On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:07:01AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
On that note, is it ok for me to upload packages that depend on packages
stuck in NEW, or do I have to wait for the packages to clear NEW first? I
have at least one pending Python3 package in this situation.
If you upload things to
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 04:46:17PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
On 16 Aug 2014 16:19, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi wrote:
If you upload things to unstable that depend on things in NEW, nobody
will be able to install or upgrade that package (until the dependency
gets through NEW).
In this case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 16:37:17 +0100
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp
Architecture: all source
Version: 1.20140719-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:49:30PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:33:35AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 04:37:16PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
This violates the Policy's section 10.1, but it is still my
favorite solution for the
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:10:51AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:53:06AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
But OK. I get it - this is still too contentious to have any room for
this sort of foolishness and if it's to exist at all it'll have to be
called something boring. That's a
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:23:01PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
You get a choice of 'prevent-systemd' which stops it running as init
but allows the -shim and libpam packages so that logind and the like
will work. Or 'systemd-must-die' which conflicts with everything
systemdish.
Wookey,
Please rename
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:53:27PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
The replies were not just terse, the replies were downright rude.
That's hardly the main problem with Michael's behaviour.
I stand by what I said yesterday, in a different thread, but the same
mailing list:
# When a project
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Thomas Goirand
+1 for keeping the name which is funny
No, it's not. It's offensive to those of us who spend time on making
systemd integration in Debian be as good as possible.
It's also offensive to those who think
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:45:21PM +0200, Dennis van Dok wrote:
I'm symlinking files to /etc/grid-security/certificates/ on
installation, and everything but the directories themselves are removed
on package removal.
I guess I could remove these directories if they are completely empty
after
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:10:19PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
But I wonder whether it is a good idea to promote only non-secure URL's
to the source (at least if there are no associated signtures), as some
packages do. One may also wonder whether the package maintainer has
used such a URL to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:37:00 +
Source: soundconverter
Binary: soundconverter
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:01:14AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 21:51:10 +0200, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org
wrote:
Given the fact/bullshit ratio of your recent posts, I invite you, again,
to take a step back from debian-devel.
Given the insult/information ratio of your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 08:04:18 +0100
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 1.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Closes
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 09:56:17AM +0200, Adrien Clerc wrote:
In systemd, the ExecStartPre directive can be helpful. But the
documentation doesn't say if it is executed as the user defined in the
User directive, or as root. I guess the latter is done, but I'm too lazy
right now to test it :)
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:58:40PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please file bugreports about such details, instead of posting to d-devel
(or if you must then least in addition to - mentioning the bug number).
Or better yet, provide patches. I did, on IRC, to Adam. A few lines of
patch to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:03:18 +0100
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 1.7.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Closes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:33:42 +
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:58:15 +0100
Source: genbackupdata
Binary: genbackupdata
Architecture: all source
Version: 1.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:18:43 +
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 1.7.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Closes
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 01:20:20AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Actually, if we really want to strictly +literally interpret the DFSG,
then yes, tarballs (or the directory trees they represent) are no longer
the preferred form of modification when everybody uses a DVCS like git.
I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:15:50 +0100
Source: python-tracing
Binary: python-tracing
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:07:44 +
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp
Architecture: all source
Version: 1.20140315-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:22:18 +
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:18:30 +
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 1.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Closes
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 12:12:10AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
There is no DEP-5 rules on what to do. For example the followings are
I hasten to point out, just in case it's still unclear to anyone, that
DEP-5 (now copyright-format/1.0) does not, in any way, affect what
files can or can't be
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:09:11AM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
Is it not? It's much more convenient than fighting with a broken audio
server which was written by a bunch of not really sane people suffering
from some extreme form of a NIH syndrome.
I think that attacking people isn't a good
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:46:13PM -0500, Maas Verri wrote:
Proposal: SystemD pushers/forcers be physically beaten as revenge.
This is, of course, absolutely intolerable. Regardless of how strongly
you might feel about any technical issue within Debian, resorting to
threats of any kind of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:10:00 +
Source: luxio
Binary: lua-luxio0
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:46:52PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
And my final question: what should it be called ? I'm terrible at
names.
debian-standard-resolution-vote-counter
condorcet-schultze-vote-counter
This doesn't seem like something that needs a short name. If you
insist on short,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:23:05PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
I feel singled out. As a blind DD, I can not play any of their games
since they are not accessible. :-/ OTOH, thats probably an advantage
for me, since I am not risking to waste alot of hours with unproductive
work. :-)
Valve has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:50:25 +
Source: python-larch
Binary: python-larch
Architecture: all source
Version: 1.20131130-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:18:48 +
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Closes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:46:30 +
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 1.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
I've never tried to perform any package maintenance, but I would be very
happy to contribute these packages to Debian... (NMU?)
What are the next steps for it? Should someone (some maintainer?) review
it?
Yes, someone needs
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
By making changes to the software.
This discussion is getting a tad too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:18:33 +
Source: luxio
Binary: lua-luxio0
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:14:06AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Actually, contributing to Upstart does not require copyright assignment (as
for example, would contributing to an FSF-owned GNU project). Instead, it
requires a Contributor License Agreement be signed:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:47:00AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:40 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Why force
*every* user of the installer to make that choice, when many of them
find the very question to be a needless imposition which makes the
installer
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:41:29AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Trying to say [GNOME upstream] continuously try to [...] force their
blessings on all users. is just wrong. Nobody is forced to use Gnome.
Sorry, I've implicitly meant all _of their_ users. My apologies.
I write a
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 05:32:37PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
xy may only use a tiny bit, but the combination of apt-get, dpkg and
xy seems to cause problems. Its not just BeagleBones, there are x86
machines with just 64MB still on sale.
Do we expect to build Debian packages on such
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 (CPAN/PAUSE) da...@cpan.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: liblog-any-adapter-filehandle-perl
Version : 0.008
Upstream Author : Jason Rodrigues jasonjayr
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 (CPAN/PAUSE) da...@cpan.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libfailures-perl
Version : 0.002
Upstream Author : David Golden dagol...@cpan.org
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 (CPAN/PAUSE) da...@cpan.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libdata-hal-perl
Version : 1.000
Upstream Author : Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ da...@cpan.org
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 (CPAN/PAUSE) da...@cpan.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libdatetime-format-rfc3339-perl
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Eric Brine ikeg...@adaelis.com
* URL
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 (CPAN/PAUSE) da...@cpan.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtypes-path-tiny-perl
Version : 0.005
Upstream Author : David Golden dagol...@cpan.org
* URL
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 (CPAN/PAUSE) da...@cpan.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libconvert-ascii85-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Lukas Mai l@web.de
* URL : https
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 07:17:32PM +0200, Olе Streicher wrote:
What are the status, the pros and cons here? Is there an attempt to get
the XDG somehow into the Debian policy?
There is no active Debian effort to make all our packages to conform
to the XDG directory spec. It is my understanding
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:04:57PM +0200, Olе Streicher wrote:
Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi writes:
Having Debian versions of the programs differ in this from everyone
else would create a lot of confusion, and needlessly cause everyone
more support burden than is needed.
Isn't
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:49:12PM +0200, Lukas Anzinger wrote:
I've seen that you stop dbus via invoke-rc.d because it's started from its
postinst script.
There's a way to prevent the starting of services so you don't need to stop
it: Just install https://github.com/grml/grml-policyrcd into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 15:07:43 +0100
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:42:40 +0100
Source: luxio
Binary: lua-luxio0
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:53:47AM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
But I'd like to stress we need *all* developers to be involved fix bugs
(esp. security) in their packages in all the supported releases, not only
in current-stable.
I am afraid I am not on board for this. I do not agree with
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:41:22PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:21:05 -0400
Ryan Kavanagh r...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 03:33:06PM +0200, root wrote:
* Package name: esu
Description : It allows to copy files with different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:00:23 +0100
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp
Architecture: all source
Version: 1.20130808-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:51:30 +
Source: summain
Binary: summain
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 0.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:51:05 +0100
Source: python-larch
Binary: python-larch
Architecture: all source
Version: 1.20130808-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:26:17 +0100
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Closes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:56:29 +0100
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
) and to the sources of the theme itself. I think it might
be surprising to most users that they cannot just install a distribution
package but have to take such tedious extra steps in order to comply with the
license and I do not think most are aware of that.
Any thoughts on that?
Lars
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
.
Lars
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1373535676.42287.yahoomail...@web163804.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
- Original Message -
From: Paul Wise p...@debian.org
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: AGPLv3 Compliance and Debian Users
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
It is not that simple, Debian itself complies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:33:43 +0100
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:26:37 +0100
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:47:12AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Why is UTC time bogus?
If you set your BIOS clock to show the current time in the UTC time zone,
it will confuse people who think the BIOS clock shows the local time on
Mars.
--
http://www.cafepress.com/trunktees -- geeky funny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:36:05 +0100
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.8.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:00:17 +0100
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:26:14 +0100
Source: python-ttystatus
Binary: python-ttystatus
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.23-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 08:28:18PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Hello,
I have a question concerning a bugreport I got, but that could be quite
general.
Let's say a daemon provides POP and IMAP, and is configured to provide both,
in a pop.conf and imap.conf.
How should the daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:57:47 +0100
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:18:56 +0100
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp
Architecture: all source
Version: 1.20130613-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:14:58AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 28/05/13 16:42, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I'm not sure I agree with the above. I'm fine with Debian being the OS
for the experts.
That's a shame; I think it should be for everyone (including, but
not limited to, experts).
+1
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:58:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
The trouble is that piuparts doesn't manage its own chroot tarball last
I checked; it uses the pbuilder tarball instead.
piuparts -s $HOME/piuparts.tar.gz ... # create the tarball
piuparts -b $HOME/piuparts.tar.gz ... # use the
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:29:11AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
One thing I'm wondering about, and you don't seem to talk about is
what versions end up in a release.
Some upstreams have a testing branch of there software and a
release branch. It's sometimes useful to have people test the
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 09:20:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:52:25PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I fought quite hard against the copyright file format but was promised
that it wouldn't be something required.
At least *I* never did such promise.
I
and
release process smoother, and increase the quality of the end result.
Lars Wirzenius
Russ Allbery
--
http://www.cafepress.com/trunktees -- geeky funny T-shirts
http://gtdfh.branchable.com/ -- GTD for hackers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 08:26:13AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Kurt Roeckx kurt at roeckx.be writes:
Not sure what a clean way of escaping the colon would be.
apt already saves it with %3a in /var/cache/apt/archives/
%2a IIRC… but I consider this a bug personally and think apt
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
A test case (in a directory you can see via http://angband.pl/tmp/):
for x in : %3A %3a; do echo $x foo${x}bar;done
echo ok baz%3Aquux
Let's try to access a file with % :
wget -q -O- http://angband.pl/tmp/foo%3Abar
:
-- should
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Daniel Walrond wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Walrond deb...@djw.org.uk
* Package name: opensmtpd
Version : 5.3.1p1
Upstream Author : OpenBSD
* URL : http://www.opensmtpd.org/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
* Package name: luxio
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Rob Kendrick rjek+lu...@rjek.com
* URL : http://www.rjek.com/software.html
* License : MIT (Same as Lua)
Programming Lang: Lua
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:12:33PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Just being curious... Is the -turbo called this was because it's faster?
How much faster is it then?
Hi, Thomas,
The very first hit on the duckduckgo.com search engine for search
expression libjpeg-turbo (not including the quotes)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:05:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
For the record, I completely disagree with this packaging advice. Why
carry an upstream patch when you can handle this easily during build time?
As much as I dislike quilt, at least it makes it easy to see what
change Debian is
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:07:25PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:05:47 +0900, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org
wrote:
The tool you are looking for is mk-build-deps from the package
devscripts.
So one uses mk-build-deps to create a .deb containing the build
dependencies
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:13:32PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Lars Wirzenius
- if it's a lot of packages, I construct a complicated sed
and awk and so on pipeline to extract the package names
and feed those to apt-get install
Aka /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I like to keep only Debian packaging specific scripts in devscripts (see
the list below). Where should we put the non Debian packaging specific
scripts? Should we create a neutral project or are there other projects
in which these
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:33:46PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 31 March 2013 at 18:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| Aside from the lack of pre-discussion, co-ordination etc., the last few
| weeks of a freeze _really_ isn't the right time to be starting a large
| (or indeed small)
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:48:09PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
If a package fails to do what it is supposed to do, isn't that a valid
argument that it is RC?
gnome-power-manager is meant to suspend a user's laptop when they shut
the lid and put it in a carry bag. That's what the manual
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:36:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:54:41PM +, adrelanos wrote:
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to have a /etc/environment.d folder. Contributing that code
shouldn't be hard for me. But I don't know where the would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:27:20 +0100
Source: python-larch
Binary: python-larch
Architecture: all source
Version: 1.20121006-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:34:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Charles,
On 12-08-25 at 01:03pm, Charles Plessy wrote:
a paragraph must not contain multiple instances of the same field.
Interesting. Where is that defined?
Policy, 5.1, Syntax of control files
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:02:13AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Isn't there something called FHS and which would be the thing to
change first? Or aren't we sticking to the FHS anyway or just don't
care?
If we keep /sbin as a symlink to /bin, and similarly for the other sbin
directories,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:25:19AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Also, FHS development seems to be effectively dead. We're already
carrying a fairly large collection of exceptions. One more wouldn't make
a tremendous difference as long as there's no major user behavior change,
and the symlinks
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:12:43AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
I do believe that whenever an initscript is called with the argument
start, it should bloody well start, and not exit after doing
nothing because I haven't edited some scarcely related file
somewhere.
As long as scripts
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:02:10AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Well there is experimental that could be used to package pre-releases
and new releases to make them suitable for unstable and testing _before_
the freeze!
Add to that unresponsive package maintainers, refusing to package new
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:28:34PM +0900, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Please consider that he is speaking on his own, do not take him as the
Hurd porters. The Hurd porter team wants to avoid anything that would
delay the release.
I apologize for implying that the Hurd porter team would do that. It
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:00:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, as the new wording is logically inconsistent. *By definition* a Debian
Project Member, as the term is being used here, is someone who has voting
rights. The term Debian Developer was being used to distinguish between
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:15:15AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Our constitution does not talk about project members, and instead uses
the word developer.
In fact, the Constitution
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 07:49:50PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Lars,
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:12:41AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
tools POV). The one _good_ reason for using the aarch64 name is avoiding
accidental matches with arm* in various bits of configery so leaving
that alone probably makes sense despite the silly name.
How much of the arm* silliness is there
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would
stay dedicated to important announcements which may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:47:15 +0100
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.20120630-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius l
201 - 300 of 1135 matches
Mail list logo
