Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
I'm working on it. But even if I get it to compile with Debian
sources, we still would need another soname for this.
I was going to respond to your earlier message(s), but I see you're
ahead of me. Ok, for now, I'm just going to assume that you will work
this all out
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 08:23:04PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
I'm working on it. But even if I get it to compile with Debian
sources, we still would need another soname for this.
I was going to respond to your earlier message(s), but I see you're
ahead of me.
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 04:21:05PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
anything more with it), but it seems to require gtk-- and gtk1.1, and
the two don't seem to work together at this point.
I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
'Bout what I figured, but wouldn't it be possible to produce two
versions which conflict? Not a perfect solution, but it would make it
possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
stuff to do so. The
Chris == Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chris Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see any way of
Chris using gtk-- with gnome at the moment. I was going to try
Chris packaging gnome-hack (for my own use -- I'd want to check
Chris with the nethack maintainer before
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version
of gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on this?
Not really
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version
of gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on this?
Not really possible
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Mmmh. I just checked. The reason why gtk-- is currently w/o gnome support
is, because I never installed libgnome-dev I think. I'm just doing it now
and will recompile gtk-- (or better: I'll try to compile gtk-- 0.9.17) with
gnome support.
Any
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 04:45:35PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Gnome support requires Gtk 1.1 from CVS, so if you want a 1.0-based
version you have to build it separately from the Gnome version.
Mmmh. I mailed to the gtk-- mailing list for
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
anything more with it), but it seems to require gtk-- and gtk1.1, and
the two don't seem to work together at this point.
I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version of
gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version
of gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on this?
Not really possible without hacking Gtk-- (which can be done, but
it's work). Gtk-- can be
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
'Bout what I figured, but wouldn't it be possible to produce two
versions which conflict? Not a perfect solution, but it would make it
possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
stuff to do so. The conflicts could be
12 matches
Mail list logo
