On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 7:00 PM Javeed Ahmed wrote:
> can i make my own os using debian as a base and distribute it?
Yes, but you can also join the Debian project and help us improve the
Debian operating system for your use-cases.
Would you like to share your plans for how you want to change
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:44 AM Kyle Edwards
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 10:22 +, Javeed Ahmed wrote:
> > sir/madam
> > can i make my own os using debian as a base and distribute it?
>
> Absolutely! Debian is free software, and you are free to use, modify,
> and distribute it for any
On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 10:22 +, Javeed Ahmed wrote:
> sir/madam
> can i make my own os using debian as a base and distribute it?
Absolutely! Debian is free software, and you are free to use, modify,
and distribute it for any purpose. Please make sure to follow the rules
of each package's
sir/madamcan i make my own os using debian as a base and distribute it?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
Just - Wow... thanks!
Hopefully digesting of this tasty post would not cause too much of farting ;-)
:)
seems might be worth adding (if I am not missing the point), then the
concept of derivatives would then
Have you seen this project [1]? It looks like they have been already
thinking about the git+bittorrent idea.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/gittorrent/
--
Oscar Morante
Self-education is, I firmly believe, the only kind of education there is.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Oscar Morante spacep...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you seen this project [1]? It looks like they have been already
thinking about the git+bittorrent idea.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/gittorrent/
yes. it's effectively shelved. the name gittorrent was abandoned
Hi.
Le mercredi 01 septembre 2010 à 17:40 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton a écrit :
* again: ikiwiki or something similar could well be used as the basis
for a distributed bugtracker.
I'd suggest you have a look at the SD tool and the incoming debbugs
support for it developped by
Hi.
Le mercredi 01 septembre 2010 à 17:40 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton a écrit :
i leave you with this: the idea of the Freedom Box caused quite a
stir at debconf2010, but i honestly doubt that, without any experience
of getting *yourselves* off of the client-server paradigm, there
Just - Wow... thanks!
Hopefully digesting of this tasty post would not cause too much of farting ;-)
seems might be worth adding (if I am not missing the point), then the
concept of derivatives would then converge finally to a more
digestible, more manageable, and thus more robust mechanism of
kernel version yet so our Debian system integrators still have to go
through driver compilation in every installation process. Therefore, our
Debian customers request HighPoint must work with Debian developer to
include our linux drivers into the latest Debian Distribution. HighPoint is
always looking
have to go
through driver compilation in every installation process. Therefore, our
Debian customers request HighPoint must work with Debian developer to
include our linux drivers into the latest Debian Distribution. HighPoint is
always looking ways to provide friendly use experience for customers
Debian customers request HighPoint must work with Debian developer to
include our linux drivers into the latest Debian Distribution. HighPoint is
always looking ways to provide friendly use experience for customers so we
will assign a dedicated firmware interface to work with Debian developer
]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: HighPoint- GPL Licensed Controller wants To be Include In
Debian Distribution
Hi May Hwang!
On Jan 28, 2008 2:59 PM, May Hwang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These Hardware
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:24:55AM -0800, May Hwang wrote:
Dear Margarita,
Can you resend Sean's email because I didn't receive his email?
Up to this point, we are offering binary package based on customer request,
because binary driver package only support one specific kernel version.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:11:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came up with nothing on Google for stem linux., and DeliLinux
looks to be turkish so I don't know if we would even be to
communicate. I should try talking with them, their desktop looks
pretty nice. I have already done
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:50:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had considered releasing an extra-light version as well but it
surely you mean lite ?
;-)
Regards,
Paddy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly I do not think I have the
ability, patience, or time to be packaging software for Debian and dealing
with bugs I cannot correct.
What lets you assume you will have ability, patience, or time to maintain
a separate repository if you even
If you do not know what applications are on which CD, or even what you
need it becomes a little more difficult. I am trying to make it a
little easier for these
persons. I just went through all of this trying to install IceWM on an
older machine, so I thought to try to make it a little
I do have this ability. I am lacking in the programming skills
needed for the packaging and bug fixing. I can read most code and make
some small changes, but my programming skills are mainly in C# and a
little Java. I know just enough C++ to be dangerous.
Quoting Andreas Tille [EMAIL
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:03:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me explain to you the why I have decided to start the project. I
have searched for a lightweight distribution and none of what is
available has been what I wanted for one reason or another. I also
have used IceWM on
I came up with nothing on Google for stem linux., and DeliLinux
looks to be turkish so I don't know if we would even be to
communicate. I should try talking with them, their desktop looks
pretty nice. I have already done a bit of research on what
applications similar distributions are
I would expect a smaller package list would help in that respect.
But one of the issues people on debian-user have mentioned on low-memory
(and low cpu) hardware is the long wait for apt-get and friends to run
(if at all).
-Kev
[0] This machine has no floppy support, no network, no cdrom, no
I had considered releasing an extra-light version as well but it
seemed several other distros had that covered and it would be too much
to try to maintain too many different versions. Is it needed?
I suppose everyone has a different idea of what is functional as an
OS on older hardware. I
Why does the Debian distribution need so many applications? It
doesn't, it is nice to have them available though.
It may depend upon one perception of sluggish. I find Fedora's Gnome
desktop to be sluggish on an ATHLON 2000 XP. I tried Ubuntu with XFCE
and while the desktop loaded fine
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does the Debian distribution need so many applications?
Because the people who use Debian need different sets of applications.
It doesn't, it is nice to have them available though. It may depend
upon one perception of sluggish. I find Fedora's
Quoting Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You appear to be conflating a few different things here.
Yes, the initial statement was intended to be separate from the
paragraph after.
As far as the set that's appropriate for medium-memory users, that's
really a user specific thing; what
Hi,
I have recently started a project to create a custom Debian
distribution DebIce which provides a desktop with very low hardware
requirements. I would appreciate any advice you could give me
regarding the following:
1) Inclusion of software not currently available in the Debian
Hi,
I have recently started a project to create a custom Debian
distribution DebIce which provides a desktop with very low hardware
requirements. I would appreciate any advice you could give me
regarding the following:
sounds like you want to create damn small linux[1] again. Better go
Hi, upfront: Bernd's earlier reply on DSL is probably the best advice.
Just in case that there is some misunderstanding
On Sunday 19 August 2007 19:55:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recently started a project to create a custom Debian
distribution DebIce which provides a desktop
No, I do not want to create Damn Small Linux. This project has different
aims, one of which is to not be a livecd distribution since DSL and
Morphix have covered those bases nicely. An additional goal of the
project is to ensure that users of Debian have what they need should they
need or choose
I am hoping to get some outside developers involved as I know Debian
developers have there hands full. I am also hoping that some of the
Debian developers who can assist will do so. Honestly I do not think I
have the ability, patience, or time to be packaging software for
Debian and
Let me explain to you the why I have decided to start the project. I
have searched for a lightweight distribution and none of what is
available has been what I wanted for one reason or another. Debain has
most of what I need for a desktop, but it trial and error to find what
works and
Let me explain to you the why I have decided to start the project. I
have searched for a lightweight distribution and none of what is
available has been what I wanted for one reason or another. I also
have used IceWM on an older laptop for a while and like it. Debain has
most of what I
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Picture installation from a dialup modem. to do this one has 2
options. Option 1) Download all of the CD's, as the old machine does
not have a dvd player.
People only need to download the first CD and as many additional CDs
as they feel like. The
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IIRC, he sent an email out a few days ago saying that
http://planet.debian.net/ now serves most of the purpose of DWN.
Unfortunately, at least for me, planet.debian.net contains an
aggregation of more than just debian-related blog entries.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:45:01AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IIRC, he sent an email out a few days ago saying that
http://planet.debian.net/ now serves most of the purpose of DWN.
Unfortunately, at least for me, planet.debian.net contains an
HI,
I am an honest user of China, I love linux especially Debian distribution ,
I think Debian is the greatest linux distribution , but nowdays, the
debian weekly news was not updated ,
I think Debian will become more and more popular, since its feedom
and stability
I just want to know
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:32:01AM -0400, ?? wrote:
HI,
I am a honest user of China, I love linux especially Debian distribution ,
I think Debian is the greatest linux distribution , but nowdays, the
debian weekly news was not updated ,
I think Debian will become more and more popular
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/22/06 08:15, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:32:01AM -0400, ?? wrote:
HI,
I am a honest user of China, I love linux especially Debian distribution ,
I think Debian is the greatest linux distribution , but nowdays
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
That's why I feeled obliged to add the remark that I greatly appreciate
the work of the SkoleLinux people and that they probably did more for
Debian than any CDD is out of any question.
In the above sentence you seem to refer to Skolelinux as a CDD , yet
.
I'm sorry, but I really have a hard time with this. A Custom Debian
Distribution is nothing more than what is provided within Debian proper,
as Andreas said. While a Debian subproject may consider and make use of
stuff in development that is outside of Debian while transitioning it to
be pure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 13:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
On 2003-12-05 11:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
their fine work. I really love what they do and SkoleLinux is one of
the most impressive derivatives of Debian, but it just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 17:10, Tom wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:36:20AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Then that discussion needs to be resolved so that a solution can be made
that is in Debian main.
It's useful to try to clarify the terms so people
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:07:14AM -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote:
I've just learnt of Cubit from South Africa: http://www.cubit.co.za/
Is it free software? They don't seem to provide a link to the full text of
their license, it sounds free according to their license summary but I also
see
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:00:05PM +0100, cobaco wrote:
- if you don't allow temporary solutions while low priority debconf
question get included, than there currently are no CDD's as
custom configuration is necessary to support a CDD's target group
out-of-the-box.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-04 10:41, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
Can you say who the flavors people, the metadistros people and the
subproject people were? I'd like to make contact with all of these to
get more details
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-03 21:58, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
hm, I've added a definition to the wiki:
A Custom Debian Distribution (CDD) is a version of Debian that is
tailored
I do not like the term version. I'd prefer
to
set the default locale for both single users and the system as a whole.
Well, at least for my understanding SkoleLinux is not a Custom Debian
Distribution
exactly because they have packages which are not integrated in Debian. This is
no problem at all, but exactly here is the cruxial point
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
hm, here are the names I can remember:
Petter , me, (Kurt Gramlich, Maximillian Wilhelm, Frank Matthieß - not on
devel as far as I know) from Skolelinux
Mako, Enrico who organized the meeting
David Martinez (I think), and one or two others from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 11:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
their fine work. I really love what they do and SkoleLinux is one of the
most impressive derivatives of Debian, but it just does not (yet) fall
under our definition.]
huh ?! How do you figure that?
-env, and the different user-language packages, with the hope
of eventually creating one package to set the default locale for both
single users and the system as a whole.
Well, at least for my understanding SkoleLinux is not a Custom Debian
Distribution exactly because they have packages
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
On 2003-12-05 11:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
their fine work. I really love what they do and SkoleLinux is one of the
most impressive derivatives of Debian, but it just does not (yet) fall
under our definition.]
huh ?! How do you figure that?
Please read
on/after install
If there is a need for other terms (eg. metadistro, whatever), please
speak up/ add them in now if you are so inclined - carpe diem as they
say.
cheers
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/
* PGP
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
hm, as far as I know Debian-edu is nothing more then a couple of
task-packages at this point (and some education packages that got added to
the archive)
I do not compare the quality of Debian-Edu or SkoleLinux - I just want to
use the right term. Yes,
as a whole.
Then that discussion needs to be resolved so that a solution can be made
that is in Debian main.
I'm sorry, but I really have a hard time with this. A Custom Debian
Distribution is nothing more than what is provided within Debian proper, as
Andreas said. While a Debian subproject may
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
I will personally move forward with this as soon as I get access to
CVS.
Thanks. This would be much appreciated.
Andreas, perhaps you missed this message:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:36:20AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Then that discussion needs to be resolved so that a solution can be made
that is in Debian main.
It's useful to try to clarify the terms so people can speak the same
language, but as soon as you categorize anything somebody's
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:23:52AM -0600, cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2003-12-05 11:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
Well, at least for my understanding SkoleLinux is not a Custom Debian
Distribution exactly because they have packages which are not integrated
in Debian. This is no problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 16:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
More importantly, Skolelinux has done more than almost any CDD in
terms of contributing back to Debian in both code and in
methodology. Their method of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 17:13, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:23:52AM -0600, cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2003-12-05 11:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
Debian-Edu *is* a CDD because
it is completely inside Debian and
hm, as far as I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 16:48, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
hm, as far as I know Debian-edu is nothing more then a couple of
task-packages at this point (and some education packages that got added
to the archive)
I do not
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 16:02, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
If you apt-get install the subproject-howto you will get something
talking *only* about creating a custom Debian-distribution -- not
about creating a subproject for any other sort of work. The folks at
the BOF saw a real lack of interaction
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
Can you say who the flavors people, the metadistros people and the
subproject people were? I'd like to make contact with all of these to
get more details about their respective projects and their view on this.
Here on debian-devel. (Can you hear me?
on debian.org, with a note on the wiki that new
additions/ comments can be added to the wiki, to be further incorporated
into the HOWTO at a later date. Better to reduce duplication in this way
I think...
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage
postings to this list:
Debian is the super-project.
XYZ is a Debian subproject
that produces a Custom Debian Distribution
with the flavors A, B and C.
A subproject is easily understood: it's an organisational structure.
Basically, it's a group of people working
.
XYZ is a Debian subproject
that produces a Custom Debian Distribution
with the flavors A, B and C.
A subproject is easily understood: it's an organisational structure.
Basically, it's a group of people working on a subset of Debian. They
coordinate via a web site
.
XYZ is a Debian subproject
that produces a Custom Debian Distribution
with the flavors A, B and C.
Right.
Your other posts seems well informed. Subprojects is already defined
for us (see http://www.debian.org/devel/ for an example of one
place). Debian-NP is clearly
On December 1, 2003 07:05 pm, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:33:57PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
- GNU ERP software project ?name?
GNU Enterprise (gnue) http://www.gnue.org/
I've just learnt of Cubit from South Africa: http://www.cubit.co.za/
Is it free software? They
Custom
Distribution BOF (see
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-nonprofit/News/2003/20030717) are
listening, perhaps you could elaborate? (Cc'ing Mako Hill since he was
referenced as one of the driving forces behind the meeting.)
hm, I've added a definition to the wiki:
A Custom Debian
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
hm, I've added a definition to the wiki:
A Custom Debian Distribution (CDD) is a version of Debian that is tailored
I do not like the term version. I'd prefer a subset of Debian. You
get a CDD together with main but you get a helping hand to cope
postings to this list:
Debian is the super-project.
XYZ is a Debian subproject
that produces a Custom Debian Distribution
with the flavors A, B and C.
Right.
I think this terminology is now pretty well defined. I think the above
is clear.
Your other
, I've added a definition to the wiki:
A Custom Debian Distribution (CDD) is a version of Debian that is tailored
for a particular situation/target group out-of-the-box.
Any changes necessary to Debian to support this particular situation/target
group arge merged back
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
? It might help you registering a site under www.debian.org (once its
services are up again.
Cool. I'll check it out in a day or five :)
If you are interested I could send you my CDD - talk stuff in private mail
until people.d.o is up again.
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:05:29AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
- GNU ERP software project ?name?
GNU Enterprise (gnue) http://www.gnue.org/
I've just learnt of Cubit from South Africa: http://www.cubit.co.za/
...and of the Impi distribution from South Africa, Debian-based:
Welcome to
and
debian-enterprise web pages...
cheers
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/ * PGP Key: http://soulsound.net/zen.asc
* Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.
David B Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I think I have the structure to make this work. I'm
writing now, should have something for you later today.
Sorry, yeah. I should instead have said *their*
company, not any one company. The company they buy
their hardware and support from. In my
to website.
Zenaan
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/ * PGP Key: http://soulsound.net/zen.asc
* Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.
Hello Töns,
we are trying to get the Siemens ServerView ported to debian.
After I read your message. I think you may have contact to FSC?
Or may be this software is already ported?
Do you have some more information for me?
Thank you in advance
best regards
Alex
Toens Bueker schrieb:
David B Harris
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:53:19AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 07:31, David B Harris wrote:
who run it, as is so often the case these days. I can't count the number
of times I've heard horror stories from HP customers (and other vendors
as well) about
might be important 1st step
- red hat stuff - eg. open carpet (ala red carpet)?
LEVERAGE
- base our initial kernels on the RHE kernels...
Regards
Zenaan
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/ * PGP Key: http
feels that people will percieve it as an official FSF project
if the GNU comes first. This came as something of a surprise.
Thanks
Bruce
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
This is a brief followup to my earlier queries regarding
debian-enterprise sub project - the new term being Custom Debian
Distribution
(to be implemented,
but proposed some time back)
As I said: At least other people who use the meta package approach inside
Debian use the term Custom Debian Distribution ...
- website, support forum?, lists, irc, wiki
See above.
In general I like your approach. You might have a look at
http
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:45:35 -0800
Bruce Perens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still negotiating with the large industry group that approached me
about this project. When the price tag is north of $1M, it takes time.
If that works out, they would fund 3-5 engineers full-time, plus myself
and
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:43:21AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
- GNU ERP software project ?name?
GNU Enterprise (gnue) http://www.gnue.org/
--
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
pgppwhG5wx4GS.pgp
approach inside
Debian use the term Custom Debian Distribution ...
Sorry, I should have updated that line.
I have decided upon the term Custom Debian Distribution for all my own
references. (Note that most other references in [my personal +
debian-enterprise] web pages, the email Subject: and my
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 03:31:29PM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
(Why does money always need to get involved?)
I think people start burnin' cars and shit if they don't have something
to do all day.
Okay, that sort of turned into a rant :) I do apologise, but I'd
desperately like to help
according to its charter) officially endorse anything that it does not
have an official agreement with.
Apologies to whomever I might be simply restating the obvious.
cheers
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net
David B Harris wrote:
(I don't know if you're subscribed to debian-devel@lists.debian.org, so
I am resending this mail here.
It's best to copy me on things you want me to read. Also note that mail
that doesn't have my address in the To: or Cc: field won't go to my main
inbox and is usually
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/ * PGP Key: http://soulsound.net/zen.asc
* Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.
in Debian.
Of course. Good point to clarify too.
Regards
Zenaan
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/ * PGP Key: http://soulsound.net/zen.asc
* Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:33:57PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
- GNU ERP software project ?name?
GNU Enterprise (gnue) http://www.gnue.org/
I've just learnt of Cubit from South Africa: http://www.cubit.co.za/
Ciao,
Enrico
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:53:02 -0800
Bruce Perens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you still on good terms with some people at HP?
Yes. Has anyone discussed this with Bdale?
He hasn't participated in the thread yet.
I wouldn't mind getting paid well for the work
I do, but that's a rarity. (Why
On 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
- debconf package configurations (with enterprise defaults)
To me this is still the largest hurdle, having to work around packages
that don't yet use debconf, and not easily being able to take a debconf
snapshot and apply it to another host. Being able to
the infrastructure enables and supports them imho.
Perhaps it really is getting to a good time to start a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list
(custom debian distributions) for all such topics ??
cheers
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net
95 matches
Mail list logo
