>
> Email does compress reasonably well, but having your mail server in
another
> country raises an entirely new set of issues. There's issues of support
etc.
>
> As you have probably noticed I have a lot of experience of this...
Yes... ;-)
> Also email (excluding file attachments which are usu
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 20:37, Jason Lim wrote:
> > However, I was wondering if there is a solid method to setup a link
> > between a Linux or Windows or Mac box here in Australia, and have all
data
> > travel across a compressed tunnel of some sort.
>
> What do you do
Hi all,
If you live in Australia, i'm sure you know about the exorbant prices for
broadband here. HK, on the other hand, provide unlimited bandwidth and
fast connections.
I was wondering about this... okay, we know about mod_gzip for Apache, and
i *think* it does proxy connections (through mod_pr
Sincerely,
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: ATA Drive Selection (Reliability)...
> On Thu, 29 Aug
> * Another point on reliability that was published on this list very
> recently is MTBF linked to the heat. It was noted 50% reduction
> in MTBF with a 3 degree celcius increase.
>
Yes... I must agree.
We have quite a number of IBM Deskstar 120GXP drives with 3ware cards
running RAID5. Some of
I think there is a HOWTO on setting up a small ISP somewhere... check
http://www.linuxdoc.org/ for it.
However, AFAIK that howto talked about Redhat... and it was old (last time
i check... maybe a couple of years ago).
So you may want to try and find that if you want... just as a point of
interes
That was REAL smart... sending this kind of tripe to us at Debian-ISP (and
also Debian-vote and probably many others).
You'd imagine that the spammers would remove keywords like antispam,
admin, isp, and so on, since people with these kind of email addresses
aren't usually THAT stupid to fall for
Hi,
We use mod_throttle. Works well... haven't had any problems with it.
Provides everything mod_bandwidth does (I think).
You might want to try that.
Jason
http://www.zentek-international.com/
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to get mod_bandwidth to work with my apache (1.3.26-0woody1)
>
> I've read the
> I'm a sysadmin in a small ISP here in Argentina, and I'm not using
> osirusoft rbl, why? fibertel. What's that? A big cable-ISP (in .ar,
obviously)
> who gives BOTH dinamic and static IP address for their customers, the
> mails coming from the static one are (mostly) legit mails from real
>
> I guess debian-isp is not a good forum for a discussion about internals
> of RBL databases. One point, which could be useful for Debian ISPs here
> is that Osirusoft's database uses unfair methods to fight spam
> and blocks whole networks without proper explanation. The decision
> to use that
>
> he claims that it's OK for chinese sysadmins to ignore spam complaints
> because they don't know english and don't understand the complaint. he
> does read english and can act as an interpreter for them. if he really
> cared about resolving the issue, he'd do something productive about it
>
>
> he claims that it's OK for chinese sysadmins to ignore spam complaints
> because they don't know english and don't understand the complaint. he
> does read english and can act as an interpreter for them. if he really
> cared about resolving the issue, he'd do something productive about it
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 06:47, Nathan wrote:
> > > And besides... having those western legistative ppl... in Australia,
> > > USA,
> > > etc. acting like children, in front of everyone... is that really
> > > something to be proud of?
> >
> > Ugh, since when did this turn into a racist political d
> > > i think you're bring up irrelevancies. the fact that company A is
doing
> > > wrong is not justification for company B doing the same.
Its not justificaiton. But if TWO men kill people, why does it make it
okay for the USA murder to go free, while the Asian murder gets the ax?
> > > this
> if you really want to do something to help resolve the problem, then
> educate your countrymen about why running an open relay is a bad idea.
> get them to understand the problem and DO something about it. that will
> be far more productive and effective than simply whining about various
> RBLs
> if you really want to do something to help resolve the problem, then
> educate your countrymen about why running an open relay is a bad idea.
> get them to understand the problem and DO something about it. that will
> be far more productive and effective than simply whining about various
> RBLs
>
> > Ah... but if I had not brought this to light, would you have even
KNOWN
> > about what was happening? Also keep in mind... it was "mail sent FROM
> > the
> > USA THROUGH Asia). People in Asia have no interest in your Penis
> > Enhancements, Breast Enlargers, Free Trips to Vegas, 0% APR Credit
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 10:57:35AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> > AND I REPEAT (since you didn't choose to reply to this):
> > ---
> > [blah blah blah]
> >
> > What do you think now?
>
> i think you're br
> > > Been there. Seen it. There are two sides to this issue, and when
> > > you put 'em both on the same news group, you'd better expect
> > > flames, especially when they are so totally diametrically opposed.
> >
> > This only supports my previous statment that telling people to go to
NANAE
>
>
> > I suppose because I notice these things first I tend to be the
"bringer of
> > bad news" to people and hence get flamed most. Oh well.
>
> Why not bring the news to people who run those Asian ISPs?
>
Because i can't possibly start teaching hundreds... possibly thousands of
chinese net admin
>
> whether you like it or not, anyone can block email on their own servers
> using whatever criteria they choose. you do NOT have a right to have
> your mail accepted. nobody does. that choice rests with the recipient
> server.
Yeah... except many End-users don't know / not aware of what RBLs
> Please take this conversation off debian-user. I'm not entirely sure why
> it ended up here, but it's quite off-topic.
Isn't the discussion of various RBLs and mail software on-topic?
Doesn't this affect debian users ability to receive email?
Would discussion of various anti-virus software be m
> >
> > (sorry for the long link... i couldn't find a way to make it much
> > shorter).
>
> http://www.makeashorterlink.com/ :-) -rt
>
Ah yes, I'll need to keep that one in mind next time. Thanks :-)
>
> > And you wonder why Chinese admins don't respond. What would YOU do if
you
> > got an email in Yiddish?
>
> When I get email in Chinese I just report it to SpamCop, if I've ever
> received a Yiddish email I'm sure I did the same.
Eeep... spam or not?
Nei how ma? ;-)
> Everyone who is doing
N see the backlash of personal
insults, foul language, etc. that they get in return.
> Also it would be good to see a response from you to Jules regarding the
> "Zentek (Jason Lim) is a spam-house, Iadvantage
> tolerates spammers" issue.
Already have responded to it. I'm vocal
=telstra&as_ugroup=news.admin.net-abus
e.email
reveals 4260 messages concerning Telstra spam.
What do you think now?
> Further, the SPEWS record for iAdvantage
>
> http://spews.org/html/S475.html
>
> says, and I quote, "Zentek (Jason Lim) is a spam-house, Iadvantage
> to
> Large multinational firms get to choose their own policy for spam
blocking,
> they don't let an ISP tell them what to do. All you need is a MD of a
> company they do business with being unable to send an email to the MD of
> their company and heads will roll.
> If you want to persue your crusa
This isn't really a Debian-ISP question.. but anyway...
I don't think the 2.2 release had the Compaq SCSI drivers built into the
kernel.
You either need to compile/get a kernel with the required SCSI drivers
built in, or get the module for it.
Check the Debian website... I think there were boot
Sincerely,
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: failure notice (about relays.osirusoft.com)
> On Sun, 1
> the same problem occurs for anyone unfortunate enough to use a clueless
> or spamhaus ISP. it's got NOTHING to do with the fact that it's asian.
> spamhaus and open relay ISP's *MUST* be blacklisted regardless of what
> continent they are on.
Then please... go ahead and block rackspace netbloc
> > >
> > > > SO... if you plan on receiving email from me or Asia, I suggest
you
> > use
> > > > RBLs with clear listing and removal policies and methods (eg. the
RBLs
> > I
> > > > listed above, and others),
> > >
> > > This is a good policy. Using DNSBL's that don't have some
> > > resolution
> >
> > I have communicated with Joe Jared on this (not using real
> > identification), and while I won't divulge the private communications
> > on a
> > public list, the general jist is "i don't get legit emails from Asia,
> > nor
> > do people that use my list. So I could block all of Asia and n
> you seem to have a chip on YOUR shoulder about the osirusoft RBLs. this
> is not the first time you have bitched about them in public.
Yes... yes I do. I will bitch about things that I see are bad, and try and
do things about it (like offer better alternatives). Perhaps you are one
to sit on
>
> > SO... if you plan on receiving email from me or Asia, I suggest you
use
> > RBLs with clear listing and removal policies and methods (eg. the RBLs
I
> > listed above, and others),
>
> This is a good policy. Using DNSBL's that don't have some
> resolution method for a black listing is risky.
gt;
> Received: (qmail 24127 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2002 01:29:56 -
> Received: from unknown (HELO zentekgateway) (150.101.192.86)
> by 203.194.146.32 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2002 01:29:56 -
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Jason Lim" <[EM
> Rumour has it that data=journal can actually improve performance in some
> situations. If a program is writing lots of small files synchronously
(quite
> common for a mail server that has one tiny control file for every
message,
> and the average message file isn't too big) then journalling the
I thought the stock Debian kernel came with IP Alias support built in?
- Original Message -
From: "James Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lem Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 6:02 AM
Subject: Re: Binding Multiple IP's to a single NIC
> Was your kernel comp
I thought the stock Debian kernel came with IP Alias support built in?
- Original Message -
From: "James Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lem Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 6:02 AM
Subject: Re: Binding Multiple IP's to a single NIC
> Was your kernel comp
Paste the entire contents of your interfaces file, so we can actually see
what is wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Lem Bryant
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 2:40 AM
Subject: Binding Multiple IP's to a single NIC
Would someone mind pointing a brain-dead u
> > I was wondering what the best way to determine maximum bandwidth
> > thoughtput is. I've looked at "bing", but it doesn't seem very
accurate to
> > me.
> >
> > Do you know of a tool or method which can simulate large bandwidth
> > traffic, or can otherwise measure what maximum bandwidth though
Hi all,
I suspect that our upstream bandwidth providers including AGC (Asia Global
Crossing) and that aren't providing us with the maximum possible bandwidth
that we should be theoretically getting. We've been looking at informally
made MRTG reports (yes, we know it isn't very accurate, which is w
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:39:02PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> >
> > > # ls -lad /root/
> > > drwxr-xr-x9 root root 4096 Jul 31 18:25 /root/
> > >
> > > I wonder if /root/ shouldn't be accessible by root only per default?
Hi all,
We've been using Spamcop (http://www.spamcop.net) for... well... ever
since I last discuss this on the Debian-ISP mailing list a long while
back.
We chose to go with Spamcop because of it's "democratic" voting system, in
which a number of people would have to send in a spam report (contai
> I have checked the things with mii-tool ..but as it don't support
> rtl cards ...
>
> is there some options for rtl cards..
> i am using a RTL8139 100Mbit card..
Are you sure? I used it a long time ago with Realtek cards, and it worked
fine.
Not sure about the latest version... but I can't se
> I have checked the things with mii-tool ..but as it don't support
> rtl cards ...
>
> is there some options for rtl cards..
> i am using a RTL8139 100Mbit card..
Are you sure? I used it a long time ago with Realtek cards, and it worked
fine.
Not sure about the latest version... but I can't s
> But won't "rmdir ." succeed if they are in the public_html directory?
rmdirs _below_ client1/site1/cgi-bin/ and client1/site1/htdocs/ would
all work.
rmdirs of client1/site1/htdocs/, or client1/site1/cgi-bin/ themselves
will not work as that requires modifying the parent directory
(client1/site
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: Users deleting public_html and log causing Apache to fail
startup
On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Jason Lim wrote:
> The "users that know too much" keep on deleting their directories that
> Apache uses to load up files from.
>
> For
Hi all,
The "users that know too much" keep on deleting their directories that
Apache uses to load up files from.
For example, assume the user directory is /home/username/public_html (for
the HTML docs), and /home/username/log (for the LOG files).
If the user deletes /home/username/log, or publi
Hi All,
How are you guys handling the SSH vunerability issue?
Have any of you got the 3.3 working on testing/woody?
Anyone tested the newest 3.4?
I've included patches below to solve the problem (courtesy Markus Friedl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). How soon do you think these patches could be included
in
Hi All,
How are you guys handling the SSH vunerability issue?
Have any of you got the 3.3 working on testing/woody?
Anyone tested the newest 3.4?
I've included patches below to solve the problem (courtesy Markus Friedl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). How soon do you think these patches could be included
i
I think this is serious enough for fellow ISP admins that I would post it
here.
Do you all know how Debian's progress is regarding this? We are starting
to get a large increase in SSH probes... perhaps crackers are already
compiling a list of hosts running SSH, so when the full vunerability is
rel
I think this is serious enough for fellow ISP admins that I would post it
here.
Do you all know how Debian's progress is regarding this? We are starting
to get a large increase in SSH probes... perhaps crackers are already
compiling a list of hosts running SSH, so when the full vunerability is
re
>
> I'm in the process of building debian/woody packages containing the most
> recent versions of vpopmail and vpopmail-enabled courier. Unfortunately
> it may take a few extra weeks since I'm involved in many other projects.
> I'll keep you informed just in case ;-)
>
> Best regards,
>
I thought
>
> I'm in the process of building debian/woody packages containing the most
> recent versions of vpopmail and vpopmail-enabled courier. Unfortunately
> it may take a few extra weeks since I'm involved in many other projects.
> I'll keep you informed just in case ;-)
>
> Best regards,
>
I though
Dselect output for "testing" distro:
*** Opt web apache 1.3.23-11.3.24-3Versatile,
high-performan
*** Opt web apache-commo 1.3.23-11.3.24-3Support files for
all Apa
And this is after dselect update.
I see it in the pool directory, but obviously the package list
Dselect output for "testing" distro:
*** Opt web apache 1.3.23-11.3.24-3Versatile,
high-performan
*** Opt web apache-commo 1.3.23-11.3.24-3Support files for
all Apa
And this is after dselect update.
I see it in the pool directory, but obviously the package list
> I can see your point on the performance problem. I know openantivirus
is in
> Java, I wasn't terribly excited about that either. I was more or less
> hoping for some kind of cross platform C code. Many of the folks
involved
> with openantivirus have been/are involved with amavis as well so on
> >
>
> There is a free version of Trend Micro's virus scanner at:
> ftp://ftp.antivirus.com/products/freetools/
>
> You can download the latest pattern file and scan engine library for it
from
> their web site. I was able to use it to build trophie & virge found
here:
>
> http://www.vanja.com/tool
cause the school's mail server is only a 586 with 128M
(or was it 64M) of ram...and they also run a small internal website for
teachers on it. So it obviously isn't any beefy server.
Jason
http://www.zentek-international.com/
- Original Message -
From: "Vector" <[
Hi all,
I was wondering if you guys know of any "open source" anti virus solution.
I know about the ones that cost money, but I wonder if there is a good,
production-quality, open source solution. Perhaps something even we can
contribute to, so the virus signature database is expanded, etc. (but
> I can see your point on the performance problem. I know openantivirus
is in
> Java, I wasn't terribly excited about that either. I was more or less
> hoping for some kind of cross platform C code. Many of the folks
involved
> with openantivirus have been/are involved with amavis as well so on
> >
>
> There is a free version of Trend Micro's virus scanner at:
> ftp://ftp.antivirus.com/products/freetools/
>
> You can download the latest pattern file and scan engine library for it
from
> their web site. I was able to use it to build trophie & virge found
here:
>
> http://www.vanja.com/too
stantly infecting themselves as well.
>
> vec
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:37 AM
> Subject: Antivirus setup?
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
Hi all,
I was wondering if you guys know of any "open source" anti virus solution.
I know about the ones that cost money, but I wonder if there is a good,
production-quality, open source solution. Perhaps something even we can
contribute to, so the virus signature database is expanded, etc. (but
-- /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure
Would this be something we want to do on Debian?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "John Gonzalez/netMDC admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:22 AM
Subje
Hi all,
This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply
across all Linux distros.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# pwd
/usr/sbin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# rm sendmail
rm: remove `sendmail'? y
rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not perm
-- /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure
Would this be something we want to do on Debian?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "John Gonzalez/netMDC admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:22 AM
Subject:
Hi all,
This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply
across all Linux distros.
[root@linux1 sbin]# pwd
/usr/sbin
[root@linux1 sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail
[root@linux1 sbin]# rm sendmail
rm: remove `sendmail'? y
rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted
[root@l
> >
> > Using your mentality, then everything always gets escalated to the
highest
> > point (since everyone below the top-most ISP is essentially a
customer).
> > So... essentially, the highest point is nearly always the network
> > provider... UUnet, Level3, MCIWorldcom... whomever owns the actu
> On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > > what has size got to do with it?
> >
> > Because the distinction between a customer and an ISP is not clear.
> > [...]
>
> that was a tautology. it only matters if you think size is relevant.
>
> it doesn't matter in the s
> Of course. As said, if the list causes only people with *dynamic* IPs to
> be forced to use their ISP's MTA, I'd agree that it's a very good idea.
Very good idea... but how is the RBL going to stay so up-to-date with what
is static, what is dynamic, etc.? It sounds good, but would be a logisti
> > 1. is the site an open relay?
>
> Most people here agree on this, but you'll still see some debate,
> particularly about the distinction between relays that are merely open
and
> relays that have been actively abused. Some people think that we
shouldn't
> block an open relay until it's spamm
> > 2. is the site a spam source?
>
> That's my point. *Where* is your threshold? *When* do you, with absolute
> certainty, conclude that a site is a spam source?
>
Actually, he sort of answered you...
> if any of the above are true, then the site should be black-listed.
> regardless of company
> [SNIP]
> > no, it's not relative. there is an absolute, black-and-white criteria
> > which you are too stupid to see: if a site is part of the spam
problem
> > then it should be black-listed. if it is not part of the problem then
> > it shouldn't be listed.
>
> Pray tell then, *when* is a si
> > Okay... in that case, you can block virtually ALL the large network
> > providers and hosting providers like Sprint, UUnet, Level3, etc.,
> > because nearly all of them have some sort of spam problem, big or
> > small. I know of virtually no large provider that has not had 1 single
> > compla
> > > > ---
> > > > Q41: How does one contact SPEWS?
> > > > A41: One does not. SPEWS does not receive email - it's just an
automated
> > > > system and website, SPEWS and other blocklist issues can be
discussed in
> > > > the public forums mentioned above... Note that
>> Yes. But if you want to get rid of _any_ spam, shut down your MTA.
>> Which will yield about the same effect than using Spamcop as a German
>> ISP.
>
>Have you sent an email to the administrators of spamcop informing them of
the
>sizes of the ISPs in question?^
>Why should I? After first notic
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:29:41AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Have you sent an email to the administrators of spamcop informing them
> > of the sizes of the ISPs in question?
>
> why the hell should I, or anyone else, have to go out of my way to
> inform some third party how large the ISP
>And Spamcop does *NOT* block entire ranges of IPs like other RBLs, so it
>is virtually impossible for you to say that t-online, gmx and web.de are
>"blocked". Only the spamming IPs within their ranges would be blocked,
NOT
>the entire range.
>T-Online does Port 25 blocking, forcing you to use t
> On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 11:48:10PM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> > This is why Spamcop's collateral damage is much lower than others in
> > that it does not block entire ranges, and which is why it is suitable
> > for an ISP or Hosting company to use.
>
> both o
On Thu, 2 May 2002 21:47:07 +1000, Russell Coker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 2 May 2002 19:58, Glenn Hocking wrote:
>> I've found that spamcop blocks email from both GE (General Electric)
and
>> Pizza Hut mail servers which clients of mine need to receive.
>
>Are the GE and Pizza Hut case
> > > Yes, but here is the thing you did not mention. Spamcop does not
> > > automatically block an IP just because a few people complained. It
> > > takes into consideration the ENTIRE mail volume. So, using your
> > > example, if the mailing list sends out 50,000 emails per day, and
some
> > >
> > I might also mention that it is not hard to get out of spamcop's
> > lists, even if you are listed. Unless a site continually gets spam
> > complaints, I think spamcop checks the RBL database ever 24hr... or
was
> > it every week... and removes stale/old entries. Try to get off some
> > of t
> Then I started using Exim. It doesn't send bounces to the postmaster by
> default. (I just view the queue daily and receive an eximstats -- log
> anaylsist report -- daily.)
>
> Don't configure your MTA to send copies of bounces to the postmaster.
Is that even possible with qmail? It seems to
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:55:12PM +1000, Glenn Hocking wrote:
> > Seems that one persons advertising email is another persons spam.
>
> no, the key difference between advertising email and spam is that spam
> is unsolicited.
>
> not all advertising email is spam, and not all spam is adver
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 06:52:33PM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Well, they are not exactly comparable, as the rule-based Spamassassin
> > does things based on "keywords and "keyphrases" and that kind of
> > thing, while RBLs do things based on actua
> Sometimes people forget that they signed up for a mailing list and when
some
> content arrive they treat it as spam. But also some big companies just
> genuinely think that an advert for their products is desired by millions
of
> people and that they should send it out indiscriminately.
>
> If
I *REALLY* hate it when these spammers try dictionary attacks. The
postmaster accounts fill up with thousands upon thousands of emails, until
they are over quota. Then the emails double/triple bounce to the admin of
the server (us).
Sincerely,
Jason
http://www.zentek-international.com
- Orig
> procmail/spamassasin process mails yes "inside" the server, I just
> give you a made up example:
>
> 60 Mails incoming per Minute,
>
> 5 seconds average Spamassasin procesing time per Mail
>
> => 60-12 = 48 Mails per Minute piling up on your incoming mail
> queue = 48 new S
>
> > Does the -t option work in such a way, that if -t 10 was inserted,
then
> > the mail server would wait a maximum of 10 seconds for the lookup
requests
> > to be complete, and if they aren't complete, then ignore them and let
the
> > email through?
>
> Sadly, that's not what I've understood
Hi all,
This is a bit off-topic, but since I run a number of high volume incoming
mail servers, this applies to any ISP...
>From http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html
---
rblsmtpd opts prog
rblsmtpd drops the limited SMTP conversation after 60 seconds, even if th
webalizer and analog come to mind straight away.
Webtrends is the big commercial one.
There was another... Urchin... or something like that, that claims to have
bigger clients that Webtrends, but don't quote me on that, i'm not 100%
sure.
The above should do well. Freshmeat and Google are your
Hi All,
I would like to make the extremely important yet rarely mentioned fact
that you should always compile critical drivers directly into the kernel
and not as some module (all the essentials, like the 3w- driver if you
have 3ware cards, etc.). The reason being is that if anything ever stu
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Secondary MX record for mail backup
It's just a relay with an MX record, it will queue if it can't deliver it.
Regards
Tim Kent
>>> "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/23/02 11
> > Does anyone have any pointers or a doc file somewhere on how to setup
a
> > secondary MX server. Basically, if the primary MX is down, then try
the
> > secondary MX (or at least compliant mail servers should try secondary
> > MX...). The secondary MX server should more-or-less spool/store the
Hi all,
Does anyone have any pointers or a doc file somewhere on how to setup a
secondary MX server. Basically, if the primary MX is down, then try the
secondary MX (or at least compliant mail servers should try secondary
MX...). The secondary MX server should more-or-less spool/store the
message
> > There is no performance-hit with UDMA100/133 drives when using two
> > devices per channel. This an old "SCSI-is-best" story that were true a
> > long time ago.
>
> On http://www.coker.com.au/hardware/46g.png I have a graph of this using
> ATA66 on an Athlon800 machine without DDR RAM. It sh
> > Apr 17 10:49:49 teks kernel: TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer
> > 210.135.175.47:43827/
> > 80 shrinks window 2321430930:2321431630. Repaired.
> >
>
> So it appears that someone is running some sort of "tar-pit" system that
is
> designed to keep sockets in a bad state and run you out of kernel
me
Hi all,
can anyone make sense of the following?
Apr 17 10:49:49 teks kernel: TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer
210.135.175.47:43827/
80 shrinks window 2321430930:2321431630. Repaired.
What is this "Treason uncloaked"?
I think the following is unrelated, but I also found a lot of them (50+)
in the l
> > > Is there any way to setup a "catch-all" BIND IP address? That is...
if a
> > > domain name has our DNS servers listed, then we automatically
resolve it
> > > to a predefined IP number (act authoritive). Sort of how you can
have a
> > > "default" virtual host in Apache.
> > >
> > > Naturally,
201 - 300 of 639 matches
Mail list logo
