On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 12:14 -0300, elementar wrote:
> Where do I find kFreeBSD-amd64 isos, from testing or unstable?
>
> Em sex, 12 de abr de 2019 17:49, Joerg Jaspert
> escreveu:
> > Hi
> >
> > back in August 2018 we discussed architecture inclusion into
> > unstable/experimental.
> >
> >
Where do I find kFreeBSD-amd64 isos, from testing or unstable?
Em sex, 12 de abr de 2019 17:49, Joerg Jaspert escreveu:
> Hi
>
> back in August 2018 we discussed architecture inclusion into
> unstable/experimental.
>
> Today we had our regular FTPMaster meeting and discussed hurd and both
>
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As
> hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that all the 3 architectures
> have now been moved.
I removed kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386 from ftp-master's unstable and
experimental suites yesterday. The
On 5/26/19 1:22 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> [SN: Trimmed Cc list]
>
> Hi John
My name is Adrian. Thanks.
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 06:48:36AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Could you PLEASE stop posting to debian-ports@? You are sending these mails
>> to every Debian Ports
[SN: Trimmed Cc list]
Hi John
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 06:48:36AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Could you PLEASE stop posting to debian-ports@? You are sending these mails
> to every Debian Ports architecture mailing list.
Please stop shouting. Please fix your MUA to produce
Aurelien Jarno
>> Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2019 4:56 PM
>> To: debian-h...@lists.debian.org; debian-...@lists.debian.org; debian-
>> de...@lists.debian.org; debian-po...@lists.debian.org; ftpmaster@ports-
>> master.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} re
: Aurelien Jarno
> Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2019 4:56 PM
> To: debian-h...@lists.debian.org; debian-...@lists.debian.org; debian-
> de...@lists.debian.org; debian-po...@lists.debian.org; ftpmaster@ports-
> master.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal
&g
On 15413 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Thats ok, end of May is a nice point to take.
Thanks for the work and the timeframe for the rest!
kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As
hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that all the 3 architectures
have now
On 2019-05-25 13:00, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Em sáb, 25 de mai de 2019 às 10:57, Aurelien Jarno
> escreveu:
> >
> > kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As
> > hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that all the 3 architectures
> > have
On 5/25/19 1:00 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Not sure who's the admin (I couldn't find the admin address in the
> main pages), but they're not registered in the graphs (while
> powerpcpse, recently removed, still is).
Could you please not use debian-ports@ unless you actually want to
Hi,
Em sáb, 25 de mai de 2019 às 10:57, Aurelien Jarno
escreveu:
>
> kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As
> hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that all the 3 architectures
> have now been moved.
Nice :-)
Not sure who's the admin (I couldn't find the
Hi,
On 2019-04-24 12:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15381 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > > > It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that.
> > > Ok. How much? Is 6 or 8 weeks better? I don't think, given how long this
> > > is on the table already, it doesn't make
On 15381 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that.
Ok. How much? Is 6 or 8 weeks better? I don't think, given how long this
is on the table already, it doesn't make much difference if its 2 or 8.
Just something thats clear defined
On 2019-04-13 17:01, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15371 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > > How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
> > > time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
>
> > The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
>
Jonathan Carter, le lun. 22 avril 2019 21:42:33 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 2019/04/22 20:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > So I could produce some hurd CD images with the archive from this
> > week-end. Aurélien injected the hurd-i386 archive to debian-ports, and
> > we got the buildds running. Various
On 2019/04/22 20:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> So I could produce some hurd CD images with the archive from this
> week-end. Aurélien injected the hurd-i386 archive to debian-ports, and
> we got the buildds running. Various scripts will start breaking but at
> least package building will continue
Hello,
Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 12:16:54 +0200, a ecrit:
> Holger Levsen, le sam. 13 avril 2019 09:50:25 +, a ecrit:
> > I can see how the ftpteam doesnt want to delay this *after* the Buster
> > release,
>
> Ok, if it can't be after Buster releases because e.g. ftpmaster wants
On 13.04.19 17:01, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15371 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>>> How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
>>> time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
>
>> The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
>> deb,
Aurelien Jarno, le dim. 14 avril 2019 16:08:20 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 2019-04-12 23:01, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
> > time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
>
> Note that there is no need for the removed architectures
On 2019-04-12 23:01, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
> time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
Note that there is no need for the removed architectures to be hosted on
debian-ports, especially if you are not
Hello!
Just as a heads-up: Sending mail to debian-ports@l.d.o ends up sending
the mail to debian-alpha@, debian-hppa@, debian-ia64@, ... simultaneously,
so it would be better to avoid using this address in the discussion.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian
On 15371 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and
On 2019-04-13 13:07, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 4/13/2019 12:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
> > deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and debug) and
> > associate them with the .changes files that are hosted on
On 4/13/2019 12:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
> deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and debug) and
> associate them with the .changes files that are hosted on coccia. We'll
> also need to fetch all the
Carsten Schoenert, le sam. 13 avril 2019 12:41:25 +0200, a ecrit:
> Am 13.04.19 um 12:06 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> >> Both architectures haven't seen any major development in the past years
> >
> > They have.
>
> O.k. need to be more specific, so the same as you mentioned further
> down, ..."in
On 2019-04-12 23:01, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 22:48:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> > back in August 2018 we discussed architecture inclusion into
> > unstable/experimental.
> >
> > Today we had our regular FTPMaster meeting and discussed hurd and both
> >
Svante Signell, le sam. 13 avril 2019 12:36:54 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 12:18 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > He rightfully means he does not want patches, but patches getting
> > submitted upstream, so he does not have to maintain them. A Debian
> > package maintainer is not
Samuel,
Am 13.04.19 um 12:06 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>> I can't follow that style of discussion.
>
> Please don't, Svante is only trolling here, please don't feed him.
yes, this is true. As you've answered in your other email, such emails
bringing no real gain or progress.
>> I haven't seen a
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 12:18 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> He rightfully means he does not want patches, but patches getting
> submitted upstream, so he does not have to maintain them. A Debian
> package maintainer is not supposed to maintain patches long-term.
Then the question of which
Svante Signell, le sam. 13 avril 2019 12:13:41 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 11:51 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> > So I disagree on "One person is enough" as long this one person can
> > not keep track on all the required main and corner cases so other
> > maintainers get to do the
Holger Levsen, le sam. 13 avril 2019 09:50:25 +, a ecrit:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:31:46AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 00:11:15 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:30:31 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > > It seems to exist there,
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 11:51 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Am 13.04.19 um 11:15 schrieb Svante Signell:
>
> > Please give up on Debian. They clearly have no interest in anything
> > non-linux or non-systemd, that is fully clear. Let's make a joint
> > effort to make a Guix release of Hurd (and
Carsten Schoenert, le sam. 13 avril 2019 11:51:51 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Please give up on Debian. They clearly have no interest in anything
> > non-linux or non-systemd, that is fully clear. Let's make a joint
> > effort to make a Guix release of Hurd (and kFreeBSD) happen. Or, if you
> > still want
Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 11:57:20 +0200, a ecrit:
> That kind of mail is useless.
I actually meant: it is also harmful.
Samuel
That kind of mail is useless.
Samuel
Am 13.04.19 um 11:15 schrieb Svante Signell:
> Please give up on Debian. They clearly have no interest in anything
> non-linux or non-systemd, that is fully clear. Let's make a joint
> effort to make a Guix release of Hurd (and kFreeBSD) happen. Or, if you
> still want to continue using apt-style
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:31:46AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 00:11:15 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:30:31 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and
> > > is interested in
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 10:58 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert, le sam. 13 avril 2019 10:24:53 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On 15371 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
>
> Well, it's very odd that a team decision is suddenly made with a
> two-week effect without asking whether the schedule
Joerg Jaspert, le sam. 13 avril 2019 10:24:53 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 15371 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > > > It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and
> > > > is interested in hurd-i386 goes and uploads stuff.
> > > Within a two-week timeframe only?
> > (while
On 15371 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and
> is interested in hurd-i386 goes and uploads stuff.
Within a two-week timeframe only?
(while everybody is supposed to be busy fixing RC bugs)
I just jumped over old threads -
Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 00:11:15 +0200, a ecrit:
> Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:30:31 +0200, a ecrit:
> > It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and
> > is interested in hurd-i386 goes and uploads stuff.
>
> Within a two-week timeframe only?
Bernd Zeimetz, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:32:32 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 4/12/19 11:21 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Time will. I will have time later, but that'll be after the Buster
> > release, i.e. a *way* less coherent set of packages since a flurry
> > of package updates will happen, thus less
Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:30:31 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 15370 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > > Today we had our regular FTPMaster meeting and discussed hurd and both
> > > kfreebsd architecture and decided to remove them from unstable and
> > > experimental 2 weeks from now.
On 4/12/19 11:21 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Time will. I will have time later, but that'll be after the Buster
> release, i.e. a *way* less coherent set of packages since a flurry
> of package updates will happen, thus less usable, if installable at
> all. The only alternative I have is to
On 15370 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Today we had our regular FTPMaster meeting and discussed hurd and both
kfreebsd architecture and decided to remove them from unstable and
experimental 2 weeks from now.
Just before the Buster release? That's far from the easiest timing.
There is
Bernd Zeimetz, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:14:10 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 4/12/19 11:01 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I was hoping to do a non-official relase of Debian Hurd along Buster as
> > usual, but a change of archive, which means uploading packages, fixing
> > scripts, etc. will take a lot of
On 4/12/19 11:01 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I was hoping to do a non-official relase of Debian Hurd along Buster as
> usual, but a change of archive, which means uploading packages, fixing
> scripts, etc. will take a lot of time, which I simply just will not have
> within the coming two-three
Hello,
Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 22:48:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> back in August 2018 we discussed architecture inclusion into
> unstable/experimental.
>
> Today we had our regular FTPMaster meeting and discussed hurd and both
> kfreebsd architecture and decided to remove them from unstable
48 matches
Mail list logo
