Bug#801441: Upcoming stable point release (8.3)

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On 2015-12-18 8:20, Arto Jantunen wrote: >> "Adam D. Barratt" writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The next point release for "jessie" (8.3) is scheduled for Saturday, >>> January 23rd. Processing of new uploads into

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

On 17/12/15 14:09, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ferenc Wagner writes: > >> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: >> >>> On 16/12/15 00:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >>> Niko Tyni writes: > So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source

Processed: fix bug report for dbc update in jessie and wheezy

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 806247 -1 Bug #806247 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package dbconfig-common/1.8.47+nmu3 Bug 806247 cloned as bug 808282 > retitle -1 wheezy-pu: package dbconfig-common/1.8.47+nmu1 Bug #808282 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package

Re: Tentative last d-i release for 2015?

On 17/12/15 18:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2015-12-13): >> We're getting close to start the Perl transition. I guess there are packages >> in >> there building udebs, and I guess the transition won't be over by the weekend >> (so the block may be

Bug#801441: Upcoming stable point release (8.3)

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > Hi, > > The next point release for "jessie" (8.3) is scheduled for Saturday, > January 23rd. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates > will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Has the deadline already been missed for

Bug#807621: marked as done (transition: stk)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:23:07 +0100 with message-id <5673d07b.6030...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#807621: transition: stk has caused the Debian Bug report #807621, regarding transition: stk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#801441: Upcoming stable point release (8.3)

On 2015-12-18 8:20, Arto Jantunen wrote: "Adam D. Barratt" writes: Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.3) is scheduled for Saturday, January 23rd. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Has the

Bug#801441: Upcoming stable point release (8.3)

On 2015-12-18 9:45, Arto Jantunen wrote: "Adam D. Barratt" writes: On 2015-12-18 8:20, Arto Jantunen wrote: "Adam D. Barratt" writes: Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.3) is scheduled for Saturday, January 23rd. Processing of

Bug#805894: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1

On 2015-12-18 14:13, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: Hi, Is there any blocker for this update? As with every other update, person time. Regards, Adam

Bug#807651: nmu: systemd_228-2

(resending so that this makes it to -release, the bug was already reassigned+retitled) >> Am 11.12.2015 um 11:21 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: >>> 0m44.8s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system: >>> /etc/init/udev.overridenot owned > > On 2015-12-11 11:47, Michael Biebl wrote: >>

Bug#808319: britney: Allow skipping the second (upgrade testing) stage

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hello, It's sometimes useful to run britney in "dry mode" to run tests on the unstable packages, but not the full second-stage upgrade test. This is even more useful if/once

Bug#805894: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1

Hi, Is there any blocker for this update? Do you think it could be included in the coming point release? This would be great as it is a rather ancient and annoying bug and there seems to be some expectation on this update (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784070#303) ;-) If the

Processed: linux-tools: needs a rebuild for Perl 5.22

Processing control commands: > block 796345 with -1 Bug #796345 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.22 796345 was blocked by: 787453 796923 790532 807038 799118 807423 807493 802939 807400 805391 787493 795127 804603 788073 804590 808325 787450 807478 807401 807324 787468 807422 807492

Bug#804055: marked as done (transition: graphicsmagick)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:32:59 +0100 with message-id <5674434b.1040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#804055: transition: graphicsmagick has caused the Debian Bug report #804055, regarding transition: graphicsmagick to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: block 796345 with 808325, block 796345 with 805391

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 796345 with 808325 Bug #796345 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.22 796345 was blocked by: 807400 807423 807038 796923 807493 787450 790532 807492 799118 802939 804590 804603 807478 807422 787453 795127 807324 787468 787493 807474

Processed: Re: Bug#805012: transition: giflib

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 805012 + pending Bug #805012 [release.debian.org] transition: giflib Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 805012: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805012

Bug#805825: marked as done (transition: hdf5)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:30:55 +0100 with message-id <567442cf.2040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#805825: transition: hdf5 has caused the Debian Bug report #805825, regarding transition: hdf5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#805894: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 14:58:18 + "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > > Is there any blocker for this update? > > As with every other update, person time. I understand and highly appreciate the effort spent on Debian, and therefore I want to thank everyone who contributes

Bug#808319: britney: Allow skipping the second (upgrade testing) stage

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Martin Pitt: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: britney > > Hello, > > It's sometimes useful to run britney in "dry mode" to run tests on the > unstable packages, but not the full

Processed: Re: Bug#808319: britney: Allow skipping the second (upgrade testing) stage

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #808319 [release.debian.org] britney: Allow skipping the second (upgrade testing) stage Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 808319: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808319 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Re: xfe is marked for autoremoval from testing

On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 23:06 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Hello release team, > > Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote on 2015-12-18 04:39: > > > > xfe 1.41-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-12-28 > > > > It is affected by these RC bugs: > > 806579: xfe: FTBFS:

Bug#800556: marked as done (transition: suitesparse4.4)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:56:09 +0100 with message-id <5674ab29.6070...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#800556: transition: suitesparse4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #800556, regarding transition: suitesparse4.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#650601: transition: libpng 1.5

Package: release.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #650601 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear libpng maintainers, how's about starting the transistion NOW? (I also volunteer to help out; bonus: I'm gonna have a few days off after the christmas...) -- tobi --

Re: Request for release team decision on MySQL and MariaDB [was: Re: Bug#793316: [debian-mysql] Bug#793316: transition: mysql-5.6]

(removing Jonathan specifically; the debian-release ML should be sufficient as this is for the release team generally now) On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 05:45:24PM +, Robie Basak wrote: > Can I ask that this request (for the release team to make a decision > between the choices I outlined[1]) be

Re: xfe is marked for autoremoval from testing

Hello release team, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote on 2015-12-18 04:39: > > xfe 1.41-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-12-28 > > It is affected by these RC bugs: > 806579: xfe: FTBFS: configure:14251: error: "ftheader.h not found" since xfe version 1.41-1 the FTBFS bug