* kaffe and other GPL-licensed JVMs can only be used with GPL compatible
software (i.e. no Apache style licenses!). See
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL
Not to mention that kaffe's classlib is GPL [1]
What exactly do you mean by this?
The interpreter can be
- it's upstream is really interested in having robust and widely
used
JVM [2], not only another research tool for students
- it is written in pure C, should be very easily portable to other
architectures (currently it supports x86, not sure about alpha,
but in
few months sparc
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
Facts that caused that I have choosen this set of tools.
It'd be nice if you kept this comparison list somewhere (and up to date
;-) - at an URL or in the README, so the measurement can be repeated,
verified,
criticised, enhanced...
*t
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:37:04PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
Facts that caused that I have choosen this set of tools.
It'd be nice if you kept this comparison list somewhere (and up to date
;-) - at an URL or in the README, so the measurement
W licie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 21:22, Adam Heath pisze:
So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is
better than these others?
Below I am forwarding parts of a mail from sablevm author,
Etienne M. Gagnon
[...]
I also looked at porting abilities - I think that
I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding
'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I
detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps).
Grzegorz, perhaps you could get Etienne to file a bug report for us.
I considered discussing
W licie z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 20:40, Tom Tromey pisze:
I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding
'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I
detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps).
Grzegorz, perhaps you could get
Hi,
I have hacked on GNU Classpath (which sablevm uses as its standard class
library) and gjdoc. I am really glad that you took the effort to package
them for Debian. Especially since I am a Debian user :)
Since I have also hacked a little on (lib)gcj (which is now being merged
with GNU
In addition to Mark's and Tom's comments, I'd like to address JNI vs CNI.
Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
Also, SableVM implements the invocation interface, and has clean
support for native code through the standard JNI interface.
So of course does GCJ.
Now, GIJ's people main objection to JNI (instead
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: free-java-sdk
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Grzegorz B. Prokopski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* License : LGPL
Description : Complete Java SDK environment consisting of free Java tools
The
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: free-java-sdk
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Grzegorz B. Prokopski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* License : LGPL
W licie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
depends.
I am not really restricting you to anything. You're free to create your
own java devel environment. It's all free software and I can't really
make any
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
W li¶cie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
depends.
So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is
better than these others?
Debian
On 12-Aug-02, 14:22 (CDT), Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
W li¶cie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
depends.
So, what about kaffe? What about
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:22:49PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
W li¶cie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
depends.
So, what about kaffe? What about gcj?
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 12-Aug-02, 14:22 (CDT), Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
W li¶cie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in
W licie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 21:22, Adam Heath pisze:
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
W licie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
depends.
So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
Facts that caused that I have choosen this set of tools.
* kaffe
It contains it's own JAVA_HOME environment, so it wouldn't make sense
to just copy it. If you can build with kaffe - then stick with
it and don't use free-java-sdk. However - be
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 16:56, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
I know gcj can compile to native code (on x86 platform only AFAIK) -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] madison gcj-3.1
gcj-3.1 | 1:3.1.1-1 | unstable | arm, ia64
gcj-3.1 | 1:3.1.1-2 | unstable | alpha, i386, m68k, powerpc, s390,
sparc
On 12-Aug-02, 15:55 (CDT), Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So use virtual packages, which other packages provide, and which this new
package depends on.
Then the user is back to having to figure out which one actually works
with the rest of the software. If you do this (virtual packages)
20 matches
Mail list logo
