
>
> The package is ready (and already in Ubuntu since some time), but I
> haven't looked for a DD to sponsor it yet.
unfortunately i'm not available for spon
Hi Thijs,
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 18:16:21 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > as I can understand, that this would be a usefull addition, I think we
> > have a couple of disadvantages.
> >
> > * users which uses a certificate and don't care if its valid/expired
> > (just want to encrypt the payload)
Package: nagstamon
Version: 0.9.6.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi there,
since nagstamon 0.9.6 python-beautifulsou is used. While backporting to
squeeze, henri und I discovered[1], that python-beautifulsou needs to be at
least 3.2.0.
Thanks and with kind regards, Jan.
[1]
http://sourceforge.net/track
forwarded 608714
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3302033&group_id=29880&atid=397597
Thanks
Hi Marc,
thanks for taking care and reporting this problem.
On Sunday, 2. January 2011, Marc Haber wrote:
> Using strace or wireshark reveals that the plugin is actually talking
> proper
tag 620965 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi root,
thanks for taking care and reporting this problem.
Unfortunately I can't reproduce your problem.
On Tuesday, 5. April 2011, root wrote:
> The snmp_procs command definition uses a wrong MIB for querying the total #
> of processes. With "host.h
tag 587590 + wontfix
thanks
Hi Russell,
On Wednesday, 30. June 2010, Jan Wagner wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 June 2010 05:26:53 Russell Coker wrote:
> > The "mailq" command reads the headers of each message, if there are many
> > thousands of messages that can regularly ta
reassign 592940 wnpp
retitle 592940 'RFP: nagios-plugin-munin -- Nagios check plugins using rrd
generated by munin'
thanks
Package name: nagios-plugin-munin
Version: %
Upstream Author: Julien Rottenberg
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS-Async/
License: GPL2+
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for your bugreport.
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 09:36:00 Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 19:32:52 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 02:23:44PM -0400, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > > we got a bugreport[1] against our nagios-plugins pack
and line, each of its IPs is added
+ to the host table (and each one is pinged). So, the buffer has to be large
+ enough to hold all of the respective host objects. (argc - 1) only fits
+ hosts with a single IP.
+
+ -- Jan Wagner Wed, 18 May 2011 21:21:05 +0200
+
nagios-plugins (1.4.1
Hi Adam,
On Saturday, 21. May 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Thanks for working on fixing this in stable; please go ahead with the
> upload.
I uploaded the fixed package last night.
Thanks and with kind regards, Jan.
--
Never write mail to , you have been warned!
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
tags 623702 + moreinfo unreproducible
severity 623702 normal
thanks
Hi Max,
thanks for your bugreport.
On Freitag, 22. April 2011, Max Kosmach wrote:
> check_host segfaults on www.google.ru
>
> /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_icmp -H www.google.ru
> OK - www.google.ru: rta 78.868ms, lost 0%|rta=7
Hi Sven,
Am 11.02.19 um 09:51 schrieb Sven Hartge:
> Also I am a bit disappointed by you invoking the "the next release is
> near" argument. Most of my servers for example won't get Buster until
> early to mid 2020 and I think many of others are in the same boat.
just to point this out. You prefe
Am 11.02.19 um 10:46 schrieb Sven Hartge:
> But this bug has been encountered frequently enough (and is difficult to
> spot, if you don't exactly know what to search for) and with increasing
Beeing there. Searched >3 weeks before I thought it would be a idea to
switch the mpm.
> adoption of SSL m
Am 11.02.19 um 13:12 schrieb Sven Hartge:
>> Okay ... here is an area where you can push forward. What about
>> providing documentation patches?
> Sure. What kind of documentation. NEWS.Debian?
where would you expect such a documentation, as you suggested it?
Cheers, Jan.
--
Never write mail to
Am 12.02.19 um 17:28 schrieb Gedalya:
> So how about backporting it to stretch-backports? Isn't that what the
> backports section is for?
backports is not meant for fixing things. beside that it would require
all rebuilding most of the additional apache modules not shiped by the
apache2 source pa
Am 12.02.19 um 17:44 schrieb Gedalya:
> On 2/13/19 12:38 AM, Jan Wagner wrote:
>> backports is not meant for fixing things. beside that it would require
>> all rebuilding most of the additional apache modules not shiped by the
>> apache2 source package.
> So we're
Am 06.07.13 um 09:23 schrieb David Schmitt:
> root@testagent:~# /usr/share/munin/plugins/apt_all update 7200 1
> E: The value 'testing' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a
> release is not available in the sources
> E: The value 'unstable' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a
> r
Hi Lars,
Am 20.02.19 um 21:13 schrieb Lars Kruse:
> Am Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:33:34 +
> schrieb Holger Levsen :
>> strangely this commit is in Buster:
>> ~/Projects/munin/munin$ git tag --contains 44604624b1c27f6
>> 2.0.44
>> 2.0.45
>> debian/2.0.44-1
>> debian/2.0.44-1_bpo9+1
>> debian/2.0.44-2
reopen 985336
thx
As 0.7.15.0+debian does not incorporate the changes done by
0.7.14.0+debian2+nmu1 and 0.7.14.0+debian2+nmu2 (where are the
changelogs?) this bug is present in 0.7.15.0+debian again!
Cheers, Jan.
--
Never write mail to , you have been warned!
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
V
Am 14.05.21 um 12:46 schrieb Pirate Praveen:
Tracker says it will be auto removed by May 25 and 15 more days are needed for
migration. Does it mean, this missed bullseye?
0.7.14.0+debian2+nmu2 would have been in time.
Cheers, Jan.
Hi Gabriel,
Am 29.06.21 um 19:34 schrieb Gabriel Filion:
I would like to suggest breaking up this package into smaller binary packages
that are focused on one application/service per package. This way one could
install only the checks that are required with their individual requirements.
as yo
forwarded 982847
https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-plugins/issues/1660
forwarded 982847
https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-plugins/issues/1661
thanks
Hi Florian,
thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Am 15.02.21 um 11:16 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
> diff --git a/
Package: nagios-plugins-contrib
Version: 34.20210407+1
Hi Slavko,
Am 07.04.21 um 14:52 schrieb Slavko:
The currently shipped check_ssl_cert has broken Renegotiation test, which
uses plain ports with STARTTLS certificate checks. It was fixed by upstream,
see https://github.com/matteocorti/check_
Package: nagios-plugins-contrib
Severity: normal
Monitoring Plugins ships a check_uptime since version 2.3, see
https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-plugins/commits/v2.3/plugins-scripts/check_uptime.pl
I would suggest to remove check_uptime from the package. If removing is
not an opti
Hi Humberto,
thanks for reporting,
Am 25.03.20 um 21:47 schrieb Humberto Flores III:
> * What led up to the situation?
> # /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_mailq -w 100 -c 200 -W 10 -C 20
>
>
> * What was the outcome of this action?
> Unknown option: W
> Unknown option: C
while added the feature
Hi Chirstoph,
thanks for taking care.
Am 07.12.20 um 08:09 schrieb Christoph Biedl:
> to resolve this issue, I've prepared a NMU for nagios-plugins-contrib
> (versioned as 27.20200511+1+nmu1), and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please
> feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
1.124.0 is alr
tags 943888 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi Felix,
thanks for reporting.
Am 31.10.19 um 13:37 schrieb Felix Geyer:
> To reproduce on buster with systemd (but obviously applies to other
> processes as well):
> apt install --reinstall libseccomp2
> # /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_libs
> No upg
Hi Christoph,
Am 07.12.20 um 22:05 schrieb Christoph Biedl:
> Okay, I've removed the upload from the queue as I really like to avoid
> disrupting the maintainers' workflow by doing a NMU. However, I'd
> appreciate if you could deal with this pretty soon as it is delaying the
> testing migration of
Hi,
Am 22.11.20 um 17:22 schrieb Otto Kekäläinen:
> And if you find out there are no code changes needed, maybe submit an
> addition to the README's so the next users have an easier time
> figuring out how to properly run multi-instnances?
sorry, I'm not using this szenario anymore. So I don't ha
Hi Helmut,
Am 21.05.19 um 22:04 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
> nagios-plugins-contrib fails to build from source. The first failure is
> installing Build-Depends as python and python-debian are not cross
> satisfiable. Since these are only used for scripts, we can annotate them
> with :native. Then, che
Hi Lars,
Am 17.11.17 um 04:10 schrieb Lars Kruse:
> I was able to work around this by adding the following line to
> /etc/dehydrated/config:
>
> LICENSE="https://letsencrypt.org/documents/LE-SA-v1.2-November-15-2017.pdf";
>
> I guess, that it would be sufficient (and proper) to update the defa
Hi Mattia,
thanks for caring!
Am 18.11.17 um 14:04 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
>>> I guess, that it would be sufficient (and proper) to update the default
>>> value for LICENCE in /usr/bin/dehydrated.
>>
>> a fix for this was implemented with
>> https://gist.github.com/waja/8df78afb09691e4f383d818685
Hi there,
Am 08.10.17 um 12:28 schrieb Thomas L.:
> yesterday I did an upgrade from Debian Stretch 9.1 to 9.2. Postfix was
> updated. During the update, no error accured.
> After a reboot, "systemctl status postfix" showed this:
>
> ● postfix.service - Postfix Mail Transport Agent
>Loaded: l
Hi there,
Am 16.10.17 um 22:58 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> I've just upgraded several systems to 9.2 (and rebooted) and am unable to
> reproduce the problem. For the original submitter (or anyone else who had
> the
> problem) do you use multi-instance postfix? Is there anything unusual about
severity 764603 normal
thanks
Am 10.10.14 um 14:14 schrieb leo weppelman:> It looks like my ntpd is
more eager to send a KoD than yours :-) It can> also be that your nagios
check has more time between the requests (I> believe 2secs. is the
threshold). But why this differs between our> configs is a
Hi Christoph,
do you have still issues with recent (stretch or buster) versions of
check_apt. There has been enhancements implemented since you bug report.
Thanks, Jan.
--
Never write mail to , you have been warned!
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL P+ L+++
Dear Release Team,
Am 28.04.19 um 12:57 schrieb Bálint Réczey:
> Unattended-upgrades 1.12 contains almost only fixes for bugs holding
> back security updates or for regressions.
> I'm wondering if you would let it in Buster in full or just with
> omitting parts of the fixes. If omitting some of th
hi there,
Am 16.05.19 um 06:58 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
> I got the same error message after a fresh installation.
>
> The file /etc/mysql/mariadb.cnf doesn't exixt.
fresh installation here:
# ls -la /etc/mysql/mariadb.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 869 Jan 8 23:10 /etc/mysql/mariadb.cnf
# dpkg
Dear release team,
Am 12.05.19 um 12:41 schrieb Jan Wagner:
>>* Skip sending email when no package had to be installed, upgraded
> or removed
>> (LP: #1821103) (Closes: #924554)
> I'm still considering this as a regression and thus RC.
DO we need to change sev
601 - 700 of 734 matches
Mail list logo
