Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > >>> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. >

Bug#804900: marked as done (nmu: flightgear_3.4.0-2 fgrun_3.4.0.final-2)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:09:42 +0100 with message-id <564a29f6.5020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#804900: nmu: flightgear_3.4.0-2 fgrun_3.4.0.final-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #804900, regarding nmu: flightgear_3.4.0-2 fgrun_3.4.0.final-2 to be marked as done. This

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >>> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. >>> >>> James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in >>>

Bug#805093: transition: qpdf

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 14/11/15 17:41, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > The latest version of qpdf includes an soname bump. The qpdf > transition is very small. The only other

Processed: Re: Bug#805093: transition: qpdf

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #805093 [release.debian.org] transition: qpdf Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 805093: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805093 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#805293: jessie-pu: package systemd/215-17+deb8u3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu I'd like to update the systemd package in stable to fix a few issues where users asked us explicitly to backport fixes from upstream. All those issue have been fixed in

Processed: Re: Bug#760849: transition: glew

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 760849 pending Bug #760849 [release.debian.org] transition: glew Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 760849: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760849 Debian

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > >> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 16/11/15 20:08, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > FTR, we're now

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 16/11/15 20:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 16/11/15 21:59, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 16/11/15 20:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 16/11/15 20:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >

Bug#804775: marked as done (transition: bullet)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:20:34 +0100 with message-id <564a64c2.6050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#804775: transition: bullet has caused the Debian Bug report #804775, regarding transition: bullet to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#804055: transition: graphicsmagick

On 14/11/15 17:35, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 09/11/15 09:59, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >>> OK, 0.5.12 was uploaded and built on all supported architectures, but >>> fails on mips64el due to an

Bug#804775: transition: bullet

On 13/11/15 10:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:05:45 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote: >> Am 11.11.2015 um 15:47 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: >>> On 11/11/15 14:21, Markus Koschany wrote: I would like to request a transition for Bullet 2.83.6.

Processed: Re: Bug#804055: transition: graphicsmagick

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 804055 + pending Bug #804055 [release.debian.org] transition: graphicsmagick Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 804055:

Processed: Re: Bug#804285: transition: ode

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 804285 pending Bug #804285 [release.debian.org] transition: ode Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 804285: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804285 Debian