Andrew Suffield said:
>On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:56:44PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Wrong. There have been specific technical things I wanted to do
>> which simply cannot be done easily as an outsider.
^^
>>
>> Generally it's QA stuff. I'm doing it an
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anybody who has to ask "Why should I/we/they contribute?" is not
>suitable for Debian. (The "answer", incidentally, is "because we can"
>or "because it's there", or some other variation; it is a goal in
>itself, and not a means to an end)
OK, now *that*
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Please, as a courtesy, when you reassign a bug report to another
> > package, cc it to the package maintainer, and put enough information in
> > so they can know why their package is at fault. Also check the severi
I'm currently at the SAGE-AU annual conference, and Apple presented a
paper about their Rendezvous technology, which is their implementation of
Zeroconf[1].
Is anyone working on getting Debian to do any of this sort of stuff? If
not, I might look into spinning off a subproject. I don't think it
On Thursday, Aug 7, 2003, at 02:51 America/Denver, Peter Mathiasson
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:34:28PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Here it isn't. That is because that correspondence is done on
company
time using company equipment supposedly for company purposes. They
have the
right to
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
> > >
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
> > >
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that
Josef Spillner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That being said, the cyclic mentioning of non-openness problems on d-d does
> not invalidate the fact that those who invest time into a project are
> steering it, independent of whether they're a "member" or not (true also for
> KDE and certainly oth
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:02:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Also aren't mails between AM, DAM, Advocate and NM archived somewhere?
>
> This is not the case for at least the AM<->NM mails. Also, advocating
> someone is basically just a vir
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Obviously you want people who like the project to contribute.
>
> For meaningful values of "contribute", sure. But being a project member
> with a d.o account is not essential to contributing, and its arguable
> how significant a "
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 21:49, Chris Cheney got eaten by the Troll:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:10:01PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > I've always thought KDE a wonderful example of what happens when you
> > give commit access to just about anybody too.
> >
> > Scott
> > (GNOME user)
>
> O
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-07
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bsgloss
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : E. A. Tacão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://br.tldp.org/ferramentas/vp/bsgloss/bsgloss-0.6.tar.gz/
* License : (GPL)
Descrip
Hi, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> rpm -Uvh estracts in /usr/src/rpm/SOURCES
The best idea probably is to use rpm2cpio => extract to the current
directory.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | htt
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:55:14AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:41:44PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:25:58PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > Trivialities such as people refusing to disclose their real names
> > > jump to mind.
> >
>
Suggested Answer
---
Dear Correspondent:
Recently you requested personal assistance via our web site. Below is a summary
of your request and our response.
Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you.
Title: Military Public Affairs
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 04:14, Otto Wyss wrote:
> I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this
> version can't compile all the drivers in kernel 2.4.21. Which version
Which drivers and what errors do you get? If you tell us the errors then we
can get them fixed.
--
http:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=&include=patch
> >
> > See the form at
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:41:44PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:25:58PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > Trivialities such as people refusing to disclose their real names
> > jump to mind.
>
> This strikes me as one of the *best* reasons to deny someone. If
> som
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 00:08:38 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody who has to ask "Why should I/we/they contribute?" is not
> suitable for Debian.
Oddly enough, I've never asked that.
> (The "answer", incidentally, is "because we can"
> or "because it's there", or some oth
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>Wrong. There have been specific technical things I wanted to do
>which simply cannot be done easily as an outsider.
In this sort of case, the answer is not necessarily to make the NM
process faster - it's to make it easier for outsiders to contribute to
the rest of Debi
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:57:32PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:56:44PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > Wrong. There have been specific technical things I wanted to do
> > which simply cannot be done easily as an outsider.
> >
> > Generally it's QA stuff. I'm doi
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:57:10PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:25:41 +0100
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I *do not* want people to contribute *because* they "like the
> > project".
>
> What other reason would their be? Why would they want to contribute
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:56:44PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >I'm not sure there are any good ones other than having some specific
> >(technical, not political) things you want to see done and are willing
> >to do. In that case, you won't have to be told to demonstra
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:25:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >glibc is even worse. It has multiple maintainers, and they still don't
> >have enough time to chase down all the important bugs, let alone
> >insignificant ones like this.
>
> This is unfortunately true;
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is /usr/bin/pager a Debianism, or is it common to other
> distributions and/or unices?
>
Don't really know, but it's alternatives-managed, so likely to be a
Debianism.
Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
> Please, as a courtesy, when you reassign a bug report to another
> package, cc it to the package maintainer, and put enough information in
> so they can know why their package is at fault. Also check the severity
> to make sure it makes sense for the new pack
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:25:41 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I *do not* want people to contribute *because* they "like the
> project".
What other reason would their be? Why would they want to contribute to a
project they don't like esp. when there is no financial gain for it
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No. But you said that the opposite is the wrong reason. If we like
> Debian it is a bad reason to want to contribute.
No. I think Andrew meant that liking Debian or wanting to contribute
is a bad reason to join Debian. He wants people to contribut
Andrew Suffield wrote:
>glibc is even worse. It has multiple maintainers, and they still don't
>have enough time to chase down all the important bugs, let alone
>insignificant ones like this.
This is unfortunately true; glibc seems to be severely broken on a
routine basis upstream. Kinda makes m
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:26:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 21:23:20 +0100
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Of course that isn't true, I was just showing the farce of your
> > > statement. Obviously you want people who like the project to contribute.
>
> >
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:15:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > reassign 204169 debhelper
> > Bug#204169: docbook-utils: Build from source on reiserfs gives dangling
> > symlinks
> > Warning: Unknown package 'debhemper'
> > Bug reassigned from package `debhemper' to `debhelpe
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:15:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > reassign 204169 debhelper
> Bug#204169: docbook-utils: Build from source on reiserfs gives dangling
> symlinks
> Warning: Unknown package 'debhemper'
> Bug reassigned from package `debhemper' to `debhelper'.
Actually that particular o
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:25:58PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > the person who's in charge of the keyring has to be as paranoid as
> > > James. The other person in the project that comes to mind is
> > > Manoj. And that's it. I wouldn't trust Martin with such a
> > > responsab
It's very annoying to pull my mail and get several bug reports that were
reassigned to debhelper (one of them falsely grave), with no explanation
cced to me. Not only is something like this very easy to skip over, but
it forces me to wait until the next time I am online (in this case, two
days) to
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:25:58PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Trivialities such as people
> refusing to disclose their real names jump to mind.
This strikes me as one of the *best* reasons to deny someone. If someone is
unwilling even to trust Debian with their real name, then why shou
> Uh, no. You have 3 possible pools.
>
> 1: Someone likes Debian.
> 2: Someone dislikes Debian.
> 3: Someone hasn't formed an opinion of Debian or doesn't care about Debian.
>
> Do you want contributions from 2 or 3? IE, someone who dislikes it or
> someone who is uninformed or ambivale
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:07:11PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> According to the Debian Constitution, he only has mastery over the
> keyring because he's a "Delegate" appointed by the DPL.
Yeah, like that's ever mattered. I can't actually remember someone
saying "for this period of time
Is /usr/bin/pager a Debianism, or is it common to other
distributions and/or unices?
Regards,
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Palm City, FL 34990 USA GPG Key ID: 390D655
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:49:28 -0500
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:10:01PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > I've always thought KDE a wonderful example of what happens when you
> > give commit access to just about anybody too.
> > Scott
> > (GNOME user)
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:29:03 -0700
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew said that merely liking Debian wasn't a good enough reason to
> want to join the project.
No, he said it wasn't a good reason. No "enough".
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"TBH, that's a lousy reason to join
On Thursday 07 August 2003 09:51, Yven Johannes Leist wrote:
> I think not even that is exactly true either, since the skills required to
> get a cvs account for KDE are surely somewhat above our NM checks[1]. You
> usually need to have a whole application written by yourself to get an
> account, a
Andreas Barth said:
>Yes, I can see the problem. However, it would have helped me much if
>this policy would have been clearly stated at
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/ (should I open a bug,
>or can it be fixed without?).
The rate of things getting fixed without having bugs reporte
> Incidentally, the entire NM system seems geared toward package
> maintainers only, if you read the web pages. (That was not
> particularly encouraging.)
It seems in that way. However, AM asks you what to do in Debian.
When you choose a specific section, You are not supposed to know
that issue
Marcelo Magallon said:
> You mean you actually think James can even consider the possibility of
> handing the management of the keyring over?
Well, he should. He'll have to someday, such as when he dies. (Unless
he is actually immortal, or more likely if Debian is utterly destroyed
first.)
A
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 21:23:20 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Of course that isn't true, I was just showing the farce of your
> > statement. Obviously you want people who like the project to contribute.
> You have failed miserably at understanding my statement. I do not want
>
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:54:43PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:41:37PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > the person who's in charge of the keyring has to be as paranoid as
> > James. The other person in the project that comes to mind is
> > Manoj. And that's
Andrew Suffield wrote:
>I'm not sure there are any good ones other than having some specific
>(technical, not political) things you want to see done and are willing
>to do. In that case, you won't have to be told to demonstrate stuff -
>you'll just do it, because you want to.
Wrong. There have bee
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:02:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Also aren't mails between AM, DAM, Advocate and NM archived somewhere?
This is not the case for at least the AM<->NM mails. Also, advocating
someone is basically just a virtual tick in a box.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we
Andrew Suffield wrote:
>>Because you think it's an awesome group with laudable goals and you
>>want to contribute?
> TBH, that's a lousy reason to join Debian. Send a cheque or something.
Yeah, but Debian isn't *that* awesome before I decide to join (and am
accepted). ;)
Cheers
T.
P.S.: SCNR
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:10:01PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I've always thought KDE a wonderful example of what happens when you
> give commit access to just about anybody too.
>
> Scott
> (GNOME user)
Oh you mean the fact that KDE has rapid development... Yep. ;)
Chris
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:56:24PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:23:48 +0100
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:06:39PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > > On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:23:17 +0100
> > > Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
Steve Lamb wrote:
> No. But you said that the opposite is the wrong reason. If we like
> Debian it is a bad reason to want to contribute. So the it is only
> logical to presume that if you feel liking is a bad reason disliking
> might very well be a good one.
This is "logical"? In what univer
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:36:45PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > (IMO, the kernel ignoring $(CC) is the kernel's problem.)
>
> Don't you know your O doesn't matter, only Steve's?
I'm pretty accustomed to my O mattering only to me. :)
--
G. Brande
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:03:01PM -0400, Streph Treadway wrote:
>
> For me, only HOSTCC=gcc-2.95 works for the 2.4.21 kernel.
>
Sorry about that, I'm recompiling the kernel now, and what I said above
seems true of the dep and clean targets, but not bzImage. For bzImage,
CC=gcc-2.95 works fine on
Hi, all,
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:10:00PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:14:27PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this
> > version can't compile all the drivers in kernel 2.4.21. Which version
> > should I use
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> > > access to packages with patch
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:23:48 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:06:39PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:23:17 +0100
> > Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:27:00AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> >
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:06:39PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:23:17 +0100
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:27:00AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > Because you think it's an awesome group with laudable goals and you
> > > want to
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:14:27PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this
> version can't compile all the drivers in kernel 2.4.21. Which version
> should I use? And how do I set this version (Environment variable?)
> without deinstalling
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:23:17 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:27:00AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > Because you think it's an awesome group with laudable goals and you
> > want to contribute?
> TBH, that's a lousy reason to join Debian. Send a chequ
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:47:38AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:38:34PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > Anyway, waiting for DAM for some months now. I guess it has been
>
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> > access to packages with patches pending would be a start.
>
> Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
>
>
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> > access to packages with patches pending would be a start. Or a system
>
> Try http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le jeudi 7 août 2003, Jamin W. Collins écrit :
> [...]
> > Are you saying that you do not want, and would not welcome,
> > feedback on your application?
> No,
>
> > I'm not asking whether you would clamor
> > for updates, but whether receiving th
I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this
version can't compile all the drivers in kernel 2.4.21. Which version
should I use? And how do I set this version (Environment variable?)
without deinstalling GCC 3.3?
O. Wyss
--
See "http://wxguide.sourceforge.net/"; for
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:15:35AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >
> > So, I wonder if someone has already built a package from a SRPM package
> > ?
>
> You can easily extract the .tar.gz using alien.
>
rpm -Uvh estracts in /usr/src/rpm/SOURCES
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-07
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jot
Version : 9.0
Upstream Author : John Kunze, Office of Comp. Affairs, UCB
* URL :
http://www.mit.edu/afs/athena/system/rhlinux/athena-9.0/free/SRPMS/athena-jot-9.0-3.src.rpm
*
Hi all!
Just a little contribution to those wunderful threads like "NM
non-process" and "NM and Next Release".
I just played around with db.debian.org and nm.debian.org to produce
some fancy graphs...
I won't be here for the next 72 hours, so I won't comment much. But you
can flame on!
http://c
I demand that Joe Wreschnig may or may not have written...
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:48, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>>> You asked for gcc-2.95. You got gcc-2.95. Whatever else you got should be
>>> of no consequence whatsoever.
>> It's this kind of attit
On Aug 07, Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So, I wonder if someone has already built a package from a SRPM package
>?
prelink
--
ciao, |
Marco | [1175 vol.vXH2n4yMA]
pgpEXBULObHxj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> "kq" == Keegan Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
kq> [1 ]
kq> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 07:02:35PM +0200, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
>> Description : LADSPA plugins designed for Alsa Modular Synth
>>
>> Set of LADSPA plugins that vastly improve the sound of
>> AlsaModularS
> "nvy" == Nikita V Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
nvy> The thing I really don't like in debian-cd is the requirement
nvy> to have a local mirror. I prefer to use apt-get (+apt-proxy)
nvy> to fetch packages while building CD. I have a (currently
nvy> ugly) script to do
[Joey Hess]
> Probably making the print server task install it instead of lpr, which
> would have a side effect of making sure it's on CD#1 if it's not
> already. Probably also demoting the lpr package to optional and moving
> cups from there to standard. Possibly making lsb depend on part of cups
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:27:00AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > It runs deeper than that. If you aren't sufficiently interested to do
> > the work for its own sake, why the hell are you trying to join Debian
> > in the first p
Le jeudi 7 août 2003, Jamin W. Collins écrit :
[...]
> Are you saying that you do not want, and would not welcome,
> feedback on your application?
No,
> I'm not asking whether you would clamor
> for updates, but whether receiving them would be a problem for you?
No, but I don't need any, I just h
IMPORTANT!!! You need to reply to this message in order to have your
subscription activated.
hey asshole... please conjfirm !!!
Subscription information:
You have been subscribed to the following ezine at Zinester.com:
Tjafie e-zine
Your subscription parameters are:
Email: debian-de
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 19:39, Oliver Bausinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 August 2003 20:01, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:10:24PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > Interessting analysis. Many things that hold up the release can only be
> > > solved by active and expe
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:47:38AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:38:34PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Anyway, waiting for DAM for some months now. I guess it has been
> > 4-5 months now. I asked him on IRC when he might
This hasnt been updated to gcc-3.3 yet, has it been obsoleted perhaps, or am i
just being impatient ;)
Thanks
Tom
--
^__^ Tom Badran
(oo)\__Imperial College
(__)\ )\/\
||w |
|| || Using Debian SID
pgpgtGkeEoBLD.pgp
Descriptio
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> access to packages with patches pending would be a start.
Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
http://bugs.debian.
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:00:53PM +0200, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote:
> Le jeudi 7 ao?t 2003, Goswin von Brederlow ?crit :
> > WE NMs WANT FEEDBACK. Someone please tell the DAM already to
> > activate
>
> YOU, not 'we', YOU are impatient, YOU are cannot wait any more,
> I am waiting for DAM approva
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Sounds really odd. Maybe the previous gcc binaries you had where
> corrupted during your previous hardaware problems. I once got some
> really funky errors after running fsck on /usr with buggy ram.
>
I thought of that but fsck and badblocks both reported
Le jeudi 7 août 2003, Goswin von Brederlow écrit :
> WE NMs WANT FEEDBACK. Someone please tell the DAM already to activate
YOU, not 'we', YOU are impatient, YOU are cannot wait any more,
I am waiting for DAM approval, so I just wait...
Nicolas Bertolissio
--
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:56:08PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Heh :) If I hadn't responded to it manually, it would have gotten ignored
> > as spam (nobody cared enough to write a nice formail -r message because it
> > happens rarely enough and the spambounces would waste us more resources).
>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> access to packages with patches pending would be a start. Or a system
Try http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch .
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, li
Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:50:03AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Then he should spend the 10 minutes it takes to implement a "reject"
> > button on the webpage he can just press to
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Moin Goswin!
> Goswin von Brederlow schrieb am Thursday, den 07. August 2003:
>
> > > > Working on boot-floppies and debian-installer is not realy fruitfull
> > > > as non-DD. cvs access goes a long way there.
> > >
> > > I must have severe reading and
Cédric Delfosse dijo [Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:04:45AM +0200]:
> Hello
>
> at work, I have played a little bit with a Redhat 9. There are lots of
> nice system setup tools that could be useful for Debian users. These
> tools are GPL.
> The problems are:
> - no source tar.gz / tar.bz2 distribution
Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:30:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > >
> > > Someone should point NMs to difficulty of entering the development
> > > mainstream of FreeBSD or becoming maintainer for the kernel...
> > > IMO it's general
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:25:03PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:50:03AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Then he should spend the 10 minutes it takes to implement a "reject"
> > button on the webpage he ca
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> When you have maintain a package, shouldn't you be able to fix
> it yourself?
>
> IMHO, people should not package or take over a package that they
> do not understand how it works. For example, a kernel maintainer
I think you're dreami
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:33:08PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> What we need is a database with simple mailing list function (similar to
> PTS) where willing sponsors for a certain package can subscribe and
> sponsorees with much motivation can send diffs for the next version
> upgrade. Easy to
* Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030806 21:40]:
> Erm, configuring an SMTP server for a mail client is not an admin level
> thing. I mean, c'mon, fetchmail can be run as the user and the same user can
> configure a pop server there. *shrug*
I wonder when people will start telling configurin
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:50:03AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Then he should spend the 10 minutes it takes to implement a "reject"
> button on the webpage he can just press to reject someone.
> After that rejecting would be a matter of seco
> On [06/08/03 17:29], Halil Demirezen wrote:
> > What I would like to point out here is, totally over the world claims
> > that debian is being obsolete. New releases are so slow. Yes they are
>
> Why do you you think that "over the world" Debian is "being obsolete"?
> Do you have some evidence
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:09:15PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:16:12PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> > Here is where you're entirely and totally wrong. It indicates a
> > breakdown in the communication process.
>
> Communication with whom? I don't think that
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:04:16 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 00:34:53 +0100
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > While I'm at it, a quick and possibly irrelevant bit of stats-pr0n I
i agree, we have a great support for Python.
thanks to those who make it possible.
cavok
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:47:48AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
...
>
> Personally I was going to post "nice job everyone... the Python Policy
> looks like it is working". There are still a few niggly thing
Moin Goswin!
Goswin von Brederlow schrieb am Thursday, den 07. August 2003:
> > > Working on boot-floppies and debian-installer is not realy fruitfull
> > > as non-DD. cvs access goes a long way there.
> >
> > I must have severe reading and parsing problems today, because I don't
> > understand w
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:30:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > Someone should point NMs to difficulty of entering the development
> > mainstream of FreeBSD or becoming maintainer for the kernel...
> > IMO it's generally too easy entering in Debian.
>
> You can get access to the gc
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
