On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 15:58:24 +, Olly Betts wrote:
> Sorry, I'm an idiot and uploaded a new version of sffview, despite being
> aware of this transition. If the upload causes any problems for the
> transition, please just boot sffview out of testing - it's a leaf
> package.
>
> It does se
Sorry, I'm an idiot and uploaded a new version of sffview, despite being
aware of this transition. If the upload causes any problems for the
transition, please just boot sffview out of testing - it's a leaf
package.
It does seem to build fine with boost 1.54 at least.
Cheers,
Olly
--
To U
Looking at boost1.53 transition in ubuntu[1] at the moment. It's
probably as best as I can prepare the transition. There are still a
few FTBFS in ubuntu but the numbers of those are quite low.
Looking at the blocking bugs in Debian, most of them are easy & quick
uploads once the transtition starts
On 9 May 2013 08:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 09.05.2013 05:39, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
>> On May 8, 2013 12:05:39 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 23:08:15 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
I would like to change Debian's default boost version from 1.49 to
1.53 or l
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 07:23:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 15.05.2013 15:49, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> > On May 15, 2013 04:28:59 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> Am 14.05.2013 09:00, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> >
> >>> Note also that gcc 4.8 is going to break Boost 1.49 so my suggestion
Am 15.05.2013 15:49, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> On May 15, 2013 04:28:59 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 14.05.2013 09:00, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
>
>>> Note also that gcc 4.8 is going to break Boost 1.49 so my suggestion
>>> is that Boost transition before gcc does.
>>
>> GCC 4.8 will add a han
Hi,
Another update: I did a rebuild of the boost-dependent packages in an
unmodified sid chroot (using the newly-uploaded boost 1.49-4 that
fixes the UTC issue (#707389).
There are presently 60 such failures. After transition there are 86
failures, so the boost transition causes about 26 new fai
On May 15, 2013 04:28:59 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 14.05.2013 09:00, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> > Note also that gcc 4.8 is going to break Boost 1.49 so my suggestion
> > is that Boost transition before gcc does.
>
> GCC 4.8 will add a handful of build failures to boost 1.49 based packages,
Am 14.05.2013 09:00, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:30:58PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 23:08:15 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>>>
I would like to change Debian's default
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:30:58PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 23:08:15 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to change Debian's default boost version from 1.49 to
> > > 1.53 or later -
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 23:08:15 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > I would like to change Debian's default boost version from 1.49 to
> > 1.53 or later -- likely to the most current Boost at the time the
> > transition is schedul
Am 09.05.2013 05:39, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> On May 8, 2013 12:05:39 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 23:08:15 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>>> I would like to change Debian's default boost version from 1.49 to
>>> 1.53 or later -- likely to the most current Boost at the ti
On May 8, 2013 12:05:39 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 23:08:15 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > I would like to change Debian's default boost version from 1.49 to
> > 1.53 or later -- likely to the most current Boost at the time the
> > transition is scheduled. This change d
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 23:08:15 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> I would like to change Debian's default boost version from 1.49 to
> 1.53 or later -- likely to the most current Boost at the time the
> transition is scheduled. This change does not directly impact any
> binary packages. However,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
Clearly this transition won't be acted upon until after the wheezy
release is done. However, I'm filing the bug now so that we can track
the build failure bugs related to updating b
15 matches
Mail list logo
