On 05.12.2012 23:49, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:10:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[rt maintainers added to CC]
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 07:17 +0100, Tom Jampen wrote:
On 20.11.2012 19:56, Tom Jampen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 10:05 +0100, Tom Jampen wrote:
An
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
decide what to do with Ruby 1.9.X on ia64. It has been broken for
months, and hasn't seen any activity in Debian (#539141) or upstream
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi, as explained in the bug 691742[1], The current version of fs2ram in
testing is RC buggy. The last upload fixing this the RC bug was late
according to the debian release objective for wheezy.
Your message dated Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:07:46 +
with message-id 20121206110746.gk23...@halon.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#695158: Bug#591969: Bug#695158: wheezy-ignore tag for
RC bug #591969 in typo3-src
has caused the Debian Bug report #695158,
regarding wheezy-ignore tag for RC bug #591969
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:25:45PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be
Hi,
I just uploaded clamsmtp with only two changes. The debconf translation to
Italian was added and the debhelper version increased to 9 to get the hardening
flags applied.
Debdiff attached.
Thanks.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot
Hi Roger,
On 12/06/2012 01:15 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:25:45PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
On 2012-12-06 12:44, Michael Meskes wrote:
Hi,
I just uploaded clamsmtp with only two changes. The debconf
translation to
Italian was added and the debhelper version increased to 9 to get the
hardening
flags applied.
Please file an unblock bug.
Thanks,
to relieve, but not for on or
On 2012-12-06 13:58, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2012-12-06 12:44, Michael Meskes wrote:
Hi,
I just uploaded clamsmtp with only two changes. The debconf
translation to
Italian was added and the debhelper version increased to 9 to get the
hardening
flags applied.
Please file an unblock
Dear release managers,
if there is anything I can do about the following unblock requests
please let me know.
THe package is now 10 days in unstable.
On Mo, 26 Nov 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:00:10PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Before doing so, please consider undoing the debhelper compat 9 because
it is explicitly listed as not accepted in the freeze policy[1]
Oops, didn't know that. I take it we're too late in the release cycle then. I
don't feel like
Am Dienstag, den 04.12.2012, 22:45 +0100 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:47:51AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 18:44:42 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:
Alle mercoledì 5 dicembre 2012, Julien Cristau ha scritto:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 20:09:38 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to upload akonadi 1.7.2-2.
The
Hi,
Rob Browning wrote (03 Dec 2012 01:41:26 GMT) :
I haven't uploaded it yet (wanted to ask first), but the debdiff is
below. Please let me know if I should proceed with an upload, or make
changes -- #674181 is minor (doc change); #676424 is serious.
Thank you for tackling this RC bug.
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 677943 by 694790
Bug #677943 [munin] /etc/apache2/conf.d/munin removed on upgrade
677943 was not blocked by any bugs.
677943 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 677943: 694790
block 694355 by 694790
Bug #694355 [munin-doc]
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:22:00 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
decide what to do with Ruby 1.9.X on ia64. It has been broken for
months, and
Michael Stapelberg dijo [Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:22:00AM +0100]:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
decide what to do with Ruby 1.9.X on ia64. It has been broken for
months, and
What is broken about it? Has anyone estimated how much effort it would take
to fix? Are we talking needing assembly language bindings or just some dumb
SIGBUS error?
Patrick Baggett
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org wrote:
Michael Stapelberg dijo [Thu, Dec 06, 2012
[dropping explicit CCs to people who I know read -release]
On 29.11.2012 13:46, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Will wheezy ship sgml catalogs as configuration files or as
conffiles?
I am explicitly deferring this question to the release managers now.
There is no obviously correct answer, but we can
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:22:00 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
decide
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 10:01 +0100, Tom Jampen wrote:
On 05.12.2012 23:49, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:10:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
RT maintainers: is there any form of policy on how extension packages
should handle restarting web servers after clearing
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #692773 [release.debian.org] unblock: vlc/2.0.4-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
692773: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692773
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 04.12.2012, 22:45 +0100 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
The isolated security fix can be found here:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package squid3
Version 3.1.20-2 fixes an 'important' bug (#660489) with the addition of a
simple upstream patch. No other diffs where added. This bug allows squid3 to
run
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 unblock: mesa/8.0.5-3
Bug #694746 [release.debian.org] unblock: mesa/8.0.5-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: mesa/8.0.5-3' from 'unblock: mesa/8.0.5-2'
--
694746: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694746
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: retitle -1 unblock: mesa/8.0.5-3
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 21:10:43 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Please unblock package mesa.
Just uploaded 8.0.5-3, a single change:
commit a2ecfd6abf0073b2a48ead01ee3490d6a0b04744
Author: Frank Henigman fjhenig...@google.com
Date: Fri Nov 2 16:12:50
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 23:23 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Please unblock package axis
Thanks to Alberto Fernández Martínez inf...@gmail.com
CVE-2012-5784 (=bug #692650) was fixed and I just sponsered
his NMU. Debdiff is attached.
It appears that this isn't quite
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #695236 [release.debian.org] unblock: axis/1.4-16.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
695236: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695236
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #695234 [release.debian.org] unblock: commons-httpclient/3.1-10.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
695234: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 23:21 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Please unblock package commons-httpclient
Thanks to Alberto Fernández Martínez inf...@gmail.com
CVE-2012-5783 (= bug #692442) was closed and I just uploaded
his NMU. Debdiff is attached to the bug report.
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:41:38 +
with message-id 1354830098.8381.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695109: unblock: xarchiver/1:0.5.2+20090319+dfsg-4.1
(pre-approval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #695109,
regarding unblock:
Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze10_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze10_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze10_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze10_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:08:20 +
with message-id 1354831700.8381.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695189: unblock: bogofilter/1.2.2+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695189,
regarding unblock: bogofilter/1.2.2+dfsg1-2
to be marked as done.
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 11:50 +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
cdo (1.5.4+dfsg.1-5) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
.
* Fix for data loss due to '--enable-cgribex' not enabled. Thanks to
Marco Galli. Closes: #695009.
The bug mentioned in the changelog is filed with a severity
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
Hi,
http://bugs.debian.org/683010 (FTBFS on ia64) was filed against
evolvotron/0.6.1-2 before it could enter testing, so it never
migrated. Nevertheless, 0.6.1-1 from testing is also affected, i.e.
the bug was
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi,
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 02:00:19 +0100
Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/683010 (FTBFS on ia64) was filed against
evolvotron/0.6.1-2 before it could enter testing, so it never
migrated. Nevertheless, 0.6.1-1 from testing is also affected,
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #695321 [release.debian.org] tpu: evolvotron/0.6.1-1+wheezy1 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
695321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695321
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Could you unblock package speech-dispatcher?
There was a missing breaks/replaces for some files moved between
speech-dispatcher and libspeechd-dev, leading to an upgrade issue,
38 matches
Mail list logo
