Le 12/09/2023 à 14:29, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:36:00AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
llvm-defaults has been pointing to 16 in experimental for quite sometime.
Opening this transition to make sure
Le 31/08/2023 à 14:47, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-08-19 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
Let's upgrade llvm one more time.
I am
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
Let's upgrade llvm one more time.
I am aware of mipsel and mips64el build failures. I am looking into it.
llvm-defaults has been pointing to 16 in experimental for quite
Le 13/03/2023 à 18:54, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-03-13 14:27:52 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: llvm-toolchain...@packages.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: llvm-toolchain...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:llvm-toolchain-15
Please unblock package llvm-toolchain-15
[ Reason ]
Fixes autopkgtest issues and new version
Le 25/03/2022 à 22:00, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Hi Sylvestre,
>
> On 18-10-2021 22:42, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>> So, please share your plans with us.
>> My target is to have 2 versions for the next release. Realistically,
>> because of all the use
>> cas
Hello,
First, thanks for asking and I apologize for not communicating more on this.
Le 18/10/2021 à 20:40, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Dear LLVM maintainers,
>
> As a Release Team member I'm wondering what your plan is with the
> different version of llvm-toolchain-* we have in unstable and
Hello,
Le 04/12/2020 à 18:44, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2020-10-31 14:35:36 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
One more time, it is time
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
One more time, it is time to have upgrade llvm.
I would like to ship bullseye with 11 and skip -10 (it had some performance
regression in the
binary generated).
I am building a
Le 10/04/2020 à 18:47, peter green a écrit :
(note: these are my observations as a maintainer of a derivative)
The rust ecosystem in Debian
recently had (and I expect still has) trouble to properly migrate to
testing
Indeed there are still issues, most notablly IMO that firefox-esr's
Le 03/02/2020 à 10:47, Carsten Schoenert a écrit :
Hi Sylvestre,
Am 04.01.20 um 17:19 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
Honestly, (shame on me) I didn't pay much attention to the cbindgen
migration
or other migrations of rust binaries.
Mostly because when I look at the transition dashboard, I don't
Le 10/01/2020 à 12:34, Ximin Luo a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi, rust-grcov depends on old versions of some rust crates, blocking testing
migration.
It will be some time before we can deploy the new version
Hello,
Le 04/01/2020 à 17:02, Paul Gevers a écrit :
Dear rust maintainers,
I should have probably contacted you earlier, but better now than
latter. I think it is time to align between the rust maintainers and the
release team how we (ideally you without needing our assistance) can
manage the
Le 27/12/2019 à 10:43, Paul Gevers a écrit :
What happens if rebuilt packages don't migrate to testing? I'm
seeing rust package in the picture
Besides rustc, it should not have an impact on rust.
But rustc is having issues migrating, so this is something I am worried
about. Also, do you
Le 26/12/2019 à 21:40, Paul Gevers a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sylvestre,
On 22-12-2019 11:57, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
LLVM 9.0.1 has just been released. I am not planning to spend significant time
on the -8 branch.
It is therefor time to move to the version 9
Just to get
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
LLVM 9.0.1 has just been released. I am not planning to spend significant time
on the -8 branch.
It is therefor time to move to the version 9
Thanks,
Sylvestre
Ben file:
Le 23/09/2019 à 22:04, Paul Gevers a écrit :
Hi Shengjing, Sylvestre,
On 15-09-2019 09:52, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
Now that we release buster, I would like to move llvm-defaults to
llvm-toolchain-8.
[...]
Affected: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[345678]/
Good: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[8]/
Le 25/07/2019 à 18:43, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 09:22:54AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package encoding-rs
Last minute, we had to update
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello
Now that we release buster, I would like to move llvm-defaults to
llvm-toolchain-8.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
Ben file:
title = "llvm-defaults";
Affected: .depends ~
To be clear, we don't need dh-cargo
if we can have encoding-rs without dh-cargo, this is perfectly fine :)
S
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dh-cargo
Hello
We don't need dh-cargo per say but it is blocking rust-encoding-rs migration.
Version 18 has been in unstable since march without regression
and it
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-From 0181b7b648e12fcaf9c8f6c1614f5055ce59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Sylvestre Ledru
-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 18:04:25 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] fix the copyright
-
- src/encoding-rs/debian/copyright | 6 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package rust-cbindgen
Needed for Firefox ESR 68.
Only used by Firefox, leaf package with a popcon of 27!
Not attaching the debdiff because it includes upstream fixes.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
cc + update of bug #929110
Please unblock package spectre-meltdown-checker
This is a leaf package and version 0.42 is improving some last minutes bug from
0.41 (Fallout, RIDL and
-cli
+(Closes: #907607)
+
+ -- Sylvestre Ledru Sat, 18 May 2019 13:50:11 +0200
+
scilab (6.0.1-9) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru scilab-6.0.1/debian/rules scilab-6.0.1/debian/rules
--- scilab-6.0.1/debian/rules 2019-03-30 14:22:45.0 +0100
+++ scilab-6.0.1/debian/r
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package spectre-meltdown-checker
This is a leaf package and version 0.41 is checking for the new
security issues: Fallout, RIDL and ZombieLoad
If any issue, it should not
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello
I would like to llvm-toolchain-7 the default for buster.
This for the following reasons:
* llvm 6.0 upstream won't have a new upstream release
* I have been focusing my Debian
Hello Emilio and others,
Le 23/06/2018 à 11:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :>>
>> Not yet, sorry. been busy with other things!
>
> Hi Sylvestre, any progress with this? Would be nice to bump llvm-defaults so
> that we can start removing the old versions.I would like upload llvm-defaults
>
Le 23/06/2018 à 11:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 23/04/18 20:39, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Le 23/04/2018 à 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> Hi Sylvestre,
>>>
>>> On 28/03/18 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 17/0
Le 23/06/2018 à 11:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 23/04/18 20:39, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>
>> Le 23/04/2018 à 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> Hi Sylvestre,
>>>
>>> On 28/03/18 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> O
Le 23/04/2018 à 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> Hi Sylvestre,
>
> On 28/03/18 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 17/03/18 09:43, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@pa
On 18/03/2018 05:02, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The ben file is broken ...
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 09:43:38 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru
> <sylves...@debian.org> wrote:
>> title = "llvm-defaults-4.0";
>> is_affected = .depends ~
>> "lib(clang1-3.6|lib
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM.
This time to 6.0. Just like in bug 832098 & 869752, I propose that we skip one
version (5.0 here)
All
Le 20/10/2017 à 10:09, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> At the moment, llvm-toolchain-3.8 FTBFS with "gcc-7.2: Command not
> found" and this blocks the OCaml transition.
>
> I see there are already bugs open related to gcc-7 (#871011 and
> #853523), but these do not have recent activity.
>
>
Le 08/09/2017 à 17:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
On 26/07/17 09:04, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le 26/07/2017 à 09:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
On 26/07/17 08:08, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Le 26/07/2017 à 09:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 26/07/17 08:08, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM.
This time to 4.0. Just like in bug 832098, I propose that we skip one version
(3.9 here)
All supported
Le 20/01/2017 à 00:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 19/01/17 21:17, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:07:03PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Tags: stretch
>>>
>>> Please remove gcc-5, gcc-5-cross and gcc-5-cross-ports from testing. Now
Le 04/10/2016 à 19:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> Hi Sylvestre,
>
> On 22/07/16 11:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@pa
Hello
Can we consider a stretch-ignore for this issue?
We released squeeze, wheezy and jessie with this issue. And it is not
100% clear that it is non free code.
merci
Sylvestre
Le 20/08/2016 à 06:39, Debian testing autoremoval watch a écrit :
> scilab 5.5.2-2 is marked for autoremoval from
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM.
This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition:
* takes too much time
* 3.8 is stable
Le 01/11/2015 12:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 11/10/15 14:14, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>>> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
>>>> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 onc
Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>
>> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
>> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is
>> released (in one or two months)
>> or the fun way would be to skip 3.6 in the transition.
>> I would prefer the first option but
Hello,
Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM & Clang 3.6. The changes have
> been in exp for a while.
> However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
>
Can we start this transition?
Hello,
I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM Clang 3.6. The changes have been
in exp for a while.
However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
1) Upload soon (while gcc-5 is still transitioning)
2) After the gcc-5 transition
Thanks,
Sylvestre
--
To
Le 11/08/2015 14:35, Matthias Klose a écrit :
On 08/11/2015 11:19 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:10:05 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM Clang 3.6. The changes have
been in exp for a while.
However, I would like
Sorry for the lack of info, we would like only the removal from testing.
It is too early to be on that channel.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Not ready to go to the general audience
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'stable'),
(500,
On 01/03/2015 20:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:54:17 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:03:03PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru
sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Please unblock package llvm-toolchain-3.5
The lldb arch detection
+++ llvm-toolchain-3.5-3.5/debian/changelog 2015-02-27 15:29:28.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+llvm-toolchain-3.5 (1:3.5-10) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * lldb-arch.diff: Fix a critical bug on lldb arch detection
+(Closes: #779332)
+
+ -- Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org Fri, 27 Feb 2015
)
+
+ -- Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:10:50 +0100
+
morse-simulator (1.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
diff -Nru morse-simulator-1.2.1/debian/patches/bump-max-blender-version.patch
morse-simulator-1.2.1/debian/patches/bump-max-blender-version.patch
On 29/09/2014 08:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 02:26:11 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
So AIUI Sylvestre needs to remove that symlink in a new upload, but
all reverse-deps must be NMUd to use the new, versioned library name
e.g. libclang-3.5.so.1.
Yes, that is why I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
I guess https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/llvm-toolchain-3.5
and https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/llvm-toolchain-3.5.html
are using the same source of data.
Links pointing to the transition:
On 27/09/2014 18:54, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sylvestre Ledru (sylves...@debian.org) [140927 16:51]:
nmu doxygen_1.8.7-3 . ALL . -m binMNU because of the libclang change of
soname
I updated the soname as part of the coordination to switch to llvm 3.5.
https://release.debian.org/transitions
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu doxygen_1.8.7-3 . ALL . -m binMNU because of the libclang change of soname
I updated the soname as part of the coordination to switch to llvm 3.5.
On 21/09/2014 13:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 19/09/14 20:15, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 19/09/2014 19:43, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-19 18:22, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-19 18:03, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.html
On 16/09/2014 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 05/09/14 17:47, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Ping? I'm mostly interested in whether the affected packages are in
the tracker, i.e. we don't have 200
On 19/09/2014 19:43, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-19 18:22, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-19 18:03, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.html
On 16/09/2014 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 05/09/14 17
On 14/09/2014 00:50, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to privately rent a VM from BigV.io for approximately one week
to do some Debian GNU/kFreeBSD work:
* to test jessie d-i, particularly partman-zfs
* clang-3.4, #759303: Does not have multiarch include paths on !linux
*
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
To make sure Jessie gets ship with a recent version of llvm, I would
like to transit llvm from version 3.4 to 3.5.
I am also planning to update llvm-defaults to make sure that
On 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 15.07.2014 23:08, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
This was expected but now it's effective, Java 9 no longer supports
source/target level 1.5:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-July/000972.html
So if you update a package and see these
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu lightspark_0.7.2-3.1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against the new version
llvm-defaults (llvm 3.4)
Thanks
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu ldc_1:0.13.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against the new version llvm-defaults
(llvm 3.4)
Thanks,
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
As discussed on IRC, I forgot:
nmu vim-youcompleteme_0+20140207+git18be5c2-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild
against the new version llvm-defaults (llvm 3.4)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
I would like to propose two release goals for Jessie (and probably
Jessie + 1).
First, I would like to propose a release goal which will aim to make
sure that the CC and CXX variables are honored.
Currently, last time I tried, around 40 % of the packages will not take
in account such
On 29/09/2013 16:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 16:18:32 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose two release goals for Jessie (and probably
Jessie + 1).
First, I would like to propose a release goal which will aim to make
sure that the CC and CXX
On 07/09/2013 10:34, Julien Cristau wrote:
It doesn't seem to work on ia64, causing a number of build failures. Is
there a way this can be resolved quickly?
I just check with a rebuild of openmpi on a ia64 porterbox and all
upstream unitary tests are working ... (they don't have much).
Le 18/08/2013 21:58, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 16:05:50 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team
for Jessie:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7
Why does this need to be a release goal?
We
Hello,
I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team
for Jessie:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7
While the OpenJDK 7 switch is done in unstable, there are still packages
depending on OpenJDK 6.
This release goal will also include the removal of OpenJDK 6
On 17/08/2013 16:21, Christoph Egger wrote:
Moin!
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes:
On 16/08/13 13:15, Christoph Egger wrote:
I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past
when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on
falla -- in
On 13/08/2013 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:14:25 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
I would like to propose the transition of openmpi from version 1.4 = 1.6.
Please go ahead.
Excellent! It has just been uploaded!
Sylvestre
On 11/07/2013 00:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:14:25 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to propose the transition of openmpi from version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to propose the transition of openmpi from version 1.4 = 1.6.
The ABI has changed between the two releases.
However, the MPI ABI being stable, binNMU should be enough
On 18/02/2013 07:26, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Thanks a lot for explaining the situation and alternative paths forward.
My view as a user:
I only want OpenJDK7 (maybe OpenJDK8 when that becomes generally
available on September 9, 2013 :-)
Oracle has announced that no more new public
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Could you unblock sundials version 2.5.0-2 ? It would fix the RC bug
#700525 (fix by Christophe).
The change is basically adding -lblas -llapack -lm to LDFLAGS
debdiff attached.
Le 02/07/13 13:15, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Looking at the proposed tpu diff and the 3.0 - 3.1 diff, it looks like
the armhf changes should apply as is to 3.1; has anyone tried that?
I have ported the patches from 3.0 to 3.1 and
Le 02/07/13 18:07, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
Hi Adam,
Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org writes:
Therefore, I will now build it on armhf, which will take around a day.
Update: the armhf build failed because about 100 testcases fail.
I have no clue on how to fix this and can’t spend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/12/2012 18:24, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:40:06 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
So, to fix this issue, should I do the following ?
* ask for a removal of clang 3.1 in unstable * upload a version
3.0 in unstable
On 14/11/2012 11:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:24:50 +, peter green wrote:
I have attatched a diff which I would like to upload to TPU are the
maintainer and release team happy with this? I have tested that the
patch does not break linking on armel with either bfd
On 14/11/2012 11:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:24:50 +, peter green wrote:
I have attatched a diff which I would like to upload to TPU are the
maintainer and release team happy with this? I have tested that the
patch does not break linking on armel with either bfd
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu llvm-3.0_3.0-9 . ALL . -m Rebuild to fix #680326
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
Salut Cyril,
Le 18/06/2012 00:04, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Ole Streicher deb...@liska.ath.cx (17/06/2012):
I completed a release that fixes the FTBS, it awaits its upload.
Can you please give a link to the source package so that somebody will
free time can upload it?
I uploaded it this
Hello,
No, it is not a mistake. It has been decided during the Paris BSP of
this week end that this bug should not block the transition, especially
since things should moved in the future regarding this issue.
Sylvestre
Le lundi 20 février 2012 à 18:10 +0100, Anton Gladky a écrit :
Is it a
Le mardi 14 février 2012 à 12:15 +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org (13/02/2012):
Writing in with an update:
Thanks.
Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these
didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be
Hello
I am going to make some changes in the dependencies of hdf5. However,
reseting is maybe a too strong word.
Sylvestre
Le jeudi 09 février 2012 à 16:26 +, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
Hi Sylvestre,
I noticed that you weren't on the CC: list for this mail. Just to
check, are you
Hello Salvatore,
Le mercredi 25 janvier 2012 à 08:33 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso a
écrit :
Hi Sylvestre
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
udav (U)
I have prepared the package 'udav' for this transition. But I cannot
build it currently. I will upload once I can test it.
Is the
)
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
vtk (U)
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
udav (U)
Soeren Sonnenburg so...@debian.org
h5py
shogun
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org
jhdf (U)
libcgns (U)
scilab (U)
Sébastien Villemot sebastien.ville...@ens.fr
octave
)
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
vtk (U)
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
udav (U)
Soeren Sonnenburg so...@debian.org
h5py
shogun
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org
jhdf (U)
libcgns (U)
scilab (U)
Sébastien Villemot sebastien.ville...@ens.fr
octave
Le lundi 09 janvier 2012 à 22:03 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 20:17:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Depends if we're happy with removing petsc, getdp, illuminator, slepc,
plplot, gnudatalanguage, cl-plplot and pygpiv from testing. Are we?
So apparently nobody
Le mercredi 07 décembre 2011 à 23:07 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 00:10:43 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I did many changes in the HDF5 libraries (including symbol files!). I
will detail them later.
As Julien requested, here is the list
Le vendredi 21 octobre 2011 à 08:41 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi Philipp,
Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
Or it's the removal of the package.
we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we
CC debian release security
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
with security fixes.
Well, that especially means that it is now
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
Could you remove clang from testing ?
It migrated to testing but the version of gcc currently available in testing
is too old and provides old paths for the multiarch aspects.
Version
Hello,
I did many changes in the HDF5 libraries (including symbol files!). I
will detail them later.
As Julien requested, here is the list of the packages with their RCs bug
([] is none).
Do I have to add them of dependency for this bug/transition ?
cdo []
cgi-mapserver []
cgns-convert []
Le jeudi 25 août 2011 à 15:28 +0200, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ?
I think we should remove it from unstable soon. It is a good question
What's the status of the free JVMs wrt
Le jeudi 21 juillet 2011 à 11:04 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine a écrit :
Hi RMs and d-g followers
I'm going to upload 1.8.7
Before doing that, if you don't mind, I would like to add symbol files
to the C library.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 à 20:09 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
Please report your transition as a transition bugreport, next time.
OK, Sorry about that.
On 02/27/2011 09:15 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Just to let you know that we are planning to upload a new upstream
release of the hdf5
Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 21:05 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine a écrit :
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 21:15:04 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello guys,
Just to let you know that we are planning to upload a new upstream
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
Finally, could you remove also llvm-gcc-4.2 ?
The reasons are the following:
* llvm-gcc are no longer supported upstream:
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
* dragonegg package
Le samedi 07 mai 2011 à 20:20 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 21:11 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Finally, could you remove also llvm-gcc-4.2 ?
The reasons are the following:
* llvm-gcc are no longer supported upstream:
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
