Processing changes file: typo3-src_4.2.5-1+lenny7_i386.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ptpzo-0004us...@franck.debian.o
On 12/17/2010 04:14 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 01:26:46 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> On 12/06/2010 01:15 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> Thomas,
>>>
>>> am Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:26:05AM +0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
* Sets the SUID bit, chown sbox to root.ro
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 16:02, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 21:13:58 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> Dear release team,
>>
>> Recently, a bug was reported against csound (#603321), which was
>> already fixed in upstream CVS. The bug is severity: normal, although
>> one could a
ping.
This revision is the thing which is important for a bluetotoh input
device user.
I want to put the package that this was revised into squeeze.
2010/12/14 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
> Hi, Release team.
>
> Could you check and apply this?
>
> Best regards,
> Nobuhiro
>
> 2010/12/7 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 20:15 -0200, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Could you, please, unblock scuttle?
> The new version closes #606688.
Already done earlier this evening, thanks.
fwiw, it's not an exception if it meets the rules :-)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-re
Hi!
Could you, please, unblock scuttle?
The new version closes #606688.
Cheers,
--
Marcelo Jorge Vieira
xmpp:me...@jabber-br.org
http://metaldot.alucinados.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: release.debian.org
Please consider unblocking prayer/1.3.3-dfsg1-3. It merely adds a patch
setting the IPV6_V6ONLY socket option.
* ipv6_v6only.patch (new): Set the IPV6_V6ONLY socket option on
AF_INET6 sockets; since Prayer by default enumerates available address
families
Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
>> ... and as Julien pointed out, these are not RC bugs unless you can
>> show that these packages fail to install/uninstall/purge.
>
> I know >50 packages failing to purge properly (+ which need bug filing), but
> I
>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 21:25:15 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> Dear Julien,
>
> I have received this answer from the upstream maintainer.
>
Debian packages are governed by Debian policy, not LSB. Quoting 9.3.2:
These scripts should not fail obscurely when the configuration files
remai
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 22:04 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Thursday, den 16. December 2010:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 11:21 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > > As I have not yet received any response to what should be a very
> > > simple, but rather important, documentation
Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Thursday, den 16. December 2010:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 11:21 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > As I have not yet received any response to what should be a very
> > simple, but rather important, documentation change, I am following up.
>
> Apologies for the delay.
>
> > Ale
Dear Julien,
I have received this answer from the upstream maintainer.
Kind regards
Harald Jenny
- Forwarded message from Paul Wouters -
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:02:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Paul Wouters
To: Harald Jenny
Subject: Re: [jcris...@debian.org: Re: openswan 2.6.28+dfsg-4 unblo
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:32:54 +
with message-id <1292531574.17170.370.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606981: unblock: kbd/1.15.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #606981,
regarding unblock: kbd/1.15.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Dear Julien
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 23:41:37 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
>
> > Dear release team,
> >
> > I was trying to get a new version of amavisd-milter (1.5.0-3) sponsored and
> > the
> > issue was raised if the package is s
On Dec 16, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue.
> I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight
LVM is unreliable in squeeze.
> it out and then come back to us when you have packages you want to see
> in squeeze?
The upstrea
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 01:26:46 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 01:15 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Thomas,
> >
> > am Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:26:05AM +0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> >> * Sets the SUID bit, chown sbox to root.root (Closse: #605868).
> >
> > you know, that bug
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:59:14 +0100
with message-id <20101216195914.gi5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#605757: unblock: fakeroot/1.14.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #605757,
regarding unblock: fakeroot/1.14.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 23:41:37 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I was trying to get a new version of amavisd-milter (1.5.0-3) sponsored and
> the
> issue was raised if the package is suitable for inclusion into Squeeze. As the
> upcoming release is already in deep freeze the
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 23:33:27 +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hello RT,
>
> On 11/29/2010 08:28 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > If you agree with the changes, we would prepare an upload.
>
> haven't heard back yet, so I thought I'd ping again.
>
Please send the actual diff, not just the c
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:03:18 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> diff -Nru openswan-2.6.28+dfsg/debian/patches/08-initd-configcheck.dpatch
> openswan-2.6.28+dfsg/debian/patches/08-initd-configcheck.dpatch
> --- openswan-2.6.28+dfsg/debian/patches/08-initd-configcheck.dpatch
> 1970-01-01 01:00:00.
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:43:43 +0100
with message-id <20101216194343.gf5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#605350: unblock: centerim/4.22.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #605350,
regarding unblock: centerim/4.22.10-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Thursday, den 16. December 2010:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 11:21 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > As I have not yet received any response to what should be a very
> > simple, but rather important, documentation change, I am following up.
>
> Apologies for the delay.
>
> > Ale
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 18:52 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2010-12-12, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Can someone from the release team please take a look at #555668. I
> > think this bug can be marked squeeze-ignore or downgraded.
>
> I agree with a squeeze-ignore tag.
For the record, Mehdi
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 11:21 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> As I have not yet received any response to what should be a very
> simple, but rather important, documentation change, I am following up.
Apologies for the delay.
> Alex followed up on my initial post with "If it helps I can add a an
> updated
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:36 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Adam D. Barratt]
> > Thanks for that, and your notes on them. Based on these and looking
> > at the patches, I agree with your assessment. Please upload to
> > unstable with the first and last patches
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> Lo
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:24:20 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Brian May schrieb am Sunday, den 28. November 2010:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Would you be willing to accept a new version of amavisd-new into
> > testing that does nothing but update the Maintainer header field?
> >
> > -Maintainer: Brian May
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:21:50 +0100
with message-id <20101216192150.gd5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#604464: unblock: apt-cacher-ng/0.5.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #604464,
regarding unblock: apt-cacher-ng/0.5.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:48 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I noticed that you've recently uploaded new upstream versions of sqlite3
> > and neon27 to unstable. Were either of these uploads targetted at
> > Squeeze?
>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:03:08 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue.
>
I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight
it out and then come back to us when you have packages you want to see
in squeeze?
Cheers,
Julien
si
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
> ... and as Julien pointed out, these are not RC bugs unless you can
> show that these packages fail to install/uninstall/purge.
I know >50 packages failing to purge properly (+ which need bug filing), but I
dont think failing to purge
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 21:13:58 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> Recently, a bug was reported against csound (#603321), which was
> already fixed in upstream CVS. The bug is severity: normal, although
> one could argue for a higher severity given that it segfaults whenever
>
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 15:45 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> It contains a fix for a ppc thermal module squeeze regression
> and 2 dist-upgrade from Lenny fixes.
Unblocked; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
reassign 607293 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:56 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Severity: wishlist
[...]
> To get a list of affected binary packages:
>
> w3m
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/install-info-used-in-maintainer-script.html |
> awk '/[(]binary[)]$/
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:20:30 +0100
Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Philipp Kern [2010-12-16 19:06 +0100]:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:56:13PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > > Could rebuilding them please be scheduled?
> >
> > We cannot rebuild arch:all packages without sourceful uploads.
... and as Jul
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: gaw...@camlann.de
Hi,
please unblock typo3-src/4.3.8+dfsg1-1 which is a bugfix only upstream
release, fixing several serious security problems.
typo3-src (4.3.9+dfsg1-1) un
Carsten Hey wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> $ dpkg-reconfigure nana
> This is not dpkg install-info anymore, but GNU install-info
> See the man page for ginstall-info for command line arguments
> install-info: No dir file specified; try --help for more information.
> zsh: exi
* Philipp Kern [2010-12-16 19:06 +0100]:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:56:13PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > Could rebuilding them please be scheduled?
>
> We cannot rebuild arch:all packages without sourceful uploads.
This prints the non arch:all packages:
w3m http://lintian.debian.org/tags/insta
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 18:56:13 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> This breaks unrelated software (dpkg-reconfigure -a).
>
No, it does not.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:56:13PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> Could rebuilding them please be scheduled?
We cannot rebuild arch:all packages without sourceful uploads.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
$ dpkg-reconfigure nana
This is not dpkg install-info anymore, but GNU install-info
See the man page for ginstall-info for command line arguments
install-info: No dir file specified; try --help for more information.
zsh: exit 1 dpkg-reconfigure nana
This
Dear Richard A Nelson,
Dear release team,
I would like to know if unblocking the current Sid sendmail package would be
possible so that the above mentioned bug could also be solved in testing? If
not, are there any other options to fix this bug, like preparing a patch for
the libmilter issue (and
It contains a fix for a ppc thermal module squeeze regression
and 2 dist-upgrade from Lenny fixes.
thank you.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.
Thijs Kinkhorst writes:
> On Tuesday 07 December 2010 18:01:05 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Uploading ia32-libs-core_20101207_source to mentors. Sponsors
>> welcome.
>
> I have uploaded this now. I think this needs unblocking so that ia32-libs can
> also migrate.
>
> I've also sponsored ia32-l
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:14:50 +0100
with message-id <4d09e69a.5030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#607255: RM: trac-datefieldplugin/0.7782-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #607255,
regarding RM: trac-datefieldplugin/0.7782-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi!
The named package in testing is affected by rc bug #603076 (installation
failure) and important bug #581486 (bashism in debian/rules). In a private
reply to my request, the maintainer basi
On 09:23 Thu 16 Dec , Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
MD> On 12/16/2010 06:54 AM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
>>
MM>>> Dmitry, this is still unfixed in Squeeze. Please take care of an
MM>>> update ASAP.
>>
>> centerim contained ancient version of the library (all its
>> libraries), so the patch wouldn't so
On 12/16/2010 06:54 AM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
>
> MM> Dmitry, this is still unfixed in Squeeze. Please take care of an
> MM> update ASAP.
>
> centerim contained ancient version of the library (all its
> libraries), so the patch wouldn't so easy as Mehdi said. And I don't
> know what to do: t
47 matches
Mail list logo
