Re: Reimbursement rules for people traveling to a BSP

2023-01-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 22/01/23 at 09:27 -0500, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 11:37:41AM +0100, Daniel Lange wrote: > > Am 21.01.23 um 22:34 schrieb Louis-Philippe Véronneau: > > > It used to be one could get an "automatic" (by this I mean, without > > > having to ask for pre-approval) bud

Re: Covering visa fees as part of flights+accommodation expenses for events

2022-06-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 27/06/22 at 17:43 +, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Daniel (2022.06.27_15:57:52_+) > > I think covering travel Visa fees makes a lot of sense. > > +1 +1 > > Thus I suggest a maximum fee for any Visa related activities, e.g. a default > > of USD 200, adjusted to inflation and (if necessary

Re: Debian.net Team

2020-09-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/09/20 at 13:49 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > Hey Lucas > > On 2020/09/01 16:05, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 01/09/20 at 15:29 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > >> On 2020/09/01 09:14, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >>> 2. Keeping our important services sa

Re: Debian.net Team

2020-09-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi On 01/09/20 at 15:29 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > On 2020/09/01 09:14, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > 2. Keeping our important services sanely maintained. Your proposal is to > > sanitize *.debian.net a bit. I wonder if instead, we should have a list > > of requirements

Re: Debian.net Team

2020-09-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 31/08/20 at 18:21 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > 2. Create a new team to organise some aspects of everything under > debian.net, which would include: > > * Keeping the domain list on the above mentioned > DebianNet page maintained on a regular basis > * Maintain external contacts/

Re: Announcing miniDebConf Montreal 2020 -- August 6th to August 9th 2020

2020-02-19 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 19/02/20 at 23:17 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Hello Lucas, > > Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:45:43AM +0100]: > > > Most probably, the results will be announced by mail (and not > > > communicated during a meeting), because the bid review process

Re: Announcing miniDebConf Montreal 2020 -- August 6th to August 9th 2020

2020-02-19 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 18/02/20 at 23:54 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Most probably, the results will be announced by mail (and not > communicated during a meeting), because the bid review process has led > us to need to decide in this way. I cannot speak for the previously > appointed DebConf Committee¹, but for

Re: Repeating: Only the Automatic Approvals of BSP Reimbursements are on Hold; You scan still Ask

2020-01-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Sam, On 10/01/20 at 05:35 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > TL;DR: You are welcome to ask for approval for attending a BSP or > similar; it's only the automatic approvals on hold. > > I heard two different people in an email thread claim that you cannot > get reimbursed for attending a BSP. > The on

Re: Community Team - where we want to go

2019-10-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 09/10/19 at 22:26 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > * Proactively writing emails to those who habitually make the >community a hostile place, informing them that their behavior is >harmful to the community, that action may be taken in the future, ^^^

Re: hacking a home with free technology and Debian

2018-10-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/10/18 at 17:25 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > - hardware controller: > > + a USB ZWave dongle > > Did you mean the Z-Stick[1] or another model? > > Z-Stick is rated highly in reviews[2] and the web site claims it is > aimed at open source and cloud-averse users. Yes, that's the one I'm

Re: hacking a home with free technology and Debian

2018-09-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Daniel, On 15/09/18 at 00:45 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've got an interesting opportunity to completely replace all the > sockets, lights, heating controls and appliances in my Dublin house with > things that are free or easily hackable. > > Which direction are other pe

Re: shutting down httpredir.debian.org?

2016-04-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/04/16 at 07:04 +, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Hi, > > we keep getting reports of httpredir.debian.org not working correctly, > such as intermittently just sending errors or redirecting to mirrors > that are out of date. This doesn't solve the issue of finding someone to maintain it, but wo

Re: call for help: partners program

2015-03-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 16/03/15 at 10:13 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-03-16 09:45 +0100]: > > Obviously I'm not in a position to make long term commitments as > > the DPL. I'd welcome "crazy ideas" in that area, at least in > > a brai

Re: call for help: partners program

2015-03-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 16/03/15 at 09:32 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-03-16 07:55 +0100]: > > Please let me know if you need something from me. > > I would like to know how the procedure will be between now and then. > > Let's make it easy and say up-fr

Re: call for help: partners program

2015-03-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/03/15 at 14:51 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Sorry for bringing up > https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2015/03/msg00020.html > earlier today without having seen this message last month. > > > also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-02-17 14:02 +0100]: > > I wou

Re: On Debian not using its money (was: Q to all candidates: SWOT analysis)

2015-03-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/03/15 at 13:05 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-03-15 12:40 +0100]: > > I agree that it should be possible to improve on identifying a > > recurring, plannable, dependable income. But there hasn't been much > > response to reques

Re: On Debian not using its money (was: Q to all candidates: SWOT analysis)

2015-03-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/03/15 at 11:28 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Our problem wrt money is IMHO that we don't have cash flow, i.e. > recurring, plannable, dependable income, which can be allocated to > budgets and necessary expenses, bypassing the substance which then > only serves as our backup. > > The subst

call for help: partners program

2015-02-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, Debian has a partners program (see https://www.debian.org/partners/). It is used to thank and advertise organizations that are supporting or helping us. Examples include: - hosting Debian infrastructure, or providing services used by Debian - providing hardware (or plans to buy hardware at a l

Re: What do you expect from the DPL?

2015-02-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 16/02/15 at 20:39 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Just few random notes... > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015, at 04:08, Paul Wise wrote: > > > - Mediation regarding social and technical problems > > > > The former seems like the responsibility of Debian as a whole and the > > latter is the responsibility o

Re: What do you expect from the DPL?

2015-02-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 13/02/15 at 11:08 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: > > > Lucas sent an email asking people to encourage their 'dream DPL' [1]. > > I have already encouraged a few people in the last weeks, but when > > discussing > > with them, they all

Re: Debian Project - Donations Question

2015-01-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Anthony, On 08/01/15 at 15:51 -0800, Anthony Hunter wrote: > My name is Anthony Hunter and I'm inquiring as to who is the best contact > to discuss about your donations program? If you are interested in hardware donations, please see https://wiki.debian.org/Hardware/Wanted and contact hardware

Re: Alternative proposal (+call for seconds): Expire 2-R members every year

2014-12-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/12/14 at 13:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:37:30PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Rationale > > - > > First, I think that there is wide agreement that a more regular > > turn-over among TC members would be a good thing. And

Alternative proposal (+call for seconds): Expire 2-R members every year

2014-12-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
[ Cross post -vote, -project ; M-F-T: to -vote ] Hi, I am hereby formally submitting an alternative proposal, between double-dashed lines below (formally it's an "amendment", but I don't expect Stefano to accept it, as we discussed it before). I am also calling for seconds (see below). =

Re: [CTTE #746578] libpam-systemd to switch alternate dependency ordering

2014-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I think that everyone will agree that we are having a big crisis about the role of the TC in Debian. What saddens me deeply is how some of us framed this as a "Debian vs the Technical Committee" fight. The Technical Committee _is_ Debian. If we feel it's malfunctionning, it's our problem as De

Re: donations and paypal

2014-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/11/14 at 16:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > However, this is not a reason to bounce my email from -www@ to -project@ > > without making it clear that you did that (by forwarding it instead of > > bouncing it

Re: donations and paypal

2014-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi David, On 16/11/14 at 18:31 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Hi, > > Le 16/11/2014 15:23, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > (resending to -www@, #681501 is now archived) > > Resending to project, and setting follow-up-to accordingly: this is > about the public image of the p

donations and paypal

2014-11-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(resending to -www@, #681501 is now archived) Hi, I was asked to look into the question of whether (and how) we should list Paypal on https://www.debian.org/donations. I've gone through various discussions about Paypal, including the one on debconf-team (http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/2

Travel reimbursement for BSPs

2014-11-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I was asked if I would consider reimbursing travel and accomodation costs for participation in Bug Squashing Parties. Fixing our RC bugs (and generally helping the release team with getting Jessie in a releasable state) is clearly something that we should all encourage and get involved with,

Re: Update to reimbursement procedure (now: max 3 months after expense)

2014-10-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/10/14 at 09:18 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 08:12:49AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Providing a rough estimate should not be a problem, given it is already > > required to get pre-approval. > > If it's already required to get pre

Re: Update to reimbursement procedure (now: max 3 months after expense)

2014-10-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/10/14 at 23:13 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:26:25PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >On 06/10/14 at 20:38 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:38:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> >On 06/10/14 at 12:0

Re: Update to reimbursement procedure (now: max 3 months after expense)

2014-10-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/10/14 at 21:09 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Somewhat of a separate problem, but it seems we're currently punishing > our volunteers with delays of many months. AIUI, people are still > waiting for reimbursements for the release sprint nine months ago. According to a quick email search, o

Re: Update to reimbursement procedure (now: max 3 months after expense)

2014-10-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/10/14 at 20:38 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:38:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >On 06/10/14 at 12:07 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > >> > >> Both 2008 and 2011 are more than a year ago, so I don't see any > >> justi

Re: Update to reimbursement procedure (now: max 3 months after expense)

2014-10-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/10/14 at 13:33 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Montag, 6. Oktober 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Both 2008 and 2011 are more than a year ago, so I don't see any > > > justification for making this change and would like to see it reverted. > &g

Re: Update to reimbursement procedure (now: max 3 months after expense)

2014-10-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/10/14 at 12:07 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Lucas Nussbaum > > > As a general rule, no reimbursement requests will be processed if > > requested more than 1 year after the corresponding event (sprint, > > purchase, etc). > > > > I receiv

Re: Update to reimbursement procedure (now: max 3 months after expense)

2014-10-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/10/14 at 09:51 +, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > i am a bit unhappy with that change, i can understand your move though. > See reason below. > > On Mon Oct 06, 2014 at 10:53:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I also used that opportunity to update

Update to reimbursement procedure (now: max 3 months after expense)

2014-10-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(Cced -sprints@ and dsa@, as those groups are the most likely to be affected by this change) Hi, https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/Reimbursement stated: As a general rule, no reimbursement requests will be processed if requested more than 1 year after the corresponding event (sprint, pur

Prospective Trusted Organization - Debian.ch

2014-10-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, As you know, we now have a list of criteria to evaluate prospective Trusted Organizations[1], which makes it possible to implement our Constitution's §5.1.11. Debian.ch is now ready to go through this process. You will find at [2] how this organization relates to those criteria (wiki source c

Re: Prospective Trusted Organization - Debian.ch

2014-10-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 05/10/14 at 15:52 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > == The organization should be reliable, sustainable, and reactive == > > As for reliability and sustainability, debian.ch has been running since > at least 2008 without interruption, with annual general meetings (AGMs) > and

Re: Debian Quiz game

2014-10-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/10/14 at 14:00 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Thu, October 2, 2014 11:45, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > It would be great if a team could magically form to maintain it as a > > Debian package. I'm Ccing people who already expressed interest in > > helping with t

Re: Debian Quiz game

2014-10-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/10/14 at 11:48 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > (bcc:ed the other interested parties...) > > On Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I've pushed the current state (with answers!) to collab-maint: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/c

Debian Quiz game

2014-10-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, During one of DebConf14 evenings, I raised the idea of creating a 'Debian Quiz', inspired from the famous TCP/IP Drinking Game that used to be maintained by Valerie Aurora [1,2]. [1] http://valerieaurora.org/tcpip.html [2] http://sock-raw.org/netsec/tcpipdrink.html We quickly found 23 questi

Re: On a policy for non-debian foss content in a mini debconf

2014-09-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 06/09/14 at 16:31 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > There was recent discussions on debian-dug-in list [1][2] on the content > of a mini debconf being planned in India during October 17 and 18. > > The event is being organized in an engineering college with a good track > record of f

Re: Cooperation with the FSF?

2014-09-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Ansgar, On 05/09/14 at 09:42 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Hi, > > elsewhere I heard that there was some talk (also including people from > the FSF) about cooperation with the FSF. > > Could anybody tell a bit more what current ideas are? I just remember > the fsf-collab-discuss list on Al

Debian participation in the Outreach Program for Women

2014-08-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, The Outreach Program for Women, organized by the GNOME foundation, aims at helping women get involved in Free Software, in a scheme similar to Google's Summer of Code. Nicolas Dandrimont and Tom Marble (Cced) proposed to act as Debian coordinators for the winter edition of the program, which I

Re: Updating the DebConf Chairs delegation

2014-08-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 16/08/14 at 14:46 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I pointedly asked you in our private discussions: what problem are you > trying to solve by appointing additional DebConf chairs? > > You did not respond to this question. > > Instead, you have delegated new chairs, reproducing the previous

Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

2014-07-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Ian, Thanks for bringing this up. On 30/07/14 at 13:09 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > There has been an ongoing and wholly unproductive conversation on > -legal about some difficulties with the PHP licence. > > Would it be possible for us to obtain some proper legal advice ? > Do we have a relat

Re: Updating the list of Debian Trusted Organizations

2014-07-11 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 09/07/14 at 12:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Brian Gupta wrote: > > > Auditors team has been maintaining a list in the wiki [1]. I updated > > it to include the latest updates, but Lucas may have other thoughts > > about where and how to maintain the list. >

Task open for takers: review Debian status wrt OIN

2014-07-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, One of the task on my TO-DO list that I would happily delegate is to review the status of Debian wrt the Open Invention Network, to possibly change our position from "We are not interested in joining OIN" to "We want to join OIN", because: (1) OIN claims they have changed quite a lot over the

Re: Trusted Organisation status for DebConf15's legal entity

2014-05-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 20/05/14 at 14:26 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > Dear all, > > is there anything more I can (or need to) do? No, that's on my TO-DO list now. Thanks, Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: Trusted Organisation status for DebConf15's legal entity

2014-05-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 03/05/14 at 10:54 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > As you already described how you met the TO criteria in > > , > > I think that we can safely say that the minimum two weeks discussion > > period s

Sponsoring a Tails hackfest?

2014-05-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, The Tails project is a Debian-based live system focusing on privacy and anonymity. For more information about Tails and their relationship with Debian, see: https://tails.boum.org/ https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Census/Tails https://tails.boum.org/contribute/relationship_with_upstream/ ht

Re: Trusted Organisation status for DebConf15's legal entity

2014-05-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/05/14 at 19:47 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > Dear all, > > as announced some time ago, we will incorporate DebConfDeutschland > e.V. tomorrow. > > All founding members will be DDs with the full list being sent as a > reply to this email after the fact. > > > Given that: > > * We will

Re: Trusted Organisation status for DebConf15's legal entity

2014-04-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 26/04/14 at 23:42 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > Before anyone raises this point: Yes, we tried contacting[1] FFIS, but > they have not even answered in more than four weeks; we are not > confident that they would be more reactive going forward and do not > consider them an option any more. >

Re: Trusted Organisation status for DebConf15's legal entity

2014-04-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 26/04/14 at 23:42 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > 2. The organization should remain loyal to Debian > > See 1. > Going against Debian's best interest now or in the future would not > only be stupid beyond description, it would also wipe out our > collective reputations and remove the comm

Call for Debian speaker(s) at Distro Recipes

2014-04-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, Distro Recipes is a 2-day event organized in Paris (11+12 June 2014), aiming at gathering people from various distributions for talks and fruitful exchanges. The same group of people also organize Kernel Recipes. I attended last year's edition and really enjoyed it. Unfortunately, I can't att

Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - FFIS

2014-03-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Joey, On 11/03/14 at 11:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > == The organization should be reliable, sustainable, and reactive == > > * The organization has several people sharing the role of treasurer in > >order to react quickly to requests in all circumstances > &g

Prospective Trusted Organizations - FFIS

2014-03-11 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
o ask follow-up questions. Based on this discussion, I will then decide whether to officially add FFIS to our list of Trusted Organizations. I haven't received answers from debian.ch yet. - Lucas - Forwarded message from Martin Schulze - From: Martin Schulze To: Lucas Nussbaum Cc: i.

Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - (FFIS), Debian France

2014-03-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/03/14 at 13:22 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > While I don't think there's any question that FFIS should be one of Debian's > > TOs, I think having the answers to these questions is important in order to > > protect both parties, so that

Prospective Trusted Organizations - (FFIS), Debian France

2014-03-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
el Hertzog - From: Raphael Hertzog To: Lucas Nussbaum Cc: audi...@debian.org, c...@france.debian.net Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:42:27 +0100 Subject: Re: Evaluation criteria for (prospective) Trusted Organizations -- Debian France Message-ID: <20140214214227.gd23...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com>

Re: State of the debian keyring

2014-02-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 27/02/14 at 11:11 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 05:35:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 22/02/14 at 20:57 -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > > > Has there been any analysis of how active the developers are? I&

Re: State of the debian keyring

2014-02-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 22/02/14 at 20:57 -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > Has there been any analysis of how active the developers are? I'd > hazard to guess that a good number should be moved to emeritus status. > Perhaps we should do a ping of developers with 1024 bit keys? I've done a quick hack using

Re: Possibly moving Debian services to a CDN

2014-02-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi James, On 08/02/14 at 13:48 +0800, James Bromberger wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 8/02/2014 11:46 AM, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > > Have you been trying to reach out to other CDN providers about supporting > > Debian? I know of > discussions with Amazon Cloud

Re: Debian services and Debian infrastructure

2014-02-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/02/14 at 18:16 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > It'd be super nice to have > > the archive rebuild jobs running on the Debian infrastructure rather > > than on AWS for example. > > I agree, and it h

Re: Possibly moving Debian services to a CDN

2014-02-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 30/01/14 at 13:53 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Tollef Fog Heen > > Hi all, > > > - the various bits and bobs that are currently hosted on > > static.debian.org > > I thought it's time for a small update about this. As of about an hour > ago, planet and metadata.ftp-master are now ser

Re: mailing list auto subscriptions

2014-02-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/02/14 at 01:46 +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:31:17PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I believe every new DD or DM should be auto subscribed to -devel, -project > > and > > -devel-announce (and -private for DDs), best with the usual "someone > > su

Re: Debian services and Debian infrastructure

2014-01-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I'm only replying on the main point I'd like to make, so I'm limited my quoting to that. Do not take it as agreement or disagreement on the other points -- I just consider them more minor points. On 21/01/14 at 22:09 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > The recurring pattern seems to be that,

Re: bits from the DPL -- December 2013

2014-01-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/01/14 at 10:22 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > - [bgupta] work with SPI to enable donations via paypal > > Note that Debian France has planned to setup that for the Debian project. > > It would be a small change

Re: Please give a summary (Was: Debian services and Debian infrastructure)

2014-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Ian, On 21/01/14 at 18:11 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Lucas seems to be intending to mediate these offers to interested DDs > (who have Debian-related uses for a VM) directly, with the apparent > expectation that those DDs would end up administering those VMs > directly in an ad hoc manner. DS

Re: Please give a summary (Was: Debian services and Debian infrastructure)

2014-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Andreas, On 21/01/14 at 17:51 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > as a random reader I have the feeling that this thread is about a > conflict between DSA members and DPL. For me all these mails do not > make the slightest sense and it would help if someone could give a > summary what you a

Re: Debian services and Debian infrastructure

2014-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/01/14 at 17:23 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > > I have some operational questions about this cloud setup, since it seems > > > you've delegated running Debian owned machines to us and then gone and > > > got some that you don't want us to run. I'm not sure what to do with > > > that disju

Re: Debian services and Debian infrastructure

2014-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/01/14 at 15:47 +, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > And I actively engaged other DDs regarding their VPS opportunities > (although no response so far in some cases). Oh, that's great! I've just sent you a private mail to share my contacts. I really had no idea that you intended to work on that, gi

Re: Debian services and Debian infrastructure

2014-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/01/14 at 15:07 +, Stephen Gran wrote: > I think there's quite a range of options between "DSA can't host > everything under the sun" and "I'll go set up a private parallel > development environment out of project funds without any further > discussion". I don't know who you are quoting h

Re: Debian services and Debian infrastructure

2014-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 21/01/14 at 13:11 +, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said: > > [...] single mail shot with no follow up. > > Well, it's been a bit over 2 weeks, and you haven't posted a follow up. > This doesn't feel like a convers

Re: Evaluation criterias for (prospective) Trusted Organizations

2014-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/01/14 at 12:47 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > So, first things first, I would welcome your feedback on the TO > > criterias[1]. Soft deadline: 2014-02-01. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/Trusted

Re: Evaluation criterias for (prospective) Trusted Organizations

2014-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/01/14 at 11:13 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > With auditors and DPL helpers, we worked on a list of evaluation > criterias for prospective Trusted Organizations[1]. ^ (and now, I remember that 'criteria' is plural. Please s/criterias/criteria/ everywhere ...)

Evaluation criterias for (prospective) Trusted Organizations

2014-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
TL;DR: let's try to implement Constitution 5.1.11 and 9.3: discuss status of prospective TOs, accept them, have an official list of them. Hi, Our Constitution says: (5.1.11) The project leader may: Add or remove organizations from the list of trusted organizations (see §9.3) that are au

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-01-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
.oO ( funny that this comes up now, given the same delegation text was already used in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/10/msg6.html and https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/06/msg4.html) On 06/01/14 at 13:51 +, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Fri, Jan 03,

Debian services and Debian infrastructure

2014-01-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, As previously mentioned[1], I've been talking with DSA about the state of Debian services on Debian infrastructure. DSA asked me to move the discussion to a public list, which is what I'm doing here. What follows is my current state of mind on this question. I'm open to changing my mind based

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

2014-01-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 04/01/14 at 14:04 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > * Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@debian.org) [131202 22:11]: > > Hi Lucas, > > > > I am pleased to announce that DSA has promoted Héctor Orón Martínez to a > > full member of the team. > > > > Please update the delegation for the D

Re: Buying hardware with Debian money

2013-12-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Mason, Sorry for the delayed answer. On 16/12/13 at 22:33 -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > I received a few requests for hardware purchases, that I think are worth > > discussing with the project as a whole in order t

Re: DPL helpers meeting today (2013-12-16)

2013-12-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 16/12/13 at 08:28 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > We will have a DPL helpers meeting today at 18:00 UTC, on #debian-dpl. Hi, The meeting was cancelled due to the lack of participants. I'll organize a poll to schedule the next meeting (next year). Cheers Lucas --

DPL helpers meeting today (2013-12-16)

2013-12-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, We will have a DPL helpers meeting today at 18:00 UTC, on #debian-dpl. Titanpad with agenda: http://titanpad.com/debiandpl-20131216 (Please update the status of your action items before the meeting if possible) Lucas -- copy of the agenda below ->8 #+TITLE:

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

2013-12-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Martin, On 05/12/13 at 23:03 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > Hi Lucas, > > > Hi Lucas, > >  > > I am pleased to announce that DSA has promoted Héctor Orón Martínez to a > > full member of the team. > > I think that this mail must have been misinterpreted.  It was not meant > to be a dem

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

2013-12-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/12/13 at 14:26 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Please update the DSA delegation"): > > On 05/12/13 at 09:35 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > > Perhaps it would make sense to first more clearly define problems we want > > > to so

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

2013-12-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/12/13 at 13:46 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Thu, December 5, 2013 11:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > This was discussed in > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/05/msg00018.html. > > Main points are: > > * it facilitates the monitoring of the

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

2013-12-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/12/13 at 10:53 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed Dec 04, 2013 at 17:45:22 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > 3) I was a bit surprised to see Martin's announcement that Hector > > was now a member of DSA, and his request to update the DSA delegatio

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

2013-12-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/12/13 at 09:35 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Thu, December 5, 2013 02:15, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I would go further and say that I think it would be better to do > > things differently. For a team which is functioning well, it would be > > helpful if the DPL delegated to the team the au

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

2013-12-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/12/13 at 14:58 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Hi > > >>I am pleased to announce that DSA has promoted Héctor Orón > >>Martínez to a > >>full member of the team. > >>Please update the delegation for the Debian System Administrators > >>accordingly. > >I'd rather wait until we see where our cur

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

2013-12-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/12/13 at 22:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > I am pleased to announce that DSA has promoted Héctor Orón Martínez to a > full member of the team. > > Please update the delegation for the Debian System Administrators > accordingly. Hi, I'd rather wait until we see where o

Re: DPL helpers meeting on wednesday (2013-11-27)

2013-11-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 26/11/13 at 14:11 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > As previously announced, we will have a DPL helpers meeting tomorrow > (2013-11-27), at 18:00 UTC, on #debian-dpl. Hi, The meeting happened. Minutes: http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-dpl/2013/debian-dpl.2013-11-2

DPL helpers meeting on wednesday (2013-11-27)

2013-11-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, As previously announced, we will have a DPL helpers meeting tomorrow (2013-11-27), at 18:00 UTC, on #debian-dpl. Titanpad with agenda: http://titanpad.com/debiandpl-20131127 (Please update the status of your action items before the meeting if possible) Lucas -- copy of the age

Re: DPL helpers meeting on wednesday (2013-11-13)

2013-11-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/11/13 at 23:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > As previously announced, we will have a DPL helpers meeting tomorrow > (2013-11-13), at 18:00 UTC, on #debian-dpl. > > Titanpad with agenda: http://titanpad.com/debiandpl-201311XX > (Please update the status of you

Debian participation in Outreach Program for Women

2013-11-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, As you probably noticed[1,2,3], Debian is participating in the GNOME foundation's Outreach Program for Women. A targeted fundraising campaign[4] has been running, with the informal agreement that, if it was "quite" successful but not successful enough to fund one slot ($5750), the rest would b

DPL helpers meeting on wednesday (2013-11-13)

2013-11-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, As previously announced, we will have a DPL helpers meeting tomorrow (2013-11-13), at 18:00 UTC, on #debian-dpl. Titanpad with agenda: http://titanpad.com/debiandpl-201311XX (Please update the status of your action items before the meeting if possible) Lucas -- copy of the age

Next DPL helpers meetings

2013-11-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 28/10/13 at 16:17 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Due to a lot of travelling for me during the next weeks, I've set up a > doodle poll to schedule the next meetings: > http://www.doodle.com/tnu46wcan8y69ipg (all times are UTC) > The goal is to find one date between Nov. 11

Re: Possibly moving Debian services to a CDN

2013-10-31 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 29/10/13 at 10:54 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Just a minor nitpick on the point below; for the more general discussion > I stand behind the opinion I've previously posted in this thread. > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 04:00:42PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Aft

Re: DPL helpers meeting on wednesday (2013-10-23)

2013-10-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/10/13 at 17:53 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > We will have a DPL helpers meeting on wednesday: > $ date -ud @1382547600 > Wed Oct 23 17:00:00 UTC 2013 > on #debian-dpl. Hi, Minutes: http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-dpl/2013/debian-dpl.2013-10-23-16.58.html Min

DPL helpers meeting on wednesday (2013-10-23)

2013-10-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, We will have a DPL helpers meeting on wednesday: $ date -ud @1382547600 Wed Oct 23 17:00:00 UTC 2013 on #debian-dpl. Titanpad with agenda: http://titanpad.com/debiandpl-20131023 (Please update the status of your action items before the meeting if possible) Lucas -- copy of t

Buying hardware with Debian money

2013-10-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I received a few requests for hardware purchases, that I think are worth discussing with the project as a whole in order to progress towards having clear guidelines for what is acceptable and what isn't in terms of spending Debian money. Please provide feedback on the proposed decisions -- th

Re: Possibly moving Debian services to a CDN

2013-10-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 13/10/13 at 08:44 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > We appreciate feedback while we continue our investigation of CDNs. Hi, I'm trying to summarize the discussion so far and add my own understanding/thoughts, in a set of Q & A. Q: What problem are we trying to solve? What's the current status?

  1   2   3   >