Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Hi Aaron, On Wed, 23 May 2018 at 20:36 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Liubov Chuprikova writes: > > > Please, have a look at my two last commits ( > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/ncbi-tools6/commits/master). Actually, > > the first one was made a month

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Hi Andreas, Thank you for your detailed answer! On Thu, 24 May 2018 at 07:44 Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:14:56PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > > W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright > > > (paragraph at line 30) > > > W:

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:14:56PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright > > (paragraph at line 30) > > W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph > > at line 35) > > W: ncbi-tools6 source:

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

On Wed, 23 May 2018 at 20:36 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Liubov Chuprikova writes: > > > Please, have a look at my two last commits ( > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/ncbi-tools6/commits/master). Actually, > > the first one was made a month ago. > > All

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Hi Liubov, On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:01:55AM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > Aaron, thank you for the explanations! They helped me a lot! +1 > Aaron, Andreas: what is your opinion about the whole test? Could we > consider it as completed? Your work looks very fine grained but for the

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Hi Aaron, Hi Andreas, Please, have a look at my two last commits ( https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/ncbi-tools6/commits/master). Actually, the first one was made a month ago. On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 03:48 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Liubov Chuprikova

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Liubov Chuprikova writes: > Sorry for a delay, but I was planning to make one more effort on extending > the set of tests. No problem. > At the moment, the following commands are still lacking tests: > >- *asn2ff*, *gbseqget*, *findspl* (their output indicates they

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Hi Aaron, On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 at 02:04 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Liubov Chuprikova writes: > > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 at 17:30 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > > >> > >> That said, you did catch a bug in taxblast; I'll push a fix this > >>

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Liubov Chuprikova writes: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 at 17:30 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > >> >> That said, you did catch a bug in taxblast; I'll push a fix this >> evening. (The binary will still require a network connection, just >> actually be able to use it

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 at 17:30 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > That said, you did catch a bug in taxblast; I'll push a fix this > evening. (The binary will still require a network connection, just > actually be able to use it now). > Ok, thank you! With regards, Liubov

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Liubov Chuprikova writes: > Ops, it's escaped my attention somehow that tests are usually run on a > disconnected machine. I thought the opposite way.. Then I also need to > comment tests for *insdseqget* and *idfetch*.. Thank you for the > clarification! That said, you

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 at 16:40 Andreas Tille wrote: > > Just from reading the shell script it looks fine. Requiring bash is > also OK. > Ok, thanks! SSL I'm getting suspicious: The test suite needs to be run in a machine > that is disconnected from the internet (similarly

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Hi Liubov, On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:24:12PM +, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > > > Great, thanks! I suppose you could check for specific output contents > > (via grep, not necessarily 100% identity), but this otherwise all looks > > good, and is a clear improvement over not having

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Hi Aaron, On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 23:30 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Liubov Chuprikova writes: > > > the same directory. What do you think about the whole test at this stage? > > Great, thanks! I suppose you could check for specific output contents > (via

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Liubov Chuprikova writes: > Did it and also configured my vim to always show them. Thanks! > Thanks, I've included this macro file into the test. Also, I've added a > test for *vecscreen *since I've noticed UniVec database already built at > the same directory. What do

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Hi Aaron, Hi Andreas, On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 at 01:41 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Liubov Chuprikova writes: > > > Last two days I have been figuring out how to test *tbl2asn* and > > *asnmacro*. Please, take a look at the last commits > >

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Liubov Chuprikova writes: > Sorry for the delay in continuing the work! No problem. > Last two days I have been figuring out how to test *tbl2asn* and > *asnmacro*. Please, take a look at the last commits > .

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Dear Andreas, dear Aaron, On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 at 18:14 Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 02:35:01PM +, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > > > Thanks a lot for your attention to my work on the project! > > I'd like to confirm that this is because of your pretty good

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Liubov Chuprikova writes: > Please, have an eye on my last commits > ! I'd like to > ask one question (most likely it is to Aaron): Are there tools that I > didn't include, but you would strongly recommend for

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 02:35:01PM +, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > Thanks a lot for your attention to my work on the project! I'd like to confirm that this is because of your pretty good work. ;-) > Please, have an eye on my last commits >

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Dear Andreas, dear Aaron, ср, 28 мар. 2018 г. в 5:07, Aaron M. Ucko : > Liubov Chuprikova writes: > > > Thanks a lot for helping me out with this project! I saw your messages to > > Aaron and it was a relief for me that there was a "real" problem to

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Liubov Chuprikova writes: > Thanks a lot for helping me out with this project! I saw your messages to > Aaron and it was a relief for me that there was a "real" problem to build > the package. I had it too, but thought, this was with updating package > dependencies on my

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Dear Liubov, On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 01:33:58PM +, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > I can confirm that the test works for me (now since I'm able to build > > the package - thanks to Aaron for the quick response). > > Thanks a lot for helping me out with this project! I saw your messages to >

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Dear Andreas, вт, 27 мар. 2018 г. в 12:49, Andreas Tille : > Dear Liubov, > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 06:45:42PM +, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > > I once had the idea in the figtree package to use xvfb-run[1]. It was > > > not really successful and most probably the answer

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Dear Liubov, On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 06:45:42PM +, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > I once had the idea in the figtree package to use xvfb-run[1]. It was > > not really successful and most probably the answer is: No, there is no > > sensible way to test X applications right now. > > Thank you

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Dear Andreas, сб, 24 мар. 2018 г. в 17:33, Andreas Tille : On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 02:35:41PM +, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > Is there a way to test graphical applications in *ncbi-tools-x11? > > I once had the idea in the figtree package to use xvfb-run[1]. It was > not

Re: Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Dear Liubov, On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 02:35:41PM +, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > I have started to work on writing tests for *ncbi-tools6*, which is the > source for multiple binary packages. Yes. Its tough that you want to tackle this more complex package which is definitely very valuable

Bug#879619: Autopkgtest for ncbi-tools6

Hello Andreas, I have started to work on writing tests for *ncbi-tools6*, which is the source for multiple binary packages. Some of them contain shared libraries, others are with data files and only two contain executables ( *ncbi-tools-bin* and *ncbi-**tools-x11*). Is there a way to test