Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Tiago Ilieve wrote: > Nice job! A simple and properly packaged Python library. I have > absolutely nothing to ask to be changed. check-all-the-things and lintian print a number of things that could be polished. > P.s.: I see that you have an "@debian.org" addres

Bug#818184: marked as done (RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP])

2016-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:59:58 +0900 with message-id <20160414015958.ga10...@lilith.infoblue.home> and subject line Re: Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #818184, regarding RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: Bug#820879: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:37:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 03:38:16PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Could you advise for the proper option to get a less strict dependency? > > > > Please read its manual page, it's al

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 03:38:16PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Could you advise for the proper option to get a less strict dependency? > > Please read its manual page, it's all documented: > > | The "replace" action is like "deduplicate" except th

Bug#820940: RFS: node-clone/1.0.2-1 [RFP #805907]

2016-04-13 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-clone" * Package name: node-clone Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Paul Vorbach * URL : htps://github.com/pvorb/node-clone * License :

Bug#820938: RFS: complexity/1.9+dfsg-1 ITP

2016-04-13 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "complexity" * Package name: complexity Version : 1.9+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Bruce Korb * Url : https://gnu.org/software/complexity * Licenses: GPL-3+,

Bug#818921: RFS: python-neovim-gui/0.1.1-1 [ITP]

2016-04-13 Thread James McCoy
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 03:06:21PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Victor and James! > > > >Upstream released python-neovim-gui_0.1.2. > > >That depends on python-neovim >= 0.1.6, which I already have packaged > >and not uploaded, since python-neovim depends on neovim >= 0.1.3, > >curre

Bug#820543: RFS: python-django-feincms [NMU] [RC]

2016-04-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Chris >I am looking for a sponsor to update the python-django-feincms package. >The package has 3 RC bugs, the earliest dating back to June 2014 (nearly >a year). > before uploading I have some issues to raise. first python-django-tagging needs t

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

2016-04-13 Thread HAYASHI Kentaro
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 02:09:35 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote: > Please restart ITP process and re-upload this with removal of overriding > for pedantic tags. I've removed pedantic tags and uploaded again. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hal-flash/hal-flash_0.3.3-1.dsc

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-13 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Edward, Nice job! A simple and properly packaged Python library. I have absolutely nothing to ask to be changed. I'd upload it if I had upload rights... :-) P.s.: I see that you have an "@debian.org" address in your DDPO page. Aren't you a DD anymore? Regards, Tiago. -- Tiago "Myhro" Iliev

Bug#820915: marked as done (RFS: arrayfire/3.3.1+dfsg1-2)

2016-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:23:20 + (UTC) with message-id <1933889216.3925984.1460564600634.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820915: RFS: arrayfire/3.3.1+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #820915, regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.3.1+dfsg1-2 to be marked as do

Bug#820915: RFS: arrayfire/3.3.1+dfsg1-2

2016-04-13 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arrayfire" * Package name: arrayfire Version : 3.3.1+dfsg1-2 Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group * URL : http://arrayfire.com/ * License : BSD

Bug#818921: RFS: python-neovim-gui/0.1.1-1 [ITP]

2016-04-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Victor and James! >Upstream released python-neovim-gui_0.1.2. >That depends on python-neovim >= 0.1.6, which I already have packaged >and not uploaded, since python-neovim depends on neovim >= 0.1.3, >currently unreleased git master branch, which is changing. > >We could send the tagged pytho

Bug#820900: marked as done (RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1)

2016-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:19:41 + (UTC) with message-id <1438127128.3794136.1460557181902.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #820900, regarding RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1 to be ma

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-13 Thread Edward Betts
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-hashids" * Package name: python-hashids Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : David Aurelio * URL : https://github.com/davidaurelio/hashids-python * License

Re: Bug#814852: RFS: openfst/1.5.1-1 -- weighted finite-state transducers library

2016-04-13 Thread Giulio Paci
Hi Jakub, upstream released a new version of openfst. On 15/03/2016 11:33, Giulio Paci wrote: > On 11/03/2016 16:34, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> * Giulio Paci , 2016-03-08, 22:24: we do seem to have an s390x buildd with only 3GB of RAM: https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=zemlinsky

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > Could you advise for the proper option to get a less strict dependency? Please read its manual page, it's all documented: | The "replace" action is like "deduplicate" except that it does | replace existing files even if their content is different from t

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Raphael, On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:41:52PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > It really depends... you're trading one problem for another. In general, > it's best if you can just rely on the packaged javascript without having > to replace any embedded copy. > > But if you have to replace an e

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > Ahhh, good hint. So the solution to my problem would rather be to > drop dh_linktree? (Raphael in CC whether I might have missed something). It really depends... you're trading one problem for another. In general, it's best if you can just rely on the p

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi James, On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:28:58PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 13:13 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > via this bug I learned (the hard way) that a > > > >    Depends: ${js:Depends} > > > > will be resolved into > > > >    libjs-jquery (<< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~), libjs-

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-13 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 13:13 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > via this bug I learned (the hard way) that a > >    Depends: ${js:Depends} > > will be resolved into > >    libjs-jquery (<< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~), libjs-jquery (>= 1.11.3+dfsg) > > (for instance) in the final package.  I have no reason t

How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, via this bug I learned (the hard way) that a Depends: ${js:Depends} will be resolved into libjs-jquery (<< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~), libjs-jquery (>= 1.11.3+dfsg) (for instance) in the final package. I have no reason to assume that the actual version that was available at package build time

Bug#820733: Guidelines for sensible package synopsis (was: Bug#820733: RFS: Series/1.0 [ITP] -- Keep track of your favourite TV series)

2016-04-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi again, stuff to do: fix lintian, make a real copyright file, fix flags, fix useless files, convert the format to quilt... come back if you don't know how to fix issues, when you have a larger userbase, and when you learn how to tag release, remove useless stuff and *not* commit binaries on

Bug#820717: marked as done (RFS: mercurial-extension-utils/1.2.0-1 [ITP])

2016-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:21:43 + (UTC) with message-id <212860291.3370885.1460539303391.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820717: RFS: mercurial-extension-utils/1.2.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #820717, regarding RFS: mercurial-extension-utils/1

Bug#807432: RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.1-1 [ITP]

2016-04-13 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
control: block -1 by 819016 Hello Giafranco, > FWIW adding "u" to the strings indeed fixed the issue > e.g. 'string' becomes u'string' (IIRC forcing unicode) thanks, it's been confirmed by upstream and promptly fixed on the upstream repository [1]. > BTW, the Python policy is something like > "