Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 677384 RFS: hoteldruid/2.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Web based hotel management
system
Bug #677384 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: hoteldruid/2.0.0-1 [ITP] -- Web based
hotel management system
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: hoteldruid/2.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Web
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2012 06:20:00 +
with message-id e1sj2ew-0007kq...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: unpaper/0.4.2-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #676391,
regarding RFS: unpaper/0.4.2-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package coinor-ipopt. It contains
a fix for #662236 which caused its removal from testing.
The .dsc is available on mentors.d.n :
dget -x
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:08:41 +0200
with message-id 20120625080841.GA16438@klow
and subject line Re: Bug#672654: package marked needs sponsor = no at mentors
has caused the Debian Bug report #672654,
regarding RFS: glyr/0.9.9-1 [ITP] -- search engine library for music metadata
to be
On 25/06/12 02:14, Phillip Susi wrote:
Generally, Debian packages stable releases of software. At the current
state is this package ready for unstable or better suited for
experimental? Has it seen wider testing / user base? (e.g. did you post
an announce to ext-dev mailing lists? LWN.net?
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 09:14:47PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
Exactly. I was planning on announcing it once it's in the archive to call
for testing and feedback. The usage of experimental is still unclear to me.
If it's of release quality, then use unstable. If it needs wider
testing before
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of my package tennix.
This upload fixes a FTBFS on amd64 (Bug #664907).
Related changes:
tennix (1.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/patches/fix_FTBFS.patch: add to fix FTBFS
Hi,
I have sent these two RFS a little bit more than two months ago. I have
put a lot of effort into them (for instance I've worked with upstream to
fix bugs in yp-svipc and port it to Python 3) and I'd be sorry if they
missed Wheezy for lack of a sponsor.
yp-svipc: System V InterProcess
Hi!
A few time ago I sent an ITP [1] for Grive. Finally, I get a Debian
package working and lintian free thanks to debian-devel and hardening
lists support.
The problem is that Grive is inside the process of development and they
has published a newer version than I open the ITP for (0.1.0 -
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:05 PM, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
The problem is that Grive is inside the process of development and they
has published a newer version than I open the ITP for (0.1.0 - 0.1.1).
In addition, the 0.1.1 published version has some things that are
corrected on the
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
Please use X-Debbugs-Cc instead of regular Cc when filing bugs:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc
Thanks!
* Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru, 2012-06-21, 10:57:
  * Translation files were moved to new package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n:
    fixed
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
Please use X-Debbugs-Cc instead of regular Cc when filing bugs:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc
Yes, I didn't know about it when I sent this RFS, but I already used it in my
recent messages.
* Translation files were moved to new package
On 6/25/2012 4:25 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Your decision whether you upload into Debian experimental or unstable
should not be affected by other derivative distribution policies. You
can request syncing packages from experimental into Ubuntu, but the
package will still land in Ubuntu's new
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
Owner 677564 carlosjor...@gmail.com
Bug #677564 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: metaphoneptbr/1.12.34 [ITP]
Owner recorded as carlosjor...@gmail.com.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
677564:
I changed the owner of this bug to me. Should I open a new ITP bug?
Regards,
Carlos
2012/6/25 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:28AM -0300, Carlos Jordão wrote:
2012/6/24 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
Hi Carlos,
This RFS is marked [ITP], but is
On 25/06/12 14:34, Phillip Susi wrote:
On 6/25/2012 4:25 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Your decision whether you upload into Debian experimental or unstable
should not be affected by other derivative distribution policies. You
can request syncing packages from experimental into Ubuntu, but the
tag 677239 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Marc,
Marc Pegon wrote:
I am looking for someone to sponsor my first package fractalnow.
* Package name: fractalnow
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Marc Pegon pe.m...@free.fr
* URL : http://fractalnow.sourceforge.net
* License
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 677239 moreinfo
Bug #677239 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: fractalnow/0.8.0-1 [ITP #673395] --
Fast, advanced fractal generator
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
677239:
Hi!
I updated my fio debian package to 2.0.8 of fio.
My usual sponsors Sebastian 'tokkee' Harl and Michael Prokop seem to be missing
in action.
The package is already in the repository and has been reviewed by both Michael
initially and Sebastian for latest 1.x versions.
Can somebody review
El 25/06/12 13:14, Paul Wise escribió:
Please ask upstream to tag their releases properly and upload tarballs.
I have a frequently contact with them and they are working on their next
release. I want to package the git version because they make some little
changes (mainly on the CMakeLists.txt).
Hi James,
James McDonald wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package cwm
* Package name: cwm
Version : 5.1-1
Upstream Author : Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/chneukirchen/cwm
* License : ISC
Section :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package grive
* Package name: grive
Version : 0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1
Upstream Author : Matchman Green match...@gmail.com and Nestal Wan
m...@nestal.net
* URL :
Hello Debian Developers,
My name is Ronoaldo, and I wold like to be a Debian Developer. I'm
currently interested in helping with packaging through a sponsor. At the
-desktop lists, I offered myself as a packager to alternative desktop
themes. I'm also interested in helping and maintaining other
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hi,
My usual sponsors Sebastian 'tokkee' Harl and Michael Prokop seem to be
missing in action.
I kinda doubt that, I guess they're just busy as everyone else is. :)
Can somebody review my updates and upload?
Where could
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:53:56PM -0300, Ronoaldo José de Lana Pereira wrote:
Hello Debian Developers,
My name is Ronoaldo, and I wold like to be a Debian Developer. I'm
currently interested in helping with packaging through a sponsor.
Go ahead. Welcome.
At the
-desktop lists, I offered
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:46:19AM -0300, Carlos Jordão wrote:
2012/6/25 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:28AM -0300, Carlos Jordão wrote:
2012/6/24 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
Hi Carlos,
This RFS is marked [ITP], but is there an ITP bug ?
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012 schrieb Sven Hoexter:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hi,
My usual sponsors Sebastian 'tokkee' Harl and Michael Prokop seem to
be missing in action.
I kinda doubt that, I guess they're just busy as everyone else is. :)
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
I'd guess you've usually worked through the collab-maint git repo?
Short round of nitpicking the wrong way ;) at what I've found in the
git repo.
1) I see no point in listing changes from 2.0.7 and that you've undone them with
2.0.8
Hi Ronoaldo,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ronoaldo José de Lana Pereira
ronoa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor to help me package the alternative desktop
themes, and to further assistance into the process of becoming a Debian
Developer.
The Debian Women [1-3] has a very
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012 schrieb Sven Hoexter:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
I'd guess you've usually worked through the collab-maint git repo?
Short round of nitpicking the wrong way ;) at what I've found in the
git repo.
1) I see no point in listing
Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
Now there are only such changes:
libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Added debian/watch.
* Updated debian/control:
- added homepage field
- fixed lintian warning
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:57:18PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hi,
Rest seems to be ok at a first glance,
And another small one I would change to be more generic:
debian/copyright:
-Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/fio-1.32.tar.gz
+Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/
though
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012, 19:08:34 schrieb Sven Hoexter:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:57:18PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hi,
Rest seems to be ok at a first glance,
And another small one I would change to be more generic:
debian/copyright:
-Source:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:18:40PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012, 19:08:34 schrieb Sven Hoexter:
Hi,
debian/copyright:
-Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/fio-1.32.tar.gz
+Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/
Shouldn´t this field show what has been used
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012, 18:42:02 schrieb Sven Hoexter:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
I'd guess you've usually worked through the collab-maint git repo?
Short round of nitpicking the wrong way ;) at what I've found in the
git repo.
[… three nit^W^W^W
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 675310 by 678992
Bug #675310 [wnpp] ITP: grive -- GNU/Linux client for Google Drive
675310 was not blocked by any bugs.
675310 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 675310: 678992
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:20:21 +
with message-id e1sjdtd-0002x1...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: tennix/1.1-2 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #678940,
regarding RFS: tennix/1.1-2 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:04:13 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package coinor-ipopt. It contains
a fix for #662236 which caused its removal from testing.
I looked at the package now, and there's one that doesn't make me
happy:
The old packages has:
Depends:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:58:45 +0200, Julian Wollrath wrote:
since I offered Patrick Winnertz, the maintainer, to co-maintain about two
weeks ago and he was also CC'ed in parts of this thread but got no response
from him, I am hoping someone could sponsor my updates to the powertop
package,
X-Debbugs-Cc: jw...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Hello Jakub,
On 04/16/2012 11:35 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here's my review:
Thanks again for the review. I've adjusted 1.26-1 and uploaded a
corrected variant to
* gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org [120625 22:19]:
The old packages has:
Depends: libmumps-4.9.2 (= 4.9.2) | libmumps-seq-4.9.2 (= 4.9.2), ...
After the changes the dependency is:
Depends: ..., libmumps-4.10.0,
so the alternative on libmumps-seq-* is missing. Probably this
Hi Gregor,
thank you for your comments. I uploaded a new version of my packaging to
http://rbw.goe.net/jw/ which addresses all of your comments.
- some other changes in d/control are also not mentioned
If you mean the dependency change from libnl2 to libnl3, then this is
mentioned know.
-
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package xmhtml.
It builds those binary packages:
xmhtml1 - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (library)
xmhtml1-dev - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (development
Hi Julian,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Julian Wollrath jwollr...@web.de wrote:
snip
- no idea if Multi-Arch: foreign has any benefits?
I too do not really know if there are big benefits from it but since I had
debian/control open in my editor and Debian is on the way to become aware of
Hi Vincent,
thank you for the clarification. I uploaded a new version to
http://rbw.goe.net/jw in which I removed the Multi-Arch: foreign field.
With best regards,
Julian
P.S.: I just saw, that bug 656421 (Please update to libnl3) was promoted to
the severity serious, hence this new package
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package qpxtool.
It builds those binary packages:
libqpx-dev - CD/DVD quality checker (development files)
libqpx0 - CD/DVD quality checker (shared libraries)
pxfw
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com writes:
It was. But then Russ Allbery noted some oddities! :-) I have
addressed those issues with a new package turn. Here is the latest
and greatest:
http://www.proulx.com/~bob/debian/pool/sid/main/time/2012-06-24/time_1.7-24.dsc
Thanks!
I'm working on the packges yet. I'll post back when they are done.
Best Regards,
Att,
2012/6/25 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:53:56PM -0300, Ronoaldo José de Lana Pereira
wrote:
Hello Debian Developers,
My name is Ronoaldo, and I wold like to be a
Thanks for your help. I'll take a look.
Best Regards
2012/6/25 Abdoulkadri Bongo bongoka...@gmail.com
Hi Ronoaldo,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ronoaldo José de Lana Pereira
ronoa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor to help me package the alternative desktop
themes, and
49 matches
Mail list logo
