On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 17:57:21 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Unless I missed your point: It did work somewhat ok for tiff3/tiff4
> source packages AFAIK. No-one depends on source packages directly,
> right ?
>
Please don't take tiff as an example. No API change was involved there.
Cheers,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 16:48:18 -0300, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
> Hello ALL,
>
> I took over packaging for Conquest DICOM Server a few months ago (bug
> #680352) and I am approaching upload state. You can check my work in Debian
> Git [1].
>
> Since the shortest form of the package name would be
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:57:02 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:47 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Adam Borowski angband.pl> writes:
> >
> > > You don't need to jump through those multistrap hoops anymore. You need
> > to
> > > recompile the kernel with CONFIG_X86_X32=y
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:10:26 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Another package (just an example) is this one, gambas3 [2] that uses sdlgfx
> as B-D
> that has been uploaded on unstable on
> [2014-04-11] Accepted 3.5.2-2 in unstable (low)
>
gambas3 has no runtime dependency on sdlgfx. Do
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:48:35 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
>
> > Il Mercoledì 23 Aprile 2014 10:29, Julien Cristau ha
> > scritto:
>
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:10:26 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >
> >> Another pack
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 23:01:58 -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Debian X Strike Force
>xserver-xorg-video-vmware
>
I've split the rule in
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-vmware.git;a=commitdiff;h=f9208ee13d7ecb6efac784514897c824c65e9365
Hopefully that
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 07:33:04 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> IMHO the severity should be raised to critical as it breaks unrelated
> software.
>
Reverse dependencies are anything but unrelated.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:42:10 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Note that e.g. haskell-zeromq4-haskell already requires zeromq 4.x to build,
> and
> others (python-zmq, hbro, ...) depend on libzmq3 >= 4.0.1, so zeromq4 should
> be
> packaged first, those packages updated to build depend on l
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 07:21:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Perhaps we can stop overriding this option ? For a lot of scientific
> packages, -O3 is chosen by the upstream author, and I always feel bad
> that if we make the programs slower by overriding it to -O2, it will
> reflect poorly on D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Cristau
* Package name: ndg-httpsclient
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ndg-httpsclient
* License : BSD
Programming
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 17:25:14 +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> I've read that there was a recent change made to the buildd resolution with
> regards to ensuring that consistent package versions are used on the builds
> [0]. Is it possible that this changed also messed up self-dependency
> res
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Given that Fedora are adopting /run, and it has been something
> we have wanted in the past, is anyone working on implementing
> /run in Debian?
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/146976
That seems to say "on D
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:29:10 +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> PS. I could not determine which mailing list is haunted by the ftp-masters.
> If debian-admin is wrong, please forward it.
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization#distribution
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 09:05:50 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I don't agree with this. You can do _a lot_ in 3 months. So saying "fall"
> leaves a big uncertainty in terms of roadmap.
>
And you know two years in advance exactly what you'll have done and what
you'll want to do for the next thre
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:42:25 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> So if a vague freeze date (such as "Fall 2011") is all we get now, we still
> need a firmer *future* date, nearer the time (e.g., "Freeze on Halloween",
> announced late August), to allow this sort of work cycle to happen.
>
I think tha
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 18:04:20 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> bash is not the default system shell anymore. It's now only the default
> user shell. As such it is not required for a sysadmin to boot and
> install software. Besides that some users would like to get rid of bash
> in their enviro
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:41:13 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> * Package name: evtest
> Version : 1.27
> Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
> * URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/evtest/
> * License : GPLv2
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : utility to m
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 13:22:29 +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> * MIA database information
> ssh merkel.debian.org /srv/qa.debian.org/mia/mia-query ja...@debian.org
>
s/merkel/qa/
> * Group membership information
> ssh merkel.debian.org id jandd
>
works on any debian.org machine.
Cheers,
J
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:41:24 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:14:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Luk Claes (04/04/2011):
> > > The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important
> > > is obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash w
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:18:32 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:54:53 (CEST), Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > As of base-files 6.2 which went into unstable yesterday, we have a
> > new top-level directory, /run.
> >
> > This directory will contain a tmpfs which will be prese
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 19:13:43 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2011-04-06 codeh...@debian.org wrote:
> > Package: ggz-grubby
> > Severity: normal
> > User: codeh...@debian.org
> > Usertags: la-file-removal
>
> > To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
> > 10.2 and t
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:40:14 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Bastien ROUCARIES writes:
> >
> >> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
> >> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
> >
>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:18:05 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> We do count situations like
> http://lists.debian.org/deity/2011/04/msg00154.html
>
> <676992.81078...@web26502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
>
That seems silly. They broke their system using dpkg -i, they can fix
it with dpkg -i.
Chee
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:20:00 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> This is an updated package for version 4.1 of Xen.
>
Updated packages don't need ITPs.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 14:08:00 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building for
> i486, but for i586 ? That even the maintainer doesn't know why for
> sure[1] and that no changelog entry documents when or why that happened?
> (nothing in debian
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 13:58:08 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> We basically know the reasons on both sides. Most objections are of
> social nature (fear of "APT has a Pre-Depends, let's add one to"), and
> Eugene thinks it is unfair if APT were to pre-depend on things while
> Cupt would not,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 17:02:50 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >From a maintainer point of view, this could mean more burden. But, if ever
> implemented, debbugs can send a copy of the bugreport to the backporter
> only, and avoid sending it to the usual maintainer of the package.
>
That was discu
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 15:47:07 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I maintain libsmi2 which ships libsmi2ldbl binary package which is the
> result of a transition started more than four years ago. I am wondering
> if I should do something to get rid of the "ldbl" prefix? Should I make
N
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 14:02:13 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> The package is ready for upload in the svn repository of
> debian-med.alioth.debian.org.
>
Is this the package's long description?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 13:42:20 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I'm not sure I could speak about "cases", but an obvious use case
> aside from bootstrapping is backporting, where I could just drop off
> dependencies I'm not going to use instead of looking at the code and
> figuring out if it's easi
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:19:13 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> But that the procps package is non-essential but seems to be installed
> on (some?) buildds is irrelevant?
>
Yes.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 13:56:47 -0500, Jeffrey G Thomas wrote:
> > > chgrp -R staff /home/wvincent/public_html/lps/sites
> > > chgrp: changing group of
> > > `/home/wvincent/public_html/lps/sites/default/files/feeds/studiolocations.csv':
> > > Operation not permitted
> >
> > I'm afraid that so
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 18:50:35 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > $ sudo apt-get install dpkg-dev
> [...]
> > > tar: unrecognized option `--warning=no-timestamp'
> > > Try `tar --help' or `tar --usage' for more information.
> > > dpkg-deb:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 22:02:50 +0100, Rik Theys wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I was thus far unable to pinpoint which component causes this behaviour as I
> can
> not find anything in my logs (and/or journal). I have therefore assigned it
> to general. Feel free to
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 18:06:49 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:37:33PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Original only on d-event-eu@ldo, now updating
> > and cross-posting to d-d-a@ldo and d-e-nl@ldo
>
> Now only to d-d-a@ldo because previous posting didn't return
> a
Control: reassign -1 general
Control: retitle -1 init should not be Essential
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:04:17 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> control: reassign -1 debootstrap
> control: retitle -1 variant=buildd should not install init systems
>
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, Joey Hess w
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 15:47:16 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:50:11PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > I'll curate the raw run I did today, since I saw a few false positive
> > (python 3 backports to python 3) and file them. I'll run a dd-list at
> > some point bef
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 15:26:11 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Luca,
> as discussed on a thread on debian-python mailing list [0], I'd like
> to start a MBF against about 420 packages [1] to propose the removal
> of the deprecated python-support.
>
> A couple of lintian tags have been
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian X Strike Force
X-Debbugs-Cc: libin...@package.debian.org
* Package name: xserver-xorg-input-libinput
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
* URL : http://www.x.org/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang:
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 18:49:25 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> I'm happy if you change this - it seems like fixing a bug to me, but I
> will just throw in this observation from recent arm64 archive-rebuilds, that
> -j and DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel= are not exactly the same. Is that
> expected? If not th
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 19:42:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 25/05/15 18:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:27:47 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> Due to the way that the archive manages uploads to proposed-updates, if
> >> you upload a .changes
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:46:30 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While investigating libspiro build, I found BD-Uninstallable on powerpcspe.
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=libspiro&suite=sid
>
> > Dependency installability problem for libspiro on powerpcspe:
> >
>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 23:29:14 +0200, Bruno Ramos wrote:
> Description : open source MIT licensed game engine
>
That's not a terribly useful short description. Only the last two words
belong there, IMO. The "open source" bit is kind of implied by it being
in Debian, and the exact licens
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 13:46:16 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I notice that Ubuntu has gone ahead with a lot of library renames. Did
> the Ubuntu developers doing these uploads test the results, or did you
> just "upload and hope"? One reason I have held back from doing more NMUs
> is that for t
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:48:54 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Release team, here are some suggestions for binNMUs and other
> wanna-build interactions:
>
> Fixes for some earlier failures, and version skews caused by
> maintainer-built binaries not being discarded:
>
> # retry failed build wit
On 11/22/18 10:30 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 22.11.2018 o 19:37, Dmitry Shachnev pisze:
>
>> The Qt framework can be built either with “desktop” OpenGL, or with OpenGL ES
>> support. At the moment we are building it with OpenGL ES on armel and armhf,
>> and with desktop OpenGL on all o
On 11/23/18 12:18 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:05:27PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> At least mesa drivers can be used for desktop GL or GLESv2 just fine,
>> AFAIK. Maybe the answer for Qt is to switch to GLESv2 for all
>> architectures, to st
On 11/28/18 2:26 PM, Daniel Reichelt wrote:
> On 11/22/18 1:56 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> (Bear in mind of course that happily our build machines
>> *can* be reverted because they are frequently re-imaged.[…])
>
> Using code from a debian package? Some script being hand-knitted using
> hot needles?
On 12/7/18 4:34 PM, Cyrille Bollu wrote:
> The URL https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.28.html is
> 404 :-(
>
With Perl 5.28 in testing, the transition is over.
Cheers,
Julien
On 11/17/18 9:23 PM, Nick Morrott wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Nick Morrott
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: python-hgapi
> Version : 1.7.3
> Upstream Author : Fredrik Håård
> * URL : https://github.com/haard/hg
On 2/6/19 4:31 PM, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
>> Gard Spreemann writes ("Reusing source package name of long-removed,
>> unrelated package"):
>>> I understand that 3.3.2 of the policy mandates that I at least bump the
>>> epoch, but I wanted to ask the list to make sure: is
On 2/16/19 7:08 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, February 15, 2019 08:59:41 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Use of the Build-Conflicts field is currently mostly optional, but Ian
>> Jackson and I have been working on text for Debian Policy that would
>> require its use in certain case
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:29:01 +0200, olivier sallou wrote:
> Le mer. 10 juil. 2019 à 11:08, Andrey Rahmatullin a
> écrit :
>
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:54:21AM +0200, olivier sallou wrote:
> > > So, am I doing something wrong?
> > You tried to install a package (what package? they don't e
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:24:03 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > On 9 Sep 2019, at 15:31, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> >
> > I for one, do trust my ISPs a lot more than I trust Cloudflare or
> > Google, simply based on the jurisdiction.
>
> While I still strongly agree with you on this one (even though I
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:56:28AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Possible solutions:
>
> - Change at least 622 packages so they have something more like
> Depends: foo-data (>= ${source:Version}), foo-data (<< ${source:Version}+c)
> (also hope that all of their maintainers can get those runes
[bcc: {openssl,ca-certificates}@packages.d.o]
Hi,
the ca-certificates package is currently "Priority: optional", like most
of the archive. It's Recommended by a bunch of packages, Depended on by
an equivalent number, but I'm not sure if this is optimal. I suspect
most packages can be configured
Hi Antonio,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:47:25PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:10:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > And which of standard or important made most sense (AIUI, standard
> > means "installed by default in d-i" and impo
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:34:14PM +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Stephan Lachnit
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, stephanlach...@protonmail.com,
> debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: root
[...]
>
> I want to maintai
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 06:03:57PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Adrian Bunk
>
> Package name: xserver-xorg-input-aiptek
> Description : X.Org X server -- Aiptek input driver
>
> Adopting X drivers that were removed in #955603 despite many ob
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:59:42PM +0100, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Those files are not really meant to be immutable:
> - signing keys can expire and be revoked, upstream might want to update
> signatures of already released tarballs
> - the set of "upstream release managers" might evolve over tim
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 04:51:14PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Job Snijders
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: openbgpd
> Version : 6.8p1
> Upstream Author : OpenBSD tech mailing list
> * URL
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear Julien,
>
>
> > Description : Free, functional, and secure implementation of the
> BGP-4 protocol.
>
> the above short description has 3 useless words in it, I suggest you drop
> them.
>
> If it wasn'
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:49:49PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 20:07 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I cannot find appropriate pseudo package in reportbug, so ask this
> > in -devel.
> >
> > Fumiyasu (CCed) found a issue with samba package changelog in
> > p
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:11:21PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a mass bug filing on source packages that miss
> support for build-arch or build-indep targets in debian/rules.
>
> Those targets were made mandatory in Debian Policy 3.9.4 (released in
> August 2012
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 10:28:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:11:33PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2021-08-19 16:37:13 -0400 (-0400), Kyle Edwards wrote:
> > > On 8/19/21 3:46 PM, Simon Richter wrote:
> > > > For the most part, users would configure https if t
This is all pretty straightforward. If foo.pc in libfoo-dev references
bar.pc that lives in libbar-dev, then libfoo-dev needs a dependency on
libbar-dev, and the missing dependency is a serious bug. That has been
the case for as long as I remember, and doesn't require more long
discussions or pol
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:47:49PM -0800, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The cloud team wants to make folks aware of a possible change to the cloud
> images. The team plans to register a new domain, debian.cloud, for mirrors
> inside of cloud provider infrastructure. For such mirrors, sourc
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 09:43:16PM -0800, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 07:58:23PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I think we (DSA) have been reluctant to add new third-party-run services
> > under debian.org, and it's not clear to me if that infrastructure
> My limited understanding of the landscape of git workflows is that a
> > workflow that is quite popular among packages still using the 1.0 format
> > is the one used by the Debian X strike force. Julien Cristau described
> > it as follows when I asked about it on IRC:
> >
&
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:08:47AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:53:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 04:43:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> > What's the plan for upgraded
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 15:45:25 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 10:11:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:08:47AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> >>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Maybe and idea would to do something like isa-support does for e.g
> sseX-support
> on CPUs that does not have that feature: It fails on installation with an
> debconf message, IIRC.
> So that would allow something like "new package"
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 05:17:59PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 05:08:57PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > Maybe and idea would to do something like isa-support does for e.g
> >
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 12:03:43 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> two packages[¹, ²] I uploaded are "Rejected due to piuparts
> regression". I learned, that this is due to a bug in piuparts.
> Any solution on its way? Would I need to re-upload later?
>
No, it'll eventually get retried a
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:06:11AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Debian Ports is affected by this problem in particular because we don't have
> the cruft feature in mini-DAK [3], so every time I build a debian-installer
> image and forget checking whether vim build successfully on every
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 00:51:34 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> And another question for DSA is, whether the lists.alioth.debian.org
> address is expected to work, as long as the alioth-lists.debian.net
> exists?
>
I don't see a reason to break it.
Cheers,
Julien
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 20:53:48 +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> On വ്യാഴം 28 ജൂലൈ 2016 12:10 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving to less
> > controversial alternative pagure.
>
> When did we (i.e Debian) finalize on us
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 09:46:04 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2016-08-06 23:37, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 05:00:09PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> >> as you somehow add jquery.js to your doc-package, please add its license
> >> to your debian/copyri
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 23:37:03 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 05:00:09PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> > as you somehow add jquery.js to your doc-package, please add its license
> > to your debian/copyright.
>
> The jquery.js is installed by doxygen in the d
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 19:01:52 +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:12:46PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> > Today I was, once again, surprised to see how many (low popcon) orphaned
> > packages we have. I believe that orphanage is a burden to our community
> > in the sense th
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 15:24:42 +, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > Have we gotten to the point where we consider deb.d.o suitable for
> > production use? The web page still says Experimental (so I would assume
> > "not production yet") and I'm not real
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:45:33 +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> > Kristian Erik Hermansen writes:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> […]
>
> >> For the kind of attacks you are describing, https is just snake oil.
>
> > Profusely disagree and so do other member
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 22:54:57 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> lördag 29 oktober 2016 kl. 21:35:14 CEST skrev Ian Jackson:
> > Debian FTP Masters writes ("xen_4.8.0~rc3-0exp1_multi.changes REJECTED"):
> > > libxenstore3.0-dbgsym: lintian output: 'extended-description-is-empty ',
> > > automatic
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 18:11:27 +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> The -dbg package is Multi-Arch same. It Depends on the packages for
> which it provides debugging symbols, some of which are Multi-Arch:
> allowed.
That Depends seems wrong, there's no reason a -dbg package needs a
dependency on any
On 11/28/2016 02:38 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> thanks for this update!
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>* The update must be built in an (old)stable environment or chroot
>
> afaik source only uploads work as well, dont they? (and technicall
On 11/28/2016 05:18 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:47:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> source only uploads work for stretch and up. There are no arch:all
>> autobuilders for wheezy and jessie.
>
> Well, it doesn't even work for stretch
On 11/29/2016 12:07 AM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On 2016-11-27 20:42:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>* The bug should be of severity "important" or higher
>
> Quick question: assuming all the other conditions are met (minimal patch,
> clean debdiff, etc.), this seems to discourage normal bugs fixing.
On 12/09/2016 05:22 PM, Wookey wrote:
> We can do poor-mans partial arch by just being fairly agressive about
> disabling armel for packages that are broken or not suitable. Not very
> clever or efficient, but it is easy to do and requires no infra or
> tooling changes at all. So long as someone is
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 09:20:40 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> >> >> Considering that we are already in the transition freeze I suggest
> >> >> going with enabling bindnow for all architectures in dpkg and
> >> >> for Stretch+1 the responsibility of setting some hardening flags
> >> >> could be tr
On 12/19/2016 11:37 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Thanks. If I could perform the autopkgtest run with bindnow this year would it
> be convincing enough given only a small amount of breakages to enable
> bindnow early in January?
>
I thought I was clear earlier. No, enabling bindnow globally is
somet
On 12/22/2016 11:40 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-December/126684.html
>
> Some have praised BSD code to be better than Linux's. And this link says that
> Linux is trying to be too perfect in terms of code.
>
> Given that BSDs are also a supp
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 22:42:46 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > some of the LTS sponsors are looking to extend the support period of
> > Debian 7 Wheezy (from a few months up to a full year).
> >
> > Our question is whether this can be done on debian.org infrastructur
On 03/29/2018 10:19 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> its not the first time that I'm running into that problem: A package
> that is Architecture: all depends from packages Architecture: any.
> These dependencies are not available on all architectures and thus the
> package does not migrate to t
On 05/03/2018 02:09 PM, Julien Aubin wrote:
Hi
Firefox 60esr is due for next week.
As of now Debian Stretch is bound to Firefox ESR 52 which reaches EOL
soon. The problem is that it becomes less and less usable as more and
more extensions are becoming incompatible with it.
On the other hand te
On 07/10/2018 03:50 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/09/2018 11:03 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:33:18PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> On 07/08/2018 12:36 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
List of affected packages:
openscap-daemon: /usr/lib/python3/dist-pa
On 07/11/2018 10:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a daily cron job on host blends.debian.net to gather machine
> readable data from all blends packages. The cron job fetches only the
> following files
>
> debian/changelog
> debian/control
> debian/copyright
> deb
On 07/11/2018 04:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:34:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> You could probably save yourself some trouble by not polling repos that
>> have had no activity since you last looked at them.
>
> Is there any sma
On 08/11/2018 07:52 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Carl-Valentin Schmitt writes:
>
>> Apparently the installer compels each time before Installation to delete
>> hard disk too slowly.
>
>> It should be optional to delete (slowly) the harddisk or to format
>> harddisk quickly.
>
>> In 9.5 installer t
On 08/12/2018 04:58 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> My previous mail didn't result in any feedback, so let me try again
> with some more detailed questions that might be easier to discuss
> related to the PAM configuration of su (and su-l).
>
FWIW I'm not sure -devel is very like
On 09/05/2018 04:38 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>>> Browserify (or webpack) is a static compiler for javascript. I believe
>>> that we must use built-using field in order to be policy compliant.
>>>
[...]
> But I was thinking Built-Using may be used by security team in order
> to trigger rebuild.
401 - 500 of 524 matches
Mail list logo
