On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:52:27AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 07/10/14 23:43, Olly Betts wrote:
> >The result of these is that the tracker no longer presents useful
> >information - most of the listed packages are actually fixed already,
> >but several packages needing attention aren
On 07/10/14 23:43, Olly Betts wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:05:54AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
So the ben file I originally sent has a couple of annoying issues:
One is
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:05:54AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
So the ben file I originally sent has a couple of annoying issues:
One is that packages which recommend or s
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:33:03PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Asking what will happen with packages depending on wxPython 2.8 and
> which cannot be converted to 3.0.
There aren't many incompatible changes between wxPython 2.8 and 3.0.
With the C++ API, the Unicode changes have been quite painf
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 755757 + pending
Bug #755757 [release.debian.org] transition: wxpython3.0
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
755757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755757
Am 23.07.2014 15:07, schrieb Olly Betts:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:10:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 23.07.2014 03:38, schrieb Olly Betts:
>>> The intention is to eliminate wxwidgets2.8 (and hence wxpython 2.8) before
>>> releasing jessie - the last upstream release (2.8.12) was over 3
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:10:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 23.07.2014 03:38, schrieb Olly Betts:
> > The intention is to eliminate wxwidgets2.8 (and hence wxpython 2.8) before
> > releasing jessie - the last upstream release (2.8.12) was over 3 years ago,
> > and there's very little upstr
Am 23.07.2014 03:38, schrieb Olly Betts:
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block
> -1 by 734799
>
> This is a follow-on from the wxwidgets3.0 transition. The wxwidgets2.8
> source package actually contains
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html
Bug #755757 [release.debian.org] transition: wxpython3.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html'.
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #755757 [releas
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 23/07/14 03:38, Olly Betts wrote:
> This should be a "smooth transition", as the packages for wxpython 2.8
> and 3.0 are co-installable.
That's great!
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 734799
This is a follow-on from the wxwidgets3.0 transition. The wxwidgets2.8
source package actually contains the wxpython source, which has an
embedded copy of wxw
11 matches
Mail list logo