shown as the homepage and
download location if that's what you mean. That page doesn't seem to
have been updated since 2014, which matches the last year of the last
maintainer upload to Debian.
It may be best simply to push your code to a public git repository
(like githu
lies with the upstream code, not the Debian packaging.
--
Neil Williams
li...@codehelp.co.uk
https://linux.codehelp.co.uk
pgpBeFv4p_JCz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
#x27;t. By the
> way, there is a newer gaffitter version available (1.0.0).
>
> What can I do to prevent gaffitter from being removed from testing?
You do not need to do anything.
>
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Douglas A. Augusto
--
Neil Williams
=
https://linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpixJZri3NMS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
o enable checking for broken audio files, just add ` –all-features`
https://qarmin.github.io/czkawka/instructions/Compilation.html
--
Neil Williams
=
https://linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp89EfxwK6Sp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
as well.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas Kirbach
--
Neil Williams
=
https://linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgplMz0lmddV6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
which groups does the user running those commands belong?
6. What system is running these commands? (Information on the reporting
system was removed but equivalent information about the running system
was not included).
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpkIwu9kvaSQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:08:16 +0300
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:32:09AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> >...
> > Hi Adrian.
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> > Sorry, No. The commit linked to CVE-2021-37232 does not even fix the
> > problem descri
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:05:09 +0300
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 993378 moreinfo
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 03:49:45PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Package: ftp.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > gtkpod upstream has moved but has not had
Package: gtkpod
Version: 2.1.5-6
Severity: important
Tags: security
https://github.com/wez/atomicparsley/issues/32
See also #993366
gtkpod embeds a vulnerable version of AtomicParsley which causes a stack
overflow,
however the data file used to test atomicparsley upstream is not recognised by
Package: gtkpod
Version: 2.1.5-8
Severity: important
Tags: security
gtkpod embeds a vulnerable version of AtomicParsley, however, the data file
used to
test atomicparsley upstream is not recognised by gtkpod.
https://github.com/wez/atomicparsley/issues/30
https://sources.debian.org/src/gtkpod/2
n will not change. It seems obvious that
nobody else considers the package useful.
Just pinging the bug report will not suddenly produce a volunteer to do
the work.
Personally, I do not see merit in having mpage in Debian. I am
comfortable with the removal of a package with such a small ni
is probably means that
the package has been removed (or has been renamed). Thus the information here
is of little interest ... the package is going to disappear unless someone
takes it over and reintroduces it."
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#reintrod
On 28 Jun 2019 4:55 pm, Gautam Iyer wrote:Hi All,
I'm not sure if this is the right place / person to report this to. I
noticed mrxvt was distributed with stretch, but not in Buster.
Is there a reason for this?Yes. The package was actively removed from Debian due to missing functionality co
d, it does smack a bit of flogging a dead horse to
potentially cause ksh to be removed from buster.
I think this should be downgraded or even marked as fixed in
2020.0.0~alpha1-1~exp1 and therefore fixed once buster is released.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpI
eeding the code.
--
Neil Williams
h...@codehelp.co.uk
pgpsosjV9ZWsw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
this, but I'm
> sure if you are not you can redirect it to whereever it should go.
>
You need to feed back to the cdebootstrap bug, in good faith, and go
from there. Forget about "malice" and just deal with the problem at
hand:
As Policy is currently, cdebootstr
tutions)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
----
Installed-Size: [-243-] {+199+}
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
bhl_1.7.3-3_amd64.build
Description: Binary data
pgpuigD7Ces6k.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
It's odd but verifiable - downgrading extlinux to the version in jessie
(3:6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u1) does not fix the problem. Building a new image
with the same options fails in exactly the same way. However, building
on jessie itself, does work.
--
Neil Williams
=
Package: extlinux
Version: 3:6.03+dfsg-14
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/extlinux
With vmdebootstrap, I'm trying to maintain extlinux support but the latest
package
fails to make the image bootable if the rootfs is ext4. ext3 and ext2 work, so
I'm
going to need to prevent vmdebootstrap image
all, the chances of anyone being able to help with your request
are slim. Sorry.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpvPlTjXRDPZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
for more
information."
> Is there
> someone who is 'responsible' for sendmail on debian these days?
No individual, the Debian QA Group in general, it then comes down to
whether someone wants to spend time on it. For sendmail, that does not
include me.
--
Neil Williams
idelines.
If you are going to do the work via mentors, then you should adopt the
package, following the mentors guidelines for adoption. If you don't do
the work, the package and the bug will have to wait until someone else
is sufficiently interested and motivated to care about the packa
y has cared enough about fte to adopt it in the year
since the QA upload.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpJ8aOgKT5J8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
still beta (for KDE 4) and was discontinued over 3 years
> ago. I wouldn't expect a stable adept too soon, and doubt it's worth to
> have more NMUs. I found this bug with 10 minutes of testing - obviously
> nobody's used it since 4 months.
So all your bug report has done is to have brought removal closer. OK,
that's what happens with RC bugs in orphaned leaf packages more often
than not. So be it.
#673085
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpVt6Jlzziak.pgp
Description: PGP signature
already missed the Squeeze
release by being removed before that release. If it's going to miss
Wheezy as well, it probably is worth removing from Debian entirely.
Severity does NOTHING to influence how quickly a bug is fixed,
especially with an orphaned package.
--
severity 673040 normal
done
On Tue, 15 May 2012 12:44:37 -0400
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: adept
> Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2
> Severity: serious
No justification for this severity. Downgrading.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpPO3QG
do some work on the package for some other
reason, it's possible that these patches will be applied as part of
that fix.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpfnIzoRrLNL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
weeks - if a suitable
version is not ready by that time, I'll do a QA upload of 2.2.8-4 to fix just
bugs #665535 and #660642 but I would prefer that the package gains a maintainer
who can fix and triage the rest of the bugs too.
[0] http://people.debian.org/~biebl/glib-single-include/glabe
n that someone intends to maintain it comes from the
PTS as the orphaning bug has been retitled to an ITA. The owner of that
ITA is CC:'d.
That's about all that can be said about gnunet AFAICT.
-- http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnunet.html
Neil Williams
==
27;t working, purge defoma from your system and see
whether fontconfig is actually working.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpcTDadjIw1E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
42560 re the removal of scim-bridge since Sat, 24 Sep
2011.
If someone wants eventually does the work, the package can be
re-introduced but it's been 5 months since the original bug report, so
that seems unlikely.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpEvaO9XocGQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ght*
get applied by someone fixing other stuff.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp5iYxUZ7pnN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
need to step up and do the work.
That's all there is to it. It's not enough to just protest or complain -
unless someone does the work, the package remains a candidate for
removal. The RC bugs mentioned originally don't seem to be open any
longer, so there is time for the work to be done.
If the work isn't done, I'll reassign the removal bug myself.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpaX1SZMzPkD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t version of timidity unless someone
steps up to introduce the new upstream release.
So, overall, there are three very good reasons to remove the current
timidity version from Debian - each of which is sufficient reason for
removal on their own. Someone needs to adopt it and get your new
release uploaded real soon now.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpzy7OlXDZVN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s much work on
apt-build, maybe you should read the orphaning bug (#365427) and see if
you can work with those who have also expressed an interest but not
actually made the upload as maintainer. Maybe even form a team.
Otherwise, once the Wheezy freeze starts, apt-build could well be
removed.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpRIXg2LEd7s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
y
`/home/neil/code/debian/src/trousers/trousers-0.3.6/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/neil/code/debian/src/trousers/trousers-0.3.6'
dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
make: *** [build] Error 2
This is the same error as in 0.3.5
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpwsfbmLJkWu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hat
> /usr/lib/$(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/odbc
> is better than
> /usr/lib/odbc/$(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
This is covered in the MultiArch docs but from my understanding, it
would be:
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/odbc/
e.g.
libgl1-mesa-dri: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpR8fOBkABWc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
0.4.2
Copyright 2004-2005 Oleg I. Vdovikin (o...@cs.msu.su)
Copyright 2004-2006 Nicolas Boichat (nico...@boichat.ch)
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You may redistribute copies of this program under the terms of the GNU General
Public License.
Usage:
...
Can you check the equivalent ch
. Please change the manpage accordingly.
There is much more chance of this being fixed if you report a bug
against the i8kutils package - wishlist or minor severity would seem
appropriate.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pg
have until the Wheezy release process starts to be able to get mma from
Lenny - after that, it will need to be via archive.debian.org
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp4SeDNth278.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t of advice on this list, the best place
for packaging advice is:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/
I don't have time to sponsor uploads, so I can't help much more than
point you at other places where you can ask questions and find out how
things work.
HTH
--
Neil Will
te -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-pilot-conduits-data_2.32.1-1_all.deb will fix
your problem in the meantime. I'll upload the fix tonight.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgp00Cdfty2sw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eason it was removed, along with no evidence of any significant user-base.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
like soci. Nobody cares about it anymore.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpIwywhnxeEr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
r-gnome0.4
after Lenny
3. Remove the orphaned libmimedir0
Doing that means that the "problem" of /usr/lib/libmimedir.a in
libmimedir-gnome0-dev goes away completely.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpqko0DoIL1g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:47:15 +0100
Peter De Wachter wrote:
> > Neil Williams (03/01/2009):
> > > > For every presentation I try to start (sample.mpg, sendmail6.mpg,
> > > > v6.mpg), mgp dies with an X error. I've reproduced this on several
> > > &
428 -
consists solely of whitespace changes.
Most of the changes in draw.c are related to rotation support, as are
many of the changes in print.c.
Other changes include in the imlib support. mgp might just have to be
removed.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
rror of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
Major opcode of failed request: 75 (X_PolyText16)
Serial number of failed request: 206
Current serial number in output stream: 210
Taking a look at the amount of changes . . .
--
Neil Williams
=
x27;ll be happy to sponsor this once the autoconf issue is resolved and
if you decide to call for some new translations, I'll upload it for you
once those are in.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpuNyAL7hvOP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- is there an
updated patch at all?
I was thinking I'd probably add dpatch support and patch 'src/track.c'
directly.
No rush - I expect you're busy with DebConf. (See you in Edinburgh.)
:-)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com
lpaper-tray has recently been adopted [2] after being orphaned, so
hopefully these issues can be resolved by the new maintainer with
upstream.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00016.html
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=391406
See also: ht
51 matches
Mail list logo
