Bug#1043539: Gmail forwarding issue with more information

2024-02-02 Thread 황병희
Hellow Debian Hackers, I did investigate about Gmail's behavior for lone time. Today i would like to submit some evidences. There are two screenshot picture. Plus one headr file and one postfix log file: https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/commit/9b352348a622a5bb2adf909fd3987e91d6c4205a Thanks in

Information

2023-10-24 Thread Giovanni Guarino
Following my precedent email. I want to inform you that after my investigation, the problem is only with Plasma Desktop Environment and with the Konsole terminal. With best regards Giovanni Guarino

Re: Information

2023-10-23 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 07:24:06PM +0200, Giovanni Guarino wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > First of all thank you for your big work to continue to support debian. > I have installed version 12 and I want to inform you that the Shared > Clipboard and Drag & Drop doesn't work. > With lsmod i saw vboxguest p

Information

2023-10-23 Thread Giovanni Guarino
Dear Sirs, First of all thank you for your big work to continue to support debian. I have installed version 12 and I want to inform you that the Shared Clipboard and Drag & Drop doesn't work. With lsmod i saw vboxguest perfectly installed but doesn't work Thank you very much Giovanni Guarino

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:27:57AM +0100, Agata Erminia Pennisi wrote: > Thanks Andrey. So the future Debian Stable release will probably not > include Chronium if the vulnerabilities are not fixed and this will also > happen in future third party Linux distros. > > I think upstream developers (Go

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-22 Thread Agata Erminia Pennisi
Thanks Andrey. So the future Debian Stable release will probably not include Chronium if the vulnerabilities are not fixed and this will also happen in future third party Linux distros. I think upstream developers (Google) will have an interest in fixing vulnerabilities and potential exploits. Th

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 02:15:04AM +0100, Agata Erminia Pennisi wrote: > Dear Max, > I am a simple user. > Thank you for notifying the community of the unresolved Chromium > vulnerabilities. > You can use official channels to report vulnerabilities. Chromium being full of vulnerabilities is well-k

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-21 Thread Agata Erminia Pennisi
Dear Max, I am a simple user. Thank you for notifying the community of the unresolved Chromium vulnerabilities. You can use official channels to report vulnerabilities. Also, if you find these vulnerabilities "dangerous" and underrated, report them to the community as you did with Chronium. You mus

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-21 Thread Max WillB
One DD replied off-the-list, so I'll quote him without attribution: > I understand your concern, but practicality is better then theory. > > (...) we will get notification when vulnerabilities are exploited, and so we > get priority. It's not so theoretical: "Google is aware that an exploit fo

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-21 Thread Max WillB
Dear Diederik, New code fixes old bugs, but introduces new ones. Then Debian comes in and, at some point, applies a small portion of those fixes to old code. My problem is that debian.org/security is not telling you that. People read the page and get the mistaken impression that all of Debian's

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-20 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Monday, 20 December 2021 00:03:51 CET Max WillB wrote: > 3. Inform the users that using anything but the latest version of the kernel > (2) and other packages comes with inherent risks and explain them (delays > in backporting fixes and known vulnerabilities not being disclosed) > > (2) https:/

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-19 Thread Max WillB
Dear Andrew, My critique is NOT of how the Debian project manages updates in Stable. It's of the decision not to inform the users of the inherent limitations of Debian's approach, which I believe is a violation of the social contract. Let me make some concrete proposals for debian.org/security

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-19 Thread Agata Erminia Pennisi
Dear Max, I am also a simple Debian user. Debian naturally follows the free software rules of the do-ocracy. Therefore, you can share the vulnerabilities you encounter in the software with both the upstream developers and the dedicated security team. In addition, the customary law of open source c

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-19 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 05:37:40PM +0100, Max WillB wrote: > Davide Prina wrote: > > > you must understand that who report a security problem can be a > > different person > > The point is, to quote the paper: > > "a vast majority of vulnerabilities and their corresponding security > patches

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-19 Thread Max WillB
Davide Prina wrote: > you must understand that who report a security problem can be a different > person The point is, to quote the paper: "a vast majority of vulnerabilities and their corresponding security patches remain beyond public exposure" Vulnerabilities are fixed in fresh versions o

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-18 Thread Davide Prina
tory, that has no more security support or have a limited security support Hiding this information from the users I don't think anyone is hiding this information, all this information is public and can be accessed by any user. You can subscribe to the security mailing list you can monit

Re: Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-17 Thread Max WillB
Am I really the only one who thinks that it's a direct violation of the social contract? Of course, I wouldn't expect a commercial entity in Debian's position to be upfront with their users about the limitations of their product, but Debian was supposed to be different, was it not? -- Sent wit

Concerns about how the Security information is presented on Debian.org

2021-12-16 Thread Max WillB
Hello Let me first say that while my message is critical, Debian is my favorite Linux distro, and I've used many over many years. The goal of this post is to improve the way the security information is communicated on debian.org, which I believe is misleading. security.debian.org start

Re: Inquiry regarding libncurses5 license information /#266603

2021-09-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2021-09-15 at 18:52 +0900, 赤星香菜【株式会社Cygames】 wrote: > Sorry and thanks for letting me know about support channel > information page, > and also thanks for the License information, > I'd missed checking Copyright section in the right panel. > > Thanks again for

Re: Inquiry regarding libncurses5 license information /#266603

2021-09-15 Thread 赤星香菜【株式会社Cygames】
Hi, Sorry and thanks for letting me know about support channel information page, and also thanks for the License information, I'd missed checking Copyright section in the right panel. Thanks again for your support, have a great day, Kind regards, Kana 2021年9月15日(水) 13:04 Paul Wise : >

Re: Inquiry regarding libncurses5 license information /#266603

2021-09-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:08 AM 赤星香菜【株式会社Cygames】wrote: > Hi support, This isn't a Debian user support channel, see here: https://www.debian.org/support > Here is my inquiry regarding your libncurses5 package: > https://packages.debian.org/ja/stretch/libncurses5 > > By what license is this pack

Inquiry regarding libncurses5 license information /#266603

2021-09-14 Thread 赤星香菜【株式会社Cygames】
Information System Div Cygames, Inc.

information about Chromium-shell

2020-07-09 Thread BG
Hello, I would have been interested by Chromium-shell I installed it but no shortcut was created. So I don't know how could launch it without that and I uninstalled it because no shortcut as i said and also when i wanted to connect to email account there was a message saying impossible because not

Re: Information request

2018-12-28 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Xavier wrote: > > But I also know that there is the possibility of replacing the > > repository of the oldstable version with backports, but I do not know if > > this repository makes available for debian oldstable also the latest > > version of LAMP and wo

Re: Information request

2018-12-28 Thread Xavier
not have your expert knowledge. > Secondly, I contact you to ask an information: > > I know the safest version is old stable (jessie), but I know it can only > have older software. Hello, no the safest is "stable" > But I also know that there is the possibility of repla

Information request

2018-12-28 Thread User Web
Dear Debian team, Hi! First of all, thank you for all the work you do to make debian such a powerful, reliable and secure distribution. Thanks also for all your support, documentation and availability to those who do not have your expert knowledge. Secondly, I contact you to ask an information: I

Re: €EUR 500 cash bounty for information / Debian privacy breaches, let go

2018-12-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 23/12/18 21:53, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 09:51:03PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> I don't want to risk spreading fake news or "generalizations". >> >> I'm offering a EUR 500 cash bounty for evidence about the privacy violation. >> > > Let it go > Let it go at least for

Re: ??? 500 cash bounty for information / Debian privacy breaches, let go

2018-12-23 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 09:53:43PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 09:51:03PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > > I don't want to risk spreading fake news or "generalizations". No one wants fake news And on "generalizations" it is an abstraction by definition. > > > >

Re: ??? 500 cash bounty for information / Debian privacy breaches, let go

2018-12-23 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 09:51:03PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > I don't want to risk spreading fake news or "generalizations". > > I'm offering a ???500 cash bounty for evidence about the privacy violation. > Let it go Let it go at least for a now Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en lat

€ 500 cash bounty for information / Debian privacy breaches

2018-12-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
news or "generalizations". I'm offering a €500 cash bounty for evidence about the privacy violation. The first person to send me the proof privately (not on the mailing list) receives the bounty. To qualify, the proof needs to show how private information was transmitte

Information ASMDA2019 International Conference and DEMOGRAPHICS2019 Workshop

2018-11-26 Thread secretar
of Abstracts in Electronic and in Paper form 2. Electronic Proceedings in the web in a permanent website 3. Publications in International Journals 4. Publications in edited Books For more information and Abstract/Paper submission and Special and Invited Session Proposals please visit th

Re: Information Please.

2017-07-13 Thread krystalsauce4
Sww Sent from my iPhone

Bug#861781: www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information

2017-05-03 Thread Paul Wise
(representative: Wichert Akkerman*) SchoolForge (representatives: Ben Armstrong*, Raphaël Hertzog) OASIS: Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (representative: Mark Johnson*) Reconfirm the involvement of these representatives: Linux International (representative

Attention required: Important information for your website: Debian.org

2016-10-04 Thread Paulo Climachauska
Hi Debian.org Team, I trust you are doing splendidly. My team has gone through your website and comprehends that it’s well built. Of course, the site can be improved in several ways to get better sales and revenue. If you would like, I can send you the list of upgrades and improvements neces

Re: Information serveur miroir Debian

2016-03-30 Thread Paul Wise
2016-03-31 13:22 GMT+08:00 mathias lan-man-chung: > j'aurais quelques questions à vous poser concernant l'officialisation d'un > serveur miroir Debian. I suggest asking your mirror questions in English on debian-mirrors: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mirrors/ -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debia

Information serveur miroir Debian

2016-03-30 Thread mathias lan-man-chung
Bonjour, j'aurais quelques questions à vous poser concernant l'officialisation d'un serveur miroir Debian. J'aimerai monter un serveur miroir Debian à l'île de la Réunion pour au moins 800 000 habitants, et je voulais savoir si une bande passante de 10 M est-ce suffisant pour devenir un dépôt off

Re: Debian 64bit information on website

2016-03-06 Thread Steffen Möller
why it is named AMD64 vs. i386. I agree. Had tried it on an IT-savvy close relative. > Users normally do associate Intel and AMD to be two different sets. > > Could this information on the website be made available more prominently? > Directly on the download locations of the "h

Re: Debian 64bit information on website

2016-03-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2016-03-05 at 12:49 +0100, error.hotm...@brushdesign.com wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > A long time Debian user I still have friends asking me where to find > a 64bit distro to run on INTEL processors. When pointing out that the > AMD64 distro is the way to go I always got questions why it is nam

Debian 64bit information on website

2016-03-05 Thread error.hotm...@brushdesign.com
different sets. Could this information on the website be made available more prominently? Directly on the download locations of the "how to get Debian" instead of the wiki or the FAQ? It would be interesting to have a look at todays downloads, I suspect that the 32 bit versions are

Important information for your website

2015-09-18 Thread Michael Dennis
Hi Debian.org Team, I hope you are enjoying the season. My team has gone through your website and comprehend that it's well built, but can be improved in several ways to get better sales and revenue from the site. If you would like me to send you a complete list of upgrades and improvements w

Important Information For Your Website :Debian.net :ZS

2013-12-18 Thread Kym Crox
Hi Debian.net Team, Hope you are doing great and everything fine at your end. I thought you might like to know some of the most important factors of your website and reasons of lacking enough organic traffic & most often you stick to Ad words to get more traffic which is quite expensive and

Re: Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-29 Thread Olivier Berger
service or other sources of RDF (copy paste or using sameAs references). In turn, the Whois service could exploit these FOAF/WebID profiles to render them as HTML, in a similar way to what the FOAF explorer does (see http://xml.mfd-consult.dk/foaf/explorer/?foaf=http%3A%2F%2Fpeople.debian.org%2F~o

Re: Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-28 Thread Olivier Berger
Martín Ferrari writes: > (Sorry I've been so slow to respond, I was pretty busy these days) > +1 ;) > >> Also may I suggest to think about adding a FOAF profile [1] and similar >> machine-processable (RDF based, for interoperability benefits) documents >> in addition to human readable ones, so

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-28 Thread Olivier Berger
names they have in Debian (for example, the primary UID on their > GPG key) should be the default on the site. > > The multiple email situation can be addressed by interfacing with the > MIA database, which already tracks this kind of information, of course > after a little d

Whois service (was: Review of personal information sources in Debian)

2012-08-26 Thread Martín Ferrari
things to be able to publicise it properly. Consider this an open call > for help O:-) Well, I could help, but I haven't found any information about it, not even what is the help wanted :) Is converting wiki/forum and other sites to use it part of the plan? Will it use anything more t

Re: Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-26 Thread Martín Ferrari
(Sorry I've been so slow to respond, I was pretty busy these days) Hi Olivier, On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: > Your proposal looks very interesting to me : part of the interest of FS > contributors, in contributing to projects, is to be able to demonstrate > through a r

Re: Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-20 Thread Enrico Zini
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 05:13:10PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Enrico Zini wrote: > > Recklessly exposing too much information outside the context in which it > > was published can in some cases turn people away from contributing. If [...] >

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-20 Thread Enrico Zini
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:37:57AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Added info about wiki.d.o/forums.d.n user information access policies. Thanks. > How much detail do you want on the data available? The use cases I can see for the page are: 1. someone trying to manage their own identity

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 12:26 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > Added to http://wiki.debian.org/ContributorsInformationSources mostly > as stubs. Could you please have a go at the details? Added info about wiki.d.o/forums.d.n user information access policies. How much detail do you want on th

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-18 Thread Enrico Zini
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:33:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > In terms of implementation, I see an overlap with nm.debian.org, > portfolio.debian.net and db.debian.org. ...and the Debian Maintainer Dashboard (http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi), thanks today's Misc Developer News. Ciao, Enrico --

Re: Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-17 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Enrico Zini wrote: > Recklessly exposing too much information outside the context in which it > was published can in some cases turn people away from contributing. If > ohloh were actually being taken seriously by people in my professional > cir

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-17 Thread Enrico Zini
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:57:29PM -0600, Paul Wise wrote: > wiki.d.o: email/jabber address, name, page subscriptions, timezone, > other settings. > > forums.d.n: email, various contact addresses/URLs. > > carnivore: stores other email addresses that might be unknown to the > keyring & LDAP. Ad

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-17 Thread Enrico Zini
obably should if it is storing unique information, or if it is distributing information to a larger audience than the original data sources. For example, UDD exports carnivore data to anyone who has an alioth account, but can carnivore itself be accessed by people who just have an alioth account? Ciao,

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-17 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Enrico Zini writes: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:54:38AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > >> Would you consider adding this to wiki.d.o so that it can be maintained >> collaboratively ? > > Sounds good with me. If you have a good name for the wiki page, please > feel free to copypaste my email

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-16 Thread Enrico Zini
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:54:38AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > Would you consider adding this to wiki.d.o so that it can be maintained > collaboratively ? Sounds good with me. If you have a good name for the wiki page, please feel free to copypaste my email into it. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG ke

Re: Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-16 Thread Enrico Zini
e with most of what you said, I feel the need of a warning before taking ohloh too seriously as an inspiration. In my experience, ohlog has severe privacy issues: I once wrote them saying that they were misrepresenting my work skills and politely asking to please not show any information about my onlin

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-16 Thread Enrico Zini
that a way of > managing the different email addresses associated, because that's the > main problem I see for integrating different sources of information > about one person. Currently, many tools in Debian still don't > recognise that tincho@ and martin.ferrari@ are the same person.

Re: Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-16 Thread Olivier Berger
Martín Ferrari writes: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: >> Do you have any preferred means to receive some feedback on your >> proposal (I can't seem to find some comments on your blog post) ? > > Sorry, I've never had the patience or motivation to enable them :) > Email

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-15 Thread Martín Ferrari
d. I'd also add to that a way of managing the different email addresses associated, because that's the main problem I see for integrating different sources of information about one person. Currently, many tools in Debian still don't recognise that tincho@ and martin.ferrari@ are the sam

Re: Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-14 Thread Martín Ferrari
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: > Do you have any preferred means to receive some feedback on your > proposal (I can't seem to find some comments on your blog post) ? Sorry, I've never had the patience or motivation to enable them :) Email to this very thread seems like a g

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-14 Thread Olivier Berger
Enrico Zini writes: > Hello, > > I've recently done a review of personal information sources in Debian, > which I'd like to share here both because I don't think this has been > done before, and to check if I missed anything. > SNIP > > > Did I m

Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-14 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Martín Ferrari writes: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Enrico Zini wrote: >> I've recently done a review of personal information sources in Debian, >> which I'd like to share here both because I don't think this has been >> done befor

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Enrico, I needed to escape the problem that UDD has sometimes several different spellings for the name of the very same person. I hacked around a bit and finally settled with http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=teammetrics/teammetrics.git;a=blob;f=maintain_names_prefered.py;hb=HEAD It is

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-13 Thread Enrico Zini
tailor how their identity is exposed, would be very helpful, > and would allow to improve many other services that currently rely on > incomplete identity information, specially for non-D[DM]s. Indeed: nm.debian.org is currently the authoritative database for the status of people contrib

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-08-13 Thread Martín Ferrari
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Enrico Zini wrote: > I've recently done a review of personal information sources in Debian, > which I'd like to share here both because I don't think this has been > done before, and to check if I missed anything. Coincidentally, I

Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-07-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Enrico Zini wrote: > Did I miss anything in this review? Is everything represented correctly? wiki.d.o: email/jabber address, name, page subscriptions, timezone, other settings. forums.d.n: email, various contact addresses/URLs. carnivore: stores other email ad

Review of personal information sources in Debian

2012-07-30 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello, I've recently done a review of personal information sources in Debian, which I'd like to share here both because I don't think this has been done before, and to check if I missed anything. These are all the places I can think of, where we store personal inform

Information regarding debian.org and LegalAdvice.net

2011-02-23 Thread Craig Marsh
Hello,I'm contacting you as you are in the legal business and thought you would like to know that my client is selling the domain name LegalAdvice.netThis domain could be forwarded to your existing site to capture some pre-qualified leads from people who type the domain into their browser.Or should

Re: Help...information please

2007-06-21 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:57:43PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >  I realize that I may have the wrong place, however I'm hoping that > I might also have the right people. The information I seek is this: Is > Libranet 2.8 or 3 still available? Unfortunately, L

Help...information please

2007-06-21 Thread raygagne
 I realize that I may have the wrong place, however I'm hoping that I might also have the right people. The information I seek is this: Is Libranet 2.8 or 3 still available? If so how can I obtain it? All I know is that it was based on Debian. Google and like company carry inform

Re: Copyright Information

2007-04-23 Thread Ralph Katz
d > importance of filling out the census. One image we plan on using for > our slideshow was found at _http://www.zetnet.co.uk/~pm/photos/_. > Unfortunately, there is no contact information on that webpage. There > was, however, a picture of Debian's tenth birthday. I was hop

Re: Copyright Information

2007-04-23 Thread MJ Ray
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] One image we plan on using for > our slideshow was found at http://www.zetnet.co.uk/~pm/photos/. > Unfortunately, there is no contact information on that webpage. [...] Try emailing pm at zetnet.co.uk or pm at debian.org (checked via http://db.de

Re: Copyright Information

2007-04-23 Thread Ian.Knight
slideshow was found at http://www.zetnet.co.uk/~pm/photos/. Unfortunately, there is no contact information on that webpage. There was, however, a picture of Debian's tenth birthday. I was hoping to learn of an email address through which I can contact the owner of the picture titled "

Re: Conflicting information on current Debian release

2007-02-03 Thread Philippe Cloutier
The statement "The Debian project confirms December 2006 as the date for the next release of its distribution which will be named Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 alias 'etch'." is wrong, and indeed Debian 4.0 wasn't released in December 2006. The reason this statement reached debian-announce is insufficie

Re: Conflicting information on current Debian release

2007-02-02 Thread Martin Schulze
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:10:47PM -0500, Bob Kline wrote: > > The Debian home page (http://www.debian.org/) notes the announcement of > > the "Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0," and the page linked by > > that note says "The Debian project confirms December 2006 a

Re: Conflicting information on current Debian release

2007-02-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:10:47PM -0500, Bob Kline wrote: > The Debian home page (http://www.debian.org/) notes the announcement of > the "Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0," and the page linked by > that note says "The Debian project confirms December 2006 as the date > for the next rel

Conflicting information on current Debian release

2007-02-02 Thread Bob Kline
The Debian home page (http://www.debian.org/) notes the announcement of the "Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0," and the page linked by that note says "The Debian project confirms December 2006 as the date for the next release of its distribution which will be named Debian GNU/Linux 4.0

publically accesible NEW queue information

2006-10-28 Thread Thomas Viehmann
; tool and providing that output on a public webpage for > other people to review. That currently uses neat markup that colourises > things for less, so presumably isn't tremendously compatible with the > web though. Presumably someone could change that if they were so enthused. Would it

Re: Information Concerning Telugu Font

2006-04-04 Thread Kevin Mark
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:18:59AM -0500, James Hardy wrote: > Greetings! > > > > I am searching for a free Telugu font that I can install on my computer. I > do not know enough about the software to ask specific questions. I would > like to be able to do word processing and possibly publicati

Information Concerning Telugu Font

2006-04-04 Thread James Hardy
Greetings! I am searching for a free Telugu font that I can install on my computer. I do not know enough about the software to ask specific questions. I would like to be able to do word processing and possibly publication using Telugu font. Do you have any suggestions on how I should procee

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 01:02:25AM +0100, Anders Breindahl wrote: > On 2006-01-28 2101, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:47:05AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:45:52AM +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote: > > >> is

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 01:02:25AM +0100, Anders Breindahl wrote: > Which reminds me; is there going to be a permanent solution to this, or > is packages.d.o being migrated out of service? I hope not, as it's more useful than ftp.d.o ;) Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-28 Thread Anders Breindahl
On 2006-01-28 2101, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:47:05AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:45:52AM +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote: > >> is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o > > > packa

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-28 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:47:05AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:45:52AM +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote: >> is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o > packages.debian.org was disabled because the load of the machine

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > A while ago, the actual Packages and Sources files were moved to > dists/experimental instead of project/experimental, where they were > historically, but that change should not affect anyone using normal apt > sources.list syntax in their sources files, as that will still do the > right th

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-09 Thread Florian Weimer
* Adam D. Barratt: > On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 11:20 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Noèl Köthe: >> >> > is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o >> > and the experimental problem? >> >> Isn't experimental being

Bug#347229: DevRef: experimental link now broken, and s/distribution/suite/? (Was: Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental)

2006-01-09 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: developers-reference Severity: normal 4.6.4.3 uses the following apt lines for packages from 'experimental': deb http://ftp.xy.debian.org/debian/ ../project/experimental main deb-src http://ftp.xy.debian.org/debian/ ../project/experimental main But Joey Hess here claims that i

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 11:20 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Noèl Köthe: > > > is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o > > and the experimental problem? > > Isn't experimental being pulled from the archive or something like > t

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-07 Thread Joey Hess
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Eh, considering I'm member of the ftp-master team, what problem are you > talking about? There isn't any mail about any problem in my ftpmaster > inbox that I can see, nor any bug filed. > > The only thing I can think of you must've been referring to is the > followi

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-07 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:45:52AM +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote: > is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o packages.debian.org was disabled because the load of the machine hosting it, saens.debian.org, which also is our only ftp.debian.org at the moment, rose to 141

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-07 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:20:19AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Noèl Köthe: > > is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o > > and the experimental problem? > > Isn't experimental being pulled from the archive or something like > tha

Re: Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-07 Thread Florian Weimer
* Noèl Köthe: > is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o > and the experimental problem? Isn't experimental being pulled from the archive or something like that?

Information abount packages.d.o and experimental

2006-01-06 Thread Noèl Köthe
Hello, is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o and the experimental problem? IMHO they are important for the development and infos should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Noèl Köthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Automated testing - politics, information, and Ubuntu's plans

2005-11-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Note: this is one of two messages on roughly the same topic. This message is trying to deal with the POLITICAL and process questions about Ubuntu's work in this area. I have set the Reply-To to debian-*project*. Please send your technical contributions to debian-*policy*, as followups to my othe

Request for Advertising information

2005-08-24 Thread John Lockmer
Dear Web Publisher,   I hope your day is going well.  I just checked out your website and thought that it looked really good.  Excellent information, good colors, easy to follow layout…some of the qualities I enjoy about a site's uniqueness.  I wanted to get in contact with you be

Here is that amazing information bf

2005-04-30 Thread Cornelia David
To: Loren I was checking my email and saw this advertisement in it. just like you I = was thinking this stuff will not work its all a gimmic.. but even with my other half telling me im wast= ing my money I went ahead and purchased it. and I can tell you right now with a straight face im big= ge

information regarding the events

2004-12-27 Thread moses muyomba
Hullo there,am a ugandan by nationality who came across this web site and picked interest in it.am requesting you kindly send me information about all the neccessary requirments for some like me to attend the events in germany.i will really be very greatfull if at all am considered. thanks your

wamu.com Information requestkx

2004-12-18 Thread wamu-securihd
, We recently have determined that different computers have logged onto your Online Banking wamu account, and multiple passwords failures were present before the logins. We now need you to re-confirm your account information to us. If this is not completed by

Donation to the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure

2004-09-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
I've authorized and asked ffis e.V. (the keeper of Debian money in Europe) to donate 1,000 EUR to the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII). FFII supports the development of public information goods based on copyright, free competition, and open standards. Some of their cu

UPS Package Tracking Information

2004-05-02 Thread customer . service
Sorry, a valid UPS tracking number was not found in your message.

  1   2   >