Bug#823100: ghostscript: includes two files claimed to be under a non-free Unicode license

archive.org/web/20081228105917/http://www.unicode.org/Public/PROGRAMS/CVTUTF/ This gets worse: Seems many more packages embed this code: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=ConversionResult+ConvertUTF8toUTF16 I have reported this upstream. Will register at the secure-testing team as a case

Re: Bug#770266: libgs9: please convert to multiarch

you test that the multi-arch packages work in a multi-arch environment? Looking at the symbols file, it seems headers do vary. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Re: cups-filters 1.11.1 released!

o the minimum installation pulls in the support for one renderer, so it > works if one of the renderers is installed. With the order shown above > it would also pull in MuPDF if no renderer is installed. > > So small-footprint systems could be done either MuPDF-based or > Poppler-b

Bug#799916: libjbig2dec0 is not Multi-Arch compatible

Quoting Yuriy M. Kaminskiy (2016-05-16 18:31:50) > On 16.05.2016 19:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Yuriy M. Kaminskiy (2016-05-16 17:17:04) >>> Patch (against 0.13-1) attached. >> >> I believe your patch is flawed, however: the arch-specific jbig2dec &

Bug#799916: libjbig2dec0 is not Multi-Arch compatible

Hi Yuriy, Quoting Yuriy M. Kaminskiy (2016-05-16 17:17:04) > Patch (against 0.13-1) attached. Thanks! I believe your patch is flawed, however: the arch-specific jbig2dec package should not be marked "foreign" as it is unusable by foreign architectures. - Jonas -- * Jon

Bug#818662: ghostscript: segfault generating png on s390x ; breaks sketch build

Quoting David Bremner (2016-03-19 20:52:11) > Jonas Smedegaard writes: >> Quoting David Bremner (2016-03-19 12:43:27) >>> The attached example causes gs to segfault >>> >>> gs -dEPSCrop -sDEVICE=png256 -sOutputFile=foo.png ex000.eps >>> >>

Bug#818662: ghostscript: segfault generating png on s390x ; breaks sketch build

ng! Could you try test if the newer ghostscript in experimental still fails? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Re: Processed: reopening 404017

Why did you reopen this old bug? Any changes upstream? Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#812088: ghostscript: Recommend gsfonts rather than Depend on them

an be removed and ghostscript still works for your specific usecase. Also please tell which input and output devices is needed for your specific usecase. No promise I will make this, just considering the complexity of such option for now... - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist &

Bug#809939: ghostscript: FTBFS with libpng16

ry! I'll fix it! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#814702: ghostscript: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols file

Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2016-02-15 16:46:23) > Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2016-02-15 15:48:58) > > On 02/15/2016 03:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> Shouldn't it be this instead?: > >> > >> (arch=!sparc,!sparc64)hdr_id@Base 9.16~dfsg > >

Bug#814702: ghostscript: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols file

Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2016-02-15 15:48:58) > On 02/15/2016 03:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Shouldn't it be this instead?: >> >> (arch=!sparc,!sparc64)hdr_id@Base 9.16~dfsg > > I have re-checked a previous patch, you're right, but without

Bug#814702: ghostscript: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols file

Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2016-02-15 15:23:38) > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/15/2016 03:05 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Seems tied to Ghostscript and a deliberate change since 9.16: > > > > http://git.ghostscript.com/

Bug#814702: ghostscript: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols file

Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2016-02-15 15:32:26) > On 02/15/2016 03:08 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Whoops - above is only half the story, the other half being that > > the variable GS_USE_MEMORY_HEADER_ID set in above commit seems to > > control inclusion of the hdr

Bug#814702: ghostscript: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols file

Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2016-02-15 15:05:03) > Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2016-02-14 12:25:21) > > ghostscript currently fails to build from source on sparc64 due to a > > mismatched symbols file: > > - hdr_id@Base 9.10~dfsg > > +#MISSING: 9.16~dfsg-2.1# hdr

Bug#814702: ghostscript: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols file

cript and a deliberate change since 9.16: http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8a275b2 I am not good at understanding symbols handling, so advice on how best to proceed is appreciated. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Re: Trying to update Gutenprint on the Debian GIT repository

Quoting Till Kamppeter (2016-02-12 02:26:13) > On 02/11/2016 10:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2016-02-12 00:55:06) > >> I am trying to update Gutenprint to 5.2.11 final but have problem to > >> import the new source tarball. > >> &g

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2016-02-11 14:19:46) > Quoting Damian Dimmich (2016-02-11 13:56:17) > > So, following your advice I've added the variable in - this gets us > > much of the way there, although still fails to build cups., and with > > cups disabled, uses the

Re: Trying to update Gutenprint on the Debian GIT repository

know for sure the cause of your problems, but I suggest to try replacing your initial "git clone ..." with "debcheckout -a gutenprint". Hope that works better for you... - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website:

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

. > Thank you for all the help to date, Really excited about your helping out here - hope you are here to stay! :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

f.h > > Clearly, this isn't a good solution, as its nowhere near cross platform. > > That said, I'm not quite sure how to proceed as there is no tiff-config > command. Maybe if we can get TIFFCONFIG_H overrided at build time, using /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) <

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

ccache (and ccontrol) approx (or apt-cacher-ng) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

d localgitcowdebuild sid Hope that helps. NB! Did you subscribe to debian-printing@lists.debian.org yet? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Re: Ghostscript 9.18 packaging

CDBS files, or - if you are fine working with CDBS - edit the debian/control.in.in file and refresh with DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1. See debian/README.source for more details. -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x]

Bug#786967: ghostscript: tiffscaled24 device missing

tiffscaled* devs to configure build ...which was fixed recently for the (not yet in Debian) 9.18 release. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Re: Multi-arch extensions for Ghostscript

Quoting Till Kamppeter (2016-01-28 20:41:27) > On 01/28/2016 12:57 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Thanks for the suggestion. Easier to track if you file a bugreport >> about this. > > Here we go: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813021 Thanks

Re: Multi-arch extensions for Ghostscript

nas, can you adopt them into the Debian package so that we can sync > the Debian package into Ubuntu? Thanks for the suggestion. Easier to track if you file a bugreport about this. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website:

Bug#809939: ghostscript: diff for NMU version 9.16~dfsg-2.1

Quoting Tobias Frost (2016-01-28 00:51:02) > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for ghostscript (versioned as 9.16~dfsg-2.1). The > diff is attached to this message. Thanks! Your work is appreciated! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt

Re: Ghostscript 9.18

nt is not (necessarily) to elaborate more, just to register issues so that we can reference them and track when the release(s) fixing them. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask b

Re: Ghostscript 9.18

;h=b68e05c3 > > http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=95553954 > > They affect the daily life use of printing and screen display with > Ghostscript. > > Please apply BOTH fixes. > > Thanks in advance. Will do. Thanks! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - id

Bug#801395: libgs9-common: Unable to produce a PDF/A on Debian 8

relicense Ghostscript from GPL-3+ to AGPL-3+. There is a real risk of users relying on current stable licensing, so we need to ask upstream for relicensing of code we cherry-pick for stable. Other than that, I see not problem in getting this fixed in stable. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist &

Bug#793825: ghostscript: ps2pdf fails to open EPS file with "Error: /undefinedresource in resourcestatus"

n test pool - so if possible for you to share a breaking input file that would help a lot. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#782901: ghostscript: missing dependency on TeX

s not such > a good idea. I would think, that DVIPDF linking ghostscript to TeX, > should rather be moved to it's own package, depending on both. Another option would be to only suggest tex. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Websi

Bug#779178: pdftopdf does not handle the landscape option correctly

ject just made a change to cover rotation expressed as "90.0": http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commit;h=12ddbaa (Yes, I am aware that ghostscript might be totally irrelevant here since a libpoppler tool is used instead: passing this only for inspiration) - Jonas --

Bug#779178: ghostscript: Landscape document rotate CCW not CW

t. Seems this bug really belongs to cups-filters. It might be that an underlying bug is ghostscript rotating differently. To debug that we need a way to reproduce with _ghostscript_ - i.e. how to feed a postscript or PDF document to a ghostscript commandline. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard -

Bug#779178: ghostscript: Landscape document rotate CCW not CW

en obviously my replicating the steps would fail. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debia

Bug#732440: ghostscript: Error: /typecheck in /findfont

Hi Chris, Quoting Chris Liddell (2015-01-08 08:31:45) > On 07/01/15 21:06, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Le mercredi, 7 janvier 2015, 12.17:43 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>> This is fixed in upstream's 9.14. I'll see with the release team if >>>

Bug#732440: Patch is obviously not in updates.

> This is fixed in upstream's 9.14. I'll see with the release team if we > can backport this into Jessie. Great. But what about its licensing? I guess upstream treat it as AGPL, so we may risk disagreeing with them if we choose to ignore that - e.g. by treating it as too s

Bug#727179: Please update symbol table to support mips64(el) and mipsn32(el)

Quoting YunQiang Su (2014-10-14 12:01:39) > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting YunQiang Su (2014-10-14 11:17:50) >>> On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:25:18 +0800 YunQiang Su wrote: >>>> The attached patch can make be builtable on mips64el pla

Bug#727179: Please update symbol table to support mips64(el) and mipsn32(el)

should go into the common or e.g. endian-specific Symbols snippet. Thanks! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#762338: Generated PDF has tiny font size

Quoting martin f krafft (2014-10-10 23:47:17) > also sprach Jonas Smedegaard [2014-10-10 23:22 +0200]: >> If Iceweasel needs Ghostscript to compose its Postscript/PDF, then I >> guess it was supposed to at least suggest it. >> >> Perhaps try remove ghostscript and libg

Bug#762338: Generated PDF has tiny font size

Quoting martin f krafft (2014-10-10 22:59:02) > also sprach Jonas Smedegaard [2014-10-10 14:31 +0200]: >> What would you expect Ghostscript to do with such PDF instead of >> faithfully rendering it as composed? > > Nothing, certainly not. But since the problem exists in

Bug#762338: Generated PDF has tiny font size

the input PDF? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Re: cups-filters 1.0.59 released

ting/cups-filters.git > git import-orig --uscan --pristine-tar Arguably this is even easier than "git clone": debcheckout -a cups-filters cd cups-filters git checkout upstream; git checkout pristine-tar; git checkout master git import-orig --uscan --pristine-tar - Jonas -- * Jonas

Bug#760560: RM: ghostscript-cups/9.06~dfsg-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Seems from and that

Bug#723719: ghostscript: New Upstream Version 9.10 available

Quoting Jonathan Nieder (2014-08-27 04:31:59) > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Le lundi, 4 août 2014, 15.19:46 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Plan forward >>> >>> >>> 1a) Release 9.06 to unstable >>> 1b) Prepa

Bug#723719: ghostscript: New Upstream Version 9.10 available

Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-08-27 03:58:48) > Le lundi, 4 août 2014, 15.19:46 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> 9.06 >> >> >> Requires a SONAME bump and therefore a coordinated library >> transition. > > After discussing this with Julien

Bug#751917: ghostscript: add ppc64el to symbols file (patch available)

nless there is a reason not to, I plan to NMU this package tonight to > delayed/7-days. Good plan. No need in this specific case to add delay, however: Please feel free to upload directly to unstable. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45

Bug#745529: Please drop lcms1

planning to upload this to sid soon? Yes. First upload to unstable will however not be the 9.10 now in experimental, but instead 9.06 sitting in git ready for release. Plan is posted here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723719#39 - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard -

Re: Bug#723719: ghostscript: New Upstream Version 9.10 available

th that. Can you perhaps provide a patch? Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#735612: marked as done (ghostscript-cups became useless and should be removed)

For the record, I yet again confused lcms and icclib. It is correct that this bug was fixed in 9.10~dfsg-1, but details about it in changelog are wrong: icclib was dropped in upstream release 9.07. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Web

Re: Updating Debian package of Ghostscript

ally. Done (a few hours before your post, it seems): http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695211 > Also document well what has to be removed from the original source for > future updates. You mean something else than the DEP5 hints in debian/copyright? Regards, - Jonas -- * Jona

Bug#740079: ps2pdf: wrong conversion from ps to pdf

roperly, but that's just a wild guess. I honestly cannot help you further. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#590436: Why does cups-bsd depend on update-inetd?

-bsd >> users don't need update-inetd and forcing update-inetd on those >> people is unnecessary bloat. > > I'll demote the dependency to a recommendation and add conditionals in > the maintainer scripts then; patch attached. If I read correctly that *majority*

Bug#735612: ghostscript-cups became useless and should be removed

issue isn't "serious". Thanks for reporting, Adrian, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#732440: ghostscript: Error: /typecheck in /findfont with fonts-font-awesome installed

ghostscript 9.11 when that is released. Great. Thanks a lot! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Re: STD: Move all VCS under the new "printing" group

Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-02-11 15:09:52) > Le jeudi, 30 janvier 2014, 12.32:06 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-01-30 11:08:05) >>> As for alioth project roles, I propose to just go ahead and create >>>

Re: RFC: Move all VCS under a proper alioth team group

th as many rights as needed, that will provide a discussion > basis. I propose having 1 (one) role for team members: Admin. I see no need for subgrouping - we are few already as-is. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#732440: libgs9: findfont "Can't find font file Times"

rently in correspondence with Vasudev (who've packaged fonts-font-awesome) and upstreams of WOFF convertors about handling WOFF files differently, which may also work as workaround for this issue (at least short-term, winning us more time to solve it properly in Ghostscript). - Jonas

Bug#735612: ghostscript-cups became useless and should be removed

ve time.) I intend to look at it either tonight or tomorrow. The blocker for new upstream release should be documented in corresponding bugreport. Tell me if it isn't or you cannot locate that bugreport. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136

Re: Splitting foo2zjs

Quoting Till Kamppeter (2014-01-08 13:04:06) > On 01/08/2014 12:59 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Till Kamppeter (2014-01-08 12:42:04) >>> OdyX, you have split foo2zjs into printer-driver-foo2zjs and >>> printer-driver-foo2zjs-common telling that you want all

Re: Splitting foo2zjs

pdating more complicated > without real benefit. Or what are the real advantages? Just guessing here, but I believe that if aiming for multiarch compatibility, arch-independent parts need to be shipped as a separate package (or code patched to look in unusual locations for its data file

Bug#732555: ghostscript: gs 9.05 doesn't handle slightly broken pdf file as well as gs 9.10

7;s discuss only the actual bug in this bugreport. A separate bugreport - http://bugs.debian.org/723719 - tracks packaging of newer upstream release. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me

Bug#725171: libgs8: exports jpeg symbols, clashing with libjpeg

libgs' version and not its own... Already reported as bug#653061. Sorry this wasn't checked against the older codebase, and you've had to struggle with it anew. Help needed to backport upstream fix for that bug to the older codebase. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist

Bug#723719: ghostscript: New Upstream Version 9.10 available

tracked in bug#701993. Thanks for reporting, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#721137: ghostscript: ps2pdf produces bad pdf on x86_64 (unreadeable text)

e the display is back to normal. Thanks for your investigations. Evince can also display Postscript. For the garbled PDFs, do the corresponding Postscript look fine in Evince? If not, this seems not a Ghostscript bug, but a TeX (or user) bug to me. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealis

Bug#721137: ghostscript: ps2pdf produces bad pdf on x86_64 (unreadeable text)

that TeX can be complex and some failures are - by the package maintainers of texlive at least - treated as user bugs. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#496070: [ghostscript] opentypefont

Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2013-08-28 15:25:59) > Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2013, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: >> f) GUS TeX Gyre: unknown base 35 match, covers eastern european, >> GFL. > > Tex-gyre decided to sacrifice strict metric compatiblity with the >

Bug#721137: ghostscript: ps2pdf produces bad pdf on x86_64 (unreadeable text)

ems to contain bitmapped fonts (i.e. not all embedded as vectorized fonts). Could this perhaos be an issue of broken fonts? Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before r

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05

Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 12:30:18) > Le 28 août 2013 11:28, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]d...@jones.dk> a écrit : >> >> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 09:41:53) >>> Without so bump and transition of libcms because abi breakage is >>>

Bug#496070: [ghostscript] opentypefont

Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2013-08-28 10:02:19) > Am Dienstag, den 27.08.2013, 18:11 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > > Whoops - I had you mixed up with Reinhard Tartler. Sorry! > > So, you mean Reinhard talked about font duplication in the archive? No, I mean that it was Reinha

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05

Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 09:41:53) > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 07:32:21) >>> Le 25 août 2013 21:10, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]d...@jones.dk> a écrit : >>>> >>>

Bug#496070: [ghostscript] opentypefont

Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 07:29:32) > Le 27 août 2013 18:57, "Fabian Greffrath" <[1]fab...@greffrath.com> a > écrit : >> >> Am Dienstag, den 27.08.2013, 18:11 +0200 schrieb Jonas >> Smedegaard: >>> How about package name fonts-base35-

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05

Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 07:32:21) > Le 25 août 2013 21:10, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]d...@jones.dk> a écrit : >> >> Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55) > > > On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> &

Bug#496070: [ghostscript] opentypefont

Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2013-08-27 16:23:00) > [Resent to include the bug report.] > > Am Dienstag, den 27.08.2013, 10:08 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > > Yes, I noticed your emails about that at the Ghostscript project > > earlier this month, and also seem to recall

Bug#496070: [ghostscript] opentypefont

ould get rid of code copies. I have hesitated dropping them for now, as I am afraid some internal Ghostscript code might bypass the font path and rely on the specific location. Hm. I am now at the #ghostscript irc channel, so will simply ask... :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist &

Bug#496070: [ghostscript] opentypefont

of that: fonts-texgyre. As of today fonts-texgyre "loses" to gsfonts as provider of "serif". Bug#720953 covers that, including a fix you can try locally and see if indeed that improves the situation. Regards, and sorry for the [phone bill], - Jonas [phone bill]: putting

Bug#720906: src:ghostscript: URW++ fonts lacks licensing

Package: src:ghostscript Version: 9.05~dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The Ghostscript project updated its URW++ "base 35" font set for its 9.05 release, to files no longer including embedded licensing. Fonts shipped since then come without explicit licensing.

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05

Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55) > On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03) > >> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken > >> from the system, no convenience code is used any mo

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05

ntu. I am quite interested in learning which versions of libraries you have succesfully build against, but fail to locate _succesful_ build logs from Ubuntu (but found a few failing ones - missing build-dependency). Could you perhaps provide me a URL to a succesful build log? - Jonas

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05

hes (only some build system patches which most > probably are known to you). Sounds great! > You can find the package and the source tarball for backmerging to > Debian on > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.09~dfsg-0ubuntu1 Thanks. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedeg

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05

y - but I might be wrong, and it would be good to base such choices on concrete analysis, because both projects are alive and well. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reu

Re: Bug#714639: pu: package ghostscript/9.05~dfsg-6.3

e new upstream 9.07 soon, > it contains the patch. CCing the maintainers to find out their plans. The 9.07~dfsg-1 release is blocked by bug#701993. I will now prepare a 9.05~dfsg-8 release for Sid with this bugfix applied. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt

Bug#520753: ghostscript: diff for NMU version 9.05~dfsg-6.3

First of all, thanks to *both* og you for caring about this issue. Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2012-11-26 09:42:02) > Le dimanche, 25 novembre 2012 19.15:39, Michael Gilbert a écrit : > > I personally prefer the one-line fix for wheezy due to simplicity. > > I think the "nice" but large fix sh

Re: First package of Ghostscript 9.06

at a) was fixed in 9.05, b) the performance problem only occurs when JPEG2000 data is actually present, and c) the workaround of not linking against libjasper causes the images to be skipped - to me broken output seems worse than slow rendering. ...or did I misunderstand something? - Jonas -

Re: First package of Ghostscript 9.06

epackaging. Quite exciting! I'll have a look at it soon! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

On 12-07-30 at 10:03pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jonas Smedegaard > wrote: > > On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > >> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > >> > &g

Re: Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much > > > > simpler solution. the "master" branch is not inte

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

On 12-07-29 at 05:07pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.17:39, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > On 12-07-29 at 02:20pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in > > > ghosts

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

On 12-07-29 at 05:10pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.40:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a >

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

"shall" not mention that - but you "may" as you please :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

On 12-07-29 at 02:20pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le vendredi, 27 juillet 2012 14.23:27, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > severity 520753 serious > > thanks > > > > On 12-07-27 at 11:48am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > Bug 520753 is about a faillur

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

severity 520753 serious thanks On 12-07-27 at 11:48am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Bug 520753 is about a faillure in postinst script when /etc/cups/ppd > is not present. i am tented to raise this bug as serious, because ti > could break install. Agreed. - Jonas -- * Jonas S

Re: [RFC] Even on freez does this bug need to go to ghostscript ?

On 12-07-25 at 11:28am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On 12-07-24 at 06:36pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > >> I have made a past for ghostscript that will ease the debugging of > >> ghostscript problem. > >&

Re: [RFC] Even on freez does this bug need to go to ghostscript ?

am to adopt it and not carry a local patch for it. ...and I do not see it as important for a freeze exception, but don't mind you trying, if you insist. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me fre

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

On 12-07-24 at 03:49pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Generally, please do *not* change packaging style without consent! > > > > I notice that you've added a patch branch to the ghostscript git - > > plea

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

On 12-07-24 at 03:49pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Please subscribe to our mailinglist and tell me, so we can drop the cc. Did you see the above? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.:

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

e packaging style without consent! I notice that you've added a patch branch to the ghostscript git - please remove that again. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

d actually help hint at the proper pronounciation (not like joe but loong "o") :-) -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

tags pending thanks On 12-07-23 at 05:13pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > Ok see patch > > Thank you. Looks good to me. Looks good to me too. Applied! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 4

<    1   2   3   >