Re: long list of give away or orphaned packages

1997-05-29 Thread Galen Hazelwood
Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote: > Hi! I subscribed a few days ago, (and have been somewhat overwhelmed > by the quantity of mail on this list; is there a digestified version?) > and would like to propose that I package up Inform, Frotz, and some of > the associated games. [pro-infocom propaganda snip

Re: RFC: Policy for arch specs

1997-05-29 Thread Galen Hazelwood
Christian Schwarz wrote: > > Next step: GNU's "configure" utility. I thought that we had agreed on > using > i386-unknown-linux > (and similar for the other architectures), but then I had just discovered > that GCC uses > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.1/ >

Re: Man-Db and Man both in Frozen???

1997-05-29 Thread Fabrizio Polacco
John Goerzen wrote: > > Hi, > > There appears to be a package "man" in frozen that shouldn't be there > since man-db is the new name for that package. Somebody needs to > take it out; otherwise, it is confusing to users. > > John Where is it? I've just looked both in ftp.debian.org and in mast

Re: Upcoming Debian Releases

1997-05-29 Thread Tom Lees
On Sun, 25 May 1997, Christian Hudon wrote: > --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On May 24, Tom Lees wrote > > > > The third solution, which I prefer is a utility which modifies the > > variables within the scripts - it's faster, it is more "backwards > > compati

Re: Conflict between Packages file and actual files

1997-05-29 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Maor) wrote on 29.05.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) writes: > > > I've since seen that ftp.debian.org obviously mirrors somewhere around > > 19:40-20:50, local time for master, while the maintenance scripts run > > somewhere in the 11:50-13:

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Paul Bame
= > Communication should be done via a package-specific mailing list. The = > maintainer of the package decides who has commit privileges for this = > package and who gets on this package's developers' mailing-list. = = The way we are currently doing it here (at Pixar) is that nobody checks = in a

Re: long list of give away or orphaned packages

1997-05-29 Thread Charles Briscoe-Smith
>On a related note, games. Games are important. Please please please dont >reject someone who wants to package up a game. Thats one of the things I >like about debian, it has so many games. I first got mirrormagic working >under debian... And I hope to see abuse.svga working again too now that

Man-Db and Man both in Frozen???

1997-05-29 Thread John Goerzen
Hi, There appears to be a package "man" in frozen that shouldn't be there since man-db is the new name for that package. Somebody needs to take it out; otherwise, it is confusing to users. John -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Troub

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Bruce Perens
There actually is a packages.debian.org domain aliased on "master", I had problems making it work because darned qmail won't parse a full RFC822 address on the command line (it wants you to remove the comments). If someone wants to spend some time on a simple mailer hack, you can make this work.

Re: RFC: Policy for arch specs

1997-05-29 Thread Vincent Renardias
On Thu, 29 May 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote: > Is it correct, that we are currently working on ports to the following > platforms (the abbrevs should be the ones that dpkg is using in the file > names): > i386 > alpha > arm > m68k > powerpc > sparc > Are thes

anyone packaged/ing vice (comodore emulator) ?

1997-05-29 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
hy. i read the announcement, compiled it for local use and it's great. has anyone packaged vice, or is doing this ? if not, i will do it. regards, andreas -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Sven Rudolph writes: > Communication should be done via a package-specific mailing list. The > maintainer of the package decides who has commit privileges for this > package and who gets on this package's developers' mailing-list. > > This mailing list could be used as target for the bug reports

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Sven Rudolph
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes: > > Communication should be done via a package-specific mailing list. The > > maintainer of the package decides who has commit privileges for this > > package and who gets on this package's developers' mailing-list. (And the CVS commit messages are sent to

Re: Upcoming Debian Releases

1997-05-29 Thread Tom Lees
On Sun, 25 May 1997, Mark Baker wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Tom Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> the other solution is to have a small utility that stores these values, > >> can change them and gives the values to the scripts. > > > > The third solution, which I pref

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Bruce Perens
> Communication should be done via a package-specific mailing list. The > maintainer of the package decides who has commit privileges for this > package and who gets on this package's developers' mailing-list. The way we are currently doing it here (at Pixar) is that nobody checks in an un-reviewe

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Sven Rudolph
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes: > > E.g. boot-floppies. I regularly receive patches from the people doing > > the ports to other architectures. If they could merge them into the > > CVS repository, they needn't wait until I released a new version. > > What provision do you suggest for co

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Paul Bame
= > Should this CVS repository be mandatory, i.e. does every Debian = > package have to be there? A brief word of warning... (I tried CVS on dpkg a while back) The natural CVS model is to name the directory for the package, for example .../dpkg/ and relegate the version numbers to tags. At least

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Bruce Perens
> E.g. boot-floppies. I regularly receive patches from the people doing > the ports to other architectures. If they could merge them into the > CVS repository, they needn't wait until I released a new version. What provision do you suggest for code-review? It's important for things like boot-flopp

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Jim Pick
> Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > great. since i meet other debian developers at the linux congress, i my > > a big friend of a cvs server with all debian packages. does anyone have > > a server with enough hard disks and a good conection to run it ? > > Some problems arise

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Sven Rudolph writes: > Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > great. since i meet other debian developers at the linux congress, i my > > a big friend of a cvs server with all debian packages. does anyone have > > a server with enough hard disks and a good conection to run it ? > >

Re: GOAL: Consistent Keyboard Configuration

1997-05-29 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "DF" == David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: :: Then I have a "Print" key, "Scroll-Lock", and "Pause". All :: three keys don't have an effect in my X configuration--on the :: console "Scroll-Lock" starts/stops terminal output, just like :: "C-S and C-Q". Is there any useful

Re: Using CVS for package development

1997-05-29 Thread Sven Rudolph
Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > great. since i meet other debian developers at the linux congress, i my > a big friend of a cvs server with all debian packages. does anyone have > a server with enough hard disks and a good conection to run it ? Some problems arise: Should this

Re: Consultants list for Debian GNU/Linux

1997-05-29 Thread Behan Webster
Behan Webster wrote: > > I've just volunteered to maintain the list of consultants wanting > to offer paid support to people running debian systems. I am > unaware of anyone else currently doing so. If someone is > already doing such, please contact me. > > Once this list is assembled, it will

Re: cvs.debian.org [Was: Using CVS for package development]

1997-05-29 Thread Brian White
> > We are running cvs.debian.org over an ISDN line. Currently the only > > code under it is the Deity project. > > > > I can make other source trees and set up other users if others want to > > do distributed development this way. > > I need a shared CVS repository for boot-floppies. Especially

RFC: Policy for arch specs

1997-05-29 Thread Christian Schwarz
Hi folks! As I'm working on a new Policy I'm handling the request to include a policy for "correct architecture spec strings". However, I've discovered _several_ threads here on debian-devel without any (obvious) results. Is it correct, that we are currently working on ports to the following pl

Re: libc5 FAQ

1997-05-29 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, > I must second Andreas here. The ISDN stuff is an exception. Oh come on, there are millions of exceptions. The KErnel Development has never stoped and will never stop. There is a lot of redesign goiug on: new routing, new address families, new arp, new console, new device drivers, new me

Re: long list of give away or orphaned packages

1997-05-29 Thread Sven Rudolph
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > the list of debian packges needing a new maintainer is growing all the > > time. so - what about removeing some packages, if they are no longer > > maintained, or (better) moving them into section contrib (or a new > > section "orphaned" ?). > > There i

Re: Conflict between Packages file and actual files

1997-05-29 Thread Guy Maor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) writes: > I've since seen that ftp.debian.org obviously mirrors somewhere around > 19:40-20:50, local time for master, while the maintenance scripts run > somewhere in the 11:50-13:40 range, again local time for master. ftp mirrors twice a day at 9 and 21 ma

Re: cvs.debian.org [Was: Using CVS for package development]

1997-05-29 Thread Sven Rudolph
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We are running cvs.debian.org over an ISDN line. Currently the only > code under it is the Deity project. > > I can make other source trees and set up other users if others want to > do distributed development this way. I need a shared CVS repository fo

Re: policy about putting packages into frozen ?

1997-05-29 Thread Christian Schwarz
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > hy. > > what is the policy about putting packages into frozen ? > AFAIk only bug fixes are allowed. > > my problem is the isdn package : the new version was released (beta1) > this week, and it was tested a long time (public cvs tree). now it has

Re: Conflict between Packages file and actual files

1997-05-29 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) wrote on 25.05.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I just wrote something. First result: at this moment, master and ftp are > identical, except for Incoming (of course), and except for the problem I've since seen that ftp.debian.org obviously mirrors somewhere around

Re: long list of give away or orphaned packages

1997-05-29 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Welton) wrote on 28.05.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > While it would be nice if new developers took over some orphaned packages > (I plan to), unloading a package on someone that they have no interest in, > is, IMHO, a bad thing. If they are personally interested in it, th

Re: Sysvinit and System.map (Was: dangling symlink System.map)

1997-05-29 Thread Michael Neuffer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 28 May 1997, Guy Maor wrote: > Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > BTW, psupdate is the only program I can think about using > > System.map. Are there any other ? > > klogd ksymoops Mike -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset:

Re: libc5 FAQ

1997-05-29 Thread Nils Rennebarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 28 May 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > The bottom line is: if a program needs kernel header, the > chances are that the program, or the design of the program, is > broken. I must second Andreas here. The ISDN stuff is an exception. There is active devel

Re: base-files does not create /usr/local directories

1997-05-29 Thread Christian Schwarz
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Brian White wrote: > > > In fact, as part of the Deity project, I'd like to do something a little > > > more elaborate. I'd like to be able to remove or change any arbitrary > > > path. (This was originally Behan's idea, actually.) > > > > Ok, then I'd suggest I change the

Re: default file perms

1997-05-29 Thread Mark Baker
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE! If you are allready at it - it would be nice to > be able to find files which do NOT come from any package. This will > make it much easier for the person in charge to find sniffer log files

Re: default file perms

1997-05-29 Thread Amos Shapira
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: |--==_Exmh_263623679P |Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii | | |dpkg-cert already does something like this. Klee is going to fold the |capabilities of dpkg-cert into dpkg, so I think a solution is on |the horizon. :-) PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE! If you

Re: libc5 FAQ

1997-05-29 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Mixing user domain and kernel domain stuff is a really bad Idea, but you don't have to take just my word for it. I already have posted the FAQ once today, and I don't want to do so again: Please read the libc FAQ (or email me and I will send you a copy). The bottom line is

Re: libc5 FAQ

1997-05-29 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, > My contention is: if we are talking about a program that needs > kernel headers, and can't be satisfied with the headers included in > the libc5-dev package (which corresponds to 2.0.29, or something), > that means we are talking about a program that needs some very > specific k