dear Mentors,
first and foremost: thanks for your answers!
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, The Fungi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:28:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I see that one uploader of hasciicam is Debian Developer. He is
the first person to contact for upload or to recommend you as
Le Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:35:51AM +0200, Jaromil a écrit :
sure! and so I did, also knowing Filippo personally. In fact, despite
the limited amount of time at his hands, he is doing his best to
review my other upstream software package, which is arguably more
urgent than hasciicam: freej,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 10:35:51 Jaromil wrote:
dear Mentors,
Dear Jaromil,
first and foremost: thanks for your answers!
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, The Fungi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:28:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I see that one uploader of hasciicam is Debian Developer. He is
dear George,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote:
priorities and procedures established by a broad agreement among the
project, and if you want something to improve, try doing it yourself
first as in do-ocracy, see links below of how to help.
i don't exactly consider the links below
Hi Jaromil (2011.04.26_10:53:58_+0200)
compare that with the process of becoming an Ubuntero in launchpad,
which is free software BTW, and the answers will come to surface.
As a Debian and Ubuntu developer I can say that the processes are pretty
similar. Both require review of uploads, and
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.8+hg5533f6de130c-3
of the orphaned package ketchup which I want to adopt.
It builds these binary packages:
ketchup- update utility for linux-kernel sources
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
of my package ripit.
It builds these binary packages:
ripit - Textbased audio CD ripper
This is an upload to unstable with no changes to the version which resides in
exparimental.
The package appears to be lintian clean.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
of my package ripit.
Uploaded, thanks.
Sven
--
And I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.
[ Streetlight
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/04/2011 14:39, Etienne Millon wrote:
Hello,
I offered my help so here it is :)
Thanks a lot! ;-)
Who is interested in helping, can find my build files at [1].
I started from scratch, meaning that I downloaded the source package
from
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
of my package ripit.
It builds these binary packages:
ripit - Textbased audio CD ripper
This is an upload to unstable with no changes to the
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 11:53:58 Jaromil wrote:
dear George,
Dear Jaromil,
Let's skip mediterranean style dramas.
I had a look at it since it is a relatively simple
package one can quickly learn to grasp and you fix a
FTBFS, though the diff compared to what we have in
sid is rather large. I
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:30:05PM +0200, Daniel Richter wrote:
Hey,
I've been asked some time ago to take a look at this package. I'm still
not sure if I'd really like to sponsor it. I'm not sure how exactly we
handle software which edits rather vital configuration files and I did not
even test
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:49:30PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hey Peter,
-Description: Textbased audio CD ripper
+Description: textbased audio CD ripper
this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various
packages we seem to have a mixture of upper and lower cases.
Maybe we
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:49:30PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hey Peter,
-Description: Textbased audio CD ripper
+Description: textbased audio CD ripper
this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:33:46 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
-Description: Textbased audio CD ripper
+Description: textbased audio CD ripper
this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various
packages we seem to have a mixture of upper and lower cases.
Maybe we should try to go
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:48:16AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
Hi,
It seems like lowercase would be the way to go. The description is not
a sentence and capitalizing the first letter makes it feel like a
sentence (when it is not one.)
Since it now feels like a sentence, you also begin to
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote:
I had a look at it since it is a relatively simple package one can
quickly learn to grasp and you fix a FTBFS, though the diff compared
to what we have in sid is rather large.
you mean lots changed? well, if you have a look at the frequency of
dear Stefano,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Jaromil (2011.04.26_10:53:58_+0200)
compare that with the process of becoming an Ubuntero in launchpad,
which is free software BTW, and the answers will come to surface.
As a Debian and Ubuntu developer I can say that the
* Peter Pentchev [110426 15:49 +0300]:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
of my package ripit.
It builds these binary packages:
ripit - Textbased audio CD ripper
This is
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.9.3-1
of my package uthash.
It builds these binary packages:
uthash-dev - A hash table and linked list for C structures
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:18:08PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
* Peter Pentchev [110426 15:49 +0300]:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
of my package ripit.
It builds
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:37:25PM +0200, Matteo Vescovi wrote:
Also, if this is your first package, it may be a good idea to fix bugs
in the current package (ie prepare 0.99.14-4), rather than preparing a
new upstream version.
Should I? :-P I'm not so sure I could help solving bugs...
Hi Sven,
Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2011, 15:16 +0200 schrieb Sven Hoexter:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:30:05PM +0200, Daniel Richter wrote:
I've been asked some time ago to take a look at this package. I'm still
not sure if I'd really like to sponsor it. I'm not sure how exactly we
handle
I added the linker version script and a symbols file in git. Would you
please upload the changes Mr. Mejia?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 17:14:24 Jaromil wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote:
I had a look at it since it is a relatively simple package one can
quickly learn to grasp and you fix a FTBFS, though the diff
compared
to what we have in sid is rather large.
you mean lots changed?
On 04/27/2011 02:31 AM, Daniel Richter wrote:
* The watch file doesn't work.
Oops, there's still 2.0. I changed it to 2.1 now. Hope it works…
Just an advice. Don't just hope. Test it with:
uscan --report --verbose
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
26 matches
Mail list logo
