[mail fup to -legal]
Hi,
when reviewing several NMs' packages I came accross many broken
copyright files in recent weeks. Upon investigation I found that many
(many!) copyright files in the archive are not really any better.
This is an example on how _NOT_ to do it:
| This package was
Hi!
There's no FB1.5 (or rather FB2) package in Debian and has never been.
This should be a separate package called firebird2-* not an upgrade
from current firebird package, see also: http://bugs.debian.org/151052
I am orphaning FB1 package.
Regards,
Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I read debian-devel via the newsgroup now (linux.debian.devel) and I'd
like to unsubscribe to the list but I can't. I did receive the
confirmation string and answer it but it seems that I still receive
mails from the list (also for
I see there is an ITP for speex-xmms, but I can't find a package. Here
is a package until that time.
http://oracle.bridgewayconsulting.com.au/~davyd/debian/speex-xmms_0.9.1_i386.deb
Please don't complain about the quality of the package, I am not a dd.
--
http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/
PGP
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:33:29AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Could someone who is running chrony 1.20 please test the rtc commands for
me? You'll need 'Enhanced Real-time Clock Support' in the kernel and will
need to uncomment the rtcfile line in /etc/chrony/chrony.conf. Posting the
output
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to do it for every list but I can't unsubscribe. Is there a
problem with the unsubscribe script?
Why are you asking us? Ask the listmasters.
Solved. It
Re: Arnaud Vandyck in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solved. It was a configuration problem :'(
Your configuration is breaking threads. Your last five mails have shown
up as pseudo threads in mutt, linked only by subject.
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.df7cb.de/
Wohnheim D, 2405,
Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
3.2.1. Version numbers based on dates
-
[...]
I started a thread on -policy recently where I suggested this was bad
and should be something like 0.19960501 instead,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:22:48AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:20:30PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:30:49AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
mailx -s Merge [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
merge 219863 223355
close 223355
thanks
Hi Marco and all others!
On 2003-12-14 3:01 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 13, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would propose to handle this similarily to the devpts
filesystem i.e. by a init-script instead of cluttering fstab.
Agreed. This also solves the problem of ugly
This is an official complaint about the current buildd situation.
The situation:
- Wouter Verhelst wrote on Tue, December 9, 2003 18:40 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the m68k porters list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get information about
the process of getting wanna-build access back.
- James Troup
www.centuryweb.net-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. 1401300mb10email
2. 1801200mb10email(cgi.asp)
3. 2401300mb20email(cgi.asp)
4. 3601500mb30email(cgi.asp)
5. 2602300mb10email
6. 3402200mb10email(cgi.asp)
7. 4802300mb20email(aspphp)
8. 6602500mb30email(aspphp)
* Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-14 13:20]:
- As http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png shows, there
are some archs already have a working wanna-build access since days,
namely mips, mipsel and powerpc.
I really feel discriminated by this situation.
And it's clearly
Is there a version of run-parts out there that runs all the
scripts in a directory in parallel? I have been writing
such a thing but I want to make sure that I am not reinventing
the wheel.
--
Thomas Hood
* Bruno Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031213 19:50]:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some packages have a useless and space wasting md5sums file inside the
package. Due to its uselessness the existance is rather a bug than its
omission.
Please close this bug, read the
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the libfilesys-smbclient-perl module. The mips build
fails with this error:
dpkg-deb: building package `libfilesys-smbclient-perl' in
`../libfilesys-smbclient-perl_1.5-1_mipsel.deb'.
dpkg-genchanges -B -mDebian/MIPSEL Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dpkg-genchanges:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:37:34AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
- As http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png shows, there
are some archs already have a working wanna-build access since days,
namely mips, mipsel and powerpc.
I really feel discriminated
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Bruno Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031213 19:50]:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some packages have a useless and space wasting md5sums file inside the
package. Due to its uselessness the existance is
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
I get the impression that there is some sort of a Debian clan that
controls some important positions of the Debian project and that is
protecting itself from being influence by the outside. This is my personal
fnordTHERE IS NO
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 03:58:21PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Looking at the graphs ti seems obvious that the way how to get buildds
running again is known for about 5 days now.
And 5 days are not enough time to inform other archs or give them access as
well?
Why should it be easier
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Well, no offense, but that's ugly as hell, and is going to square the
amount of confusion people experience when trying to decode our OS
names.
Agreed, unfortunately - it is, and I suspect it may well. Suggestions for
Hiya all,
Thanks for your replys, I like the idea of making some packages
perishable the trouble is where would you draw the line? I could do
with some of the new features in proftpd, but that would not be
perishable so the problem is still there.
The main problem is that software is moving on
Title: Objective:
To:debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject:
RESUME - Client
Development Specialist for Technology firms
IF
this resume reaches you in Error.
Please
forward to your Human Resources Department
Resume
Scott
Wiseman
13428 Maxella Ave Ste 207
Marina Del
Rey, CA
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Well, no offense, but that's ugly as hell, and is going to square the
amount of confusion people experience when trying to decode our OS
names.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:55:30PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:05:39AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Remember, these machines are, behind the archives, perhaps the most
implicity trusted machines in the entire project. Compromise the archives,
and you can
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:05:39AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Remember, these machines are, behind the archives, perhaps the most
implicity trusted machines in the entire project. Compromise the archives,
and you can silently sprinkle trojans throughout any package on any port.
Compromise a
argument (publicly critising volunteers who are busy is not
productive, even if you point is otherwise valid).
The hell it isn't.
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looking at the graphs ti seems obvious that the way how to get buildds
running again is known for about 5 days now.
You're complaining about a delay of five days in a project run by
volunteers and which has been hit very severly by a break-in? I
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:19:47AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Well, compromise the machine of some DDs and you have the same. Compromising
machines opens are serious security issue regardless for what the machine is
used.
Yes. But debian-admin is not responsible for those machines;
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:57:46PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Looking at the graphs ti seems obvious that the way how to get buildds
running again is known for about 5 days now.
You're complaining about a delay of five days in a project run by
volunteers and which has been hit very
On 13-Dec-03, 11:12 (CST), Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A replacement? I'm pretty sure you need both; /sysfs doesn't include
*everything* that /proc does (and vice-versa). I'm not sure what the
long-term plans are, but /sysfs can't replace /proc right now.
There's no intent for /proc to
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I already contacted Ryan for a different issue and got no response at all.
Go and figure out my motivation to ask him again.
People do have different response times regarding different things. I
may leave trivial questions lying in my mailbox for
Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Why people tend to become polemic when they have no arguments left?
Very good question.
Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Oh, great... I wouldnt have expected that getting polemic is a
necessary to become DPL... :-//
So can we please end this flamewar before it really starts
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
The situation:
- Wouter Verhelst wrote on Tue, December 9, 2003 18:40 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the m68k porters list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get information about
the process of getting wanna-build access back.
- James
Scott Minns wrote:
Thanks for your replys, I like the idea of making some packages
perishable the trouble is where would you draw the line?
We could add an optional control field Expires: $date to packages, so package
maintainers could decide for themselves. After a package has expired, it
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
argument (publicly critising volunteers who are busy is not
productive, even if you point is otherwise valid).
The hell it isn't.
True, if you try to get rid of the current volunteers, then publicly
criticising them is somewhat productive. This usually
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Debian FreeBSD - Debian Forneus (BSD)
Debian NetBSD - Debian Naberius (BSD)
Debian OpenBSD - Debian Orobos (BSD)
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
I'm not opposed
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:24:40PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
David Weinehall wrote:
And documentation? Hell, use the source-code.
Source code? Who needs source code?
Seriously: I've had some problems with file system corruption every now
and then. The md5sums are a nice way to check
David Weinehall wrote:
And documentation? Hell, use the source-code.
Source code? Who needs source code?
Seriously: I've had some problems with file system corruption every now
and then. The md5sums are a nice way to check whether the basic binaries
on the disk are still what I'd like them to
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 02:14:05PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
Is there a simple or recommended way of making a package depend on
[Japanese] fonts?
It is categorically impossible and should not be done. At most you can
use Suggests or Recommends; do not use Depends for fonts for X
applications.
X
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:21:02PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
So can we please end this flamewar before it really starts off?
Why? Better give arguments than flames.
So far I have not read any good argument why there is no good communication
between the people that are working on recovering
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:29:35PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
True, if you try to get rid of the current volunteers, then publicly
criticising them is somewhat productive. This usually slows things
down, though, and I think that Ingo's point is that things are not
moving fast enough.
Not
Chris Cheney wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 12:28:29PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
The Categories= field (to place .desktop files into menu hierarchies) is
AFAIK not used at all by KDE, although I think Gnome may support it.
The above statements are probably true of KDE 3.1 since it
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:41:22PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Everybody seems to agree that new stable versions *should* be out
about every 6 months.
I don't think that is true. I think developers (and users) have a wide
range of opinions as to how often there should be a new Debian release.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:21:30PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
I'll suggest Offler (or Om), Foorgol (I don't like Fate) and, um,
some other god coming out of Terry Pratchett's Discworld novels,
preferably whose name starts with an N.
Or something like that.
One should never name the
Is there a simple or recommended way of making a package depend on
[Japanese] fonts?
It is categorically impossible and should not be done.
Point taken. My question then is: is there a simple/recommended way of
making a package suggest/recommend Japanese fonts?
Given that it's not a
My friend has a high volume mail server running spamassassin 2.31
Oops the spamassassin stopped working.
Now I have 12,000 people angry with me.
Take that to the bank.
--luke
Scott Minns wrote:
I know this is no panacea, since in many cases, the maintainer cannot know
whether a package will
I recently encountered a potentail bug involving openwebmail and
mysql-server. I wanted to know if anyone else could reproduce it.
Result: Install openwebmail and modifyting DB_File as per directions in
openwebmail and then installing mysql-server will prevent mysql-server
from starting.
Expected
On Dec 14, Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udev (and given time many other programs) needs sysfs mounted, so we
should decide if it will be handled by devpts.sh or by a similar script
in a different package.
Currently the udev init script[1] mounts it by itself, but I'd like to
I recently ported a testing package to stable.
Did not have to make any changes to the package, just rebuilt it on a
stable system.
Here are the directions for setting up a stable build environment.
Should be helpful to any who is starting off on setting up build
environments.
In the example I
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 02:14:05PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
Hi. I have a question in relation to #216440 (kiten requires Japanese
fonts):
Is there a simple or recommended way of making a package depend on
Japanese fonts?
The only solutions I can see are to either:
1) pick a couple
Hi Juhapekka, hi Debianers!
On 2003-12-05 19:34 +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I just corrected that to wishlist.
http://insenvim.sourceforge.net/front.php
I took at the sources. Did you try compiling them under Linux? Things
like '#include windows.h', all
Hi!
This is the last part of the saga (for a time at least), as we are
done with all assurance requrements (modulo those concentrating on
ST and PP assurance.)
I hope that at least some of you were listening.
(First I thought there would be some feedback, at least
like stop it, this is boring!,
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Billy Biggs wrote:
Bruce Sass ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The above is just the tip of the iceberg with respect to i18n, I had
roughly the same size savings when I was removing translations from
KDE2 files---KDE3 has more files, more translations per file, and I
haven't
I demand that Scott James Remnant may or may not have written...
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 08:47, Herbert Xu wrote:
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But your message didn't include a Content-Type header specifying that, so
it's likely to come through as garbage for most MUAs...
Right, here
* Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-09 15:37]:
Although I agree that there is definitely something to be said for
this approach, I would like to note an additional issue with it:
- how to verify that katie will process uploads as expected (I'd been
running dinstall -n, via dput -D;
* Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-09 09:49]:
- how to give developers the possibility of seeing what's in the queue
(daily rsyncs are not good enough for this; I've frequently pulled
packages from the accepted queue to check that bug fixes have been
correctly applied)
The queue
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 03:29:10PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
I don't think that is true. I think developers (and users) have a wide
range of opinions as to how often there should be a new Debian
release.
I like the Debian is ready when it's ready argument. Two years
between releases may be
* Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-09 22:14]:
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- how to run madison and wanna-build
I thought the idea was for the unrestricted mirror to include a
read-only copy of the database madison consults.
Yes, the idea is to sync the Postgres database
Roland Mas, 2003-12-14 21:30:17 +0100 :
[...]
I'll suggest Offler (or Om), Foorgol (I don't like Fate) and, um,
some other god coming out of Terry Pratchett's Discworld novels,
preferably whose name starts with an N.
...and then I found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuggan (only
appearing
retitle 223311 ITP: dpkg-sig -- create and verify signatures on .deb-files
thanks
Hi,
I announced the packaging of a low-level tool for creating and
verification of signatures on deb-archive files with the name
debsigs-ng. This name was criticized, because it looks like a fork of
debsigs. So, I
* Kevin Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-13 15:56]:
of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
today is the ability to check the NEW queue.
Thus, if the ftpmasters are planning on a long-term restriction on
auric, mirroring the data in the new queue [at least
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
today is the ability to
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:19:47AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:55:30PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:05:39AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Thus, he probably has little choice, in some cases, but to depend on
others
to deal with some of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #201163
* Package name: tuxcards
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Alexander Theel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.tuxcards.de/
* License : GPL
Description : a graphical (QT based) program to manage
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Everybody seems to agree that new stable versions *should* be out
about every 6 months.
[...]
No.
cu andreas
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:21:30PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
Feel free to propose alternatives from, say, the origional mythology which
spawned the concept of daemons as beings which were not inherently good or
evil, then.
I'll suggest Offler (or
Lucas Albers wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I know this is no panacea, since in many cases, the maintainer cannot
know whether a package will perish at all (like when all spammers
promptly give up advancing their software, so a given version of
spamassassin would stay useful forever)... ;-)
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:30:04PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
[snip]
I think you're seing spectres.
I think you didn't bother to read any of the parts of my message that
you didn't quote.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I'm sorry if the following sounds
Debian GNU/Linux
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 22:56, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
of discussing information we'd like from auric,
There's the question of botched uploads. I think
On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 22:16, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Scott James Remnant may or may not have written...
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 08:47, Herbert Xu wrote:
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But your message didn't include a Content-Type header specifying that, so
it's likely
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:52:15PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:22:48AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:20:30PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
It's your punishment for using the close command. DON'T!
There is no need and no excuse.
I
[I am not subscribed to debian -bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:30:48PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Nathan Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not opposed to anything else you've said. I do believe these
particular names are a bad idea, however. One of the reasons the BSD
mascot is
Re: Branden Robinson in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian FreeBSD - Debian Forneus (BSD)
Debian NetBSD - Debian Naberius (BSD)
Debian OpenBSD - Debian Orobos (BSD)
[...]
Your proposal would change that. I oppose it, and I would oppose it just
the same if you
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:07:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:19:47AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:55:30PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Try to coordinate? When there would have been a try to cooperate by
him, I wouldn´t
Nathan Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Well, no offense, but that's ugly as hell, and is going to square the
amount of confusion people experience when trying to decode our OS
names.
Agreed, unfortunately - it is,
[I am not subscribed to -bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Debian FreeBSD - Debian Forneus (BSD)
Debian NetBSD - Debian Naberius (BSD)
Debian OpenBSD - Debian
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:41:50AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Branden Robinson in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian FreeBSD - Debian Forneus (BSD)
Debian NetBSD - Debian Naberius (BSD)
Debian OpenBSD - Debian Orobos (BSD)
[...]
Your proposal would change
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have little patience for superstitious beliefs, and less still for
people who claim to be defending the tender feelings of the ignorant.
But why use names correlated with evil when other options are
available which interfere less with Debian's
Thanks Matt for your script.
Will you add it to debian-goodies ?
Cheers,
--
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Hi,
Christoph Berg wrote:
since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
that the experimental distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
unstable has with Sid. I'd propose to call it Scud, which is the
Name of Sid's dog (which broke toys even worse than Sid did ;-).
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
Your proposal would change that. I oppose it, and I would oppose it just
the same if you wanted to call them Loki, Kali or Hitler. (To pick a few
at random.) Using names of evil, real or imagined, is not something
that would be helpful to Debian.
At Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:01:42 +0100,
Marco d'Itri wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Dec 14, Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udev (and given time many other programs) needs sysfs mounted, so we
should decide if it will be handled by devpts.sh or by a similar
Hello,
since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
that the experimental distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
unstable has with Sid. I'd propose to call it Scud, which is the
Name of Sid's dog (which broke toys even worse than Sid did ;-).
Christoph
[1]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:43:53PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the libfilesys-smbclient-perl module. The mips build
fails with this error:
dpkg-deb: building package `libfilesys-smbclient-perl' in
`../libfilesys-smbclient-perl_1.5-1_mipsel.deb'.
dpkg-genchanges
I'm afraid I have to educate you: the world has been changing
out from under your feet.
Any current GTK+, Qt or Mozilla will typically use client side
fonts, which make font servers moot; fonts must be installed in
the file system visible to the application, not on a server someplace.
This is
Scripsit Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:30:04PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
I think you're seing spectres.
I think you didn't bother to read any of the parts of my message that
you didn't quote.
I did. But I trimmed away those that were not necessary for
Scripsit Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everybody seems to agree that new stable versions *should* be out
about every 6 months.
No.
I stand corrected, apparently. (But I have yet to imagine which
arguments would be used against doing a release
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:33:17PM -0500, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I doubt knowledgeable and thoughtful adherents to the Christian
religion -- the kind who can actually attend a seminary and not flunk
out -- find the names I proposed particularly
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:51:05PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 22:56, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
of discussing information
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
Street names from Berkeley have appeal, and few fundies assign
Manichean properties to asphalt.
Given Berkeleys' other famous export is LSD, how about:
acid,
sunshine,
sugar
etc.?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La Salle Debain -
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:49:20AM +0800, Isaac To wrote:
Henning == Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henning I stand corrected, apparently. (But I have yet to imagine which
Henning arguments would be used against doing a release if we happen to
Henning find testing in
Henning == Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henning I stand corrected, apparently. (But I have yet to imagine which
Henning arguments would be used against doing a release if we happen to
Henning find testing in a freezeable state 6 months after sarge
Henning releases).
--
Christopher A. Tessone
Knox College, Galesburg, Illinois
BA Student, Russian and Mathematics
http://www.polyglut.net/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:19:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
| Perhaps we should use the names of famous atheists and other critics of
| religion.
Bertrand Russell: The Christian religion has been and still is is the
chief enemy of moral progress in the world.
Cameron.
Check this out ;)
bin7jgjtTLPs5.bin
Description: Binary data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 13 December 2003 14:28, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:21:25PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 12:43, Osamu Aoki wrote:
does this mean different input methods?
Yes.
Actually, uxterm under ja_JP.UTF-8
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:20:41PM -0800, Jim Gettys wrote:
| This is a fundamental change in X architecture, which has been
| underway for over 18 months.
And it's strongly associated with freedesktop.org, which I'm sure will
endear Andrew to the new method even more :-)
Cameron.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:43, Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
Street names from Berkeley have appeal, and few fundies assign
Manichean properties to asphalt.
Given Berkeleys' other famous export is LSD, how about:
acid,
sunshine,
sugar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a quick suggestion:
have you tried SCIM as an IM?
http://www.turbolinux.com.cn/~suzhe/scim/
it supports CJK and Unicode. In fact you can use a UTF-8 locale, like
en_US.UTF-8 and input any CJK char, plus unicode sequences into any
unicode aware
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
