Re: new package listing

2008-01-25 Thread Mark Howard
to writing patches for these. Regards, Mark Howard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Java-Gnome: jni or cni

2004-03-11 Thread Mark Howard
he time to read this and hopefully responding. http://java-gnome.sf.net -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Ean, please orphan Kaffe!, was Re: Co-maintaining Kaffe

2004-03-04 Thread Mark Howard
the package than you recently, so why not let him take over and just enjoy the results. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-17 Thread Mark Howard
esting, even if these packages have RC bugs and are not themselves getting newer versions into testing. Jikes does not need versioned dependencies on these packages, so I don't see what the problem is. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.co

bugwatcher problems

2004-01-14 Thread Mark Howard
.cacheLookup(DateFormatSymbols.java:417) at java.text.DateFormatSymbols.initializeData(DateFormatSymbols.java:468) at java.text.DateFormatSymbols.(DateFormatSymbols.java:103) at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.(SimpleDateFormat.java:442) at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.(SimpleDateFormat.java:424) Thanks in ad

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-20 Thread Mark Howard
oftware and does not belong in main. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] naming and distribution issues

2003-11-16 Thread Mark Howard
sorry, forgot to add the link Original thread: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3466926&forum_id=5689 -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSU

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] naming and distribution issues

2003-11-16 Thread Mark Howard
have with my proposal though is what happens if /usr/lib/jni has both libgnome-java0.8 and libgnome-java0.9 - How does the jvm currently choose? -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: java-gnome_0.8.0cvs20031002-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2003-10-26 Thread Mark Howard
ome0-jni_0.8.0cvs20031002-1_i386.deb 368K 2003-10-03 14:44 libgtk0-java_0.8.0cvs20031002-1_all.deb 549K 2003-10-03 14:44 libgtk0-java-doc_0.8.0cvs20031002-1_all.deb 142K 2003-10-03 14:45 libgtk0-jni_0.8.0cvs20031002-1_i386.deb -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.ti

Re: RFS: libgnujaxp-java -- closes Bug#213199

2003-09-29 Thread Mark Howard
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > * Update the symlink, thanks to Gianluigi Tiesi (closes: #213199). That's really no better than saying * Closes: #213199, thanks to Gianluigi Tiesi Which symlink? -- .''`. Mark Howard :

Re: RFS: libgnujaxp-java -- closes Bug#213199

2003-09-29 Thread Mark Howard
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > * Update the symlink, thanks to Gianluigi Tiesi (closes: #213199). That's really no better than saying * Closes: #213199, thanks to Gianluigi Tiesi Which symlink? -- .''`. Mark Howard :

Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools

2003-09-12 Thread Mark Howard
his doesn't deserve to go in main? [Please *don't* CC me - I'm on this list!] -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpMLSMpgyQuA.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools

2003-09-11 Thread Mark Howard
his doesn't deserve to go in main? [Please *don't* CC me - I'm on this list!] -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools

2003-09-11 Thread Mark Howard
be compiled with free software but not run with free software > to go into main. It is not. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpIeiZgB5eeo.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools

2003-09-11 Thread Mark Howard
be compiled with free software but not run with free software > to go into main. It is not. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: http_proxy environment variable

2003-09-08 Thread Mark Howard
nux environment variables for proxys. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: http_proxy environment variable

2003-09-08 Thread Mark Howard
nux environment variables for proxys. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http_proxy environment variable

2003-08-31 Thread Mark Howard
yet tried with other JVMs, but if they do the same, should this be reported as a bug? -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

http_proxy environment variable

2003-08-31 Thread Mark Howard
yet tried with other JVMs, but if they do the same, should this be reported as a bug? -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Java RC Bug Report

2003-08-26 Thread Mark Howard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 189909 [ + ] jakarta-regexp: FTBFS: Cannot find java class files Package: java-gnome (debian/main). Maintainer: Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 173287 [] CVS Snapshot - not suitable for stable Package: javacc (debian/main). Maintainer: Nicolas S

Re: Java RC Bug Report

2003-08-26 Thread Mark Howard
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 09:18:06PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: > 20 java-ish RC Bugs based on http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/all.html This list includes RC bugs where: package is in: `ara -list 'Depends=~/.*java.*/i | Depends=~/gij.*/i | Depends=~/kaffe.*/i | Depends=~

Re: Java RC Bug Report

2003-08-26 Thread Mark Howard
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 09:18:06PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: > 20 java-ish RC Bugs based on > http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/all.html This list includes RC bugs where: package is in: `ara -list 'Depends=~/.*java.*/i | Depends=~/gij.*/i | Depends=~/kaffe.*/i | Depend

Java RC Bug Report

2003-08-26 Thread Mark Howard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 189909 [ + ] jakarta-regexp: FTBFS: Cannot find java class files Package: java-gnome (debian/main). Maintainer: Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 173287 [] CVS Snapshot - not suitable for stable Package: javacc (debian/main). Maintainer: Nicolas S

Java MIME parser?

2003-08-04 Thread Mark Howard
ld do with is a mime parser. I've done searches for java libraries which found org.w3c.www.mime. I've not worked with mime messages before, so if anyone on this list has any advice, particularly related to java libraries, please let me know. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' :

Java MIME parser?

2003-08-04 Thread Mark Howard
ld do with is a mime parser. I've done searches for java libraries which found org.w3c.www.mime. I've not worked with mime messages before, so if anyone on this list has any advice, particularly related to java libraries, please let me know. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' :

Re: Usage of dh_javadoc

2003-07-28 Thread Mark Howard
always catch a "Not a valid class or > package" error message. Please look at the source, I might not have implemented it yet (or possibly done it wrong or not upgraded it for newer gjdoc). Sorry I've been so slack with the gjdoc package, it's not acceptable. -- .&#

Re: [PROPOSAL] dh_ant

2003-07-28 Thread Mark Howard
modify the build.xml file as needed and call ant in The Right Way; leave everything else (?) to the cdbs module for those who want it. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Usage of dh_javadoc

2003-07-28 Thread Mark Howard
always catch a "Not a valid class or > package" error message. Please look at the source, I might not have implemented it yet (or possibly done it wrong or not upgraded it for newer gjdoc). Sorry I've been so slack with the gjdoc package, it's not acceptable. -- .&#

Re: [PROPOSAL] dh_ant

2003-07-28 Thread Mark Howard
modify the build.xml file as needed and call ant in The Right Way; leave everything else (?) to the cdbs module for those who want it. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBS

Class Finder

2003-06-29 Thread Mark Howard
ately, there are two required things for such a script which I don't know how to do: 1. get a list of binary packages whose source packages build-depend (or build-depend-indep) on .*jar 2. fetch a binary package without superuser permissions. Can anyone help? -- .''`. Mark Howard

[Possible mass filing of bugs] libraries not depending onjava.-runtime

2003-06-29 Thread Mark Howard
$/i' ara -list '!Depends=~/java.\-runtime/ & Package=~/lib.*java$/i' | wc -l 51 -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: Dropping gij-3.2 / gcj-3.2 / libgcj3 / libgcj3-dev

2003-05-24 Thread Mark Howard
to try again at the start of July. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[help] gjdoc packages

2003-05-12 Thread Mark Howard
6.1 which needs packaging. It is far superior to the version currently in sid. I've tried once or twice, but there are a couple of other packages which need making in order to get it to work - It's not the easiest program to package. Please can somebody help update the gjdoc package.

Re: Solution for CLASSPATH

2003-04-19 Thread Mark Howard
On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 12:40, Nicos Panayides wrote: > What do you think? sounds good What happens if a class is in multiple jar files? which will be used? Does this has any performance impact? (i.e. does it take a while to search through the jar files). -- .''`

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add some package from 'classpath'

2003-04-17 Thread Mark Howard
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 17:48, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 15:15, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > > My opinion is make the separate jar from the classpath sou

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add some package from 'classpath'

2003-04-16 Thread Mark Howard
remove them from the original archive and modify any tools which use this so that they also look at the new jar files.. we shouldn't duplicate the classes. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Swing and other free GUIs (KDE?)

2003-04-16 Thread Mark Howard
I to work with -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add some package from 'classpath'

2003-04-16 Thread Mark Howard
s are not > in a jar file and they are not in /usr/share/java. So people should > put in their classpath /usr/share/classpath/glibj.zip... with all the > classes, not only the jta, jdbc-ext or swing. I agree - these should be split into the separate jar files so that e.g. the swing part can be

Re: Virtual machines in Debian

2003-04-15 Thread Mark Howard
I've had a few problems with gij, but some people think it's the best. Gets better at each release. IBM - not available in Debian (non-free?) Blackdown, Sun Excellent, but non-free. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add some package from 'classpath'

2003-04-15 Thread Mark Howard
t ant moved to main - I think it's possible, but would need a little work. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian/Java

2003-04-09 Thread Mark Howard
bian/Java > (leading to implementations solving those ommissions) Please discuss these on this list. > - a repository of java debian packages that are not yet in Debian Again, if we can legally do this, why aren't they in Debian? -- +--+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh.comtildemh.commh@ | +--+

Re: gnujaxp-java-0.0.cvs20030320 available

2003-03-24 Thread Mark Howard
the cvs files - this is not a Debian native package The comments in debian/rules should be deleted. Other than that, everything seems fine. > (I only have a lintian warning for the symlink in usr/doc) You should upgrade your system - a newer debhelper package fixed this a long time a

Re: gnujaxp-java-0.0.cvs20030320 available

2003-03-24 Thread Mark Howard
the cvs files - this is not a Debian native package The comments in debian/rules should be deleted. Other than that, everything seems fine. > (I only have a lintian warning for the symlink in usr/doc) You should upgrade your system - a newer debhelper package fixed this a long time a

Re: JAXP-compliant XSLT processor

2003-03-20 Thread Mark Howard
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 11:46, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > I'll try to package the current cvs version to practice debian > packaging and then I'll wait for the next release. Great. Please make your cvs packages available when they're done so I can see if they work with gjdoc. --

Re: JAXP-compliant XSLT processor

2003-03-20 Thread Mark Howard
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 11:46, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > I'll try to package the current cvs version to practice debian > packaging and then I'll wait for the next release. Great. Please make your cvs packages available when they're done so I can see if they work with gjdoc. --

JAXP-compliant XSLT processor

2003-03-19 Thread Mark Howard
ckaging this? Or possibly help getting the existing packages into main if it is possible? I really know nothing of JAXP or XSLT, so do not want to maintain the packages myself. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

JAXP-compliant XSLT processor

2003-03-19 Thread Mark Howard
ckaging this? Or possibly help getting the existing packages into main if it is possible? I really know nothing of JAXP or XSLT, so do not want to maintain the packages myself. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [E

Re: kaffe 1.1 cvs

2003-02-24 Thread Mark Howard
t as a last resort, but don't feel that I could maintain the > package in reasonable quality (no time to follow kaffe development). Unfortunately I am in the same situation. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: kaffe 1.1 cvs

2003-02-24 Thread Mark Howard
t as a last resort, but don't feel that I could maintain the > package in reasonable quality (no time to follow kaffe development). Unfortunately I am in the same situation. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [

Re: texidoclet

2003-01-16 Thread Mark Howard
cript for it. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: texidoclet

2003-01-16 Thread Mark Howard
cript for it. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: policy suggestion: API docs are not for users

2003-01-02 Thread Mark Howard
nd ant (and so never needed the api). Do you disagree that it would be worthwhile to split the package into one containing the core manual and an additional one with the api docs and any advanced manual? (sorry, haven't looked at the package in detail so don't know exactly what this might b

Re: policy suggestion: API docs are not for users

2003-01-02 Thread Mark Howard
nd ant (and so never needed the api). Do you disagree that it would be worthwhile to split the package into one containing the core manual and an additional one with the api docs and any advanced manual? (sorry, haven't looked at the package in detail so don't know exactly what this might b

Re: Eclipse

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Howard
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 19:22, Mark Howard wrote: > > Cool! Then if someone else doesn't get all enthusiastic on me, I'll > > follow up on my ITP. > > Hi Stefen! Sorry Stephen, a simple typing mistake. Hope your weren't offended. -- .''`. Mark Ho

Re: Eclipse

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Howard
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 19:22, Mark Howard wrote: > > Cool! Then if someone else doesn't get all enthusiastic on me, I'll > > follow up on my ITP. > > Hi Stefen! Sorry Stephen, a simple typing mistake. Hope your weren't offended. -- .''`. Mark Ho

policy suggestion: API docs are not for users

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Howard
ch as that automatically generated from source code. If anyone has legitimate reasons for including API docs in a -doc package (for a program, not a library), then I would love to know what they are. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL

Re: Eclipse

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Howard
this unofficially and there have been offers of advice from people at RedHat who made their packages. Hopefully you will all be able to work together and make an excellent job. I look forward to trying the results. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com

policy suggestion: API docs are not for users

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Howard
ch as that automatically generated from source code. If anyone has legitimate reasons for including API docs in a -doc package (for a program, not a library), then I would love to know what they are. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL

Re: Eclipse

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Howard
this unofficially and there have been offers of advice from people at RedHat who made their packages. Hopefully you will all be able to work together and make an excellent job. I look forward to trying the results. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com

dh_javadoc

2002-12-23 Thread Mark Howard
l file; -link option. I have been in contact with upstream, however they all have very limited time and nobody seems to be regularly working on gjdoc. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

dh_javadoc

2002-12-23 Thread Mark Howard
l file; -link option. I have been in contact with upstream, however they all have very limited time and nobody seems to be regularly working on gjdoc. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROT

Re: Suggestion for javadoc building

2002-10-04 Thread Mark Howard
docs and api for any linked libraries? or is it appropriate to just Recommend the other packages and have broken links? or are there any better solutions? -- +--+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh.comtildemh.com

Re: java-compiler useless?

2002-10-04 Thread Mark Howard
ded runtime environment. If a given source (like the JDK does) brings both a compiler and a virtual machine, you may name the compiler package -dev. -- +------+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344

Re: Suggestion for javadoc building

2002-10-04 Thread Mark Howard
pi for any linked libraries? or is it appropriate to just Recommend the other packages and have broken links? or are there any better solutions? -- +--+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh.comtildemh.commh@

Re: java-compiler useless?

2002-10-04 Thread Mark Howard
ded runtime environment. If a given source (like the JDK does) brings both a compiler and a virtual machine, you may name the compiler package -dev. -- +------+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344

java-compiler useless?

2002-10-04 Thread Mark Howard
ac wrapper script for most of the java-compilers currently in main. -- +--+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh.comtildemh.commh@ | +--+

java-compiler useless?

2002-10-04 Thread Mark Howard
ac wrapper script for most of the java-compilers currently in main. -- +--+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh.comtildemh.commh@ | +--+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: L10N resources

2002-09-23 Thread Mark Howard
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 01:40, Susan Kleinmann wrote: > Hello, > > On 22 Sep 2002 11:44:28 BST, Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Hi, > > We're working (upstream) on a java program which includes multiple > > l10n files, based on ResourceBundles.

Re: L10N resources

2002-09-23 Thread Mark Howard
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 01:40, Susan Kleinmann wrote: > Hello, > > On 22 Sep 2002 11:44:28 BST, Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Hi, > > We're working (upstream) on a java program which includes multiple > > l10n files, based on ResourceBundles.

L10N resources

2002-09-22 Thread Mark Howard
r /usr/bin. Where does Debian want these files installed? [please maintain the CC to the indexgen list in replies] -- +--+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh.comtildemh

L10N resources

2002-09-22 Thread Mark Howard
r /usr/bin. Where does Debian want these files installed? [please maintain the CC to the indexgen list in replies] -- +--+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh.comtildemh

Re: free ant | naming issues

2002-08-31 Thread Mark Howard
On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 11:20, Stefan Gybas wrote: > Mark Howard wrote: > > > 1) Does anyone know of any apache ant clone in main. Or, is there any > > chance of ant being moved to main in the near future. > > I don't know of any Ant clone bu I'm working on

free ant | naming issues

2002-08-31 Thread Mark Howard
know if you have any better suggestions for the package names. [Please CC me - I'm not on the list at the moment] -- +------+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh

Re: free ant | naming issues

2002-08-31 Thread Mark Howard
On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 11:20, Stefan Gybas wrote: > Mark Howard wrote: > > > 1) Does anyone know of any apache ant clone in main. Or, is there any > > chance of ant being moved to main in the near future. > > I don't know of any Ant clone bu I'm working on

free ant | naming issues

2002-08-31 Thread Mark Howard
know if you have any better suggestions for the package names. [Please CC me - I'm not on the list at the moment] -- +------+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh