Fellow users!
Nvidia hardware is singing on Debian. I am donating.
Yours duly
Richardh Bostrom
contain mesa backports at this point and probably other hardware
> > enablement, but that could be fixed.
>
> I wouldn't recommend enabling backports by default for pre-installed
> systems as using backports is something a bit fiddly (temporarily
> uninstallable packages, sometimes ex
nt and probably other hardware
> enablement, but that could be fixed.
I wouldn't recommend enabling backports by default for pre-installed
systems as using backports is something a bit fiddly (temporarily
uninstallable packages, sometimes extra pinning to pull in additional
packages or manua
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 10:03 PM Hector Oron wrote:
> There are more companies expecting better hardware support, this issue
> is not limited to Lenovo, they are willing to pay consultancy time
> and/or sponsor Debian events, however on volunteer premises, it has
> been really har
nd graphics) let me know!
> As I become more aware of your requirements I can help find more Hectors
> too :)
There are more companies expecting better hardware support, this issue
is not limited to Lenovo, they are willing to pay consultancy time
and/or sponsor Debian events, however on voluntee
Hi Evrim,
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 10:41:03PM +0300, Evrim Erdil wrote:
> Hi. I'm using creative audigy fx sound card on my pc. I have surround sound
> problem on debian releases after debian 8. Dummy output and no sound. Please
> help me to solve this problem.
First of all, this mailinglist is
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 3:57 AM Evrim Erdil wrote:
> Hi. I'm using creative audigy fx sound card on my pc. I have surround sound
> problem on debian releases after debian 8. Dummy output and no sound. Please
> help me to solve this problem.
Please ask for help using Debian on our support
Hi. I'm using creative audigy fx sound card on my pc. I have surround sound
problem on debian releases after debian 8. Dummy output and no sound.
Please help me to solve this problem.
Hi Mason,
Sorry for the delayed answer.
On 16/12/13 at 22:33 -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
I received a few requests for hardware purchases, that I think are worth
discussing with the project as a whole in order to progress
agreement for the use of such hardware, including
such elements as a goal for the work driving the purchase, a notion of
milestones to be accomplished, and an idea of at what point the hardware
should be delivered back to the project or, alternately, a notion of when the
hardware will be considered to have
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
I received a few requests for hardware purchases, that I think are worth
discussing with the project as a whole in order to progress towards having
clear guidelines for what is acceptable and what isn't in terms of spending
Debian
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I received a few requests for hardware purchases, that I think are worth
discussing with the project as a whole in order to progress towards
having clear guidelines for what is acceptable and what isn't in terms
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I received a few requests for hardware purchases, that I think are worth
discussing with the project as a whole in order to progress towards
having clear guidelines for what is acceptable and what
Hi,
I received a few requests for hardware purchases, that I think are worth
discussing with the project as a whole in order to progress towards
having clear guidelines for what is acceptable and what isn't in terms
of spending Debian money.
Please provide feedback on the proposed decisions
Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org writes:
C. Laptop for developer (expected cost: 1k-1.5k EUR?)
=
I have no particular comment on the merits of this specific request, but
that cost jumped out at me. I don't know if systems are more expensive
in the 1k-1.5k eur range.
One could though in case both B and C consider suggesting a 10-50% own
payment depending on dialogue between the DPL and the developer in
question.
I'm not sure of what to do:
- Debian cannot afford to buy hardware for every DD
- But many DDs don't need Debian to buy
Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org writes:
But I would welcome other ideas of criterias to apply here.
I think we should spend donation money only on things that benefit
everybody. Sponsoring hardware to help maintain core packages like d-i,
glibc, the kernel, etc would be okay. But buying
frequent d-i uploads:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2013/10/msg00194.html
2. implementing some kind of official images with backported linux
kernels (and possibly other needed bits from the right suite);
Aren't this tasks better done on Debian server hardware instead of
developer
too large for a decent desktop machine.
Meh, I think that's about the right cost for a machine that we can
continue to use for a while. Sure we can buy cheep hardware, but I don't
think it's great to buy new hardware every other year.
1. performing more frequent d-i uploads:
http
On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 09:11 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org writes:
C. Laptop for developer (expected cost: 1k-1.5k EUR?)
=
I have no particular comment on the merits of this specific request, but
that cost
Thank you again Luca and Tollef. I linked to this preview from
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DSA#Hardware_replacement_plan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
]] Filipus Klutiero
Great. Is this plan written? If so, it would be a good idea to make it
available.
I'll see what we can get done. There's a bit of cleanup to be done,
since we don't want to publish all the information from our spreadsheet
of doom. It contains quotes and numbers from
Hi Tollef,
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Filipus Klutiero
Great. Is this plan written? If so, it would be a good idea to make it
available.
I'll see what we can get done. There's a bit of cleanup to be done,
since we don't want to publish all the information from our spreadsheet
of doom. It
until 2015, but
there are some 2016 bits which snuck in too. This means 2016 is not at
all complete. It's also a plan, so will have to be adjusted to reality
as time progresses.
Machines to be decommissioned, services moved to a VM, by year:
2012:
Where Machine HardwareDate
Where OLD means that the hardware in question is older (often much
older) than five years and for which a post-warranty hardware support
agreement may not be available or is unreasonably expensive.
Goal #1 is consolidation. The goal is to make greater use of virtual
machines hosted on a smaller
Hi Stefano,
On 2012-04-15 14:19, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[...]
Highlight: long-term hardware replacement planning
==
The highlight for this month is long term planning of hardware
replacement. It's something I've been discussing with DSA
Hi,
I think -project@ might be a better list for this.
On 02/21/2012 03:14 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
The info. I'm looking for is the physical infrastructure as to the
kinda specs (hardware specs of the machines) on the network are and if
they are located at diverse locations (or not).
[DB
in-line :-
2012/2/21 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org:
Hi,
I think -project@ might be a better list for this.
On 02/21/2012 03:14 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
The info. I'm looking for is the physical infrastructure as to the
kinda specs (hardware specs of the machines) on the network
that bugs.debian.org isn't what you are
looking for?
That seems like a good idea -- how about if we encouraged willing hardware
manufacturers to maintain a pseudo package type thing, perhaps per
device, although it would be good to have some sort of wild-card so that
one could report a bug
* issues when we see them,
like it happened for the X8STi-F in Debian 5.04.
In that case, are you sure that bugs.debian.org isn't what you are
looking for?
That seems like a good idea -- how about if we encouraged willing hardware
manufacturers to maintain a pseudo package type
it happened for the X8STi-F in Debian 5.04.
In that case, are you sure that bugs.debian.org isn't what you are
looking for?
That seems like a good idea -- how about if we encouraged willing hardware
manufacturers to maintain a pseudo package type thing, perhaps per
device, although it would
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
That seems like a good idea -- how about if we encouraged willing hardware
manufacturers to maintain a pseudo package type thing, perhaps per
device, although it would be good to have some sort of wild-card so that
one could report a bug
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:12:35PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:33:17AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 01:02:23PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
We talked about the possibility to have their hardware being
certified as compatible
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
To advance on this, we need someone leading the initiative and, as step
0, add all the missing wrapping (live cd, submission interface, etc.).
Collaborative test suite and the like can be added later, once the
submission interface is
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 01:02:23PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
We talked about the possibility to have their hardware being
certified as compatible with Debian, and have them advertize about
it on their website product pages.
The plan would be to test the hardware (probably with a live
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:33:17AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 01:02:23PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
We talked about the possibility to have their hardware being
certified as compatible with Debian, and have them advertize about
it on their website
that bugs.debian.org isn't what you are
looking for? Same procedure as always; people (such as yourself, Nick
Adams or Supermicro people) who care about the hardware, test running
Debian (stable, testing/unstable) on the hardware (including the
KVM-over-IP parts) and report any issues (preferably
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:42:11AM -0400, John Sullivan wrote:
Such a database is being generated now at http://h-node.com. The FSF is
also consolidating its former compatible hardware database there. Since
h-node lists hardware that works without proprietary drivers or
proprietary firmware
Hi Ben!
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Debian main uses the same standard as h-node.
Yes. Debian users don't.
Indeed. At least not in the datacenter, where 90% of the GOOD servers
(i.e. the ones whose firmware is actually tested to interoperate with Linux,
firmware updates can
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
The point is to have a system so that manufacturers can write this
system supports Debian. If they don't want to do the work, we could,
and help each other by having a list of hardware that is known to work
with Debian, and a list of hardware with issues
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 11:42 -0400, John Sullivan wrote:
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
The point is to have a system so that manufacturers can write this
system supports Debian. If they don't want to do the work, we could,
and help each other by having a list of hardware
of hardware that is known to work
with Debian, and a list of hardware with issues. If they do, it's best,
and IMHO we should help. Finally, I believe we should have a central
point on Debian's website so that this can happen.
Maybe a wiki page might be a good start, until we setup something
other by having a list of hardware that is known to work
with Debian, and a list of hardware with issues. If they do, it's best,
and IMHO we should help. Finally, I believe we should have a central
point on Debian's website so that this can happen.
Maybe a wiki page might be a good start
Debian. If they don't want to do the work, we could,
and help each other by having a list of hardware that is known to work
with Debian, and a list of hardware with issues. If they do, it's best,
and IMHO we should help. Finally, I believe we should have a central
point on Debian's website so
other by having a list of hardware that is known to work
with Debian, and a list of hardware with issues. If they do, it's best,
and IMHO we should help. Finally, I believe we should have a central
point on Debian's website so that this can happen.
Maybe a wiki page might be a good start, until
[Thomas Goirand]
The plan would be to test the hardware (probably with a live CD
using a KVM over IP). If it doesn't work, see what driver isn't
present, and if the backported kernel has the fix. If it does, in
some cases, we could add a patch in a Debian point release, if it's
not too
the
support for that and can work with Debian to get the work done.
That's what we were discussing. Who should they get in touch with? I am
not aware of any front desk for such hardware certification.
No, this is not. It is a difference if _they_ declare that Debian works
on a given machine
done.
That's what we were discussing. Who should they get in touch with? I am
not aware of any front desk for such hardware certification.
No, this is not. It is a difference if _they_ declare that Debian works
on a given machine or if _we_ do it.
The point is to have a system so
should post, if I'm doing wrong.
I was at the (China Cloud Computing Conference) in Beijing the
last 3 days. There, I had a chat with Nick, from chinaskycloud which
works tighly with SuperCloud (a Supermicro subsidiary in China).
We talked about the possibility to have their hardware
Hi,
Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
Yes. There's a kindof market point I've been wishing on Debian for
years knowing that it simply could happen: certifications and generally
rising attention to commercial producers, both hardware and (free/open)
software.
I think there's right now a thread
Hi,
I have some old AMD Athlon MP processors (1400, 1500 and 1900MHz) and
PC2100 DDR RAM sticks that I do not use anymore but that work great
and could be useful to build a server or just for testing.
Is Debian interested in such hardware ? If yes, how can I send it to
your organization
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Hervé Bouy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Debian interested in such hardware ? If yes, how can I send it to your
organization? Am happy to pay the fees. That'll be a little contribution to
a project I like a lot and use everyday.
Please check the donations page
* Mike Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-02 14:04]:
I am a QA engineer at Sun Microsystems and have been tasked with
looking into supporting Debian on some of our systems. Many other OS
vendors have a certification program for hardware and systems, where
a series of tests are run and upon
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Mike Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-02 14:04]:
I am a QA engineer at Sun Microsystems and have been tasked with
looking into supporting Debian on some of our systems. Many other OS
vendors have a certification program for hardware and systems
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:04:34PM -0400, Mike Houle wrote:
[Reformatted to remove HTML]
Hi,
I am a QA engineer at Sun Microsystems and have been tasked
with looking into supporting Debian on some of our
systems. Many other OS vendors have a certification program for
hardware and systems
Hi,
I am a QA engineer at Sun Microsystems and have
been tasked
with looking into supporting Debian on
some of our
systems. Many other OS vendors have a certification program for
hardware and
systems, where a series of tests are run and upon completion, the
system/hardware is posted to a list
I am a QA engineer at Sun Microsystems and have been tasked with
looking into supporting Debian on some of our systems. Many other OS
vendors have a certification program for hardware and systems, where a
series of tests are run and upon completion, the system/hardware is
posted to a list
martin f krafft wrote:
snippage
The alternative is simply not to buy hardware whose manufacturers
don't cooperate. This is what I've been doing for the last 5 years
or so with great success.
Excellent advice. I've also been attempting to do the same (though I'm such a cheapskate I more often
is
a database of products/vendors/merchants where this info can be
added. The Linux hardware database used to be good, but I don't know
where it went. Maybe http://www.linuxhardwaredatabase.net/. Then
there is http://www.linuxcompatible.org/compatibility.html, but
neither seems to concentrate on Free/Open
charlie derr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] But I wonder if you'd be willing to share the resources you
use to make buying choices? [...]
In addition to the excellent http://kmuto.jp/debian/hcl/ (BSDish) there's
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Hardware-HOWTO/ (GPL) in general
http://linux
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Gustavo Franco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061209 01:16]:
I would be glad to run one of the P4 or P3 to debian-desktop
development purposes. Unfortunately, i'm in Brazil and a friend of
mine (OpenBSD developer) had troubles when tried to receive some
donated hardware
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061209 14:46]:
aparently this can be worked around if the machine is owned
outside brazil and is only hosted there. so somehow e.g. fiis
could own the machine and have it hosted in .br.
Stratus, could you please try to find out further details or find
On 12/9/06, Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061209 14:46]:
aparently this can be worked around if the machine is owned
outside brazil and is only hosted there. so somehow e.g. fiis
could own the machine and have it hosted in .br.
Stratus,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:57:11AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10860 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
So, if you want a machine from the following list, send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and give a rough description what you plan to do with
it.
Hihi, Update: Please notice that the
Hi!
Thanks for your interest. We are not sure yet, how long it will take to
sort things out, but we will get back to you.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
* Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061209 00:01]:
Thanks for your interest. We are not sure yet, how long it will take to
sort things out, but we will get back to you.
Note to myself: Don't send semi-automated responsed to lists /
discussion mails.
Sorry,
Alexander
Hi
I have a number of machines to give away to Debian related people.
This is old hardware donated from Lufthansa, ranging from an older
486DX2/66 to new Dual Xeon 3GHz machines. All machines that nobody wants
here will get scrapped, so I haven't done a selection, maybe someone
wants to build
On 10860 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
So, if you want a machine from the following list, send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and give a rough description what you plan to do with
it.
Hihi, Update: Please notice that the list contains more than those 4
Dual Xeon machines. Maybe note an
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 07:47:47PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Pat Tadgerson:
I am not a real hardware person, but I would like a server with 2
hard drives with about 160 gigs of storage, with a raid 0
configuration.
RAID 0 is usually a very bad idea because you lose all your data
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:47:47 +0200
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Pat Tadgerson:
I am not a real hardware person, but I would like a server with 2
hard drives with about 160 gigs of storage, with a raid 0
configuration.
RAID 0 is usually a very bad idea because you lose
Hello,
I am going to purchase a new dell server, and I am going to
load a debian operating system on it. I was hoping you could recommend a good
server for me. I ask, because I have read about so many problems with sata
drives and raid controller problems. I am not a real hardware person
* Pat Tadgerson:
I am not a real hardware person, but I would like a server with 2
hard drives with about 160 gigs of storage, with a raid 0
configuration.
RAID 0 is usually a very bad idea because you lose all your data if
just one disk fails.
By the way, you should use a more suitable
Dear Sir/Madam,
we are a company in the field of astrology and we would like to
donate some hardware in order to support your project (e.g.
hard disks). For this reason I would be glad to be informed by
you about the postal adress to which we have to send our
hardware donation.
Looking
Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2005, 10:01 +0200 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
we are a company in the field of astrology and we would like to
donate some hardware in order to support your project (e.g.
hard disks). For this reason I would be glad to be informed by
you about the postal adress
Hello,
we would like to send hardware from 82008 Unterhaching
(nearby Munich), Germany.
Best regards
Sabine Egger
Am 10 Aug 2005 um 11:03 hat Noèl Köthe geschrieben:
Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2005, 10:01 +0200 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
we are a company in the field of astrology
Hi
I'm an individual that would like to get listed on your website as some that
can provide hardware with Debian Linux pre-installed.
How do I go about getting listed?
Rishi
* Rishi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-30 11:22]:
I'm an individual that would like to get listed on your website as some that
can provide hardware with Debian Linux pre-installed.
How do I go about getting listed?
Please follow the instructions at the end of
http://www.debian.org/distrib/pre
Are hardware vendors self destructive?
Are hardware vendors keeping open secrets?
(Too many iBooks at IBM.)
HP push PA-RISC based rp series with HP-UX
HP push IA64 based rx series with Linux
SGI push MIPS based Origin with Irix
SGI push IA64 based Altix with Linux
Sun push UltraSPARC
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:31:46PM +0800, Andrew Buckeridge wrote:
Build times would understate performance of RISC which runs compiled C
applications much faster than interpreters or compilers, however these
would still be worthwhile.
In what relevant way is gcc different from other compiled
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:06:46PM -0700, Cyber wrote:
Hello
2 wks ago i bought new debian linux (enchanced debian 2.2 )
and failed to detect modem hardware as not winmodem
Dear Cypher,
First of all, please use reconfigure your mail client to use
your real name. Please
Hello
2 wks ago i bought new debian linux (enchanced debian 2.2 )
and failed to detect modem hardware as not winmodem
i already tired with setserial -g /dev/ttyS* and tested with
setserial /dev/ttyS0 or S1 -v autoconfig then ttyS1 detected
but i typed : dpkg
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:13:45AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 30-Oct-00, 19:31 (CST), Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 08:04:53PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
The PowerPC port is about to be without an unstable build daemon again.
Insert
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 08:04:53PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
The PowerPC port is about to be without an unstable build daemon again.
Insert random support here. I think this is a completely sensible use
of project funds.
I agree, I've been
83 matches
Mail list logo
