Re: Debian package without VCS

uestions: > > 1) I want package's source on salsa.d.org. Should I create a new repo on > salsa.d.org and import 'pegtl' there with 'gbp import-dsc'? > > 2) The package is not maintained by any team (cc'ing Muri Nicanor, the > maintainer of 'pegtl'). Am I allowed to even touch it? > > Best wishes, > Andrius >

Re: Debian package without VCS

On 08/30/2018 08:23 AM, Muri Nicanor wrote: > Hello Andrius, > > On 08/30/2018 08:00 AM, Andrius Merkys wrote: >> Dear Mentors, >> >> I have stumbled upon a source package 'pegtl', whose binary is in Debian, >> but the packaging files aren't on salsa.d.

Bug#905654: RFS: usbguard/0.7.2+ds-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard" * Package name : usbguard Version : 0.7.2+ds-2 Upstream Author : Daniel Kopeček * Url : https://dkopecek.github.io/usbguard/ * Licenses :

Bug#887665: marked as done (RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1)

hm, somehow i didn't receive that mail... On 03/15/2018 10:54 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo > 1) please fix the qt bug in this upload > 2) missing lots of copyrights, e.g. src/ThirdParty/Catch/* > src/ThirdParty/PEGTL/* > do you need such

Re: Bug with sev: grave while new package waiting

Hi, On 03/15/2018 01:05 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, >> Thanks, i've added some commits and specified the qt version and pushed >> everything to salsa. > > > please also address the stuff on RFS bug i already pushed those changes a few weeks ago ;) > and... > --with=autoreconf >

Re: Bug with sev: grave while new package waiting

Hi, On 03/15/2018 10:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > >> there is a bug with severity: grave in usbguard, because of a libqt5 >> version incompatibility (#892045) and there is already a new version of >> usbguard waiting to be sponsored. Should i fix the bug in the new >> version

Bug with sev: grave while new package waiting

hi mentors, there is a bug with severity: grave in usbguard, because of a libqt5 version incompatibility (#892045) and there is already a new version of usbguard waiting to be sponsored. Should i fix the bug in the new version or should i fix it in the version thats already in the archive?

Bug#887665: marked as done (RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1)

Hi nicoo, On 02/11/2018 08:32 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 08:23:12PM +0100, Muri Nicanor wrote: >> i've fixed the bugs and uploaded the new version of usbguard to mentors, >> and i've also pushed all the commits to salsa. > > Hi! > &g

Bug#887665: marked as done (RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1)

control: reopen -1 control: retitle -1 RFS: usbguard/0.7.2+ds-1 On 01/23/2018 08:36 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Please do not close RFS in this cases, so that the context is maintained. > A RFS should be only be closed when uploaded (or when there is no longer > something to sponsor). > > When you

Bug#887665: RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard" * Package name : usbguard Version : 0.7.1+ds-1 Upstream Author : Muri Nicanor <m...@immerda.ch> * Url : https://dkopecek.gi

Re: Change file permissions

Hi, On 01/18/2018 10:02 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, >> they are not 600. should i set the file permissions on package upgrade >> or should i leave this to the user? > >> if i should set them, should i use postinst or is there a better way? > > is a dh_fixperms override helpful?

Change file permissions

hi mentors, i'm finalizing the package for the new usbguard version. the daemon now looks at the permissions of the config files and refuses to start if they are not 600. should i set the file permissions on package upgrade or should i leave this to the user? if i should set them, should i use

Bug#878516: RFS: ansi/0.1.3-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ansi". (i've already sent an RFS to debian-python a month ago: https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2017/09/msg00038.html) * Package name : ansi Version : 0.1.3-1

Bug#876199: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0+ds1-2

13 (Closes: #875808) Regards, Muri Nicanor signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Package rejected bc of missing .orig

Hi, On 09/19/2017 04:51 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > >> usbguard | 0.7.0+ds1-1 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, >> armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > > so it seems a mentors.d.o bug then (e.g. DebOMatic is smart enough to find >

Package rejected bc of missing .orig

hi mentors, please cc me on reply. i'm trying to upload usbguard_0.7.0+ds1-2 to mentors, but it gets rejected: > Rejecting incomplete upload. You did not upload > usbguard_0.7.0+ds1.orig.tar.gz and we didn't find it on any of our > alternative resources. > If you tried to upload a package which

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

Hi gustavo, On 07/22/2017 08:43 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > Hello > > I did review the package, here are my comments > > - i did compare usbguard-0.7.0 tag from upstream github with > upstream/0.7.0+ds1 from your repo > > - Why did you remove NOTES.md, doc/usbguard-vs-udev.md, and >

Bug#868378: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.1.1-1

Hello Christian, thanks for pointing that out! On 07/16/2017 08:47 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > This will likely break builds of reverse dependencies because they > might not find the header anymore. Did you test all of the reverse > dependencies of nlohmann-json in the archive that they'll

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

Hi, On 07/16/2017 05:28 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: >> [...] >> but i've removed those files from the archive for now, patched the >> relevant testscripts and created a bug report to create the testdata >> from source [0] > cool, excelent > please add a target gen-orig-xz (or gz, or bz2) to

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

i've uploaded another version that removes an unused build-dependency signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#868378: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.1.1-1

/usr/include/nlohmann, which is upstream default (Closes: #868112) Regards, Muri Nicanor signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

On 06/29/2017 05:35 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > Hello, apologies for the late response no worries, as you can see i'm not very fast myself oke, so... On 06/18/2017 11:23 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > d/copyright > > - please set the years to include 2016, 2017. there are some files owned > by

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

Hi, On 06/18/2017 11:23 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > - src/Tests/USB/data/0001.bin src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/root.tar.xz > what's the source of that file? please regenerate them at build time i'm not sure how to deal with this- the 0001.bin is a copy of a binary USB Descriptor of one of

Re: Exclude files after gpb import-orig

Hi, On 06/19/2017 06:13 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:43:43PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:38:24PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: >>> I've imported a source package into git using gbp import-orig --uscan, >>>

Exclude files after gpb import-orig

hi list, I've imported a source package into git using gbp import-orig --uscan, then updated the changelog with gbp dch and then made a lot of changes (and commited them). Now I added a file to Files-Excluded: in debian/copyright- but when I run gbp buildpackage, it still generates a

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

control: tags -1 - moreinfo hi, On 06/01/2017 12:07 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > the package builds fine with pbuilder but tests fails when i try to > build using sbuild. > > FAIL UseCase/001_cli_policy.sh (exit status: 1) this fails if there is already a running usbguard instance- when i

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

Hi, On 06/01/2017 11:54 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > Hello > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: > >> * New upstream version 0.7.0 >>This release contains a backwards incompatible >>change because it changes how the device ha

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

hi, On 06/01/2017 12:07 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > the package builds fine with pbuilder but tests fails when i try to > build using sbuild. thanks for the pointer, i totally missed that only using pbuilder. now i also have a working sbuild

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

* Compile the library static, to make `make check` work * Bump compat version to 10 * Add d/usbguard.dirs Regards, Muri Nicanor signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Additional files/folders in package

hi, On 05/24/2017 09:44 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:56:12AM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: >> i'm in the process of upgrading usbguard to 0.7. In the new upstream >> usbguard-daemon.conf there are the folder >> /etc/usbguard/IPCAccessControl.d/ and

Additional files/folders in package

Hello mentors, i'm in the process of upgrading usbguard to 0.7. In the new upstream usbguard-daemon.conf there are the folder /etc/usbguard/IPCAccessControl.d/ and the file /var/log/usbguard/usbguard-audit.log specified. I'm not sure what's the best way to create those: a) remove or comment

Bug#854230: RFS: usbguard/0.6.2+ds1-2 [RC]

ntors.debian.net/package/usbguard Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/usbguard/usbguard_0.6.2+ds1-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Add dbus to Depends (Closes: #854192) Regards,

Re: serious bug in usbguard installation

Hi! On 02/04/2017 11:25 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 02/04/2017 10:09 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: >> i just found a bug (#854192) in the installation procedure of usbguard: >> when i install usbguard on a minimal stretch system, the installation >> stalls and never ends suc

serious bug in usbguard installation

hi, i just found a bug (#854192) in the installation procedure of usbguard: when i install usbguard on a minimal stretch system, the installation stalls and never ends successfully. apparently it has something to do with dbus being a dependency of usbguard. if i install dbus *before* installing

Bug#847792: RFS: usbguard/0.6.2+ds1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard" * Package name: usbguard Version : 0.6.2+ds1-1 Upstream Author : Daniel Kopeček * Url : https://dkopecek.github.io/usbguard/ * Licenses:

usbguard soname stability

hi, the usbguard source package ships a shared library libusbguard0. i asked upstream about bumping the soname when the interface changes, but upstream considers usbguard 0.x as not stable yet and will start maintaining soname version beginninig with 1.x (which is understandable). i tried a buch

Bug#847403: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.6-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlohmann-json" * Package name: nlohmann-json Version : 2.0.6-1 Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann * Url : https://nlohmann.github.io/json/ * Licenses:

Bug#837704: RFS: usbguard/0.5.14+ds1-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, because there is still some stuff to sort out with the new usbguard 0.6 release, i fixed the bugs in the already uploaded release and made a new debian revision. I hope that approach is oke. I am looking for a sponsor for my package

Bug#837598: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.4-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlohmann-json" * Package name: nlohmann-json Version : 2.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann * URL : https://github.com/nlohmann/json * License : MIT

atomic_LIBS (was: FTBFS: how to test fixes)

hi, On 09/06/2016 12:44 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: [...] > I didn't think about adding -latomic to the linker flag list > directly via -Wl. I just tested your suggestion and it's really > funny; libtool does mangle your line and separate it into: > > -Wl,--push-state -Wl,--as-needed

Bug#836959: RFS: usbguard/0.6.0+ds1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard" * Package name: usbguard Version : 0.6.0+ds1-1 Upstream Author : Daniel Kopeček * URL : https://github.com/dkopecek/usbguard *

Re: FTBFS: how to test fixes

hi, On 09/05/2016 09:11 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 09/05/2016 08:59 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: >> On 09/05/2016 08:33 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: >>>Since you depend on systemd.pc, which is part of the >>>systemd package, just Build-Depend on systemd to make

Re: FTBFS: how to test fixes

Hi, On 09/05/2016 08:33 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 09/05/2016 07:20 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:07:51PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: >>> so, i've got my first two FTBFS bugs (on mips and hppa)- what the >>> recommended way of testin

FTBFS: how to test fixes

hi, so, i've got my first two FTBFS bugs (on mips and hppa)- what the recommended way of testing fixes for architectures i don't have testmachines of? cheers, -- muri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: d/control: Depends on same version

hi, On 09/04/2016 11:03 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 09/04/2016 09:40 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: >> if i have source package foo-x.y that builds binary packages foo_x.y and >> libfoo_x.y, how can i declare a dependency from foo on libfoo where >> libfoo has to be th

Bug#836701: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.3-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlohmann-json" * Package name: nlohmann-json Version : 2.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann * URL : https://github.com/nlohmann/json * License :

d/control: Depends on same version

hi mentors, if i have source package foo-x.y that builds binary packages foo_x.y and libfoo_x.y, how can i declare a dependency from foo on libfoo where libfoo has to be the same version of foo? thanks and cheers, -- muri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#825302: RFS: usbguard/0.4-2 [ITP]

hi, i've just uploaded a new version of usbguard to mentors. Its now version 0.5.11, which removes the build dependency on quex, and uses pegtl (pegtl-dev) instead, which i already packaged and Gianfranco kindly sponsored. The other unresolved build dependency, json (nlohmann-json-dev) i've also

Bug#833456: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlohmann-json" * Package name: nlohmann-json Version : 2.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann * URL : https://github.com/nlohmann/json * License : MIT

Bug#830599: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlohmann-json" * Package name: nlohmann-json Version : 2.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann * URL : https://github.com/nlohmann/json * License : MIT

Bug#825693: RFS: nlohmann-json/1.1.0-1 [ITP]

hi, On 06/17/2016 03:03 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > "No embedded code copies" is not a blind rule, it has its reasons, and I > think none of them applies here. It would be nice to use the Debian copy > after it is updated but I don't think it's a blocker. oke, sounds like a good plan > If

Bug#825693: RFS: nlohmann-json/1.1.0-1 [ITP]

thanks for the explanation, andrey and christian- i did indeed not know that the repackaging has to be done by uscan before the build (i thought that was done during pdebuild). in the end the Files-Excluded field worked which lead to the unit tests not being successful (the catch.hpp is only used

Bug#825693: RFS: nlohmann-json/1.1.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, thank you for your review! On 06/13/2016 02:35 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > debian/nlohmann-json-dev.doc-base: > "Document: json" is too generic, remember it must be unique. fixed, it matches the package name nonw > debian/rules: > There is too many commented out dh_make example

Bug#826387: RFS: pegtl/1.3.1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pegtl". This package will be a build dependency in the next release of usbguard. * Package name: pegtl Version : 1.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Dr. Colin Hirsch and Daniel Frey *

Bug#825693: RFS: nlohmann-json/1.1.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlohmann-json" * Package name: nlohmann-json Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann * URL : https://github.com/nlohmann/json * License : MIT

Bug#825302: RFS: usbguard/0.4-2 [ITP]

hello pabs, hello *, On 05/27/2016 06:29 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > Here is another review, I don't intend to sponsor this though. thanks for the review! again, i've learned a lot ;) i'v now pushed everythin also to https://gitlab.com/muri/usbguard-debian/, but not yet updated the package on

Bug#825302: RFS: usbguard/0.4-2 [ITP]

Hi, On 05/25/2016 11:23 PM, James Cowgill wrote: > On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 21:10 +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard" > > This looks like quite an interesting package, so here's a review. wow, thanks for the detailed re

Bug#825302: RFS: usbguard/0.4-2 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard" * Package name: usbguard Version : 0.4-2 Upstream Author : Daniel Kopeček * URL : https://github.com/dkopecek/usbguard * License