, like said, i have been hurt like no other DD has
ever been hurt before me, and each time another stab is taken against me it
is as if the wound is fresh again, and the hurt comes all over again.
Do you really think i deserved this ? Really ?
Please, don't do this anymore, and leave me in peace,
Sadly,
Sven Luther
Hello, ...
This is the first time in the over-a-year that i have been banned from the
debian mailing lists that i try to go around the ban to post an appeal to
the whole debian community. And i am sorry to come again with this.
I write this, because even despite what debian has done to me, i sti
tested, and breads only resentment and escalation, as
was the case here.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:31:07PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Openly speaking about a topic is always better than making it a taboo,
> > something to be hidden and ashamed of.
>
> Oftentimes, problems magically resolve
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:25:10PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:11:01PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070529 22:05]:
> >> > On Tue, May 29,
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:15:01PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 May 2007 11:58, Sven Luther wrote:
> > You are wrong, you still need a impartial judge. Tell me where in debian
> > i do find such ? That is the main problem, any argumentation is just
> > lost time w
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:17:02PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Care to give me a chance ?
>
> You've had your chances, Sven.
When ?
> You're restarting with the old pattern, always.
>
> > > > you don't like what i h
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:16:39PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 29 May 2007 22:05, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Lively discussion is a sign of good health in any project;
>
> not always :-)
Well, among all those here, you are the only one who spoke with me at
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:11:01PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070529 22:05]:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:26:20PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > Please limit the number of posts per day to this thread.
> >
> > Lively discussion
>
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:26:20PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> > because the DDs fail to aknowledge the part of responsability they have
> > in this mess in having it let escalate to such dramatic proportions.
>
> I'm wor
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:07:31PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:05:59PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11034 March 1977, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >> > 14:27:44 < Ganneff> svenl: would you *ever* consider something as
> >> > "valid way out" thats not 100% what you want, ie "you
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:49:23AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 May 2007 09:59, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > You might want to consider developing a web page with careful
> > > analysis of evidence
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:45:59PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Yes, it is only a handful of people who really have a problem with me. I
> >guess if you go down to it there is only a single person who really has
> >a pr
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:35:05PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070529 18:17]:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:29:35AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > Sven Luther dijo [Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:21:20PM +0200]:
> > > > > without a
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > Sven,
> > >
> > > You may or may not have been mistreated but the volume of your
> > > argument
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:45:51PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:52:03PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:29:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Sven Luther
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:19:14PM +0100, Stephen Birch wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yes, it is only a handful of people who really have a problem with me. I
> > guess if you go down to it there is only a single person who really has
> > a problem, and a few others who also
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> On 11034 March 1977, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > As an example of why this is a mess :
> > 14:27:44 < Ganneff> svenl: would you *ever* consider something as
> > "valid way out" thats no
ound half of this thread, instead of
saying, ok, we will investigate the issue, and solve this so everyone is
happy.
Sad, isn't it ?
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:32:00PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:07:40PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> [snip]
> > Err, a handful is "so many people". I guess this is the cause of all my
> > problem, we don't speak the same language.
&
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:25:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 18:10:41 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > So, maybe i should publish the irc logs of the french cabal to help your
> > memory, right ?
> >
> TINFC.
Oh fun, MadCoder is threa
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:55:07PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 29 mai 2007 à 17:44 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > Can you tell me a single other reason which justified that my expulsion
> > was requested on february 7 or so ?
>
> For example, that could be
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:05:53PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 29 mai 2007 à 17:58 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > Ok, so you have really no idea and are just trolling ?
>
> Yes, definitely. I think Debian should remain a place of shadowy
> dealings and mafioso p
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:31:45AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sven Luther dijo [Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:12:19PM +0200]:
> > > > Then what will change it ?
> > >
> > > Just leave Debian.
> >
> > Why should i ? Just because debian is unable tyo reco
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:35:21AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sven Luther dijo [Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:52:22PM +0200]:
> > > Funny thing about volunteers.. They tend to give their time willingly
> > > without getting things in return. That's kind of the point. If
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:29:35AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sven Luther dijo [Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:21:20PM +0200]:
> > > without a reason. This is justice: the harm was undone, you have aquired
> > > an additional level of protection, and no measures were taken against
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:41:44PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 29 mai 2007 à 17:32 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > > Sven, let me ask you something. Do you really feel you stood a single
> > > chance to be elected as DPL?
> >
> > Nope
>
&g
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:14:20PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, then we come back to the problem of Frans, right, who found it
> > totally unacceptable that i dared to present myself as DPL, and chose to
> > hurry to search expulsion supporter
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:13:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:52:03PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:29:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:29:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, then we come back to the problem of Frans, right, who found it
> > totally unacceptable that i dared to present myself as DPL, and chose to
>
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:35:01PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Is this so much to ask ? I ask this not of you, but of Debian, of you
> > Joey, of all other readers.
>
> Yes.
How sad, ...
but it isd because of this, that the problem is still present a
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:35:35PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > May i ask you why there is no other solution ? What is it that makes it
> > a total heresy to even propose we try to solve it fairly and honourably ?
>
> Because what you would accept
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:28:09PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:13:02PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > >But you are not asking for justice, you are asking for revenge and
> > > retalation. And
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070529 13:57]:
> > So, what is the solution, i ask you, do you see some way out of this ? I
> > am all ears, ...
>
> i proposed a solution to you that would let you work o
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:22:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Ok, but this was only the 'goute qui a fait deborder le vase', the
>
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:27:07AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Just leave Debian, like that, and who will give me back all those years
> > and uncountable hours i have sacrificed to debian ? Or the actual money
> > and time and eq
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:07:06PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070529 13:58]:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Ok, but this was only the 'goute qui a fait de
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, but this was only the 'goute qui a fait deborder le vase', the
> > bigger problem remains as a raw wound, for me, and for debian as a
>
> The - what you call - bigger pr
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:23:27PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >> Debian is better off without you. Your behaviour has bee
s thread and go back to
> work.
No, we cannot, because the problem is not solved, because the DAMs
decision was a stupid and unfair one, not even speaking of its
irregularity and lack of transparence.
So, read : Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and reply
to its substance.
Saddened,
Sven
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:14:23AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> >>> then so be it, d
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:05:00PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
> > behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
> > publicly addres
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:53:07AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is the exact example of why things went bad in erkelenz, because
> > you are unable to hear what others have to say, and want to impose your
> > own opi
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:30:31AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:31:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> >> You do not need to waste any more words on explain
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:00:31AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
> > > > behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
> > > > publicly ad
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:14:23AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > then so be it, debian is better off without such persons whose behaviour
> > will only hurt the project again one way or another, and should not be
> > encouraged.
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Sven Luther [Mon, May 28 2007, 08:23:52PM]:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > > cook this story _again_. You may be right, or not, it is just off-topic
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:31:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> >> Sven, come on. This is not the right time and not the right place to
> >
> > When is the right time
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:05:00PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
> > behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
> > publicly addres
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:05:00PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
> > behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
> > publicly addres
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Sven Luther [Mon, May 28 2007, 06:00:36PM]:
>
> > > You're not bringing up anything new.
> >
> > And i will repeat it as long as people try to ignore me, and until
> > Debian s
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:14:42AM -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> >
> >>Sven Luther wrote:
> >>
> >>>>After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access
tic
campaign to hurt me, i would have gone away running, and not sacrificed
so much of my time and work to debian.
And you ask me to be silent ?
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:04:49PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:01:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > For the record, i did ask on #debian-kernel, and got no reply, and when
> > asked, Bastian Blank did say he didn't know who did it, and Stephan
>
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 13:23]:
> > [...]
>
> Sven, this whole thread is about that your commit access to the kernel
This whole thread is about me being stopped from doing meaningful debian
technic
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been restored.
> >
> > It is not enough, i want the suspension revoked, since it was a stupid
> > decision, which has achi
e, and in a shady and mysterious
way.
It is not acceptable that debian deals in mafioso politics, and the
DAMs, by knowingly hiding most of the evidence, have actively
participated in it.
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uch
> > or something? He'll probably speak up and explain things.
>
> I already said that I can't remember. I know there was something about
> dilinger and wli but not more.
Fine, so can you reactivate my access ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:38:24AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > On Sun, 27 May 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > 17:55:11 < svenl> waldi: do you know who removed me from the kernel
> > > > alioth team ?
> > > >
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 10:23:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070527 20:56]:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Sun, 27 May 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 17:55:11 < svenl> waldi: do you know who removed me from the kernel
&g
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 08:53:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 17:55:11 < svenl> waldi: do you know who removed me from the kernel
> > alioth team ?
> > 17:57:44 < waldi> nope
> >
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > while i was working on a patch fix for the debian kernel, that i have
> > been re
next way to try
to silence me could very well involve physical hurt.
Let's again create a Debian to be proud of ...
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:52:49PM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> are you part of an organisation called GNAA?
It is not nice to joke about your fellows hurt.
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:52:13PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > If it would be done to anyone but me, you would cry in outrage, then why
> > > > not do so now ? Because there are too many hidden powers involved ?
> > >
> > >
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:28:37PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > > > while i was working on a patch fix for the debian kernel, that i have
> > > > b
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:26:08PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Sven Luther said:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > while i was working on a patch fix for the debian kernel, that i
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > while i was working on a patch fix for the debian kernel, that i have
> > been re
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:42:35PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:48:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > while i was working on a patch fix for the
.
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t;For now I only want to disable it."
in the message you quote.
This seems in complete opposition to what you claim he did say.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 05:17:01PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > >Please, Sven. There is already one thread about you in -vote where
> > > you are already copiously posting and that people are acutely following.
&
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:13:48PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:56:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> > > THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT YOU PLEASE. PLEASE LEAVE.
> >
> > Then please commen
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:56:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 08:32:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > You mean like the when the problems i now have are a direct result of me
>
> THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT YOU PLEASE. PLEASE LEAVE.
Then please commen
factor enters the picture, and with it the power
actually hold by those who are able to make other believe they represent
debian, and you have the receipe for disaster.
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nue to focus on quality and security
> to keep this wonderful volunteer-run GNU/Linux distribution suitable for
> business use.
Releases are being delayed, because the developers loose to much time fighting
between themselves :)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
january, february, and see that on february 21 some folk decided to want to
expulse me again.
Sorry, but playing nice doesn't work in debian, because the vast majority
doesn't really care, or doesn't care enough to take action when iniquity
happens.
So, given that, what do you suggest to me ?
Hurt,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:29:08PM -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 22:56 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> ..
>
> > When will Debian realise that there should be a way to solve social
> > problems,
> > and actually try to solve it, instead of t
hich was dubious and
hurting.
When will Debian realise that there should be a way to solve social problems,
and actually try to solve it, instead of trying to censor or silence the most
annoying party ? This is a real question, and once Debian has an answer for
that, it will solve my problem, but also
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:23:01PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 02:20:58PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi, please read the following, and this may give you more of an insight
> > about
> > the situation.
> >
> Sven,
>
> E
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi, please read the following, and this may give you more of an
> > insight about the situation.
>
> Please stop this *now*
Why ? Every attempt at playing nice has been meet with more punishment.
m
the team.
This is evidence, beyond my own case, how Frans Pop is nuisible to debian, and
should be suspended to give him time to reflect upon his errors, just as i
have been suspended.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e procedure was handled.
Hurt,
Sven Luther
- Forwarded message from Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:45:37 +0300
From: Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: This is g
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:52:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> As you all know there's been an expulsion process (following the
> procedure outlined in [1]) running, with Sven Luther as the
> nominee. We've finally reached a decision. *Please* read t
urrent
solution is only there to punish me, but doesn't solve the problem that you
address.
As such, i can only see it as an act of vengeance of a few who wanted to get
ride of me, or as a stupid decision which fails to achieve its goal, and hurt
me by doing so.
Friendly,
Sven Luth
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:24:12PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 08:13:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:20:42AM -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 07:07 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:20:42AM -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 07:07 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> ..
>
> > I would have gladly accepted any decision, provided it was a fair one, but
> > this one-sidedness is what caused all of this.
> &
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:47:03PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > This is very interesting, so you mean, it is impossible to have one
> > > > thread on
> > > > which one is very passionate, and post a lot, and then all the other
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:03:39AM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On 3/29/07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:56:52AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> >> Sven,
> >>
> >> I don't think anything you could say will reverse t
ads, i was well behaving during january/february, and
would have been ok, but before the ban even ended, they asked for my
expulsion.
what do you expect from me ? what ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
porn :-)
>
> Those who believe it is about something else:
> believe what you want to believe
There is Geert, coming out as expected.
Fellow DD, would you also suspend Geert now, he has been indulging in the
exact same behaviour which is reproached to me, so two weights two measures
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:52:48PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> > Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
> > >> I wanted that the expulsion be judged on his own, and not because i had
> > >> behaved or n
from debian whoever it was who has abused
his debian account in such a way.
Joerg, Elmo, whoever else is in this charge, this is a clear violation of the
policy, and as thus, you should immediately take action.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:42:42AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:49:29PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:32:48PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:09:54PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sv
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:09:54PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sv
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Sven, will you stop replying -private mails on -project ?
Why should i ? I have been expelled from debian, and can't
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:27:54PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >Well, you where not opposed to the likes of Frans, Manoj and Anthony, ...
>
> I think I tend to express my disagreement in different amplitude but even
> more
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:55:24PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Joey, if i came back in a year, at the minor difference between me and
> > others,
> > it would be "he is backsliding" again, and another round of this mess.
>
> This en
1 - 100 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
