Re: Bug#1024971: pybuild: should fail when the result of running tests is "Ran 0 tests in 0.000s"

2024-09-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On September 8, 2024 1:43:33 PM UTC, Stefano Rivera wrote: >Hi Louis-Philippe (2022.11.28_01:46:58_+0200) >> Too often, a mistake or a misconfiguration leads to no tests being detected >> when trying to run the upstream testsuite. >> >> When this happens, the result of the test command typical

Re: QA Experiment: removing "stale uploaders"

2024-08-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
As a first cut, I would exclude archived repositories for removed packages (e.g. ptable). If the team as a whole is keeping a package up to date, I think we should be happy that the package is maintained and not expend effort to make it harder for people to do that. I'm really not sure how you

Re: Policy Change Proposal: Running the upstream test suite

2024-07-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On July 30, 2024 4:27:48 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" wrote: >On 2024-07-30 12:58, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> >> On July 30, 2024 2:47:08 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" >> wrote: >>> On 2024-07-30 11:09, Scott Kitterman

Re: Policy Change Proposal: Running the upstream test suite

2024-07-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On July 30, 2024 2:47:08 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" wrote: >On 2024-07-30 11:09, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> >> On July 30, 2024 12:49:50 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" >> wrote: >>> On 2024-07-29 21:07, Scott Kitterman

Re: Policy Change Proposal: Running the upstream test suite

2024-07-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On July 30, 2024 12:49:50 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" wrote: >On 2024-07-29 21:07, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> >> On July 29, 2024 8:53:11 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> A

Re: Policy Change Proposal: Running the upstream test suite

2024-07-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On July 29, 2024 3:14:33 PM UTC, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: >> Maybe we indeed want a "minimal" autopkgtest environment, but many >> upstream tests will fail in those and I don't see an automatic way to test >> a random package in this way. > >Even if not minimal, at least correspond to th

Re: Policy Change Proposal: Running the upstream test suite

2024-07-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On July 29, 2024 8:53:11 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" wrote: >Hello, > >As discussed during the DebConf24 Python BoF, I'm submitting this change to >the policy to require the use of the upstream test suite, both during the >build process and as an autopkgtest. > >You can find the MR he

Bug#1074759: O: aiodns -- Asynchronous DNS resolver library for Python 3

2024-07-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: aio...@packages.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:aiodns I intend to orphan the aiodns package. The package description is: aiodns provides a simple way for doing asynchronous DNS resolutions with a synchronous look

Bug#1074758: O: pycares -- Python interface for c-ares (common documentation)

2024-07-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: pyca...@packages.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:pycares I intend to orphan the pycares package. The package description is: pycares is a Python 3 module which provides an interface to c-ares. c-ares is a C librar

Re: Proposal IRC meeting DPT

2024-07-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On July 1, 2024 6:08:31 PM UTC, Matthias Klose wrote: >On 29.06.24 20:29, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Saturday, June 29, 2024 1:36:41 PM EDT Soren Stoutner wrote: >>> Scott, >>> >>> On Saturday, June 29, 2024 8:58:09 AM MST Scott Kitterman wrote: >>

Re: Proposal IRC meeting DPT

2024-06-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, June 29, 2024 1:36:41 PM EDT Soren Stoutner wrote: > Scott, > > On Saturday, June 29, 2024 8:58:09 AM MST Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I would say no. Distutils is going to be with us for quite some time, > > even > > though it's no longer p

Re: Proposal IRC meeting DPT

2024-06-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
I would say no. Distutils is going to be with us for quite some time, even though it's no longer part of the standard distribution. Scott K On June 29, 2024 2:07:56 PM UTC, Alexandre Detiste wrote: >Hi, > >Should the severity of the distutils removal bugs be bumped now ? >Example such bug: ht

Re: Contacting DPT

2024-06-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, June 6, 2024 11:40:15 AM EDT Andreas Tille wrote: > - In the beginning of this year there was a change in the policy of DPT. > I'd like to hear your opinion about: > * The process how it went (possibly with suggestions to do better) > * The final result after a couple o

Re: Request to join

2024-06-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, June 2, 2024 12:20:46 PM EDT Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: > Hello, > > I'm participating in a Debian event today and willing to put some time > into a package under debian-python team: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072061 > > I'm also willing to move a few pack

Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging

2024-05-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
Overall, I think that's quite reasonable, but I think I need to pick at the both sides way this is framed. I don't recall anyone here suggesting that it's a problem is Python upstream wants to ship Python binaries. While I think that there are issues with some of the upstream design choices, I

Re: Bug#1063957: python-pytest-lazy-fixture: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8

2024-05-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On May 13, 2024 8:13:06 PM UTC, Julian Gilbey wrote: >On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 03:58:21PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: >> I noticed one package affected by this issue, prettytable, has >> switched to a fork, pytest-lazy-fixtures (note the s at the end of the >> name). >> >> Would someone like to

Re: Launchpad: Merge of Accounts Requested

2024-03-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 18, 2024 9:19:21 AM UTC, Dominik George wrote: >Hi, > >>FYI: This message got delivered at the public mailing list >>debian-python@lists.debian.org. To me it looks like someone if trying to find >>a loophole in launchpad and plans to abuse the system. > >Thanks for reaching out to th

Re: Launchpad: Merge of Accounts Requested

2024-03-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 17, 2024 8:49:02 PM UTC, Gregor Riepl wrote: >> Someone has asked us to merge one of your Launchpad >> accounts with another. >> >> If you go ahead, this will merge the account called >> 'Debian Python Modules Team (debian-python)' into the account >> 'johnfrandes12'. >> >> To confi

Re: Maintenance of python-resolvelib and python-commentjson

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 15, 2024 11:11:21 PM UTC, Bo YU wrote: >Hi! > >On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 1:18 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> On Friday, March 15, 2024 10:55:34 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: >> > Hi Scott (2024.03.15_13:31:40_+) >> > >> > > I origi

Re: Maintenance of python-tomlkit

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
⢶⣦⠀ > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ eam...@debian.org > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: FA9DEC5DE11C63F1 > ⠈⠳⣄ > > >On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 2:50 PM Scott Kitterman >wrote: > >> This is another one I don't use anymore where I'm the sole uploader. >> >> It's got a fair number of rdepends, most notably poetry. Any takers >> before I >> orphan it? >> >> Scott K

Maintenance of python-tomlkit

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is another one I don't use anymore where I'm the sole uploader. It's got a fair number of rdepends, most notably poetry. Any takers before I orphan it? Scott K signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Maintenance of python-resolvelib and python-commentjson

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, March 15, 2024 10:55:34 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Scott (2024.03.15_13:31:40_+) > > > I originally packaged python-resolvelib for pip and python-commentjson so > > we could run python-resolvelib's tests. Pip is no longer using the > > packaged version. It's currently used

Re: Maintenance of python-cryptography

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 15, 2024 3:47:25 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 3/15/24 13:52, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> >> On March 15, 2024 7:19:16 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 3/14/24 08:52, Andreas Tille wrote: >>>> I would have prefered to >>

Maintenance of python-resolvelib and python-commentjson

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
I originally packaged python-resolvelib for pip and python-commentjson so we could run python-resolvelib's tests. Pip is no longer using the packaged version. It's currently used by pdm and ansible-core. I am the sole uploader for both these packages and intend to orphan them, but if someone

Re: Maintenance of python-cryptography

2024-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 15, 2024 7:19:16 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 3/13/24 18:34, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064979 >> >> Would some of you who are pushing so hard to change the policy for Uploaders/ >> Maintainer in the t

Re: Maintenance of python-cryptography

2024-03-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 1:34:14 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064979 > > Would some of you who are pushing so hard to change the policy for > Uploaders/ Maintainer in the team please step up and take over this > package.

Maintenance of python-cryptography

2024-03-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064979 Would some of you who are pushing so hard to change the policy for Uploaders/ Maintainer in the team please step up and take over this package. It really needs updated to the new upstream release (blocking both aioquic and dnspythong for

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-03-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 3, 2024 6:12:09 AM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Christian, > >Am Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 11:48:57PM +0100 schrieb Christian Kastner: >> On 2024-03-02 23:11, Andreas Tille wrote: >> > I'm curious why you believe I didn't care. I likely would have reverted >> > my change if I didn't have m

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-03-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 2, 2024 8:29:47 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Jeroen, > >Am Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:48:33PM +0100 schrieb Jeroen Ploemen: >> ... > >Julian had sensibly commented on this and had added interesting >questions I'm keen on hearing your answers. > >> As for the inclusion of codes of cond

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
|16 > Piotr Ożarowski |23 > Sandro Tosi |82 > Scott Kitterman | 7 > Vincent Bernat |15 > (6 rows) > > Debian PaN is another team which might

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 28, 2024 9:54:55 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 2/28/24 00:54, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> It's self-induced. I mean if it's demotivating to have people point out >> that you didn't follow the policy, then you can solve that all by yourself >

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 28, 2024 7:08:14 AM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Scott, > >Am Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:54:01PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: >> It's self-induced. I mean if it's demotivating to have people point out >> that you didn't follow the policy, the

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 27, 2024 11:42:33 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 2/27/24 19:32, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> I suspect that packages will be removed from team maintenance as a result >> though and I think that's a bad idea. > >If a package isn't in the team, any DD

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 27, 2024 2:27:35 PM UTC, Scott Talbert wrote: >On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> On 2/27/24 09:05, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of >>> the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science pac

Re: Packages Up For Grabs

2024-02-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, January 3, 2024 5:22:38 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday, September 23, 2023 3:26:05 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I'm the only human upload for the following packages that I no longer > > intend to maintain. Please let me know if you are i

Bug#1063348: O: pdfkit

2024-02-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:pdfkit I am no longer interested in this package and no else in the Debian Python Team expressed interest it taking it over, so orphaning. The package itself is in reasonable shape. Upstream inclu

Bug#1063317: O: django-anymail

2024-02-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-anymail I'm no longer interested in the package and no one from the Debian Python Team expressed interest in it, so orphaning. I've updated the package to the current upstream and updated fo

Bug#1063171: O: python-sparkpost

2024-02-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:python-sparkpost I'm no longer interested in the package (it was only packaged to support django-anymail, which is also about to be orphaned). This is an interface to a proprietary mail service. T

Bug#1063033: O: django-wkhtmltopdf

2024-02-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-wkhtmltopdf I no longer use this package and no one in the Debian Python Team expressed any interest in it, so orphaning. At this time, the package is in reasonably good shape and does not g

Bug#1061447: O: django-maintenancemode

2024-01-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-maintenancemode Orphaning the package on behalf of the Debian Python Team as the sole uploader (no one else on the team expressed interest in taking over and I no longer use the package). Th

Bug#1060463: O: django-impersonate -- Django module for superusers to impersonate accounts

2024-01-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-impersonate Orphaning the package on behalf of the Debian Python Team as the sole uploader (no one else on the team expressed interest in taking over and I no longer use the package). Curren

Bug#1060406: O: django-organizations -- Django groups and multi-user account management module

2024-01-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-organizations Orphaning the package on behalf of the Debian Python Team as the sole uploader (no one else on the team expressed interest in taking over and I no longer use the package). Curr

Re: Packages Up For Grabs

2024-01-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 3:26:05 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > I'm the only human upload for the following packages that I no longer intend > to maintain. Please let me know if you are interesting in taking over the > package. If no one steps up, if a package has rdepends

Packages Up For Grabs

2023-09-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
I'm the only human upload for the following packages that I no longer intend to maintain. Please let me know if you are interesting in taking over the package. If no one steps up, if a package has rdepends I'll orphan it (since a human uploader is required) and if it doesn't, i'll ask to have

Re: Transitionning to the lextudio pysnmp / pyasn1 ecosystem

2023-09-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On September 17, 2023 9:48:38 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >Scott & everyone, > >On 9/16/23 19:04, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> It's pretty relevant to your question. If you had instead updated the >> existing packages from the new upstream, no transition would

Re: Transitionning to the lextudio pysnmp / pyasn1 ecosystem

2023-09-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On September 16, 2023 4:48:46 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 9/15/23 14:03, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Why did you hijack this from the Python team instead of just working with the >> existing maintainers to update the existing packages from the new upstream >> loc

Re: Transitionning to the lextudio pysnmp / pyasn1 ecosystem

2023-09-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, September 15, 2023 3:38:05 AM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > As you may know, the upstream author for pysnmp passed away last year. > As a result, the whole suite was forked by "lextudio". I packaged it, > and the result is this list of source packages: > > python-pyasn1-lextudio

Re: DebConf 23: Python BoF

2023-09-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 1:23:12 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: > We have scheduled a Python BoF at DebConf23: > https://debconf23.debconf.org/talks/27-python-bof/ > It will be on Sep 16 (Sat): at 10:30 local time (05:00 - 05:45 UTC) > > I started getting together an agenda in: > https://pad.dc

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, August 18, 2023 9:33:48 AM EDT Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Am Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 01:15:18PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > On August 18, 2023 1:04:26 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: > > >> In Debian terms, it's not the preferred form for

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 18, 2023 1:04:26 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Scott, > >Am Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 02:18:35PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: >> >They are zip files containing python source code. It is possible to include >> >compiled C extensions in wheels, but I check

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 15, 2023 1:51:54 PM UTC, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: >On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 15:08:11 +0200, >Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 3:53:07 AM EDT Andreas Tille wrote: >> > Hi Scott, >> > >> > Am Mon, Aug 14, 202

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 3:53:07 AM EDT Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Am Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 02:06:42PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > >Before I upload I'd like to ask for reviewing this patch and opinions > > >about the test suite errors. While t

Re: pdm: Please replace python3-pep517 with python3-pyproject-hooks in Depends/Build-Depends

2023-08-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 14, 2023 12:28:30 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Control: tags -1 pending > >Hi, > >I've fixed the issue reported in this bug[1]. > >In addition I've took the chance to upload pdm to its latest upstream >version. When doing so I realised that build time tests are basically >ignored.

Re: Naming of python binary packages

2023-08-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, August 11, 2023 10:49:00 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: > My vote would be strongly towards maintaining the status quo of the > policy-defined names. > > I don't see any strong argument for changing this. Fully agreed. In addition to the reasons you listed, renaming a lot of packages w

Bug#1043255: RM: pep517 -- ROM; Obsolete, replaced by python-pyproject-hooks

2023-08-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Python-pyproject-hooks has replaced pep517, so it should be removed once there are no more reverse Build-Depends. Most packages have been updated and bugs have been filed for the three remaining. Scott K

Re: Maintenance of gtts (python3-gtts)

2023-08-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
, August 7, 2023 9:27:05 AM EDT Emmanuel Arias wrote: > Hello Scott, > > I don't use it, but seems an interested project. I can work on it, but > it would be great if you have a maintainer that already know the project. > > Cheers, > Emmanuel > > On Sun, Aug 06,

Maintenance of gtts (python3-gtts)

2023-08-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
The gtts package is, at least nominally, maintained by the Debian Python Team, but has no human uploader. As a practical matter, I think someone should either adopt it (add themselves to uploaders) or we should formally orphan the package so we aren't pretending. It has two rdepends: Reverse-

Re: Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 2, 2023 1:23:15 PM UTC, "Éric Araujo" wrote: >Le 02/08/2023 à 00:09, Scott Kitterman a écrit : >> * pdm (update to new version, needs pyproject-hooks) >>[pdm-pep517 can probably go away too] > >pdm-pep517 was renamed to pdm-backend, which will still

Re: Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On August 2, 2023 1:34:32 PM UTC, Scott Talbert wrote: >On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 7:36:38 PM EDT Scott Talbert wrote: >>> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman

Re: Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 7:36:38 PM EDT Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>> The pep517 package has been renamed pyproject-hooks upstream: > >>> > >>> https://githu

Re: Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 6:22:26 PM EDT Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > The pep517 package has been renamed pyproject-hooks upstream: > > > > https://github.com/pypa/pyproject-hooks > > > > It looks like we need this to

Updating python-build/getting rid of pep517

2023-08-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
The pep517 package has been renamed pyproject-hooks upstream: https://github.com/pypa/pyproject-hooks It looks like we need this to update python-build to the latest version (which we should definitely do sooner rather than later). Is anyone up for packaging this? Once it's in the archive we

Bug#1040556: ITP: aioquic -- Library for the QUIC network protocol in Python

2023-07-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Scott Kitterman X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: aioquic Version : 0.9.21 Upstream Author : Jeremy Lainé * URL : https://github.com/aiortc/aioquic * License

Bug#1040553: ITP: pylsqpack -- Python wrapper around the ls-qpack library

2023-07-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Scott Kitterman X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: pylsqpack Version : 0.3.17 Upstream Author : Jeremy Lainé * URL : https://github.com/aiortc/pylsqpack * License

Moving from appdirs to platformdirs

2023-06-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
It would be nice if we could reduce/eliminate use of appdirs during the Trixie development cycle. It's unmaintained and superseded by platformdirs. As far as I can tell, platformdirs is API compatible with appdirs, except the import path is different. As a result, switching does need some cha

Future of django-redis-sessions and django-simple-redis-admin

2023-06-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
I recently removed myself from the django-reids package uploaders because I no longer have an interest in it. It's still actively maintained by Michael Fladischer (thanks). There are also django-redis-sessions and django-simple-redis-admin. I packaged these for reasons that are no longer rel

Re: Python pybuild system & setup.cfg

2023-03-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 5:07:56 PM EDT Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Hilmar, > > Preuße, Hilmar, on 2023-03-23: > > I'm a little bit lost, by building the pssh package. The upstream author > > released a new version, which changed the build system. Before I had a > > setup.py in the root directo

Re: Joining the team! Again with policy acceptance.

2023-03-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, March 5, 2023 12:51:59 PM EST Scarlett Moore wrote: > Hi! > My name is Scarlett Moore, I have been working on https://salsa.debian.org/ > mycroftai-team which consists of many python packages relating to voice AI. > Mycroft is no more, but forked. I would like to move these packages to t

Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 5, 2023 5:22:33 PM UTC, Julian Gilbey wrote: >On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:41:08PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote: >> Hi Julian (2023.02.05_10:38:23_+) >> >> > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in >> > bookworm? >> >> Because we aim to have a single Py

Re: Bug#791635 python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2023-01-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
Do we really have to have this argument again? Let's not. Please wontfix and let's move on. Personally, I maintain 25 packages in the team that would need renaming. I'm not sure how many total there are, but they'd all have to go through New again. It'd be much simpler just to drop DPT or my

Re: Old generated binary dependencies after renaming psycopg

2023-01-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 17, 2023 11:01:45 PM UTC, Tomasz Rybak wrote: >On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 09:20 +, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:08:01AM +0100, Tomasz Rybak wrote: >> > Hello. >> > After fixing #1016031 "psycopg3: binary package name should be python3- >> > psycopg" >> > (I renam

Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages

2023-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 14, 2023 7:51:47 PM UTC, Stefano Rivera wrote: >Hi Scott (2023.01.14_19:34:59_+) >> >dh_python3 would have been able to generate >> >python3-tomli | python3-min-version (>= 3.11) >> > >> >instead of >> >python3-tomli | python3 (>> 3.11) >> > >> >Then, once python3.10 was dropped

Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages

2023-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 14, 2023 7:12:33 PM UTC, Stefano Rivera wrote: >Hi Scott (2023.01.14_17:22:42_+) >> Take the example in #1027947. If this proposal had been in place >> already, what would he have been the generated dependency and how >> would it have worked? > >dh_python3 would have been able t

Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages

2023-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 14, 2023 5:08:17 PM UTC, Stefano Rivera wrote: >I have proposed a policy change that would permit dh_python3 to generate >dependencies that apply to all currently-supported Python 3 versions: > >https://salsa.debian.org/cpython-team/python3-defaults/-/merge_requests/13 > >Please revi

Re: python-avro: FTBFS: AssertionError: 'reader type: null not compatible with writer type: int' not found in {'reader type: SchemaType.NULL not compatible with writer type: SchemaType.INT'}

2022-12-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 4:13:20 PM EST Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > I wonder whether someone might suggest a fix for > > > == > FAIL: test_schema_compatibility_type_mismatch > (avro.test.test_

Re: How do you create entry-points for Python applications?

2022-12-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 19, 2022 6:27:55 AM UTC, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: >Dear Scott, > >thanks for the reply. > >Am 19.12.2022 06:25 schrieb Scott Kitterman: >> Pybuild using the pyproject plugin will build a wheel and >> then install the necessary files in the package using th

Re: How do you create entry-points for Python applications?

2022-12-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 19, 2022 5:13:27 AM UTC, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: >Am 18.12.2022 23:03 schrieb Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی: >> AFAIK Debian helper for Python handles this > >;) Yes, but how? > >Does it ignore the pip-default-entry-point-scripts? Does it create its own >script? >Do you have to expl

Re: python-tesserocr: flaky autopkgtest

2022-12-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 18, 2022 4:47:39 PM UTC, Scott Talbert wrote: >On Sun, 18 Dec 2022, Malik Mlitat wrote: > >> >> Hello DPT, >> >> I have updated the package python-tesserocr [1] to skip the flaky test to >> fix the issue below. >> >>  I need a maintainer please to upload the new release version 2

Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages

2022-12-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
>> >> Ditto on that one, I don't feel having "python-supysonic" would be a >> good naming scheme... > >please note that would be just for source packages, the user-facing >ones can still be `supysonic` as that's what you expect to install > >On S

Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages

2022-12-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 12, 2022 1:24:35 AM UTC, Sandro Tosi wrote: >Proposal: the DPT will start adding a `python-` prefix to NEW source >packages names, unless the upstream project already contains it > >AFAICT all other major languages ecosystems packaging teams use a >(semi?)mandatory tag to identify t

Re: Different behavior of package with pyproject.toml

2022-12-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 4, 2022 3:42:15 PM UTC, Ole Streicher wrote: >Hi Scott, > >thanks for the hint. > >Scott Kitterman writes: >> My first guess is that in some circumstances setuptools is doing the >> installing >> and in others it's the dh-python pyproject

Re: Different behavior of package with pyproject.toml

2022-12-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 11:19:06 AM EST Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi, > > I need some help with a package that switched to using pyproject.toml > only. The package is asdf-astropy, and the problem I have that it does > not package all Python files recursively: for example astropy_asdf.io > file

Re: Bug#1025164: lintian: missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend tag needs to check Build-Depends-Indep too

2022-11-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 10:38:30 PM EST Stuart Prescott wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On 01/12/2022 02:16, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Package: lintian > > Version: 2.115.3 > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org > > >

Bug#1025164: lintian: missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend tag needs to check Build-Depends-Indep too

2022-11-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: lintian Version: 2.115.3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org The missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend check appears to only look for the prerequisite packages in Build-Depends, but since they aren't needed for clean, they could be in Build-Depends-Indep, le

Re: How to deal with cross-dependant packages

2022-11-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 28, 2022 4:51:23 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi, > >I'd like to update python-thinc for the Debian Science team. The new >version needs srsly which needs catalogue[1] which in turn needs >srsly[2]. Do you see any means to solve this cross-dependency? > >Kind regards > Andreas.

Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals

2022-11-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, November 21, 2022 12:25:05 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > On November 21, 2022 5:02:57 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" wrote: > >On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote: > >> I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should &g

Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals

2022-11-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 21, 2022 5:02:57 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" wrote: >On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should >> proceed. Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3.11 the default >> Python version!! > >This is a co

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-11-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 5:26:35 AM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > On November 2, 2022 8:35:35 AM UTC, Gordon Ball wrote: > >On 19/10/2022 22:30, Gordon Ball wrote: > >> On 09/10/2022 21:39, Gordon Ball wrote: > >>> On 07/10/2022 01:13, Timo R

Re: pyyaml 6

2022-11-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 2, 2022 8:35:35 AM UTC, Gordon Ball wrote: >On 19/10/2022 22:30, Gordon Ball wrote: >> On 09/10/2022 21:39, Gordon Ball wrote: >>> On 07/10/2022 01:13, Timo Röhling wrote: Hi Gordon, * Gordon Ball [2022-10-07 00:10]: > * Upload to unstable and see what breaks? >

Bug#1023299: ganeti-testsuite: yaml.load in testsuite needs to specify loader

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
Source: ganeti-testsuite Version: 3.0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Previously yaml.load did not require a loader to be specified: load(stream, Loader=None) Now it does (starting in pyyaml 6.0):

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 3:31:47 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > I don't think it should do that, so we need to investigate. Where > > can I find the updated packaging? > > I did not push the change right now, I will push once I solve this issue :). > > my opinion is that I should

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 3:02:00 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > >It looks to me like the current pyproject.toml file for pyfai is not > >sufficient> > > to build the package, so I would tempted to keep what you have now. > > Due to the presence of this file, pybuild try to build using

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:48:12 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:42:22 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > > As far as I can see, the package doesn't ship any files in > > > /usr/bin. > > > Why do you need to build

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:42:22 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > As far as I can see, the package doesn't ship any files in /usr/bin. > > Why do you need to build man pages (I'm assuming that's what > > that's for? More generically, what problem did that step in the > > process solv

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 11:15:59 AM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > thanks for your help. > > I have one more question > > I have this command from the previous build > > {interpreter} setup.py build_man > > how can I translate this with the new build systeme ? As far as I can see,

Bug#1023211: RM: dirtbike -- ROM; Obsolete, no longer used for any Debian Python packages

2022-10-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org We used to use this back when we debundled pip's embedded dependencies. We don't do that anymore (no longer supported upstream), so dirtbike is not needed. It is unmaintained upstream and likely to be a problem

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-10-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, October 31, 2022 1:26:03 PM EDT Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Hello Frederic, > > Am 31.10.22 um 08:57 schrieb PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel: > >> I can build the package basically doing these modifications and by > >> adding the additional B-D package Scott did mention. Simply let > >> dh_sphin

Re: wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-10-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On October 29, 2022 10:07:13 PM UTC, picca wrote: >Hello, I try to fix an FTBFS in the python-xrayutilities package. >When I try to build it, I get this error message., I do not understand why I >need to add a build dependency to python3-wheel.Is it something missing in the >dependency of pyt

Bug#1021964: ITP: python-noseofyeti -- Module to create Python codec for tests using RSpec inspired DSL

2022-10-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Scott Kitterman X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-noseofyeti Version : 2.3.1 Upstream Author : Stephen Moore * URL : https://github.com/delfick/nose-of-yeti

Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF)

2022-07-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On July 26, 2022 2:50:19 PM UTC, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:04:27AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 07:52:19PM +0200, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: >> > == pybuild improvements == >> > >> > getting the autopkgtest MR in would be great >> > >>

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >