On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:29:29PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > There are some good suggestions in your proposal, e.g. you suggest to
> > check whether the build dependencies are fulfilled. The lack of checking
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
>...
> That could be done either by a rebuild, or, less costly, by a simple
> unpack/edit-changelog/repack.
Repacking breaks with every
Depends: somepackage (= ${Source-Version})
> In that case, if we had libfoo0_1.0-1 in pre-testing,
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 04:10:56PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>...
> > * it isn't consistent in all respects; e.g. although the package
> > dependencies might have been fulfilled, it contained for some time a
> > strange mixture of GNOME 1 and GNOME 2
>
> I'm pretty sure that was because of hi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:06:28PM -0700, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
>...
> I downloaded the source code and compiled Mozilla 1.6b
> myself. Unfortunately, the configure script required that I
> install libgtk1.2-dev, and no anti-aliasing joy whatsoever
> was apparent. I have been assuming that moz
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:04:05PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> if 'boot-loader' was not a real package (not sure if it requires a new
> catagory or if it fits under meta or virtual) and then when you did:
> apt-get install boot-loader
> it (dpkg or apt -- not sure) checked your ARCH and
severity 156227 grave
thanks
Hi Christopher,
please explain why you think that it's not RC that packages depending
libvorbis0 no longer run when upgrading libvorbis0 (the problem is similar
to the recent libc6 <-> db breakage that will be fixed by a dependency of
libc6 on libdb1-compat)?
Your lo
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.19 on a
Debian 2.2r7 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
The updated kernel packages contain a fix for a i386 DoS attack that
allows every user to crash the computer [2]. If you run older kernels
on a computer where y
Several packages in Debian depend on another package and symlink their
/usr/share/doc/ to the directory of this other package.
Section 13.5. of your policy says:
<-- snip -->
13.5. Copyright information
---
Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:27:42PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > In any case, binary modules are a fact of life I'm afraid.
>
> Bull. We are Debian, not fucking RedHat or Mandrake. We strive to
> exist without non-free software and using its existance as
> * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
> > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this
> > > error-msg:
> > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > /lib/libc.so.6:
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.4 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
The most important change in this release are the new kernel-* packages
(as always made by Herbert Xu) that include an important netfilter
security fix.
Changes
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Ben Burton wrote:
>...
> Of course there are no packages in Debian which use Gnome Basic either,
> since this is its first packaging.
You can compile gnumeric with support for Gnome Basic.
> Ben.
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sonde
On Tue, 1 May 2001, David Whedon wrote:
>...
> In that case it would be that fact that perl-base is 'priority required' that
> allows you to avoid a dependancy on perl rather than the fact that you are
> using
>...
It's not the 'priority required' but the "Essential: yes" of perl-base
that makes
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote:
> Just wanted to let people know that I'm going to hijack the
> pilot-manager package. The current maintainer seems to be completely
> MIA; he hasn't uploaded a version in over a year. I emailed him and
He seems to be MIA: How often did you try to contact
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.4 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: isdnutils
Binary packages:
o ipppd
o isdnactivecards
Hi,
it seems to be a trend that maintainers try to change their packages to be
Debian native. Policy says about native packages (in the chapter about
version numbering):
<-- snip -->
This part of the version number specifies the version of the
Debian package based on
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Herbert Xu wrote:
>...
> > the package not building with the changed kernel or not working after
> > being installed at x*1000 machines?
>
> What is better is a sane local header that works with all kernels.
I maintain util-linux that is a user space package that needs many k
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > I maintain util-linux that is a user space package that needs many kernel
> > headers (and the package in unstable compiles only with 2.4 kernel
> > headers). I do currently use the kernel haeaders libc6-dev ships. Would
> > it be the right solution to co
Hi,
I want to suggest to finish the FHS transition. This includes the
following steps:
- Packages with Standards-Version >= 3.0 must follow the FHS.
Policy version 3.0.0.0 was released 30 Jun 1999 and I consider this
enough time for every maintainer to switch to at least this
Standards-Vers
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ...
> >Oliver Elphick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) libpgsql
>
> This package is obsolete and should not be included in any release.
Please ask the ftp admins to remove the package from unstable (
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote:
> > I want to suggest to finish the FHS transition. This includes the
> > following steps:
>
> > - Packages with Standards-Version >= 3.0 must follow the FHS.
>
> Didn't we already have this discussion? The Standards-Version field
> is not a reliable indica
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:27:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Is there any reason why libggi2 from unstable is not in testing? All
> > architectures have now been compiled, being all present and up-to-date in
> > the pool, but update-excuses gives no
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > What do you suggest in my specific case with util-linux?
>
> Which specific program in util-linux and what specific headers?
>...
(I tried my best but I can't garuantee this is 100% complete...)
fdisk:
linux/unistd.h
linux/hdreg.h
linux/blkpg.h
linux/typ
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote:
> > > Didn't we already have this discussion? The Standards-Version field
> > > is not a reliable indication of much of anything. I strongly object
>
> > Policy says:
>
> "Policy says" doesn't make the packages comply. And you can file all
> the bugs repo
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
>...
> Standards-Versions aren't release critical. You can put it as
> "Standards-Version: 526.7.8.9.13-Foo.6" if you want. And no matter what
I will practice your suggestion and upload my packages with
"Standards-Version: 526.7.8.9.13-Foo.6".
> Standards
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > Package: gsfonts
> > Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 91489 Package gsfonts still has at least one file in /usr/doc
>
> Package is ready so far and instal
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
>...
> There are four ports, any of which may want to try for a woody release:
> hurd-i386, mips, hppa and ia64. If they do, they need to ensure that
>...
I did perhaps only miss it: You did post some weeks ago a list how much
each architecture is keeping
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>...
> Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a O:
>...
s/ITO/RFA/
(Request for adoption)
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwie
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I did perhaps only miss it: You did post some weeks ago a list how much
> > each architecture is keeping up with unstable (how many % of the packages
> > in unstable are compiled on this architecture). Is
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-09
Severity: normal
I offer gv (and if you want xaw3dg, too) for someone who has more
knowledge in both gs and C to fix some of the bugs (upstream is dead
since four years).
I do not intend to give this package to the first one who says "I want to
ado
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> I'm unable to find out why this command actuall doesn't work :
>
> mpg123 -s audio/01_Birdland.mp3 | sox -r 44100 -s -w -c2 - \
> audio/01_Birdland.wav
>
>
> The idea is basically to convert a .mp3 to a .wav
>
> Has anyone a hint ?
What does this
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > tag 126700 + fixed
> Bug#126700: tkstep8.0: never removes alternative
> Tags added: fixed
Why on earth do you make a NMU for my package less than 24 hours after the
original bug report and w
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
>...
> In fact, I would consider it acceptable in general to move everything in
> contrib to main as long as it each package was forced to be priority
> extra until it was suitable for general-purpose use as packaged in main
> (including any dependencie
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>...
> We actually need a Debian-wide (well, probably a LSB-wide) fix for the
> problem. The same kind of breakage is expected to hit us again and again
> until we do that.
This kind of problem does only occur if we ship several versions of a
Hi,
I had several discussions with people on Debian lists that became very
emotional. They thought that they were right in a discussion and I thought
that I was right and nothing but anger resulted from these discussions.
Several times the "opponents" in these discussions are people that are
longe
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > This kind of problem does only occur if we ship several versions of a
> > shared library at the same time (in this case libpng2 and libpng3). As
>
> Or if the user needs to have different versions of said library because of
> some closed-s
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:47:08PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Closed-source programs and libraries are not a problem if the library we
> > are talking about is copyrighted under the terms of the GPL (like libpng).
>
> My r
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > If every system had up-to-date, standards-conforming
> > ctype.h support, we wouldn't have to worry much at all.
> > But even these days, pretty many systems with buggy macros
> > are still in use.
>
> Then fix those systems. Pull the necessary stuff
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Egon Willighagen wrote:
>...
> That makes me wonder: is it possible that i am imagening things, and that the
> upgrade went well, even though my HD was full? Did it actually install files
> then, or did it not overwrite, because of the HD being full, and my files are
> basicall
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Adam Majer wrote:
> Hey, buddy!! I ITA those packages a while back - I'll be uploading them in
> the next day!!! PLEASE CHECK THE O LIST
> __BEFORE__ YOU RETITLE A BUG!
Hi Adam,
it seems you misunderstood what Uwe was doing: He did only add the package
descriptions to the WN
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The current excuse for 'fam' in
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz> is
>
> - fam (- to 2.6.6.1-4)
> * Maintainer: Joerg Wendland
> * 16 days old (needed 10 days)
> * fam/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: libstdc++3
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Joerg Wendland wrote:
>...
> > I do not understand the unsatisfiable depend error. The program was
> > successfully compiled on hppa. Is the problem gcc-3.0 >=
> > 3.0.3-0pre011214 missing in Woody? This seem to be a problem on arm
> > and m68k, and should not affect hppa, o
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, DvB wrote:
> I ran a search for dbf (xbase) packages in debian and came up with the
> 'dbf' package which is in non-free.
> If it's in non-free because of licensing issues with the Xbase format,
>...
If you lok at the copyright notice (debian/copyright in the source or
/usr/sh
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > Perhaps creating a new package, eg. 'mutt-reader' with no MTA dependency,
> > could solve this problem.
>
> Would the only difference between mutt and mutt-reader be that one
> dependency? If so, then it would be better, I think, to simply change
> "Dep
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.17 on a
Debian 2.2r4 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: kernel-image-2.4.17-i386
Binary packages:
o kernel-headers-2.4.17
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Additionally I see that you did other changes to unix/tkstepConfig.sh that
> > aren't even mentioned in the changelog!
>
> Here is the complete diff between what I uploaded, and what was in the
> archive. Dunno what change you're seeing in tkstepConfig.
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Yves Arrouye wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. Well, ICU is definitely not developed
> specifically for Debian, but since I am one of the upstream developers, I
> found it convenient to have the debian/ directory in it, not just for me but
> for anybody who would want to gra
On 7 Jan 2002, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:06:27AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> > -snip-
> > >
> > > Sounds good to fix all the current problems... however how are we
> > > going to handle the libpng2 -> libpng3 conversion ? Y
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, François Chenais wrote:
> Hello,
Hi François,
>...
> * i've downloaded the kernel-source-2.4.17 but I have an error in
> network.o
> when linking the kernel.
> I don't remember the exact error because I'm not actually using the good
> disk on my lapto
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Tille, Andreas wrote:
>...
> OK. If I understand this right that would mean that the control file
> would state
>
> Maintainer: Future Maintainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
no, the control field states:
Maintainer: My Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Where "My Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link
> > > with libpng3 ? Manual check ?
> >
> > Another possiblility is the following (only the new dependencies are
> > listed):
> >
> > Package: libqt2-dev
> > Conflicts: libpng3
> >
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Andreas,
>...
> have access to a sparc. Is there any description how to proceed
> for uploads of the same package for other architectures?
The "-B" option of dpkg-buildpackage does what you want to do.
If you don't have your GPG key on th
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > What? That means that you can't have a libpng3 program on a machine with
> > > libqt2-dev installed ... icky.
> >
> > Yes, but that's the only way I see to ensure that there aren't some ugly
> > problems like e.g.
>
> No, completely wrong. You want to k
On 9 Jan 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>...
> Is there an easy web page to point people at, where people could
> request sponsorship and sponsors could advertise their availability?
That's exactly what [1] is for (BTW: there's a link to this page from the
Developers' Corner [2]).
cu
Adrian
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:24:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [3] "tries to fix" means that he looks into the bug. I do expect a
> > maintainer to be able to fix a "missing build dependency on xyz" bug
> &
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Since the person who upload the package is not the maintainer, it is actually
> a
> non-maintainer upload, isn't it ?
No, the maintainer of the package is the person who gets sponsored (he's
the maintainer of this package although he isn't yet an
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:
>...
> qt-x11 is qt2, qt-x11-free is qt3. Chris has been busy getting Qt2 and
> KDE2.2 working fully before he turns his attention to Qt3 and KDE3. His
> hard drive just also died, so give him a little breathing room.
He should retitle the WNPP bug(s) to R
On 11 Jan 2002, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>...
> |giram (#96740), offered 247 days ago
> | Description: 3D modeller for POV-Ray
>
> Wasn't this one supposed to be removed from the archive if no one
> picked it up?
Why?
- the version currently in unstable does build
- there are no open bugs
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.17 on a
Debian 2.2r5 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes in this release:
+ fixed the bug that isdnutils erased /etc/services
if you were affected by this bug copy the file you can find
On 14 Jan 2002, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jérôme,
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
d
Hi,
I had a longer discussion with our release manager who said in this
discussion that there's no progress in the freeze of woody. We won't enter
the next stage of the freeze until the base and standard packages are in a
releasable state - and the number of RC bugs in these packages is
increasing
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Jules Bean wrote:
>...
> > officially frozen for several months but it's still possible for new
> > upstream versions of every package to enter testing.
>...
> I really don't feel in-touch with how the freeze is going, and I
> imagine that I'm not alone in that. For example, I
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Andreas,
> second call for help to compile MusixTex on all architectures:
>
> auric:~> madison musixtex
> musixtex | 1:0.98-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
> powerpc, sparc
> musixtex | 1:0.99-1 | testing |
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Brian Mays wrote:
> Lauri Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > pcmcia-modules for kernels 2.19 and 2.20 dont exist.
>
> A set of pcmcia-modules-2.2.20 packages do exist. I uploaded a new set
> of these packages yesterday to sid. As for the packages in woody, I
> have no
Hi Michael,
as I've already explained, the horrible hack in your NMU would affect
all packages using libfontconfig even though without a doubt the actual
bug is in your package (xpdf).
And as I've already said, abusing the fact that the maintainers seem to
be a bit inactive at the moment to fo
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> So to summarise: for many years the perl package has provided
> /usr/bin/rename, a stanalone utility implemented in perl. The issue is we
> don't want to provide the utility from the perl package any more because
> it's been a
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:14:17PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Thomas,
>...
> If possible, I'd like to make a survey of what kind of interpreter
> packages are using for /etc/init.d scripts. How can I do that? Note that
> this would make OpenRC maintainer's life more easy, and avoid ugl
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:08:39PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>...
> license-problem-nvidia-intellectual (1 packages, 1 tags)
>
> Huh, what a false hit, so not using this.
Actually seems to be a real hit, when you scroll to the bottom of
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/contr
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:13:30AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:08:39PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >...
> > license-problem-nvidia-intellectual (1 packages, 1 tags)
> >
> > Huh, what a false hit, so not using this.
>
> Actually seems
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:48:52AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
> > After ***forcing*** users to use libav instead of ffmpeg in debian
> > therefore making it to stuck with outdated fork istead of rapidly
> > developing original it's too late to talk about freedom..
>
> Gosh, we are not forc
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:21:02PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-13 20:37:47)
> > Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which
> > option (libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping both) will be best
> > for jessie based on
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Do you have a good idea how to avoid all the problems of mixing both
> > libraries while also creating a sufficient usage of the FFmpeg libraries
> > in a way that both libraries can be in testing at the same time, or are
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:16:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Paul Wise writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >> Having both sets of libraries in the archive at the same time is what I
> >> called "insane" in the RFP a
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 06:46:37PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 13.02.2014, 21:37 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which option
> > (libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping b
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-14 09:06:34)
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:16:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> Paul Wise writes:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
&
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 02:14:10AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> All of the bugs have been filed. Just under half have been
> fixed. Almost all the rest have tested patches. I'm going to start
> uploading 10-day delayed NMUs to try to close these out.
>
> If you have an issue with this please speak
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:02:59AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk (b...@stusta.de) wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 02:14:10AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > All of the bugs have been filed. Just under half have been
> > > fixed. Almost all the rest hav
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 02:56:23PM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many of packages include bundled Aladdin Enterprises independent
> implementation of md5. Full list can be seen at
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=typedef+unsigned+char+md5_byte_t&perpkg=1
> (100 packages)
>
> As discussed
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 09:34:59PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>...
> 1. Most licenses require copyright statements to be included.In the
> FTP
> team's view, unless a license explicitly states that copyright attributions
> only apply to source distributions, they apply for source an
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:30:23AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On October 31, 2018 3:59:42 AM UTC, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 09:34:59PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>...
> >> 1. Most licenses require copyright statements
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 02:40:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.11.18 11:26, Andy Simpkins wrote:
> >> So, again: which of the two flavors is the one that benefits more of our
> >> user
> >> base?
> >
> > BOTH are possible so why dictate only one?
> >
> > I would like to see OpenGLES ava
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 02:06:27PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>...
> Hmm, so I'm not sure this reflects the actual state of the art wrt dual Qt
> stacks as it existed in Ubuntu at the time Ubuntu Touch was sunsetted.
>...
Is there some rationale documented somewhere why this wasn't used in
Ubun
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:00:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > $ grep-dctrl -n -sSource:Package -FDepends \
> > -e
> > 'libqt5(gui|3drenderer|quick|quickparticles|quickwidgets|multimediawidgets)5[[:space:]]*(\(>=
> >
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:13:29AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 09:07:24AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > I believe that it was the case before that if the autoremoval was due a
> > specific RC bug, any activity on that specific bug would reset the timer
> > for autoremova
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:11:41PM +0100, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Michael Stone wrote on 07/03/2019:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:02:23PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>> I'm actually wondering if this is a good idea..
> >>>
> >>> There are lot of other packages installing cronjobs and people,
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 11:22:36AM +0100, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
Hi Paride,
> Adrian Bunk wrote on 08/03/2019:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:11:41PM +0100, Paride Legovini wrote:
>...
> >> Having a useless service running is itself a downside; I
> On Fri, 08 Mar 2019 at 10:24:28 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The output of "ls /etc/cron.daily" is not empty for me.
>
> That doesn't *necessarily* mean you need anacron, or even cron. Many
> cron jobs now have a corresponding systemd timer; if you are runni
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:22:12AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Simon McVittie writes:
>
> > anacron/cron don't have a built-in way to skip particular cron jobs
> > other than open-coding it in the cron job itself.
>
> Maybe we should just fix this? cron is effectively maintained by the
> distr
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:38:07PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 08:01:35PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > I intended to post a transition proposal here soon, but it's not ready
> > yet... but long story short: I believe we would be far better off moving
> > to cronie t
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:27:19PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 12:02:05AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:38:07PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 08:01:35PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> >
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 01:26:12PM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
>...
> (2) Dirty but useful non-free blobs, such as nvidia's cuDNN (CUDA Deep
> Neural Network) library, which dominates the field of high performance
> neural network training and inference. I really hate reading NVIDIA's
> non-free legal te
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:29:54PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>...
> As far as I understand your summary it would be even
> "burning" a student if we would throw theses packaging task on a
> student in a GSoC / outreachy project (I'm aware that we are usually
> not supporting packaging tasks in th
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 07:08:53AM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > How many percent of the paid GSoC and Outreachy student workers
> > continue unpaid afterwards and become a DM or DD?
> >
> > My impression is that GSoC does not have a high
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:38:22AM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Mo,
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:07:34PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > The work Mo spent on the already-outdated tensorflow package in
> > experimental was wasted if there is noone who con
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 03:04:12PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2019/04/17 13:08, Chris Lamb wrote:
> >> How many percent of the paid GSoC and Outreachy student workers
> >> continue unpaid afterwards and become a DM or DD?
> >>
> >> My impression is that GSoC does not have a high quota,
> >>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hey,
>
> the jessie-backports removal itself is a logical step and it’s good that it
> was done.
>
> That said, it complicates things a lot when backporting packages to Jessie.
> Usually, it’s fine to just pull $random extra library
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:38:26PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>...
> So let's pick compressors to enable. For compression ratio, xz still wins
> (at least among popular compressors). But there's a thing to say about
> zstd: firefox.deb zstd -19 takes to unpack:
> * 2.644s .xz, stock dpkg
> * 2.5
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 08:33:44AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>...
> Andreas Tille's explanation (quoted below) is typical of what I've heard
> in this area.
>
> >To come back
> >to the question: I'm positively convinced that we should strive to
> >unify our packaging as much as possible and in ter
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:08:21PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 22:22:32 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > In my experience, keeping existing packages at exotic build systems or
> > ancient dh compat levels causes fewer problems than people trying to
&g
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:30:11AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:22:32PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 08:33:44AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > >...
> > > Andreas Tille's explanation (quoted below) is typical of wh
201 - 300 of 664 matches
Mail list logo
