On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 7:00 PM Javeed Ahmed wrote:
> can i make my own os using debian as a base and distribute it?
Yes, but you can also join the Debian project and help us improve the
Debian operating system for your use-cases.
Would you like to share your plans for how you want to change th
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:44 AM Kyle Edwards
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 10:22 +, Javeed Ahmed wrote:
> > sir/madam
> > can i make my own os using debian as a base and distribute it?
>
> Absolutely! Debian is free software, and you are free to use, modify,
> and distribute it for any pur
On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 10:22 +, Javeed Ahmed wrote:
> sir/madam
> can i make my own os using debian as a base and distribute it?
Absolutely! Debian is free software, and you are free to use, modify,
and distribute it for any purpose. Please make sure to follow the rules
of each package's licen
sir/madamcan i make my own os using debian as a base and distribute it?
Hi.
Le mercredi 01 septembre 2010 à 17:40 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton a écrit :
> i leave you with this: the idea of the "Freedom Box" caused quite a
> stir at debconf2010, but i honestly doubt that, without any experience
> of getting *yourselves* off of the client-server paradigm, there
Hi.
Le mercredi 01 septembre 2010 à 17:40 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton a écrit :
>
> * again: ikiwiki or something similar could well be used as the basis
> for a distributed bugtracker.
>
I'd suggest you have a look at the SD tool and the incoming debbugs
support for it developped by C
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Oscar Morante wrote:
> Have you seen this project [1]? It looks like they have been already
> thinking about the git+bittorrent idea.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/gittorrent/
yes. it's effectively shelved. the name "gittorrent" was abandoned
and the name "mi
Have you seen this project [1]? It looks like they have been already
thinking about the git+bittorrent idea.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/gittorrent/
--
Oscar Morante
"Self-education is, I firmly believe, the only kind of education there is."
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> Just - Wow... thanks!
>
> Hopefully digesting of this tasty post would not cause too much of farting ;-)
:)
> seems might be worth adding (if I am not missing the point), then the
> concept of "derivatives" would then converge finally
Just - Wow... thanks!
Hopefully digesting of this tasty post would not cause too much of farting ;-)
seems might be worth adding (if I am not missing the point), then the
concept of "derivatives" would then converge finally to a more
digestible, more manageable, and thus more robust mechanism o
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:24:55AM -0800, May Hwang wrote:
> Dear Margarita,
>
> Can you resend Sean's email because I didn't receive his email?
>
> Up to this point, we are offering binary package based on customer request,
> because binary driver package only support one specific kernel version
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: HighPoint- GPL Licensed Controller wants To be Include In
Debian Distribution
Hi May Hwang!
On Jan 28, 2008 2:59 PM, May Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tem integrators still have to go
> through driver compilation in every installation process. Therefore, our
> Debian customers request HighPoint must work with Debian developer to
> include our linux drivers into the latest Debian Distribution. HighPoint is
> always looking ways to provide
l have to go
> through driver compilation in every installation process. Therefore, our
> Debian customers request HighPoint must work with Debian developer to
> include our linux drivers into the latest Debian Distribution. HighPoint is
> always looking ways to provide friendly use experien
kernel version yet so our Debian system integrators still have to go
through driver compilation in every installation process. Therefore, our
Debian customers request HighPoint must work with Debian developer to
include our linux drivers into the latest Debian Distribution. HighPoint is
always looking
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:50:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I had considered releasing an extra-light version as well but it
surely you mean "lite" ?
;-)
Regards,
Paddy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:11:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I came up with nothing on Google for stem linux., and DeliLinux
> looks to be turkish so I don't know if we would even be to
> communicate. I should try talking with them, their desktop looks
> pretty nice. I have already d
Quoting Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You appear to be conflating a few different things here.
Yes, the initial statement was intended to be separate from the
paragraph after.
As far as the set that's appropriate for medium-memory users, that's
really a user specific thing; what c
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why does the Debian distribution need so many applications?
Because the people who use Debian need different sets of applications.
> It doesn't, it is nice to have them available though. It may depend
> upon one perception of sl
Why does the Debian distribution need so many applications? It
doesn't, it is nice to have them available though.
It may depend upon one perception of sluggish. I find Fedora's Gnome
desktop to be sluggish on an ATHLON 2000 XP. I tried Ubuntu with XFCE
and while the desktop l
d, I am aiming for PII & PIII.
My wife is happily running Debian (sarge) and GNOME on a laptop with a
Pentium II processor (and 192 MB RAM). Why do you think a custom Debian
distribution is necessary for this class of system? (Perhaps RAM is
more of a constraint than processor speed?) Have the
I had considered releasing an extra-light version as well but it
seemed several other distros had that covered and it would be too much
to try to maintain too many different versions. Is it needed?
I suppose everyone has a different idea of what is functional as an
OS on older hardware. I h
I would expect a smaller package list would help in that respect.
But one of the issues people on debian-user have mentioned on low-memory
(and low cpu) hardware is the long wait for apt-get and friends to run
(if at all).
-Kev
[0] This machine has no floppy support, no network, no cdrom, no us
I came up with nothing on Google for stem linux., and DeliLinux
looks to be turkish so I don't know if we would even be to
communicate. I should try talking with them, their desktop looks
pretty nice. I have already done a bit of research on what
applications similar distributions are usin
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:03:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Let me explain to you the why I have decided to start the project. I
> have searched for a lightweight distribution and none of what is
> available has been what I wanted for one reason or another. I also
> have used IceWM
I do have this ability. I am lacking in the programming skills
needed for the packaging and bug fixing. I can read most code and make
some small changes, but my programming skills are mainly in C# and a
little Java. I know just enough C++ to be dangerous.
Quoting Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROT
If you do not know what applications are on which CD, or even what you
need it becomes a little more difficult. I am trying to make it a
little easier for these
persons. I just went through all of this trying to install IceWM on an
older machine, so I thought to try to make it a little easier
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly I do not think I have the
ability, patience, or time to be packaging software for Debian and dealing
with bugs I cannot correct.
What lets you assume you will have ability, patience, or time to maintain
a separate repository if you even d
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Picture installation from a dialup modem. to do this one has 2
> options. Option 1) Download all of the CD's, as the old machine does
> not have a dvd player.
People only need to download the first CD and as many additional CDs
as they feel like. The
Let me explain to you the why I have decided to start the project. I
have searched for a lightweight distribution and none of what is
available has been what I wanted for one reason or another. I also
have used IceWM on an older laptop for a while and like it. Debain has
most of what I nee
Let me explain to you the why I have decided to start the project. I
have searched for a lightweight distribution and none of what is
available has been what I wanted for one reason or another. Debain has
most of what I need for a desktop, but it trial and error to find what
works and some
I am hoping to get some outside developers involved as I know Debian
developers have there hands full. I am also hoping that some of the
Debian developers who can assist will do so. Honestly I do not think I
have the ability, patience, or time to be packaging software for
Debian and dealin
No, I do not want to create Damn Small Linux. This project has different
aims, one of which is to not be a livecd distribution since DSL and
Morphix have covered those bases nicely. An additional goal of the
project is to ensure that users of Debian have what they need should they
need or choose t
Hi, upfront: Bernd's earlier reply on DSL is probably the best advice.
Just in case that there is some misunderstanding
On Sunday 19 August 2007 19:55:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have recently started a project to create a custom Debian
> distribution DebIce which provides a d
Hi,
>
> I have recently started a project to create a custom Debian
> distribution DebIce which provides a desktop with very low hardware
> requirements. I would appreciate any advice you could give me
> regarding the following:
>
sounds like you want to create damn small linu
Hi,
I have recently started a project to create a custom Debian
distribution DebIce which provides a desktop with very low hardware
requirements. I would appreciate any advice you could give me
regarding the following:
1) Inclusion of software not currently available in the Debian
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:45:01AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IIRC, he sent an email out a few days ago saying that
> > http://planet.debian.net/ now serves most of the purpose of DWN.
> Unfortunately, at least for me, planet.debian.net cont
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IIRC, he sent an email out a few days ago saying that
> http://planet.debian.net/ now serves most of the purpose of DWN.
Unfortunately, at least for me, planet.debian.net contains an
aggregation of more than just debian-related blog entries.
planet.debia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/22/06 08:15, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:32:01AM -0400, ?? wrote:
>> HI,
>> I am a honest user of China, I love linux especially Debian distribution ,
>> I think Debian is the greatest linux distributi
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:32:01AM -0400, ?? wrote:
> HI,
> I am a honest user of China, I love linux especially Debian distribution ,
> I think Debian is the greatest linux distribution , but nowdays, the
> debian weekly news was not updated ,
> I think Debian will becom
HI,
I am an honest user of China, I love linux especially Debian distribution ,
I think Debian is the greatest linux distribution , but nowdays, the
debian weekly news was not updated ,
I think Debian will become more and more popular, since its feedom
and stability
I just want to know
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> > That's why I feeled obliged to add the remark that I greatly appreciate
> > the work of the SkoleLinux people and that they probably did more for
> > Debian than any CDD is out of any question.
>
> In the above sentence you seem to refer to Skolelinux as a CDD
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:00:05PM +0100, cobaco wrote:
> -> if you don't allow temporary solutions while low priority debconf
> question get included, than there currently are no CDD's as
> custom configuration is necessary to support a CDD's target group
> out-of-the-box.
Thi
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:07:14AM -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> > I've just learnt of Cubit from South Africa: http://www.cubit.co.za/
> Is it free software? They don't seem to provide a link to the full text of
> their license, it sounds free according to their license summary but I also
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 17:10, Tom wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:36:20AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > Then that discussion needs to be resolved so that a solution can be made
> > that is in Debian main.
>
> It's useful to try to clarify the terms so peo
ation is necessary to support a CDD's target group
out-of-the-box.
> I'm sorry, but I really have a hard time with this. A Custom Debian
> Distribution is nothing more than what is provided within Debian proper,
> as Andreas said. While a Debian subproject may consider a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 13:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> > On 2003-12-05 11:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > their fine work. I really love what they do and SkoleLinux is one of
> > > the most impressive derivatives of Debian, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 17:13, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:23:52AM -0600, cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2003-12-05 11:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > >Debian-Edu *is* a CDD because
> > > it is completely inside Debian and
> >
> > h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 16:48, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> > hm, as far as I know Debian-edu is nothing more then a couple of
> > task-packages at this point (and some education packages that got added
> > to the archive)
>
> I do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 16:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> > More importantly, Skolelinux has done more than almost any CDD in
> > terms of contributing back to Debian in both code and in
> > methodology. Their method of s
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:23:52AM -0600, cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2003-12-05 11:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Well, at least for my understanding SkoleLinux is not a "Custom Debian
> > Distribution" exactly because they have packages which are not int
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:36:20AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Then that discussion needs to be resolved so that a solution can be made
> that is in Debian main.
It's useful to try to clarify the terms so people can speak the same
language, but as soon as you categorize anything somebody's go
ale for both single users and the system as a whole.
Then that discussion needs to be resolved so that a solution can be made
that is in Debian main.
I'm sorry, but I really have a hard time with this. A Custom Debian
Distribution is nothing more than what is provided within Debian proper
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> hm, as far as I know Debian-edu is nothing more then a couple of
> task-packages at this point (and some education packages that got added to
> the archive)
I do not compare the quality of Debian-Edu or SkoleLinux - I just want to
use the right term. Yes, Skole
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> I will personally move forward with this as soon as I get access to
> CVS.
Thanks. This would be much appreciated.
> Andreas, perhaps you missed this message:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200309/msg00
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:16:56AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Please see my previous mail and try to accept that while absolutely
> incomplete the common entry point for CDDs is:
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/
>
> under the topic "Projects".
Right, this page is (1) out of date and (
(which may provide) CDD "Flavours" on/after install
If there is a need for other terms (eg. metadistro, whatever), please
speak up/ add them in now if you are so inclined - carpe diem as they
say.
cheers
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
with
> > the relevant maintainer about merging locale-config-skolelinux,
> > language-env, and the different user-language packages, with the hope
> > of eventually creating one package to set the default locale for both
> > single users and the system as a whole.
>
> Wel
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> On 2003-12-05 11:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > their fine work. I really love what they do and SkoleLinux is one of the
> > most impressive derivatives of Debian, but it just does not (yet) fall
> > under our definition.]
>
> huh ?! How do you figure that?
Pleas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 11:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
> their fine work. I really love what they do and SkoleLinux is one of the
> most impressive derivatives of Debian, but it just does not (yet) fall
> under our definition.]
huh ?! How do you figure that?
Sko
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> hm, here are the names I can remember:
>
> Petter , me, (Kurt Gramlich, Maximillian Wilhelm, Frank Matthieß -> not on
> devel as far as I know) from Skolelinux
>
> Mako, Enrico who organized the meeting
>
> David Martinez (I think), and one or two others from Me
s, with the hope of eventually creating one package to
> set the default locale for both single users and the system as a whole.
Well, at least for my understanding SkoleLinux is not a "Custom Debian
Distribution"
exactly because they have packages which are not integrated in Deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-03 21:58, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> > hm, I've added a definition to the wiki:
> >
> > A Custom Debian Distribution (CDD) is a version of Debian that is
> > tailored
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-04 10:41, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> > Can you say who the flavors people, the metadistros people and the
> > subproject people were? I'd like to make contact with all of these to
> > get more detail
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> Can you say who the flavors people, the metadistros people and the
> subproject people were? I'd like to make contact with all of these to
> get more details about their respective projects and their view on this.
Here on debian-devel. (Can you hear me
o's location on debian.org, with a note on the wiki that new
additions/ comments can be added to the wiki, to be further incorporated
into the HOWTO at a later date. Better to reduce duplication in this way
I think...
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debi
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 16:02, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> If you apt-get install the subproject-howto you will get something
> talking *only* about creating a custom Debian-distribution -- not
> about creating a subproject for any other sort of work. The folks at
> the BOF saw a
profit/News/2003/20030717) are
> > listening, perhaps you could elaborate? (Cc'ing Mako Hill since he was
> > referenced as one of the driving forces behind the meeting.)
>
> hm, I've added a definition to the wiki:
>
> A Custom Debian Distribution (CDD) is a ver
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> hm, I've added a definition to the wiki:
>
> A Custom Debian Distribution (CDD) is a version of Debian that is tailored
I do not like the term "version". I'd prefer a "subset of Debian". You
get a CDD together with
m can be correctly understood if you
> > present it as I have in some recent postings to this list:
> >
> > Debian is the super-project.
> > XYZ is a Debian subproject
> > that produces a Custom Debian Distribution
> > with the flavo
as one of the driving forces behind the meeting.)
hm, I've added a definition to the wiki:
A Custom Debian Distribution (CDD) is a version of Debian that is tailored
for a particular situation/target group out-of-the-box.
Any changes necessary to Debian to support this particular s
On December 1, 2003 07:05 pm, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:33:57PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> > > - GNU ERP software project ?name?
> >
> > GNU Enterprise (gnue) http://www.gnue.org/
>
> I've just learnt of Cubit from South Africa: http://www.cubit.co.za/
Is it free softwa
>
> Debian is the super-project.
> XYZ is a Debian subproject
> that produces a Custom Debian Distribution
> with the flavors A, B and C.
Right.
Your other posts seems well informed. Subprojects is already defined
for us (see http://www.debian.org/de
the super-project.
> XYZ is a Debian subproject
> that produces a Custom Debian Distribution
> with the flavors A, B and C.
>
> A subproject is easily understood: it's an organisational structure.
> Basically, it's a group of people working on a
tly understood if you
present it as I have in some recent postings to this list:
Debian is the super-project.
XYZ is a Debian subproject
that produces a Custom Debian Distribution
with the flavors A, B and C.
A subproject is easily understood: it's an organisat
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:53:19AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 07:31, David B Harris wrote:
> > who run it, as is so often the case these days. I can't count the number
> > of times I've heard horror stories from HP customers (and other vendors
> > as well) about
Hello Töns,
we are trying to get the Siemens ServerView ported to debian.
After I read your message. I think you may have contact to FSC?
Or may be this software is already ported?
Do you have some more information for me?
Thank you in advance
best regards
Alex
Toens Bueker schrieb:
David B Harris
www.cubit.co.za/
Thank you very much. Added to website.
Zenaan
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/ * PGP Key: http://soulsound.net/zen.asc
* Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And I think I have the structure to make this work. I'm
>> writing now, should have something for you later today.
>
> Sorry, yeah. I should instead have said "*their*
> company", not any one company. The company they buy
> their hardware and support f
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for the references. Will add them to CDD WIKI and
debian-enterprise web pages...
cheers
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/ * PGP Key: http://soulsound.net/zen.asc
* Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:05:29AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > - GNU ERP software project ?name?
> > GNU Enterprise (gnue) http://www.gnue.org/
> I've just learnt of Cubit from South Africa: http://www.cubit.co.za/
...and of the Impi distribution from South Africa, Debian-based:
Welcome
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > ? It might help you registering a site under www.debian.org (once its
> > services are up again.
>
> Cool. I'll check it out in a day or five :)
If you are interested I could send you my CDD - talk stuff in private mail
until people.d.o is up again.
interest
to contribute?
> Building live CDs and non-interactive installs are relatively
> straightforward, but will remain a hack and a maintainer nightmare until
> the infrastructure enables and supports them imho.
Perhaps it really is getting to a good time to start a [EMAIL PROTECT
On 2 Dec 2003, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> - debconf package configurations (with "enterprise" defaults)
To me this is still the largest hurdle, having to work around packages
that don't yet use debconf, and not easily being able to take a debconf
snapshot and apply it to another host. Being able t
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:53:02 -0800
Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Are you still on good terms with some people at HP?
> >
> Yes. Has anyone discussed this with Bdale?
He hasn't participated in the thread yet.
> >I wouldn't mind getting paid well for the work
> >I do, but that's a rari
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:33:57PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> > - GNU ERP software project ?name?
> GNU Enterprise (gnue) http://www.gnue.org/
I've just learnt of Cubit from South Africa: http://www.cubit.co.za/
Ciao,
Enrico
l of the various
> entities that would participate in Debian.
Of course. Good point to clarify too.
Regards
Zenaan
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/ * PGP Key: http://soulsound.net/zen.asc
* Please res
nscious sorry
states of living that are a complete crock.
Now _I'm_ really ranting (and seriously, nothing personal in the
slightest).
Self-responsibility; intelligence; ability. If you've got it, make good
use of it, and Do Good Things (TM).
cheers
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org/
* Homepage: http://soulsound.net/ * PGP Key: http://soulsound.net/zen.asc
* Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.
David B Harris wrote:
(I don't know if you're subscribed to debian-devel@lists.debian.org, so
I am resending this mail here.
It's best to copy me on things you want me to read. Also note that mail
that doesn't have my address in the To: or Cc: field won't go to my main
inbox and is usually discar
F to (or the FSF simply can't, perhaps
according to its charter) officially endorse anything that it does not
have an official agreement with.
Apologies to whomever I might be simply restating the obvious.
cheers
zen
--
Debian Enterprise: A Custom Debian Distribution: http://debian-enterprise.org
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 03:31:29PM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> (Why does money always need to get involved?)
I think people start burnin' cars and shit if they don't have something
to do all day.
> Okay, that sort of turned into a rant :) I do apologise, but I'd
> desperately like to help
d some time back)
> As I said: At least other people who use the meta package approach inside
> Debian use the term "Custom Debian Distribution" ...
Sorry, I should have updated that line.
I have decided upon the term Custom Debian Distribution for all my own
references. (Note that m
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:43:21AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> - GNU ERP software project ?name?
GNU Enterprise (gnue) http://www.gnue.org/
--
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
pgppwhG5wx4GS.pgp
Des
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:45:35 -0800
Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am still negotiating with the large industry group that approached me
> about this project. When the price tag is north of $1M, it takes time.
> If that works out, they would fund 3-5 engineers full-time, plus myself
t; - meta/ task packages - Debian FLAVOURS (to be implemented,
>but proposed some time back)
As I said: At least other people who use the meta package approach inside
Debian use the term "Custom Debian Distribution" ...
> - website, support forum?, lists, irc, wiki
See abo
- he feels that people will percieve it as an official FSF project
if the GNU comes first. This came as something of a surprise.
Thanks
Bruce
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
This is a brief followup to my earlier queries regarding
debian-enterprise sub project - the new term being Custom D
tion with LDP
- write a manual (debian admin guide additional chapters) and have it
printed and distributed in bookstores
COLLABORATION
- GNU ERP software project ?name?
- I think working with the RHE Fedora project might be important 1st step
- red hat stuff - eg. open carpet (ala red carpet
97 matches
Mail list logo
