Hi,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 09:01:30AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Otto,
>
> Am Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 01:43:40PM -0700 schrieb Otto Kekäläinen:
> > Yes to finalizing DEP-14 soon, but first I think we need to complete the
> > technical work to have git-buildpackage use DEP-14 branch names by de
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Günther
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libssc
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Contact: Dylan Van Assche
* URL : https://libssc.dylanvanassche.be/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 04:17:11PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 11:25:42AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 01:37:23PM +0200, Lee Garrett
two years ago,
> > and my message is awaiting moderator approval. I've also poked Guido Günther
> > directly, who seemed to have done some of the more recent uploads for
> > libvirt.
> >
> > So what would be the process to join the libvirt team? I'd like to pus
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Günther
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: livi
Version : 0.0.3
Upstream Contact: Guido Günther
* URL : https://gitlab.gnome.org/guidog/livi
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Günther
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: phosh-tour
Version : 0.21.0
Upstream Author : Sam Sam Hewitt , Guido Günther
* URL : https://www.example.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Günther
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: phom
Version : 0.20.0~beta1
Upstream Author : Guido Günther
* URL : https://gitlab.gnome.org/guidog/phom/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Günther
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: phosh-mobile-settings
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Guido Günther
* URL : https://gitlab.gnome.org/guidog/phosh-mobile-settings
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Günther
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: libadwaita
Version : 1.0.0~alpha.2
Upstream Author : Alexander Mikhaylenko and more
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Günther
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
debian-on-mobile-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name: callaudiod
Version : 0.0.4
Upstream Author : Arnaud Ferraris
* URL : https://gitlab.com/mobian1
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 05:52:47PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Finalizing and publishing DEP-14 would be nice.
>
> I have been using git-buildpackage for all of my packages for many years
> already, and thus been automatically following these guidelines as they are
> followed b
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 01:27:46AM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (dropping debian-release and debian-python since it's kind of irrelevant)
>
> 在 2020-02-28五的 05:30 +0100，Johannes Schauer写道：
> > Quoting peter green (2020-02-27 22:54:19)
> > > > Relevant packages and bugs:
> > > > 9
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 07:35:55AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I agree that better handling of things like debian/changelog is
> something we should focus effort on.
>
> I think we can either do something gbp dch like, possibly allowing
> commits to annotate whether and to what extent they sh
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 05:56:20PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting Michael Stone :
> > Unless the cpu supports rdrand/rdseed, installing rng-tools5 won't
> > really change anything. If it does support those, it probably makes more
> > sense going forward to just enable CONFIG_RANDOM_T
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 06:37:54PM -0600, Brian Smith wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've been looking into updating opa-ff to the upstream 10.8.0.0.201
> release and have some questions about the patch-queue process
> specified in d/README.source, which references DEP-14.
>
> The document states th
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:52:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Holger Levsen writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:19:33PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Why is any of this a reason for an ftpmaster REJECT ? I still think
> > > all of this should
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:42:13PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 05:41:53PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > The particular commit was fine (and had it come as a MR or bug report or
> > whatever I'd have had no problem with it at all).
>
> I'm not sure why you are so b
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:32:29PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 15:00:03 +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > Jacob Adams writes:
> > > The consensus seems to be that people should enable email
> > > notifications in salsa and open a bug when filing a merge request.
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:55:10PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guido Günther writes ("Re: Bug#910446: NMU diff (substantive patches in
> git-format-patch form)"):
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 03:36:49PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Hi. I fixed this bug, and
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:10:44PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am unable to find a place where the SSH fingerprint of salsa is shown.
> > I want to compare it with the one displayed when I try to push some
> > changes.
> Just fo
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 01:41:52PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
>
> > It often wished that these pages would show the fingerprints too. Where
> > would that bug need to go? A db.debian.org pseudo package does not seem
>
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:06:33PM +0100, Alex Muntada wrote:
> Hi Alberto,
>
> > I am unable to find a place where the SSH fingerprint of salsa
> > is shown.
>
> You'll find the SSH keys for DSA servers in:
> https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
>
> In this case, search for salsa and you'll find:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 02:26:43PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 02 2018, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> > The changelog is something which can be naturally derived from the
> > changes made to a source package and excellent tools like
> > git-buildpackage ("gbp dch") make t
Hi Bálint,
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 04:34:40AM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
> 2017-11-24 12:48 GMT+01:00 Guido Günther :
> > Hi,
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:31:43PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:31:43PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:43:17PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > my QA page or our blend's task page (like
> > https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/bio-ngs) regularl
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:43:17PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my QA page or our blend's task page (like
> https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/bio-ngs) regularly informs me about
> updates that should be performed to packages I alone maintain or (more
> likely) with the help of m
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 01:46:40PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> thanks for your reply!
>
> On 10/31/2017 07:54 AM, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> > For Thunderbird intrigeri and myself came to the conclusion that
> > especially for the apparmor profile someone from the apparmor te
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:26:04PM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 06:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Bad checksums on loki_2.4.7.4-7_source.changes: Checksum mismatch for file
> > loki_2.4.7.4-7.dsc: b4d2841416822842e6e6b85c44e3f4f3 !=
> > 7acc0c03ab3a269d117dec
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 09:49:35AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 06:00:05PM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> > Guido pointed me some times ago to the following additions to my local
> > setup in ~/.gbp.conf. That do the trick always create a *source.cha
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 06:00:05PM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Am 01.10.2017 um 17:37 schrieb Andreas Tille:
>
> > I confirm that I remember times when I had the same _source.chanegs
> > alongside the _.changes but for some reason the source changes are
> > missing now w
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:08:13PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 07:38:22PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Andreas Tille wrote:
> > [...]
> > > To answer Mattias question why not using source uploads all the time:
> > > Once I have build the package to see w
Hi John,
very interesting read!
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 02:07:32PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> On 09/09/2017 12:49 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> > Hi John et al,
> >
> > John Johansen:
> >> On 08/09/2017 02:31 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> >>> Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> Christian Seiler schrieb:
> > Ano
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: =?utf-8?q?Guido_G=C3=BCnther?=
* Package name: virt-bootstrap
Upstream Author : Cédric Bosdonnat
* URL : https://github.com/virt-manager/virt-bootstrap/
* License : GPL-v3
Programming Lang: Python3
Description : Tool to se
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:12:55PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
> just wondering, did you consider nextcloud as groupware?
Yes. I had owncl...@packages.debian.org on the list of people
contacted.
-- Guido
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 04:57:22PM +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR We need to define a way to store detached upstream signatures in git.
> I'm including a proposal, suggestions welcome.
>
> Not too long ago both uscan and dpkg-source added support for detached
> upstream signa
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:19:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:43:56PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> >
> > The top 10 teams with packages in SVN are:
> >
> > 347 Debian Med Packaging Team
> >
>
> This number contains possibly 150 packages that *coul
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 08:05:02PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guido Günther writes ("Re: changelog practice, unfinalised vs UNRELEASED vs
> ~version"):
> > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:48:35PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > We do not seem to have a coherent approac
Hi Ian,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:48:35PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> We do not seem to have a coherent approach to how to handle
> debian/changelog in trees (eg, vcs branches) which are not yet ready
> for upload.
>
> See below two examples of things done differently.
> The questions are:
>
> Q
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 02:11:12PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
[..snip..]
> with a middle ground that is less theoretically defensible than
> either, but pragmatically quite useful:
>
> * Mostly write the changelog later, as in the second model.
> Periodically summarize the changelog so far (si
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:36:13PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:20:30PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > Would a mirror of the git repository on alioth be sufficient? I had
> > planned to set that up, but didn’t get around to it yet. Any help with
> > that would be
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:14:09AM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Jan 10 2017, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:38:11PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> >> On Jan 05 2017, Brian May wrote:
> >> > Vincent Bernat writes:
> >> >
> &g
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:38:11PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Jan 05 2017, Brian May wrote:
> > Vincent Bernat writes:
> >
> >> There have been a lot of complaints about it. For me, it is a pain to
> >> use. Its integration with gbp is poor, it produces a messy history when
> >> you are wor
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:24:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath writes:
>
> > Are there really upstreams that do that? I'd expect that the primary
> > consumer of Debian patches are other distributions, downstreams, and
> > users.
>
> > I'd think that anything that's relevant for u
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 04:36:54PM +0300, Andrey ``Bass'' Shcheglov wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use a continuous integration server (Jenkins or TeamCity) to
> build binary packages from the official Debian distribution.
If using Jenkins have
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 02:56:59PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Guido Günther (2016-11-04 12:26:51)
> > We should also enable needsrestart, whatmaps, checkrestart or similar
> > to restart affected services after these upgrades otherwise the e.g.
> > openssl up
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:47:28PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I'm in Seattle for the Debian Cloud sprint and it's going really
> well. I'll post a report in a few days summarising what we've
> done. But, in the meantime, there's something that has come up which I
> think merits
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Guido Günther"
* Package name: osinfo-db-tools
Version : 1.0.0
* URL : https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/libosinfo/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Operating system database tools
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Guido Günther"
* Package name: osinfo-db
Version : 1.0.0
* URL : https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/libosinfo/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: XML
Description : Operating system database files for
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 05:58:05PM -0400, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
[..snip..]
> Debian 8.5 image URL:
>
>
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/openstack/8.5.0/debian-8.5.0-openstack-amd64.qcow2
>
> This image will be gone, soon as Debian launches 8.6.0!!! This is bad.
>
>
> So, can Debi
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:09:36PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Sven Bartscher
>
> > I am a developer and regardless of the distribution I use, I often have
> > a slow internet connection. So having to download possibly large
> > documentation is a problem for me.
>
> How do you keep up wi
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 04:08:53PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On 2016-01-03 15:59:37, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This message was not intended to be sent to a debian-* mailing list by
> > the author. However, since it is (in my opinion) of large interest I
> > got the permission to
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 03:11:54PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:02:32PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm considering:
> >archive/{debian,ubuntu}/
> >{debian,ubuntu}/archive/
> >
> > I'm still considering the capitalisation idea.
> >
> > Other suggest
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:42:15PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:15:19AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Couldn't we just use the non-minified versions in most situations? A
> > heavily loaded wordpress site might not be good example but e.g. doxyg
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 09:50:05AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > How would someone rebuild the minified javascript files from the
> > missing-sources files?
>
> They would not?
>
> The modified non-minified files are perfectly usable even if t
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 05:07:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guido Günther writes ("Re: Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git integration
> tools"):
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:21:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > I think the problems you are describing
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:21:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guido Günther writes:
> > Having patches applied with 3.0(quilt) calls out for sync problems
> > between your git tree and debian/patches/. This can be mitigated with
> > --single-debian-patch --auto-commit but
Hi Ian,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:51:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
[..snip..]
> I don't think the number of git-based workflows is going to decrease.
> I'm hoping (betting!) that the proportion of packages whose git
> maintainers' git workflows involve strange[1] git trees will go down.
>
> [1]
On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Trying to get rid of my old GPG key I stumbled over this:
>
> For devscripts you can define a variable "DEBSIGN_KEYID". For
> dpkg it is called "DEB_SIGN_KEYID". g
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 07:14:36PM +0300, Исаев Виталий wrote:
> > Hello! I'm looking for a convenient wrapper of standard Debian packaging
> > toolchain in order to automatize the deployment process. We use Ubuntu and
> > Debian, and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Guido Günther"
* Package name: wpan-tools
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Alexander Aring
* URL : http://wpan.cakelab.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Configure WPAN and 6LoWP
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:44:35PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bernhard R. Link writes ("Re: RFC: DEP-14: Recommended layout for Git
> packaging repositories"):
> > Raphael Hertzog [14 22:26]:
> ...
> > > When a Git tag needs to refer to a specific version of a Debian package,
> > > the Debia
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:35:07PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
[..snip..]
> with upstream changes - and try packaging them with each of gbp-pq,
Note that nothing withing gbp forces you to use gbp-pq. You can use
e.g. use
--no-unapply-patches
--auto-commit
--single-debian-patch
in your debian/so
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:35:45AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 14, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > This is just a proof that storing the patches as real commits is useful.
> > And that's the point of the patch-queue tag. Instead of having the patches
> > only as real commits in the local rep
Hi Raphael,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:46:13AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[..snip..]
> Problem 1: the derivatives
> --
>
> So I am a Kali Linux contributor. We use git repos to maintain all our
> packages and we use git-buildpackage. Most of the Kali contributors
> are n
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:46:13AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[..snip..]
> Well git-buildpackage obviously needs quite some update:
> - it complains when you're trying to build as soon as you're not in a
> branch named master (that can be overridden with --git-ignore-branch
> or setting --gi
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:06:59PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dimitri John Ledkov writes ("Re: dgit and git-dpm (was Re: Standardizing the
> layout of git packaging repositories)"):
> > dpkg-source removes it, by default, for 3.0 based formats as it's part
> > of the default ignore list.
> > (or
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 07:17:49PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Brian May writes ("Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging
> repositories"):
> > However, with git-dpm, no branch is ever destroyed. Every branch is always
> > merged into the Debian branch. The Debian branch itself always heads
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:32:26AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Guido Günther:
> > The overlap between n-m and systemd-networkd saddens me. n-m got
> > support for team/bond interfaces, VLANs, etc a while ago and now we get
> > to see yet another tool
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:53:51PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> My understanding is that they recommend NetworkManager or ConnMan (which
> are competitors, and fill a similar niche) for dynamic / mobile /
> wireless situations; whereas systemd-networkd is intended to be more
> like a competitor f
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 01:43:01PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
[..snip..]
> The problem with restarting applications and subsystems is that you
> never know if the loose state information if you just restart them
> (e.g. Inkscape going down on upgrade would be pretty
> annoying). Also,
Why shoul
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 03:53:22PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 25/08/14 14:01, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > is there for Debian a daemon user naming scheme or custom ?
>
> Several :-(
>
> The ones I've seen suggested are (assuming a package, daemon or user
> whose simple name is "foo"):
>
> *
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:11:16PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
[..snip..]
> >- shall we standardize the "pristine-tar" branch?
>
> I'd say "No" here. With packaging of the MATE desktop environment I started
> maintaining only the debian/ folders in the packaging Git repositories (e.g.
> [1]). So, I
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:19:48AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 26/08/14 07:01, Brian May wrote:
> > In gbp-pq [...] There is no history kept of
> > the patch-queue branch. Possibly the patch-queue branch shouldn't be
> > pushed to remote repositories, because rebasing is expected.
>
> You ar
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:38:05PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On 25 August 2014 14:34, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> > I'm beginning to think that what we want is for gbp and git-dpm to
> > interoperate, such that any individual maintainer can use whichever tool
> > they
> > choose, but would still allo
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Guido Günther wrote:
> > The gbp manual has a recommended branch layout:
> >
> >
> > http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 09:51:21PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Guido Günther wrote:
> >> The gbp manual has a recommended branch layout:
> >>
> >&
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:18:29AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[..snip..]
> We do this for Kali Linux too but there are always cases where some
> contributors forget about the suffix (in particular when we package stuff
> not yet in Debian, or new upstream releases of packages that lag behind in
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 04:16:01PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while git is the most popular VCS for packaging, there's no clear rules
> on what you can expect in a random git packaging repository listed
> in Vcs-Git. I would like to fix this so that:
> - we can extract more useful
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
[..snip..]
> [1] I'm aware that certain libraries do restart services affected by the
> upgrade, but there's no generic framework for this.
whatmaps[A] hooks into the apt pipeline for that and looks for shared
objects coming in via secu
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:51:37AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > From: Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=
>
> >GTK+3 supports themes
>
> GTK/GNOME people have stated numerous times that they do not want
> them.
There's not Debian people and not Gtk+/GNOME people, this current
thread shows t
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:31:28PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > My opinion is that many users are migrating away from Debian because we
> > are unable to make decisions on important technical topics and leave
> > them with 3 different setups, n
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:35:26AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>
> > - security patches should be clearly marked as such in every *.patch
> > file
>
> That sounds like a good idea, could you add it to the wiki page?
It's not always easy t
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 05:12:15PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 26 avril 2014 16:34 CEST, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> :
>
> >>Good to know. I was using a dedicated "dfsg" branch, but the workflow is
> >>crappy in this case. But currently, nothing we can do with
> >>debian/copyright?
> >
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 05:10:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[..snip..]
> So arguably, such a behavior change should be tied to a debhelper compat
> level change.
>
> But I think we ought to switch to autoreconfing by default.
I do too but I do wonder if this might make stable backports harde
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:03:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Brian May writes:
> > On 1 April 2014 04:42, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> >> cacert.org is unuseable if you offer your web site to muggles. It's
> >> not in the browsers.
>
> > Not sure what you mean. cacert.org is unusable at the mom
Hi Jakub,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:33:23PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Guido Günther , 2014-03-05, 20:54:
[..snip..]
> >I looked at the docs and as I read them this would affect uid 0 as
> >well.
>
> Luckily this is not the case. :) root can see other users' /proc
&g
Hi,
the work of the security team is very, very much appreciated!
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:03:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> * We're planning to request for hidepid to be enabled by default (to 1).
> This will squash an entire class of information leaks. If you have any
> comments o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Guido Günther"
* Package name: libvirt-python
Version : 1.2.0
* URL : http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-python.git
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: Python
Description : libvirt python bindings
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:31:59PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:19:04PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > That said, we provide GNOME Classic in wheezy for good reasons. Some of
> > Florian’s concerns are clearly among them.
>
> I have tried that and the annoyances wi
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:49:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[..snip..]
> If they told us we could call it Firefox without compromising our ability
> to maintain the packages to the quality standards that Debian users
> expect, we would happily change the branding back, because we know it's
> con
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:38:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jean-Christophe Dubacq writes:
>
> > Yesterday, however, I just had the case of a project with no tarballs
> > (as the library I wanted to package is part of a larger project, it's
> > not released independently). I stumbled (too lon
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:52:48PM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi Daniel et al,
>
> I'm also thinking a lot about how to improve Debian by improving our Git
> tooling. Therefor I'm packaging Gerrit (#589436). But gerrit and its
> dependencies is a big project...
>
> Now that Git slowly becomes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Guido Günther"
* Package name: network-manager-iodine
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Guido Günther
* URL :
https://honk.sigxcpu.org/piki/projects/network-manager-iodine/
* License : GPL
Programmi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Guido Günther"
* Package name: ppm
Version : 0.0.3
Upstream Author : Guido Günther
* URL : https://honk.sigxcpu.org/piki/projects/ppm/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Check and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Guido Günther"
* Package name: libosinfo
Version : 0.0.2
* URL : https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Library for managing information about
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Guido Günther"
* Package name: libvirt-tck
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Daniel Berrange
* URL : http://libvirt.org/testtck.html
* License : GPL or Artistic License
Programming Lang: Perl
D
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:47:03AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 24/08/2011 02:01, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:03:19PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> >> On 23/08/2011 15:32, Guido Günther wrote:
> >>> Hi Jérémy,
> >>> On Sun, Oc
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:03:19PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 23/08/2011 15:32, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi Jérémy,
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:12:09PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >> I noticed bzr-buildpackage is able to get upstream tarball
> >> with
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:39:41AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:24:38PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> [..snip..]
> > $ git-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot -S
> >
> > fatal: Path 'maildir-utils_0.9.6.99.orig.tar.gz.delta'
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:24:38PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
[..snip..]
> $ git-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot -S
>
> fatal: Path 'maildir-utils_0.9.6.99.orig.tar.gz.delta' does not exist in
> 'refs/heads/pristine-tar'
> pristine-tar: git show
> refs/heads/pristine-tar:maildir-utils_0
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
