Processed: Re: Bug#300672: vim-doc: fails to install because of /usr/share/doc/vim/copyright

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 300672 + pending Bug#300672: vim-doc: fails to install because of /usr/share/doc/vim/copyright Tags were: sid Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#300692: scim: Incomplete dependency

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300692 important Bug#300692: scim: Incomplete dependency Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#300692: scim: Incomplete dependency

severity 300692 important thanks On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:41:42PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: I knew only one DD for help uploading package is not enought, and I am very appreciate that he has done so much for scim package. I hope more DD will stand up for helping on pkg-ime project. :-) The

Bug#299807: marked as done (omniORB potentially vulnerable against DoS)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:17:53 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299807: fixed in omniorb4 4.0.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: tagging 300395

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 300395 unreproducible Bug#300395: po4a: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#300703: autofs: Upgrade fails

Package: autofs Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-3 Severity: grave Upgrade from 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-2 fails: Preparing to replace autofs 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-2 (using .../autofs_4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-3_amd64.deb) ... Stopping automounter:dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 dpkg -

Bug#300182: tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206)

Hi! Hilmar, where did you see patches like +if (pagesSize*(int)sizeof(Page *)/sizeof(Page *) != pagesSize || +pagesSize*(int)sizeof(Ref)/sizeof(Ref) != pagesSize) { in the current tetex-bin package? debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888 already has correct patches. Also,

Bug#300705: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory...

Package: udev Version: 0.054-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, after the last udev update my system did not come up anymore because udev failed to start and then no partitions but / had been found... The Problem: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory on startup. On

Processed: tagging 300395

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 300395 - unreproducible Bug#300395: po4a: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible End of message, stopping processing

Bug#300395: po4a: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build

Hello, I cannot reproduce this bug on my machine, and I'm thus embarrassed to fix it. I mean that a clean pbuild does not trigger the fix on my box. Does it come from the fact that I call pbuilder from the command line while you have a robot (cronjob?) calling it for you? Anyway, I would really

Processed: tagging 268944, closing 268944

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 tags 268944 - sarge Bug#268944: sh: wrong errexit with eval Tags were: sarge patch Bug#276964: set -e; if eval ...; then ...; else ...; fi exits if false, rather than executing 'else'

Bug#300117: revelation: Don't start

Hello, Hello, I found the problem. Please append the commands to the bug you used to solve the problem, that way we have the solution documented in the bts. I'll close the bug afterwards. regards Stefan -- Stefan Völkel[EMAIL PROTECTED] Millenux GmbH

Bug#300395: Ok, found a way to reproduce it

Hello, I found a way to reproduce it (playing with at(1) and friends). The fix I proposed was not enough. I'm on it, hold your breath... ;) Thanks, Mt. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package revelation Ignoring bugs not assigned to: revelation tags 300117 + pending Bug#300117: revelation: Don't start There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#300395: marked as done (po4a: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:17:21 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300395: fixed in po4a 0.20-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#300705: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300705 important Bug#300705: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory... Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#300705: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory...

severity 300705 important thanks Marc, On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:13:15AM +0100, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: after the last udev update my system did not come up anymore because udev failed to start and then no partitions but / had been found... The Problem: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory

Processed: tagging 299013, closing 299013

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 299013 - sarge Bug#299013: libdevmapper1.01 initscript should be in rcS.d, not rc2.d Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge close 299013 Bug#299013: libdevmapper1.01 initscript

Bug#296662: marked as done (security hole in LDAP login code (CAN-2005-0505))

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:20:24 +1100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line New upstream version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#300449: marked as done (cacti: Update from previous version delete custom scripts without warning !!!!)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:32:22 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300449: fixed in cacti 0.8.6c-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#292258: marked as done (libgtksourceview-cil: Will have file clash with upcoming libgtksourceview-common (1.1.2))

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:47:11 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#292258: fixed in gtksourceview-sharp 0.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#297149: compile with 0.60

Hi, I've successfully build this package by using 0.60 definitions. Here is what I did: * Download ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/aspell6-bn-0.01.1-1.tar.bz2 * Unpack and rename directory to aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1 * apt-get source aspell-bn * cp -R aspell-bn-0.50.1/debian

Bug#300185: FTBFS in experimental

Hi! Andreas Barth [2005-03-18 10:29 +0100]: Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc 1.170.5 /usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:96:29: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory I really don't understand this. This seems to happen at random, affects the Sarge/Sid version as well

Bug#300722: FTBFS in experimental

started at 20050321-0906 ** [...] dh_strip -p python-pisock dh_compress -p python-pisock dh_fixperms -p python-pisock dh_makeshlibs -p python-pisock dh_python -p python-pisock dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting

Bug#300185: FTBFS in experimental

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: Andreas Barth [2005-03-18 10:29 +0100]: Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc 1.170.5 /usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:96:29: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory I really don't understand this. This

Bug#300681: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:06:01AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Package: realtime-lsm Severity: serious The way this package is built is not accepteble. Please fix the build system to something that works with just dpkg-buildpackage. Hi, I just followed the instructions from

Bug#300681: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:20:28AM -0600, Geiger Guenter wrote: Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:06:01AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Package: realtime-lsm Severity: serious The way this package is built is not accepteble. Please fix the build system to something that works with just

Processed: Re: Nut will not work with nut-usb = 2.0.1-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300115 important Bug#300115: Nut will not work with nut-usb = 2.0.1-1 Severity set to `important'. #as per http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities, as newhidups and energizerups (from nut-usb too) are still usable. This bug seems due

Bug#300115: Nut will not work with nut-usb = 2.0.1-1

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ...But I'm also preparing the final switch to newhidups... Please, launch newhidups (from 2.0.1) and report back the data tree dumped. Ah! # /lib/nut/newhidups -D -D -D -D -a myups Network UPS Tools: New HID UPS driver 0.12 (2.0.1) Warning: This is an

Bug#300748: fop: don't update without libbatik-java 1.5.1-1

Package: fop Version: 1:0.20.5-5 Severity: critical The new fop package (1:0.20.5-5) will only work with libbatik-java 1.5.1-1 (and more), but not with previous releases of the libbatik-java package. Every one can close this bug as soon as libbatik-java 1.5.1-1 will be in the archive. Thanks.

Bug#288009: marked as done ([CAN-2005-0508] libbatik-java: new upstream release fixes a security issue and lots of bugs/conformance/performance issues)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:17:17 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#288009: fixed in batik 1.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#298922: mesa: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL

Kurt: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL This would seem to be because mesa is missing a Build-Depends on xlibmesa-gl-dev. If I give the following command, pbuilder will successfully build packages: pbuilder build --extrapackages build-essential xlibmesa-gl-dev *.dsc Marcelo, adding that and

Bug#298922: mesa: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:34:53PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: This would seem to be because mesa is missing a Build-Depends on xlibmesa-gl-dev. If I give the following command, pbuilder will successfully build packages: Argh! No... The mesa package does not require mesa to build

Bug#300302: foobillard: FTBFS: GL/gl.h missing

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:07:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: This repackaging of mesa needs some serious re-thinking; perhaps the above fix, together with fixing mesa so it doesn't require itself for bootstrapping, is the best choice. Those are big words Steve. Unless I'm missing

Bug#300302: foobillard: FTBFS: GL/gl.h missing

Just in case someone gets trigger happy with an NMU: On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 05:25:01PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: Adding the lines: == include/GL/gl.h usr/include/GL include/GL/glext.h

Bug#300703: maybe the init.s script is broken?

This one fixed the problem. cd /etc/init.d/ diff -pu /etc/init.d/autofs\~ /etc/init.d/autofs --- /etc/init.d/autofs~ 2005-02-21 12:37:43.0 +0100 +++ /etc/init.d/autofs 2005-03-21 17:25:54.0 +0100 @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ start) stop) echo -n 'Stopping automounter:' -

Processed: bug 299500 is forwarded to lincvs-users@sunsite.dk

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 forwarded 299500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#299500: lincvs failed to start Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: tagging 299500, severity of 299500 is grave, severity of 300636 is grave, merging 299500 300636

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 299500 - unreproducible Bug#299500: lincvs failed to start Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible severity 299500 grave Bug#299500: lincvs failed to start

Processed: reopening 247542

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 reopen 247542 Bug#247542: Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency Bug reopened, originator not changed. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#247542: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or directory

Hi, The bug mentionned in the BR does not seem to be solved : % make *** Building HTML *** test -d ./html || mkdir ./html cd ./html gtkdoc-mkhtml mediastreamer ../mediastreamer-docs.sgml /usr/bin/gtkdoc-mkhtml: line 42: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or directory make: *** [html-build.stamp]

Processed: reassign 300440 to dhelp

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 reassign 300440 dhelp Bug#300440: post-installation returns error code 21 if /usr/share/doc/menu/html does not exist Bug reassigned from package `menu' to `dhelp'. End of message,

Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib

Package: r-doc-html Version: 2.0.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: FHS chapter 4 /usr/lib : Libraries for programming and packages /usr/share : Architecture-independent data The documents should be somewhere in /usr/share -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT

Processed: tagging 247542

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 tags 247542 - fixed Bug#247542: Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks

Package: r-doc-html Version: 2.0.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/R/doc/manual$ ll *.html lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 2005-03-21 18:29 R-admin.html - ../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-admin.html lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29

Bug#300422: new patch for libtheora, fixing the wishlist bug too

package libtheora tags 294457 patch thanks Here is an updated patch for libtheora, can be applied to version 0.0.0.alpha4-1 I will NMU it on April 1st, if you don't upload it sooner. Thanks, Gergely diff -urN /home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/changelog

Bug#299602: error from cron job after Sarge upgrade

After upgrading (Mon 14 at 20:13 UTC) a Sarge installation, this rss2email crontab: */10 * * * * if [ -x /usr/bin/r2e ]; then /usr/bin/r2e run; fi report the following output. -- === SEND THE FOLLOWING TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] === E: nonnumeric port: ' ' http://www.osvdb.org/backend/rss.php

Bug#297149: compile with 0.60

On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:55 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote: Hi, I've successfully build this package by using 0.60 definitions. Here is what I did: * Download ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/aspell6-bn-0.01.1-1.tar.bz2 * Unpack and rename directory to aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1 * apt-get

Processed: patch for compilation with libgtk-2.6

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 300456 patch Bug#300456: oregano: FTBFS: compile error in file.c There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#300456: oregano: FTBFS: compile error in file.c

Roland Stigge wrote: building the package oregano in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = ... cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -I/usr/include

Bug#300775: Pam: newer upstream version (0.78) available fixing security bugs

Package: libpam-runtime Version: 0.76-22 Priority: serious Tags: security It seems we are missing some of upstream releases (0.77 was released in September 2002 and 0.78 was released in November 2004). Please package this new release: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/pre/library/ The

Processed: new upstream version fixes this

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 297149 +patch Bug#297149: aspell-bn: FTBFS: Cannot find is13194-bn.cset There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#297149: compile with 0.60

Soumyadip Modak wrote: Ok, thanks a lot for the info. Internet access in India is a bit spotty at the moment, because of union troubles, at the telcos. I hope to get the upstream developers to confirm whether the gnu.org wordlist is identical to the original, in a couple of days. If any emergency

Processed: update-alternatives conflict causing dangling symlinks.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 291510 serious Bug#291510: dangling symlink Severity set to `serious'. retitle 291510 kaffe: update-alternatives order causing dangling symlinks. Bug#291510: dangling symlink Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: More info on non-free fonts

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 298962 + patch Bug#298962: enlightenment: contains non-free fonts There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#300764: missing depends (at least) on tetex-bin breaks install/removal and hoses buildds

Hi James, thanks for reporting. pmx already Depends on tetex-bin, so I don't know why this: On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 17:40 +, James Troup wrote: | Setting up pmx (2.5.4-1) ... | /var/lib/dpkg/info/pmx.postinst: line 13: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file or directory could happen (with

Bug#300683: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 05:06 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Package: oprofile-source Severity: serious The way this package is built is not accepteble. Please fix the build system to something that works with just dpkg-buildpackage. I'm a little puzzled. The package 'oprofile-source'

Bug#299602: error from cron job after Sarge upgrade

Il giorno lun, 21-03-2005 alle 20:18 +0200, Lars Wirzenius ha scritto: After upgrading (Mon 14 at 20:13 UTC) a Sarge installation, this rss2email crontab: */10 * * * * if [ -x /usr/bin/r2e ]; then /usr/bin/r2e run; fi report the following output. -- === SEND THE FOLLOWING TO [EMAIL

Bug#300787: impossible to upgrade makedev

Package: makedev Version: 2.3.1-77 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Trying to upgrade to this version of makedev, when system go to configure the package it reboots immediately -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500,

Bug#300113: Bug#297137 / Bug#300113: bash 2.05-0beta1 not recent enough

The version of bash that failed for me in Bug#297137 was 2.05a-11. The version in the Depends field in hotplug-0.0.20040329-20 is 2.05-0beta1 which is OLDER than 2.05a-11. The comment in Bug#300113 speaks of version 2.05b-beta1 which doesn't exist. The changelog entry for version 2.05b-1

Bug#300780: File conflict with liblucene-java-doc on unpacking

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] | Upon upgrading all installed packages, installation halted with the | unpacking of the new version of liblucene-java because one of the files | in the new version conflicted with a file in the old version of |

Bug#300422: Fwd: problems compiling

Hello. I am interested in your patch, but am having trouble with compilation. (I am not the maintainer or a DD). If I run debuild, it tries to first run debian/rules clean, but fails at: mv config.guess.cdbs-orig config.guess mv: cannot stat `config.guess.cdbs-orig': No such file or

Bug#298467: marked as done (gaim.postinst doesn't work if directory doesn't already exist)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:17:29 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298467: fixed in gaim 1:1.2.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging 300780

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 tags 300780 sid Bug#300780: File conflict with liblucene-java-doc on unpacking There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#295008: marked as done (aspell-nl: Support for pending Aspell 0.60)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295008: fixed in dutch 1:0.1e-33 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#300683: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

Hi Al, On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:25:47PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: I'm a little puzzled. The package 'oprofile-source' does build from source using dpkg-buildpackage. I just now built a brand new sid chroot for i386, and ran 'dpkg-buildpackage' without a problem (after adding build-essential

Bug#300703: autofs: Upgrade fails

If you want to solve this bug once and for all, just replace --exec $DAEMON in your stop target with --name automount instead. This way, it will match pidfile and process name, which is about as reliable for getting the right process, but won't fail on inode removal. I'm making this change to

Processed: Re: Bug#247542: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 247542 patch Bug#247542: Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#300764: marked as done (missing depends (at least) on tetex-bin breaks install/removal and hoses buildds)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:41:14 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300764: missing depends (at least) on tetex-bin breaks install/removal and hoses buildds has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#247542: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or directory

tags 247542 patch thanks On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:41:40PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: The bug mentionned in the BR does not seem to be solved : % make *** Building HTML *** test -d ./html || mkdir ./html cd ./html gtkdoc-mkhtml mediastreamer ../mediastreamer-docs.sgml

Bug#300587: lirc-modules-source: does not compile with 2.6

Lirc 0.7 will be entering testing in a couple of days. Can you test it then? Thanks! -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.10 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com -- To

Bug#297116: marked as done (kaffe - FTBFS on s390)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:48:07 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297116: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.4.PRECVS9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#291510: marked as done (kaffe: update-alternatives order causing dangling symlinks.)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:48:07 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291510: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.4.PRECVS9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: 300587 pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 300587 pending Bug#300587: lirc-modules-source: does not compile with 2.6 Tags were: sarge Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gtk-doc 1.3-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 247542 + fixed Bug#247542: Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#298967: NMU to fix non-free font RC bug

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Gerrit Pape wrote: clone 298967 -1 reassign -1 bglibs retitle -1 bglibs: NMU is not for sarge close 298967 quit On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:18:17AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote: Hi Micah, while I appreciate your efforts, this NMU unfortunately was unnecessary, the

Bug#300683: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 15:02 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:25:47PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: Perhaps it is not clear from the description, but this package is only supposed to provide the _source_ needed to build an oprofile kernel module for 2.4.x kernels. It is not

Bug#300816: Broken dependencies means interchange should not be in testing

Package: interchange Version: 5.2.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 The upstream author emphatically states that Interchange only works with unthreaded Perl. I've run siege tests on the sample data base and confirmed that interchange fails with multiple threads. The package

Bug#300780: Swatting a very visible bug - # 300780

Now that I think about it, lucene-demo-1.4.3.jar has some very useful programs. It's arguably in a better place now than before. How about we leave it in the liblucene-java package, and follow the reporter's suggestion? It seems like this should simply require the appropriate versioned

Bug#300820: No keyboard inputs after system boot in kdm

Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I start the system, everything looks fine. But when I try to login I can't type anything. Only the mouse works. Starting the login manager takes a long time and XFree86.0.log indicates that vt2 is used.

Processed: Re: Bug#300820: No keyboard inputs after system boot in kdm

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # * emperor [Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:00:22 +0100]: # Package: kdm # Version: 4:3.3.2-1 # Severity: grave # Justification: renders package unusable severity 300820 normal Bug#300820: No keyboard inputs after system boot in kdm Severity set to `normal'.

Bug#300820: No keyboard inputs after system boot in kdm

# * emperor [Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:00:22 +0100]: # Package: kdm # Version: 4:3.3.2-1 # Severity: grave # Justification: renders package unusable severity 300820 normal tag 300820 pending thanks ^^^ pending someone sends The Emperor a nice mail clueing him in -- Adeodato Simó

Bug#300767: marked as done (r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:49:46 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Re: Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300765 wishlist Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib Severity set to `wishlist'. tags 300765 + upstream Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream

Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib

severity 300765 wishlist tags 300765 + upstream tags 300765 + wontfix On 21 March 2005 at 18:50, Pierre THIERRY wrote: | Package: r-doc-html | Version: 2.0.1-4 | Severity: serious | Justification: FHS chapter 4 | | /usr/lib : Libraries for programming and packages | /usr/share :

Bug#300683: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:02:25PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Yes, the problem is this second part, which results in binary packages in the archive that are not built as a result of ./debian/rules binary. This is non-standard, and in particular complicates the matter of security support

Bug#300302: marked as done (foobillard: FTBFS: GL/gl.h missing)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:47:33 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300284: fixed in mesa 6.2.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#300284: marked as done (crack-attack: FTBFS: GL/gl.h missing)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:47:33 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300284: fixed in mesa 6.2.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#300430: marked as done (gtkglext: FTBFS: GL/glx.h missing)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:47:33 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300284: fixed in mesa 6.2.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#298922: marked as done (mesa: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:47:33 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298922: fixed in mesa 6.2.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#300827: soap4r: builds old version of libsoap-ruby1.8

Package: soap4r Version: 1.4.8-3 Severity: serious The current version of soap4r builds binaries for libsoap-ruby1.8, but this binary has been superseded by a newer version in ruby1.8 -- which has recently been integrated completely into the libruby1.8 package. This means that the soap4r

Bug#300829: lshw: ftbfs [sparc] missing wget, tries to fetch over internet durring build

Package: lshw Version: 02.03-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source lshw fails to build from source on sparc and other architectures, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. It is missing a build dependancy on wget, and is trying to fetch

Bug#295306: debian/uw-imapd-ssl.postinst clobbers existing imaps line params

tags 295306 patch thanks Hi Jonas, This RC bug has been open for a long time now, and there has been no activity on it for three weeks. I have prepared an NMU with the attached patch, based on the one prepared by Adeodato and Pierre but without the intrusive (and currently broken)

Processed: Fixed in NMU of uw-imap 7:2002edebian1-6.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 295306 + fixed Bug#295306: debian/uw-imapd-ssl.postinst clobbers existing imaps line params Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#300834: python2.3-libxml2: not purgeing cleanly breaks other programs

Package: python2.3-libxml2 Version: 2.6.16-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I installed python2.3-libxml2 as a dependency package and removed it again sometime later. I also use straw as a rss reader an suddenly it failed

Processed: Fixed in NMU of soap4r 1.4.8-4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 300827 + fixed Bug#300827: soap4r: builds old version of libsoap-ruby1.8 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#296717: marked as done (Build-Depends on buggy and to-be-removed raidtools2)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 01:17:08 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296717: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: CMFDefault1.4 bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 297808 normal Bug#297808: zope-cmfdefault1.4: Install products in an unusable directory Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#297808: CMFDefault1.4 bug

severity 297808 normal thanks We are working to solve this issue, new packages are ready-to-be-tested here: http://www.kobold.it/plone/ -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Studio Tranchitella Assoc. Professionale http://www.tranchitella.it

Processed: Re: gda-mysql must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 299159 patch Bug#299159: gda-mysql must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#299159: gda-mysql must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12

tags 299159 patch thanks I have prepared an NMU for this bug that will be uploaded shortly, now that the problems affecting the building of docbook documentation have been resolved. Please find the patch attached. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u

  1   2   >