Package: linux-cpupower
Version: 6.10.11-1
Followup-For: Bug #894906
X-Debbugs-Cc: pitsior...@outlook.com
Can I add that this also works on my rpi3b running debian 11 arm64? The regular
debian distro, from the images of raspi.debian.net, not the fake "64bit on arm"
of raspbian.
-- System Informa
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 11:55:18 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Or otherwise, if you think there's something wrong with them, could you
> > please explain what is wrong? Maybe there's a way to fix them...
>
> The linux-cpupower package
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Or otherwise, if you think there's something wrong with them, could you
> please explain what is wrong? Maybe there's a way to fix them...
The linux-cpupower package includes low level tools to interrogate and
set certain low level
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 17:54:34 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I reiterate the request to people from the Debian Kernel Team: could
> > someone please step in, test the three files, and share his/her insight
> [...]
> >
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 17:54:34 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I reiterate the request to people from the Debian Kernel Team: could
> someone please step in, test the three files, and share his/her insight
[...]
> ?
Dear Debian Kernel Team,
this bug needs love, could some of you please spend a
Package: linux-cpupower
Version: 6.9.10-1
Followup-For: Bug #894906
X-Debbugs-Cc: pitsior...@outlook.com, invernom...@paranoici.org
First and foremost, no need to worry about delayed replies. I do not check the
bug report every day too... and I may have done the cc wrong now.
Second, I can also v
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:49:13 +0300 jim_p wrote:
[...]
> Sunday report... on Monday afternoon because I forgot about it. Like with the
> previous change, adding "After=remote-fs.target" did not change much. It still
> fails like half the times, like it does with the other parameter or with
> neith
Package: linux-cpupower
Version: 6.9.9-1
Followup-For: Bug #894906
X-Debbugs-Cc: pitsior...@outlook.com
Sunday report... on Monday afternoon because I forgot about it. Like with the
previous change, adding "After=remote-fs.target" did not change much. It still
fails like half the times, like it do
Package: linux-cpupower
Version: 6.9.9-1
Followup-For: Bug #894906
X-Debbugs-Cc: pitsior...@outlook.com
First failed start after adding "After=systemd-modules-load.service". If it
happens again today, I will not report it, but I will report how many times it
failed in total until tomorrow.
Jul 20
Package: linux-cpupower
Version: 6.9.9-1
Followup-For: Bug #894906
X-Debbugs-Cc: pitsior...@outlook.com
As you said, I used to manually run the command when the system had reached the
desktop. Here is a full output in case it helps.
$ sudo cpupower frequency-set -g powersave
Setting cpu: 0
Settin
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 12:31:59 +0300 jim_p wrote:
[...]
> Then I discovered linux-cpupower, which I used by running "cpupower
> frequency-set -g powersave" on every boot.
Hi!
How did you use to run "cpupower frequency-set -g powersave" ?
Manually?
Or did you drop that line in some script executed
Package: linux-cpupower
Version: 6.9.8-1
Followup-For: Bug #894906
X-Debbugs-Cc: pitsior...@outlook.com
Hello everyone and thank you for your great work. I am a former user of the
obsolete cpufrequtils and of the unmaintained (by debian) cpupower-gui. I was
using those tools until 2021 to set my g
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 23:21:32 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:48:58 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Once again, please accept the "patch" and incorporate the files (or
> > further enhanced versions of them) into linux-cpupower.
>
> Have you had a chance to take a look at
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:48:58 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Please find attached the three updated files.
>
> Tested on one of my systems, where I purged cpufrequtils and installed
> linux-cpupower and then I issued the following commands:
>
> # install -m 644 cpupower.default /etc/defaul
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 22:09:10 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Is there room for improvement?
> Yes, I think there is.
> For instance, the script /usr/libexec/cpupower could be translated to
> POSIX shell, getting rid of its bashisms.
Here we go, I modified the script by translating it to POSIX
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 14:38:37 +0200 Pavel Kreuzt wrote:
[...]
> linux-cpupower should be run at boot time, but no systemd service
> is installed, nor default config file is present in /etc/default.
> At least an example config should be provided as in cpufrequtils package
Package: linux-cpupower
Version: 4.15.11-1kali1
Severity: wishlist
linux-cpupower should be run at boot time, but no systemd service is installed,
nor default config file is present in /etc/default. At least an example config
should be provided as in cpufrequtils package.
-- System Information
17 matches
Mail list logo
