Hi
First, sorry if this message is not to be discussed on debian-release.
I have a package (gff2aplot), with version 2.0-1 on Testing and 2.0-2 on
Unstable. Changes between both revisions are minimal (just corrected
Suggests field and description).
The problem is that there is no ARM version on T
On 5/3/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > foomatic-filters-ppds: Fix printer options on all PostScript PPD
> > files--without this fix, printer options (duplex, resolution, etc.)
> > are not honored, which will annoy users (severity important: #299513).
>
> Both approved.
This one
OK, let's get advice from the security and release teams. Looks like
the advice from both th shadow and cron package maintainers is not enough.
In short, #300720 complains that login does not activate by default
the pam_limits module, in the provided /etc/pam.d/login file
This bug report came ver
Hi Christian,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:06:33PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Please let mysql-dfsg (4.0.24-8) and mysql-dfsg-4.1 (4.1.11-3) into
> testing.
> Both were blocked during the free announcement by bug #307473 which
> could lead to the accidental remove of all mysql databases if o
I'm getting a half-dozen or so of these messages every 24 hours. It
sounds like something is continuously trying to resubmit the
1.35-8sarge1 versions of e2fsprogs into sarge. Could you either
remove them, or tell me who I need to talk to in order to get these
erroneously NMU'ed binary packages f
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:22:17PM +0900, akira yamada / ãã
wrote:
> On 2005/05/08, at 8:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >It is not helpful to everyone else when the release team is
> >spending its
> >time reviewing low-priority changes instead of working on release-
> >critical
> >problems.
>
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:40:58AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi release team!
> I've just made an upload of argus, which closes #308242 and #308211
> Could you please allow this into sarge?
Approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
Title: fest courier antisemite pentecostal
Finally, it`s Hoodia!
more info...
loretta sprint candela climatology
hanley erode etruscan conjugal grindstone paper
bogy reminiscent davis stair ocular neural realm gluing airspace sweden
no
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:18:08PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 20:25:12 +0200
> Source: mypasswordsafe
> Binary: mypasswordsafe
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 0.0.20041004-2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Khalid El F
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:41:47PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:55:54AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Package: classworlds
> > Version: 1.0.1-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: patch
> > The package FTBFS in a clean chroot environment because a Build-Depends
> > on 'jun
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:03:20PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 15:01:15 -0700
> Source: libqwt
> Binary: libqwt-doc libqwt-dev libqwt4
> Architecture: source all i386
> Version: 4.2.0-2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: high
> Maintainer: Brian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
At Mon, 09 May 2005 01:43:54 +0900,
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> The changelog also doesn't mention the why
> >> debian/patches/02_fix_for_old_automake.dpatch was modi
Hi, Release Team! =)
A new CVS snapshot of atomix had been uploaded almost 10 days before the
freeze, and was waiting to go into sarge. The only difference between
the last version in sarge and the CVS snapshot was a fix for a rather
annoying bug, although not serious.
Fortunately or not, the fre
Hi again,
I've just NMUed kernel-patch-skas with a patch for 2.6.8 (previously it
didn't contain a patch for the kernel that will be in Sarge).
This addresses #281554, and possibly #276993 (Steve, I'll take your advice
on whether #276993 should be considered fixed or not)
regards
Andrew
signa
Hi again,
I just uploaded trackballs 1.0.0-10 to unstable, which fixes bug
#302454, a severity:important and minor security issue, so I'd like to
get this into sarge. An interdiff between revisions -9 and -10 is attached.
diff -u trackballs-1.0.0/config.guess trackballs-1.0.0/config.guess
--- trac
Hi release team!
I've just made an upload of argus, which closes #308242 and #308211
Could you please allow this into sarge?
Thanks
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:53:02AM -0700, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:13:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Er, except I was expecting you to change this build-dependency to point at
> > the *current* libmysqlclient dev package:
> Wooops... Sorry, I fixed that with -6, up
Hi,
There are a couple of iptables bugs that missed the standard
freeze. #283822 in particular is scripting error that causes
a FTBFS when using a dash (and probably other shells) instead
of bash.
iptables (1.2.11-10) unstable; urgency=medium
* fixed scripts/prep.sh: patching and patch
Hi,
I've just uploaded gimp-help 2+0.7-5 to unstable, which fixes RC bug
#308228. I'd like this to go into sarge, since it only contains a minor
change, fixing a typo in the gimp-help-zh-cn.doc-base file.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Andreas 'amq' Marquardt wrote:
> > Is mp3burn known to work on 2.6 kernels? Does mp3burn invoke cdrecord with
> > any particular commandline options that could trigger this bug, whereas
> > cdrecord would normally work for people?
> I am using mp3burn (0.4
This release fixes a serious bug which renders all the
'info' links in the HTML output as broken.
Whilst it wasn't reported in the BTS it was repeatedly
reported upstream.
(I uploaded this revision at priority 'medium'. Had it been
'high' it would have made it in!)
No rebuilding is
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:55:54AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: classworlds
> Version: 1.0.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> The package FTBFS in a clean chroot environment because a Build-Depends
> on 'junit' is missing.
[...]
Fixed in NMU classworlds 1.0.1-1.1 (diff attached
Changelog:
] * Applied patches selected from upstream CVS, to fix the following
]important issues in libgadu:
] - incorrect type punning could cause undefined behavior
] - assigning syscall return values to unsigned variable makes error
] conditions undetectable in some situatio
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote:
>> Users ask for many things that it's not feasible for us to give them.
>> The fact is that the diff between 2.16.7-5 and 2.18-6 is 197,000 lines
>
> I totally agree that RMs have your procedures, and I believe that I
> cannot change your decision
Hello
I have updated kronolith package with two more language additions
for debconf messages. Please let that go though.
As I have understood such uploads is acceptable.
kronolith (1.1.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed grammar error, closes: #273190.
* Added Czech translation of debconf me
Please consider onak 0.3.2-1 for testing, once the usual 10 day testing
period is over.
I do appreciate this release doesn't fix any bug filed against Debian,
but I am also upstream and the release is a bugfix release which I
believe it's in Debian's interests to have as part of sarge - I've had
t
Please consider allowing doctorj to be re-admitted to sarge. The only
reason it has been kept out is because it went out of sync due to a
buildd problem on vore/SPARC (dangling javac symlink).
doctorj (- to 5.0.0-2)
Maintainer: Paul Cupis
41 days old (needed 10 days)
Not touching packa
Hi!
Please consider logwatch 5.2.2-6 for sarge. The changes are minimal and
attached.
thanks
Willi
diff -u logwatch-5.2.2/debian/changelog logwatch-5.2.2/debian/changelog
--- logwatch-5.2.2/debian/changelog
+++ logwatch-5.2.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+logwatch (5.2.2-6) unstable; urgency
At the bottom of this message is a diff against glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 which
fixes merged bugs 207872, 210840, 274852, and 276384. I spoke with Colin on
IRC and he seemed amenable to this as a last-minute fix for sarge. Does
anyone else have an opinion? Are there any other bugs vital enough to fix
a
I reviewed evolution 2.0.4-2 in t-p-u since it fixes a security hole, as
well as an important bug (#280303), but I'm not comfortable with all the
other changes in this patch:
- Several apparently minor translation changes, which I am not qualified
to review, and which are not mentioned in the ch
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The changelog also doesn't mention the why
>> debian/patches/02_fix_for_old_automake.dpatch was modified to
>> remove changes to lib/fakelog.c and src/ndtpd.c.
Perhaps, in the mistake when the dpatch is generated old
0
Hi,
I've uploaded an NMU for doc++ which fixes the FTBFS bug (#292337) along
with some minor issues. Patch attached.
Cheers,
Matej
--- doc++-3.4.10.dist/debian/changelog 2005-05-08 16:39:59.0 +0200
+++ doc++-3.4.10/debian/changelog 2005-05-08 18:07:53.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,1
Joey Hess wrote:
> config.sub/config.guess? I realize it's likely only new versions, but
> it makes reviewing this package hard. The changelog also doesn't mention
> the why debian/patches/02_fix_for_old_automake.dpatch was modified to
> remove changes to lib/fakelog.c and src/ndtpd.c.
Sorry, I se
Hi,
Users ask for many things that it's not feasible for us to give them.
The fact is that the diff between 2.16.7-5 and 2.18-6 is 197,000 lines
long; while I accept that many of these changes are improvements,
there is also the possibility of regressions, and bugzilla 2.18 did
not get uploaded
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:13:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
> Er, except I was expecting you to change this build-dependency to point at
> the *current* libmysqlclient dev package:
>
Wooops... Sorry, I fixed that with -6, uploaded now (luckily in time for today's
queue run)!
Thanks,
G
Kenshi Muto wrote:
> ndtpd_3.1.5-6.2 in sid already fixed RC bugs by my NMU.
> Could you accept this again?
>
> I've NMUed ndtpd_3.1.5-6.1 for fix RC bug#301672 just before freeze.
>
> I found 6.1 and older version had still forgotten to apply
> debian/02_fix_for_old_automake.dpatch to fix #30167
Steve Langasek wrote:
> The changelog claims to fix infinite loop problems with the DSLw dissector
> and a double-free in the ICEP dissector, but here is the entire diff for
> those two source files:
>
> diff -u ethereal-0.10.10/epan/dissectors/packet-dlsw.c
> ethereal-0.10.10/epan/dissectors/pa
Paul Cupis wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> [snip]
> > asterisk-spandsp-plugins
>
> I've just upload a 0-day NMU for this to fix bug #305624. Please
> consider allowing the fixed version back into sarge.
Approved with the usual testing delay.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Hello
Please let mysql-dfsg (4.0.24-8) and mysql-dfsg-4.1 (4.1.11-3) into
testing.
Both were blocked during the free announcement by bug #307473 which
could lead to the accidental remove of all mysql databases if one of
the packages is removed but not purged, the other one is installed and
then t
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:31:28AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > So now we've got not-working[1] version in sarge, thus I kindly ask you to
> > allow 0.8.5 version migrate to testing.
> > [1] - http://bugs.debian.org/303993
>
> This bug report was against 0.8.4+0.8.5rc1-2 and I can't reprodu
On 2005/05/08, at 8:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
It is not helpful to everyone else when the release team is
spending its
time reviewing low-priority changes instead of working on release-
critical
problems.
I understood.
I tried to reduce the patch and made ruby1.8_1.8.2-7.
It is in unstable. Ple
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:57:32PM +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> Description:
> libncurses-ruby - ruby Extension for the ncurses C library
> libncurses-ruby1.8 - ruby Extension for the ncurses C library
>
> Changes:
> ncurses-ruby (0.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* Fix FTBFS C
Hi,
> Is mp3burn known to work on 2.6 kernels? Does mp3burn invoke cdrecord with
> any particular commandline options that could trigger this bug, whereas
> cdrecord would normally work for people?
I am using mp3burn (0.4.0-1) quite often, currently running kernel
2.6.8.1, and haven't ever experi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear release managers,
At Sat, 7 May 2005 21:03:19 -0400,
Joey Hess wrote:
> So here is a list (from update-excuses) of all 491 packages that is
> being held out of sarge[1]. If you've already done all you can on the RC
> bugs on packages in sarge, ta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
Description:
libncurses-ruby - ruby Extension for the ncurses C library
libncurses-ruby1.8 - ruby Extension for the ncurses C library
Changes:
ncurses-ruby (0.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Fix FTBFS Closes: #307338
* Small update
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:21:05PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On 08/05/2005-10:35, Joey Hess wrote:
> > ocaml-getopt
> According to [1], this package was removed because of bug#306074, which
> is now fixed. ocaml-getopt in unstable is now 12 days old, so I think it
> can be allowed back in t
Hi,
#294958 is important and not fixed in sarge at the moment, 2.1-6 was uploaded
on April, 6th - since then no bugs were reported.
Now what ? :-)
On Sunday 10 April 2005 18:11, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be wise to update quik to at least 2.1-4 as 2.1-3 has a
> r
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:05:32AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> lvm2_2.01.04-5 contains a single fix (for a FTBFS on amd64; #298762).
> Please consider pushing it into sarge.
This is in, BTW. udebs still need to be synced.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description:
Hi Steve!
On Sun, 08 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:22:18AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > due to the fact that I missed to downgrade a bug (#289822),
> > mp3burn got removed from sarge. I don't think thats a bug in
> > mp3burn, maybe in cdrecor
Hi all,
Blootbot 1.1.0 was originally removed from Sarge[1] due to bug #228053.
This has been fixed in version 1.2.0-1 (along with quite a few others),
which is sitting in unstable at the moment.
Could this be hinted for inclusion? I know it's not high priority, but
it would be nice to see this
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:36:01PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> whois (4.7.4) unstable; urgency=high
> * Implemented the new b, B and G flags of the RIPE server.
> * Updated the version number. (Closes: #304395)
> * Updated the .dm, .nf, .tl, .tp TLD servers.
> * Added new IPv4 and ASN all
Hi Michael,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:23:18PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> please consider updating synaptic for debian/sarge. The current
> version in unstable fix a bug in the "History" window that may result
> in showing incorrect dates. It also contains new Macedonian and Xhosa
> translations
Joey Hess wrote:
[snip]
> asterisk-spandsp-plugins
I've just upload a 0-day NMU for this to fix bug #305624. Please
consider allowing the fixed version back into sarge.
Regards,
Paul Cupis
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:17:44PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:46:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Well, at least one user seems to think that 304245 is important enough to be
> > worth fixing; if you agree with him, then it's fine to allow this fix in via
>
Dear Release Team,
please consider updating synaptic for debian/sarge. The current
version in unstable fix a bug in the "History" window that may result
in showing incorrect dates. It also contains new Macedonian and Xhosa
translations and various translation updates.
I uploaded the version into
whois (4.7.4) unstable; urgency=high
* Implemented the new b, B and G flags of the RIPE server.
* Updated the version number. (Closes: #304395)
* Updated the .dm, .nf, .tl, .tp TLD servers.
* Added new IPv4 and ASN allocations for Afrinic. (Closes: #306525)
* Added new IPv6 allocations.
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:46:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, at least one user seems to think that 304245 is important enough to be
> worth fixing; if you agree with him, then it's fine to allow this fix in via
> unstable. That wouldn't apply to whatever low-priority fixes upstream has
On 08/05/2005-10:35, Joey Hess wrote:
> ocaml-getopt
According to [1], this package was removed because of bug#306074, which
is now fixed. ocaml-getopt in unstable is now 12 days old, so I think it
can be allowed back in testing.
Thanks,
Julien Cristau
[1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:22:18AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> due to the fact that I missed to downgrade a bug (#289822),
> mp3burn got removed from sarge. I don't think thats a bug in
> mp3burn, maybe in cdrecord, but I'm not able to reproduce it.
> mp3burn works fine for me a
I have prepared an NMU for unison 2.9.1-2 in sarge to fix the FTBFS bug
#304124, as well as removing the unlicensed unison-manual.html and
unison-manual.ps files which were obtained from the upstream website. It
is based on 2.9.1-2.1, which fixed the FTBFS in sid shortly before
2.10.2 was uploaded,
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 01:31:05PM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
[...]
There was a conflicts, provides and replaces field - as I understand
the policy for replacing a package only conflicts and replaces are
needed for a smooth upgrade. Is this correct ?
Yes, Provides are only
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:34:07AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Thanks for checking back -- it looks like this got lost in the shuffle, and
> didn't make it into my hints file even though I gave you my approval. It's
> really added now; no need for a t-p-u upload.
Fine, many thanks.
Cheers.
-
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 07:33:41PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-6 for sarge. It fixes security vulnerability
> CAN-2005-0953 (RC bug #303300).
Approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Stefano,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:41:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Is it possible to accept gtkmathview 0.6.5 in testing?
> > Very much a border case, but approved.
> Sorry for disturbing you again, but I failed
Hello,
Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-6 for sarge. It fixes security vulnerability
CAN-2005-0953 (RC bug #303300).
Changes:
bzip2 (1.0.2-6) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Fixed RC bug "file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953)", closes:
#303300. Patch by Santiago Ruano Rincon <[EMAIL
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:41:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Is it possible to accept gtkmathview 0.6.5 in testing?
> Very much a border case, but approved.
Sorry for disturbing you again, but I failed to understand if I need to
upload gtkmathview to t-p-u or you can manage the transition d
Hi,
due to the fact that I missed to downgrade a bug (#289822),
mp3burn got removed from sarge. I don't think thats a bug in
mp3burn, maybe in cdrecord, but I'm not able to reproduce it.
mp3burn works fine for me and others. So I would be pleased
if you could put it back to sarge.
Best wishes
Hi Ralf,
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 08:08:31PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:51:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:28:26AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > I uploaded texmacs 1.0.5-2 into unstable on Wednesday April 27. It
> > > is autobuilt on
Hi Guido,
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 05:26:38PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:45:29PM -0700, Guido Trotter wrote:
> > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:29:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Mmm, you can contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] to ask for it to be looked
> > > at; I don't
Hi,
The tla package maintainer is a bit hanging with maintaining it. Can
someone follow on it and contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? I mean the
following bugs: #247673 and #308104 (policy issue), #289402 (missing
dependency), #289692 (FTBFS on amd64 with gcc-4.0), #292087 (FTBFS
because missing build de
Hi Steinar,
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 06:53:41PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:48:02PM -0300, Daniel Andre Vaquero wrote:
> > Is there any chance of considering an upload of autofs 4.1.4 to sarge,
> > now that it is frozen? Version 4.1.4 + the patches from kernel.or
Hi,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:36:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:59:01AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:12:05PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > > Looks like James is no longer interested in mainta
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:01:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> doom-wad-shareware was removed from sarge due to a missing build dep on
> debhelper (#260006). I've just NMUed it in version 1.9-1.1, adding the
> build dep, making no other changes. I've confirmed it works, using
> lxdoom, and would appr
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:59:01AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:12:05PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > Looks like James is no longer interested in maintaining gnupg. He
> > > doesn't respond to bugreports, and he also didn't respo
74 matches
Mail list logo
