Am 24.11.2022 um 02:28 schrieb Charles Plessy:
Hello everybody,
I have read the Muscle5 paper and it is a totally different program than
Muscle3.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36379955/
Reintroducing muscle3 as a separate package might be useful not only to
Biopython, but also to the
Am 10.10.2022 um 10:04 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
On 10 October 2022 11:50:14 am IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
If no one gets to it, asking for removal is a sensible option. It otherwise
imho becomes another time sapping package that no one cares about much.
There was no volunteer to pick up the
Am 04.10.2022 um 09:38 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
Hi,
On 2022-10-03 18:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
My main motivation to start ntcard and twopaco packages was to avoid
code duplication in pufferfish. I admit it seems I faild in doing this
sensibly to forget creating a library package. Simply do
Am 03.10.2022 um 17:32 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Hi Andrius,
Am Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 10:19:41AM +0300 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
twopaco has entered testing (yay!), thus I gave its reverse dependency,
pufferfish (ITP bug #944785), a look. pufferfish carries embedded copies
of twopaco and ntcard
Am 26.09.2022 um 20:05 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Hi Maarten,
Am Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:45:38PM +0200 schrieb Maarten L. Hekkelman:
Dear Andreas,
The version of libcifpp in trunk at github is newer than what is in Debian,
but is already outdated. I'm in the last stage of releasing yet another,
Many, many thanks also from my side. Well done!!
I very much hope that you will find your corner of interest in Debian
and somehow stay with us.
Best wishes,
Steffen
Am 14.09.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Hi Bilal,
thanks a lot for all your work! I would be very happy if you would
Am 14.09.2022 um 22:57 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
So I don't think just exchanging names is a very optimal thing to do here.
If I don't hear from Steffen, or no-one raises an objection in the next three
weeks, I'll
proceed to file an RM bug.
Steffen???
@Steffen, if you are reading this, a quick
+
Von:Debian Bug Tracking System
Antwort an: 1014...@bugs.debian.org
An: Steffen Moeller
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the ftp.debian.org package:
#1014692: RM: qiime [armel armhf i386] -- ROM; FTBFS, no longer builds
on 32bit
Hi Andreas, hi Aaron,
Thank you both for your help.
Am 02.08.2022 um 10:48 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Hi Aaron,
thanks again for your hints.
Am Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 12:14:32PM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko:
I wonder what needs to be done to create the said binaries.
Ah, right, they need VDB;
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: mview
Version : 1.64
* URL : https://desmid.github.io/mview/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : biological sequence alignment conversion
Team-maintained on https
The answer is that I had failed to rebuild the package in a chroot environment.
I'll reupload. Thanks for noticing.
Steffen
Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I injected r-bioc-hilbertvis packaging according Vcs tags in the control
file into our SVN and added the missing Build-Depends which fixes this
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille wrote:
I had a look into Artemis[1] because this might be used in our
institute. The situation of this package is similar to the recently
packaged alien_hunter: It contains a lot of Jar files without source.
to have Artemis in Debian would be very nice, indeed.
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille wrote:
I'd like to give an update on the Enhances issue. For the moment our
development instance of the webtools (debian-med.debian.net and
blends.debian.net) are running some new code which displays the packages
which are enhancing a package at the bottom of the
Hi Morten,
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
I am in the akward position that an upstream author has removed the
attribution in the Authors section in a man page that I have contributed.
See the attached diff.
I wrote an email making him aware of this, but have not received any reply.
I think this
Hello,
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 07:51:13PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
I have just prepared a bootable USB stick with
You just prepared, but the files in SVN
(community/infrastructure/livecd) are dated from November last year.
Would you mind commiting your work?
now
Hello,
Andreas Tille wrote:
I intend to update the Debian package of infernal to the newest stable
version (1.0). I just noticed that it contains a copy of libeazel. I
became curious about this library because it looked rather like a
separate piece of code. My research enedet up in
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:34:08PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
...
We should
nonetheless prepare for it. I could imagine that both the HMMER and the
Infernal packages offer a binary package libeazel-hmmer/libeazel-infernal and
that these are given the tag Provides
Hello,
I am not much of a structure guy (yet) but could imagine that a couple of
packages offered here http://sw-tools.pdb.org/ would be good to offer. Debian
is already fairly good in playing with structures that are available, from what
I overview, but we lack those tools that help in producing
Hello,
I have just prepared a bootable USB stick with
* med-bio-dev
* med-bio + clustalw (non-free) + r-recommended
* some basic infrastructure (ssh-server, dhcp-client, debfoster,
build-essential, boinc-client, ...)
* OpenCV with -dev (which is not in debian-med but we use it at our
Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
the package infernal contains a watch file saying:
version=3
ftp://infernal.janelia.org/pub/software/infernal/infernal-(.*)\.tar\.gz
and the page
ftp://infernal.janelia.org/pub/software/infernal/
actually contains newer versions than we have packaged.
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Would you mind adding this information to tasks/bio file to
let this info show up on the tasks page? BTW, do you think we
should maintain also a Published-PubMed field?
I had thought about it, too. I came
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:09:59PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Do I hear some yip, this will help us, go ahead somewhere?
Why don't you start on a Wiki what you are proposing?
You mean on wiki.debian.org, I presume. The detailed descriptions of the
projects should
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/ does not show up because of it.
It seems to be in the repository, but it is not shown on the web pages.
Many thanks
Steffen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Steffen Moeller wrote:
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/ does not show up because of it.
It seems to be in the repository, but it is not shown on the web pages.
I have added some -f to the mv command, so the permissions are
overwritten in the
backup folder. This seems to have fixed
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 10:26:00AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Source: r-other-mott-happy
Version: 2.1-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.58.2 (31 Jul 2009) on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu
[...]
** R
Hello again,
I'd be interested to see the packages listed that we are working on (on varying
degrees of
activity) as a community. Those projects don't necessarily have produced any
packages yet,
but they eventually should. What comes to mind are
* getData - the automated installation of
Dear all,
to bring Debian Med (and ourselves with it) closer with upstream and their
organisations,
I suggest to prepare a page with links to them. This would be too many to list
them, I
presume, but how about the following two selection criteria:
* regional coverage - the world-wide ones
Anthony Boureux wrote:
[...]
So, my questions for the packaging team (I not really an expert with the
debian policy) :
Do you think I can split the package libbio-das-proserver, even if
sub-package have less than 5 files ?
Yes, this is perfectly doable. I just did one which only has a
chance to see a bio-das-proserver implemented in anything else
but Perl?
If not, then bio-das-proserver is the right name for it. I share your opinion on
libbio-das-perl and libbio-das-lite-perl.
Thanks!
Steffen
Anthony.
Steffen Moeller a écrit :
Anthony Boureux wrote:
[...]
So, my
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 06:11:27PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
I feel rather good about such a page. Andreas?
[...]
So if you feel good about it - just try it.
[...]
Good! I gave an example about the information I would like to see in there.
Please give me some
-das-lite needed by
bio-das-proserver, but when I checked in the BTS for bio-das.* : I found
that Steffen Moeller already did some work on bio-das-proserver (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525847). Also he put a
first version for libbio-das-perl. So before to put RFP bugs
Hi Andreas, have many thanks for your work on the registration info - I like it
a lot. You
have seen me changing the wording a bit, hope that was ok.
The page has not yet updated itself, so I cannot be too critical myself about
it, though I
knew autodock to have a fresh paper out, which is a
Hello,
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 03:46:50PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Enhanced-By: autogrid
+Depends: autodocktools
+Friends: mgltools-dejavu, mgltools-pmv, mgltools-utpackages,
mgltools-vision, mgltools-volume
Enhanced-By: mgltools-dejavu, mgltools-pmv, mgltools
Hello,
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 01:54:14PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
I must admit that I was completely unaware of the reverse-suggests. I never
used it, but
you are right. It should be used more.
Definitely. I'd suggest doing it immediately in SVN if you
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:22:47PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I created these pages when it was time-consuming to modify our old task pages
on the Debian website. Also, I was not aware that the number of available
applications was so high !
...
There are smaller pages
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:28:20PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
1) Splitting the med-bio metapackage into med-bio-commandline and
med-bio-graphical. Not only it makes a clearer organisation, but
also it can be useful for the creation of small virtual machines
Hello,
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 12:08:54PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
time flies fast and we are already between one third and the half of this
release cycle. I propose that we discuss what are the goals that we would
like
to acheive in Debian Squeeze.
Thanks again
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:38:02AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I have been thinking a bit on the issue. How about the following workflow:
- Create a new file with a ???Name: contents??? field syntax in the Debian
source
packages, for ???online meta-data??? that
Hello,
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:12:24PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
/usr/share/icons/Tango/32x32/emotes/face-angel.png
(also found here in large
https://sharesource.org/svn/phoneme/theme/png/256x256/face-angel.png)
I found it to fit rather nicely since we
Hello,
following up the idea of Andreas to flag those software packages that ask for a
registration of their users, I skimmed through the tango-icon-theme package and
found the
following icons that I thought to fit:
/usr/share/icons/Tango/32x32/emotes/face-angel.png
(also found here in large
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:40:24PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
We could also use README.Debian (while in practice it won't reach
every user of the package (because not everybody read this file), it's
a file that all users are supposed to read).
Sure - how did it
Dear Charles,
thank your for your nice review of the current situation. I completely agree.
To my knowledge, no Linux distribution has yet addressed this issue at all.
I personally like the idea to use paypal for a transfer of funds, but even
more so for the non-anonymous registration of active
Michael Banck wrote:
(CCing -science because I think this applies to all fields of science
and should see wider discussion)
For -science, the issue is about user registration (usually before
download, or on program startup) which is an important tool for
scientific software authors to plead
Hello,
in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat
unusual
post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the users
that
upstream needs funding to maintain their software.
The respective preliminary code I have just checked in. Upstream had
Hello,
in my recent ISMB summary post I had suggested to create pointers to companies
in the life
sciences that officially state their compatibility with Debian and/or Ubuntu or
their
products. Is anybody opposing that idea?
I am asking since the sole reason for the folks in a Linux BoF of the
Dear Charles,
Charles Plessy wrote:
I almost finished to package Staden's io_lib. In contrary to Upstream's
defaults, the Debian package builds a dynamic library. Could somebody help me
to figure out the Right Thing to do with the sonames?
I have uploaded a preliminary package on
Hello,
our abstract was accepted for a short presentation. Which is just fine
and all I ever wanted, really. What is important for us does not happen
at presentation time but before and after the talk, obviously.
That said, I would be happy to revive the BOSC liveCD plans a bit to
the degree
Hi Scott,
have many thanks, I'll address that in the upcoming days when also providing a
new
upstream release.
Cheers,
Steffen
Scott Kitterman wrote:
As some of you may already know, Ubuntu went ahead an pushed to Python 2.6 as
it's default Python in it's most recent release. Python 2.6
Hello,
I was interested in numbers and how they changed over distributions. Here is
what I came
up with when I followed the Recommends of the med-bio package:
oldstable : 34
stable : 43
testing : 43
unstable : 43
though at list plink is missing here, and so is infernal that is in
Hello, sorry for being unequally distributed with my feedback. But at least
here is some.
Taken from apt-cache show med-bio-dev:
Recommends: bioperl, libajax5-dev, libbio-mage-perl, libbio-ruby,
libgenome-1.3-1,
libgo-perl, libncbi6-dev, libnucleus5-dev, libqsearch-dev, libvibrant6-dev, mcl,
Hello,
when I heard about this topic at last year's Nettab, I thought that this would
definitely
be something to present Debian-Med at. We'd need to prepare three pages to
possibly be
accepted for an oral presentation.
My June is already rather spiked with three events and I am not sure if I
Hello,
I recall from a visit at City University in London that they had just the basic
tools in
their default paths and added specialised software only upon the execution of
some script.
I did not like this back then, but with the hindsight of the conflicts with
plink, I feel
that this is
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
we should ask the technical committee to rule over it. And maybe this
needs some voting in the end.
Who is this *we*? Do you volunteer?
:) no, since I personally see no preferable alternative to the current
conflicting
Hello,
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Andreas Tille wrote:
in October last year there was a longish discussion about name space
pollution regarding plink. If you like to spend some time you should
read the complete log of #503367 [1].
I decided to put an end now on this issue to make sure it will
Hello,
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
Charles Plessy a écrit :
Le Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:48:34PM +0100, Obey Arthur Liu a écrit :
Edouard Nemours a écrit :
i'd love to raise awareness of the fact that many companies and users of
debian hosts move their systems to the cloud (for instance amazon
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Concerning specialised Debian repositories, I seem them more and more.
There is one for
the OpenMoko w/ Debian, for instance, which you cannot get around.
Once Dirk announces the
R one, this will become some standard thingy
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
volatile.debian.org could possibly be added to the prior mentioned
list of non-standard
repositories that the community is not sufficiently aware of.
But volatile *is* official and serves tasks which are orthogonal
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Exactly. We'd love to get something ready for the world to consume,
and once
that is done, we can speculate about next steps like BioC, or more
arches, or
maybe Ubuntu builds, or One step at time.
Sure. I
Hi Charles,
Charles Plessy wrote:
I would like to start a discussion about the possiblity to propose project(s)
for the Google Summer of Code 2009. Last year the project I proposed, about
data management, was accepted but canceled last minute because the student got
accepted somewhere else.
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/packages/vista/trunk/?rev=0sc=0
Is vistA software able to run on linux as it stands?
Hi,
does anybody get anything shown as translated (no red Xes) on
HMMer directly ships with a variant of squid itself. We noticed some functions
to have
been added. So, instead of hmmer suggesting biosquid, it could actually provide
it.
Upstream was unsure about the degree of compatibility himselfasked about a
year ago.
I cannot recall Infernal to ship
Charles Plessy wrote:
I just checked the HMMER3 sources, and they do not contain (bio)squid, so the
hmmer-squid would not have a long life.
Is there an ITP for HMMER3 already?
[...]
We will face similar situations in the future. Maybe we need a dedicated page
on our website?
Should
Hello,
I just learned from the upstream author of BioScuid that this is obsolete and
no longer
maintained. Should it be removed from the archive? What are the alternatives to
using it?
Best,
Steffen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
the pkg-bioc project has managed to build what is buildable
automatically, but we never
got around towards offering it as a service. Dirk maintains the
CDBS for the R packaging and I
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-escience-devel/
It is a low traffic list.
No doubt - but even low volume lists should have an archive which
I failed to seek for.
That was meant ironic, your
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, ti...@alioth.debian.org wrote:
Author: tille
Date: 2009-01-17 09:15:41 + (Sat, 17 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 3007
As you might have noticed I'm working on some R packages to
finally get r-survaillance packaged. While I'm a complete
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
I think that I will upload with a README.ftpmaster explaining that the
sources
will come in the next release and I prefer save the repacking work.
(Since the
figures are in binary format, I can not just dump them in the
Hi David,
besides being reminded that I need to take my routine check these days, I'd
like to stress
how unique your position is, David. You should not spend too much time on
coding. Rather
help with some insightful guidance to specify the minimal complexity of a
system that
could be
Hi Johan,
Johan Henriksson wrote:
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
I'd like to stress how unique your position is, David. You should not spend
too much
time on coding.
I fully agree with that.
Rather help with some insightful guidance to specify the minimal complexity
of a
system that
Hello,
I became a fan of Morten's PPA, which apparently are little apt repositories
for single
developers. However, packages do get autobuilt across platforms. And PPA has the
launchpad-typical BTS associated with the packages, too.
I'd like to see some PPA adapted for Debian med to
* increase
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
I became a fan of Morten's PPA, which apparently are little apt
repositories for single
developers.
Hmm, could you please be a little bit more verbose than little apt
repositories?
I can not see any advantage over official
Hello,
I have just gave an almost ready BioJava package the final touch, I think. If
there are
any users of BioJava on this list, then I would much appreciate feedback.
BioJava is still maintained on the collection of bits for Taverna site of
mine,
pkg-escience, but also referenced via svn
Dear all,
I was probably one of the first to have registered with the EC2, but never got
around
actually testing it. I just made myself the present to dedicate some time into
prepared a
Debian-Med Amazon Machine Image (AMI) and then running it ... it works.
$ ec2-describe-images
IMAGE
Hello,
I am so busy that I followed my attention deficit disorder a bit and came up
with those
magic for the file command. They seem to work. Before I place a wishlist to
file, please
be so kind to check them for me a bit:
sudo cat /etc/magic EOMAGIC
# Sybil mol2 format
0 string
The community folder is more of a concern to me.
What do you mean?
It is more complex. .. just a bit.
Concerning reorganisation, it may be helpful to have some package flocking
together a bit more. For instance, my mgltools packages I have combined into
one big subfolder. The perl
Hello,
it is nice to have a thread to which everyone can contribute something.
Argh, git! :)
Ok, that would probably mean some learning period for me. I'm currently using
SVN for all my personal projects, and am not really comfortable learning git
--
but hey, everyone's using that, kernel
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:54:24AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Steffen Moeller wrote:
I think that there is no problem if you maintain it with the Java team.
:) why isn't anybody mentioning pkg-escience ?
... because there is no clear structure
Dear Charles and who else may be interested in the Amazon clouds,
Slashdot just pointed me to Amazon's service of preparing public data
for the cloud's direct access. A bright move by the EC2 folks, I'd say.
They think about genomes, census data and whatever...and I thought about
Debian-Med
Amazon's URL is here
http://aws.amazon.com/publicdatasets/
Steffen Moeller wrote:
Dear Charles and who else may be interested in the Amazon clouds,
Slashdot just pointed me to Amazon's service of preparing public data
for the cloud's direct access. A bright move by the EC2 folks, I'd say
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:34:17AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond a écrit :
* Package name: jalview
Version : 2.4
Upstream Author : Andrew Waterhouse; Jim Procter; David Martin; Geoff
Barton
* URL : http://www.jalview.org
* License : GPL
Hi Michael, hi Andreas,
Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 02:46:45PM +0100, Andreas Hildebrandt wrote:
This is my first attempt at packaging, and comments would be very
welcome. Everything is checked into svn, package 'ball'.
I can only reiterate: This indirect calling of
Dear all,
I just addded Andreas Hildebrand to our project who has continued the
works of Andreas Moll for the packaging of their BallView protein
structure inspection/dynamics/..whatever.. library. Andreas is one of
the upstream researchers/developers of BallView, much like Sargis of the
So, besides the mere exchange of software packages, Debian-Med starts to
connect researchers. This is good. The Nettab 2009 will be about
Technologies, Tools and Applications for Collaborative and Social
Bioinformatics Research and Development (www.nettab.org) and I really
think we should
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Marek Stopka wrote:
Well some kind of cooperation between me and debian med project would
be cool. :-) I am not biologist, but one my friend who using openSUSE
is and I think he (and other biologist using openSUSE) will appreciate
that :-) But what
Hier Charles, a great initiative of yours!
p
We are proud to announce the release of Debian Med 1.0 together with the new
stable version of the Debian operating system, Lenny.
/p
I don't like the 1.0 so much. How about: We are proud to announce the first
release of
Debian-Med together with
Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 13:12 -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Dear Debian Med Developers,
Can you point me to the Debian sources for the plink Debian package that
is currently sitting in NEW?
Sure. ;-)
Vcs-Browser:
Hello,
Andreas Tille wrote:
I found some interesting software at
http://www-ab.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/software/welcome.html
but this is all binary distributed stuff with a free beer license for
academic use. Anybody keen on writing a nice e-mail to them whether
they might consider
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille wrote:
http://envgen.nox.ac.uk/bioinformatics/
I looked through their protein category and can stress that
Debian-Med has not need whatsoever to shy off. We just don't
list every binary that EMBOSS comes with as a separate program.
I personally feel that there is
Hi Luk,
Luk Claes wrote:
Steffen Moeller wrote:
=== qtl:
= No migration to testing for 27 days.
See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=qtl
It has a series of important fixes and particularly to the scientists,
the core QTL user group, the outdated version would
Somehow I get all these emails two to three times ;)
I am not against a rename some much, but DIS is no better than CDD, really,
so I am rather with Gert and Karsten. Better than DIS may be DUC (pronounced
duck or dak) as an acronym for Debian User Community. I never understood
though why it was
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Steffen Moeller wrote:
It is needed by bio3d and helps visualising the quality of classifiers.
Every clinical test is such a classifier and as such it would deserve
being mentioned by Debian-Med. It would need to go to bio-dev rather
than to bio
Hello,
is there a demand or some interest of individuals or research
groups on this list to have their compute resources (partially)
shared? I am asking since I am contributing to an EU project
on Grid Computing that has Debian packages at least close
to being usable (see www.knowarc.eu). For an
Thank you, Andreas!
How would you feel about a little note to times.debian.org about the arrival of
this new version? Should I prepare some text?
I played today on one of the EePCs that the Luebeck Saturn offers with
Debian Linux (they really have this written on their price tag). I
could
The package is already prepared.
Steffen
---BeginMessage---
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for
times.debian.org guided me to this article
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/feb/28/research.computing
They should run popularity-contest :)
Cheers,
Steffen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all,
I just tried to compile GAMGI but it does not work out of the box and I
feel that it is most likely due to some version incompatibilities that I
have not addressed properly.
The project is hosted here http://www.gamgi.org/ and Carlos, the
upstream author, would very much like to see
Hello,
I removed all the pdfs from the Infernal sources and extended the
copyright information. This should make Joerg happy.
Andreas or Charles pointed out that the squid subdirectory is basically
what BioSquid is to Debian. It is from the same author, though. I
compared the header files and
Dear all,
I parked here
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/community/infrastructure/getData.pl?op=filerev=0sc=0
a script which allows the download of external databases in a fairly
straight-forward manner. This is fairly far from perfect but may help to
get ourselves organised towards
Dear all,
I have kind of completed my packaging of the AutoDockSuite. The package
is lintian-clean but I might have missed something. May I asked for some
scrutiny from your side before I upload it?
Upstream's package is GPLed, although a download of the tar ball
requires registration at
On Thursday 06 December 2007 18:13:35 Michael A. Miller wrote:
Steffen == Steffen Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian-Med is so diverse in its applications that I barely
see any directly interpretable logo to fit us all. The
depicted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
