On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:06:24 +0100
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Where is this undone? What happens if you call build twice? If the
> package isn't already using a patch system, then apply the patch
> directly, not through debian/rules, please.
Okay, thanks.
I'll upload with as below changes (direc
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 14:40 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> * "What this most needs is more testing. I know you have tested it,
>>but I haven't had time to test it myself. I should have some in
>>the next month and do not think this should roll out to s-p-u unt
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:44AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>
> I was about to file unblock request and ping the installer team coordinators.
> Sorry, if this is the wrong way around with respect to an upload to unstable.
Well, normally, I'd ask the Release team first whether they would be
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:50:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > e2fsprogs (1.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
> >* Non-maintainer upload.
> This shouldn't have been uploaded to unstable without first getting
> permission from the Debian Release team (and preferably me --- it
> would have bee
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package keepassx
Sourceful NMU keepassx/0.4.3+dfsg-0.1 fixes RC bug #698832 (missing origin and
license of image icons). Note, the bug has not been closed upon acceptance to
Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:02:47 +
with message-id <1363982567.24071.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#703725: unblock: apt-spacewalk/1.0.6-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #703725,
regarding unblock: apt-spacewalk/1.0.6-2.1
to be marked as done.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package apt-spacewalk
It fixes RC bugs #703207, #700821 (both reports are about the same issue;
please consult #700821 for details). FWIW the NMU has been welcomed privately
Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:09:24 +
with message-id <1363979364.24071.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Processed: reassign 703719 to release.debian.org, retitle
703719 to rm libnss-sshsock/0.2-1, affects 703719
has caused the Debian Bug report #703719,
r
Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:09:24 +
with message-id <1363979364.24071.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Processed: reassign 703719 to release.debian.org, retitle
703719 to rm libnss-sshsock/0.2-1, affects 703719
has caused the Debian Bug report #703718,
r
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 18:54 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > reassign 703719 release.debian.org
[...]
> > # removals ought to be filed against release.debian.org
Well yes, but I already added removal hints for both packages earlier
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 703718 release.debian.org
Bug #703718 [libpam-sshauth] libpam-sshauth should not be released with wheezy
Bug reassigned from package 'libpam-sshauth' to 'release.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions libpam-sshauth/0.1-1.
Ign
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 703719 release.debian.org
Bug #703719 [libnss-sshsock] libnss-sshsock: abandoned upstream, should be
dropped from wheezy
Bug reassigned from package 'libnss-sshsock' to 'release.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions 0.2-1.
I
Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:39:45 +
with message-id <1363977585.24071.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#703722: RM: firebird2.1/2.1.5.18496-0.ds2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #703722,
regarding RM: firebird2.1/2.1.5.18496-0.ds2-1
to be marked as d
Dear release team,
Yeah, I know: l10n uploads shouldn't be allowed anymore. I concur with
this stance and fully understand it.
Still, I'd like to ask for one very very very last exception fot
tzdata.
Indeed, the last upload added a few debconf-translatable strings
(timezone names) without any co
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove firebird2.1 from Wheezy. It's filed for removal from
the archive already (#702869), but with the freeze nearing I'm not
sure if it'll be removed in due time. So let's better remove
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock haskell-authenticate/1.2.1.1-2 haskell-yesod-auth/1.0.2.1-2
Bug #702796 [release.debian.org] unblock
haskell-unordered-containers/0.2.2.1.is.really.0.2.1.0-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock haskell-authenticate/1.2.1.1-2
haskell-yesod-auth/1.0.2.1-
Control: retitle -1 unblock haskell-authenticate/1.2.1.1-2
haskell-yesod-auth/1.0.2.1-2
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2013, 20:06 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2013, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 15:30:28 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 702796
Bug #702796 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org]
unblock: haskell-certificate et. al.
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #702796 to the same values
previously set
> retitle 702796 unblock
> haskel
Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:07:32 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#703707: Acknowledgement (unblock: php5/5.4.4-15)
has caused the Debian Bug report #703707,
regarding unblock: php5/5.4.4-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package php5
The previous fix was CVE-2013-1643 was incomplete and it had been
issued an additional CVE-2013-1824 which should be complete now.
$ diffstat php5_5.4.4-15.debd
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-reference
This upload only updates the URL change for the backport archive which
is formalized recently. (Having outdated information on such facts is
critica
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 702167 = pending
Bug #702167 [release.debian.org] unblock: lvm2/2.02.95-7
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
702167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:56:42 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please ack upload to tpu to fix some bad decisions. It basicly reverts
> the removal of clvm, which produced an outc
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 23:44:39 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> So, I am asking for advice. Release team, should I go ahead with this
> upload and can I reasonably expect a freeze exception?
>
I don't think we have much choice, so, yes.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:40:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#703701: unblock: firebird2.5/2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #703701,
regarding unblock: firebird2.5/2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package firebird2.5
It fixes an issue when libfbclient2 package was first installed in lenny, then
upgraded. The issue leads to an empty /usr/share/doc/libfbclient2 director
Hi Pierre,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:55:26AM +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bug #702703 affects prelude-manager version in testing, and is severity
> serious.
> It has been fixed in unstable, however the version in unstable also
> fixes another bug (#660455 not marked RC, but important
Hi,
Bug #702703 affects prelude-manager version in testing, and is severity
serious.
It has been fixed in unstable, however the version in unstable also
fixes another bug (#660455 not marked RC, but important).
Would it be fine for the release team to allow 1.0.1-4 into testing, or
do you prefer
Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:04:20 +
with message-id <0d4c26f1672bc13c29503d37099cc...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#703362: unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #703362,
regarding unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2
to be marked as done.
This means
Adam D. Barratt (19/03/2013):
> Unblocked, but needs a udeb ack.
Looks good to me.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Niels Thykier (17/03/2013):
> Assuming the d-i side is okay with these changes (CC'ed), I will gladly
> unblock this package.
Looks good to me.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> > > This upload allows pbuilder to build a build chroot, so it seems fine,
> > > but, not being a wizard with debootstrap and archive stuff, I'd
> > > appreciate someone to confirm that fixing this is OK and fixing it the
> > > way it has been prop
Hello Release team.
MySQL in testing is currently 5.5.28.
MySQL in unstable is currently 5.5.29.
MySQL upstream has released 5.5.30.
MySQL 5.5.30 is the current "stable" release of MySQL. We can anticipate
5.5.31 very soon. I suspect there will be security fixes in that release,
although Oracle w
33 matches
Mail list logo
