[CC to Andreas]
GOTO Masanori writes:
At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:08:24 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
[CCing m68k, if the new results look acceptable]
GOTO Masanori writes:
Hi Matthias,
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version:
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| but fewer testcases as well ...
|
| FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC, load offset)
| FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
| FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC, load offset)
|
| these three did pass with
At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:08:24 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
[CCing m68k, if the new results look acceptable]
GOTO Masanori writes:
Hi Matthias,
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff
[CCing m68k, if the new results look acceptable]
GOTO Masanori writes:
Hi Matthias,
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
one built on
[CCing m68k, if the new results look acceptable]
GOTO Masanori writes:
Hi Matthias,
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
one built on
At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:08:24 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
[CCing m68k, if the new results look acceptable]
GOTO Masanori writes:
Hi Matthias,
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff
Hi Matthias,
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5). Although I
cannot prove that other build
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5).
Is this diff means as follows?
- is gcc-2.95 +
GOTO Masanori writes:
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5).
Is this diff means as
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 09:24:50AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
GOTO Masanori writes:
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
one
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 09:24:50AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
GOTO Masanori writes:
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff of a binutils built in
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: grave
Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5). Although I
cannot prove that other build depedencies of binutils are the cause of
this failures, I start with glibc as the
12 matches
Mail list logo