Re: john - Request for review of merge request - Add autopkgtests

2021-05-29 Thread Samuel Henrique
ts.debian.org/debian-security-tools/2021/01/msg00018.html Thanks for your contribution :) -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Scalpel - Request for review of merge request - Closes #980064

2021-05-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
merge and leave it in debian/master, to be uploaded as soon as the freeze is gone. Cheers, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of regripper 3.0-1

2021-05-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Arnaud, I believe you mentioned you were interested in reviewing this upload, do you still have plans to do it? I can help but I wanted to avoid duplication of work. Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Introductory Message - Contributing to Debian Forensics Environment

2021-05-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
, it might take a few days. If you have a request pending a response for at least 2 weeks, please let me know and I'll prioritize it. I've sent you a private reply before, as I was busy, but now I've got enough time to catch up with the backlog, sorry for that. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Membership removed from project proytunnel

2021-05-03 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Sven, > Please re-assign me to the proxytunnel project. Done, I've set the new expiration date to be end of 2022. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of stegseek 0.5-1~exp1

2021-04-17 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Francisco, > I'm looking for a sponsor for a new package, stegseek [1]. > > Please, could you review and upload it for the experimental? Uploaded, thanks for working on it :) Cheers, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Last days before the soft freeze

2021-02-08 Thread Samuel Henrique
ency set to medium and without regressions). I'm actually not being exactly correct on this again, so please refer to the official doc at: https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html We can still upload "Only small, targeted fixes" up until at least 2021-03-12. Cheers, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Intro + Re: Heads up: Bug#981055: O: john -- active password cracking tool

2021-02-08 Thread Samuel Henrique
gt; Would the jumbo patch have to go through NEW? I only see john, > john-data and john-dbgsym in Kali (i.e. same package names as in > Debian). Oh noes, that was a brainfart, the actual deadline is 2021-02-12 (only small changes allowed after this date), still not enough time though. Cheers, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: ed2k-hash (0.4.0+ds-4) ready for upload

2021-02-07 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Sven, > According to https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt I am still missing DM > permissions for ed2k-hash. Would you please check this? I had forgotten about it, it's done now, thanks for the heads up! Cheers, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Intro + Re: Heads up: Bug#981055: O: john -- active password cracking tool

2021-02-04 Thread Samuel Henrique
an easy change. * testing will have to be extensive, considering the scope of the changes and how john has all sorts of tweaks for different architectures > In other news: I just uploaded plaso with the last RC bug fixed. Great, thanks for joining the team :) -- Samuel Henrique

LinPEAS - Linux Privilege Escalation Awesome Script

2021-02-02 Thread Samuel Henrique
ation-awesome-scripts-suite" also provides a script for Windows but I guess there's not much use for us (only if we want to package as a payload). Cheers, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Intro + Re: Heads up: Bug#981055: O: john -- active password cracking tool

2021-02-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
it will be, so feel free to ask for help. Considering we have until around Friday to make it to bullseye, I can spend some extra time on it to make it happen (if it's feasible, of course). Cheers, [0] https://gitlab.com/kalilinux/packages/john -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Last days before the soft freeze

2021-02-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
ys to > migrate). I miscalculated it, we have until around this Friday for the uploads to reach testing (if urgency set to medium and without regressions). Cheers, [0] https://github.com/verbnetworks/arpwitch -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Last days before the soft freeze

2021-02-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
. Once again, thanks for your work :) -- Samuel Henrique

Last days before the soft freeze

2021-01-31 Thread Samuel Henrique
days left for this work (for the packages that take 10 days to migrate). Cheers, [0] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html [1] For which in one case I could patch upstream to enable a "rootless build" -- Samuel Henrique

Re: libpff_20180714-3 is ready for upload

2021-01-16 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Aleksey, > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/libpff Awesome, uploaded, I will give you DM permissions once the package hits the archive, Thanks for your work! -- Samuel Henrique

Re: libpff_20180714-3 is ready for upload

2021-01-10 Thread Samuel Henrique
see the last 3 uploads were done by you (since 2018) and you have been doing a good amount of work there. Cheers :) -- Samuel Henrique

Re: rhash_1.4.1-1 is ready for upload

2021-01-08 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Aleksey, > Could you, please, give me DM upload rights for rhash? Done! Thanks for your work! It should take a few minutes for the permissions to take effect, you will receive an email once it's done -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request to review and upload libvhdi_20201018-1

2020-12-21 Thread Samuel Henrique
> upload to unstable right away. > > We don't have to care about programs manually compiled by the user, those > are outside of our control. And honestly, we're not speaking of a popular > library here so... Agreed and uploaded! -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Intro and Intent to Package

2020-12-04 Thread Samuel Henrique
t to hear, I don't really remember how much is still missing to be done as I know you pushed more changes. I take it that since you still have intent, and packaging is on salsa, the rest of the team is free to help on any changes needed and hopefully we can make it reach bullseye :) Cheers, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: tomb (2.8.1+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1) ready for upload

2020-12-04 Thread Samuel Henrique
ded, have a good weekend :) -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Switch to KGB

2020-11-27 Thread Samuel Henrique
Thanks for that Raphaƫl and Unit193 :) -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Intro and Intent to Package

2020-11-27 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Christian, I hope you are doing well, I'm sending a ping on this thread as we are getting closer to the bullseye freeze, but there's still time to get this package on it. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request to review and upload libvhdi_20201018-1

2020-11-27 Thread Samuel Henrique
ust the binNMUs are fine. Views from the rest of the team are welcome :) Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: DD Ping: Review of Tomb for CVE-2020-28638

2020-11-15 Thread Samuel Henrique
create a bug against release.debian.org and wait for the ACK for the upload (freel free to CC me). I suggest taking a look at the current open bugs to look for examples. Thanks for your work :) -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request to review and upload libvhdi_20201018-1

2020-10-26 Thread Samuel Henrique
; the backwards compatibility breakage, the risk here being that things built outside our official repos might inadvertently break when linked against the new package. In the end, if upstream does not provide a new release with a bump, we will have to evaluate which will be the alternative with less downsides. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request to review and upload libvhdi_20201018-1

2020-10-25 Thread Samuel Henrique
ing the whole section and please feel free to reach out to me or to the list if you have any questions, Thanks for your work -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request to review and upload dfdatetime_20200824-1

2020-10-23 Thread Samuel Henrique
Francisco, can you ask to join the team through Salsa? Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request to review and upload libfsntfs_20200921-1

2020-10-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request to review and upload dfdatetime_20200824-1

2020-10-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: help with sleuthkit symbols

2020-07-29 Thread Samuel Henrique
is sleuthkit itself. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request to review and upload rhash_1.4.0-1

2020-07-20 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Aleksey, Given that I knew I wouldn't need to ask for any changes in your upload, I let this review request skip ahead of my TODO list. Uploaded. Just a reminder (I believe I said it before), please apply for DM, I would be happy to advocate for you :) Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Intro and Intent to Package

2020-07-11 Thread Samuel Henrique
rease the security and reliability of the binaries. Typos: Just in case you've missed it; lintian spotted a few typos on the project, you might wanna fix that or log a ticket. Please note that this is definitely not a blocker and can be addressed in the future, I just wanted to report them out. Alright, I believe that's it, I tried to perform an in-depth review since it's the first contribution to the team and some of the things here are not blockers, please feel free to discuss any of the topics. Thank you for your work and contributions :) Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Intro and Intent to Package

2020-07-07 Thread Samuel Henrique
but they happen because the submodule is a library that should be packaged separately. Not all libraries need/should be packaged separately, but some do, so it's on a per case basis. I will review the package soon, so I will be able to give a more specific feedback, Thanks for your work, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Intro and Intent to Package

2020-07-03 Thread Samuel Henrique
ood chunk of policy violations. Llintian gets called on salsa-ci automatically (together with some other tools to check package issues) and it's also a good idea to make sure you run it when building the package locally (if you don't already) so you can catch the issues before pushing. Rrgards, -

Re: Intro and Intent to Package

2020-07-03 Thread Samuel Henrique
in the repo, it will run when a debian/salsa-ci.yml file gets pushed. -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Webhook for arno-iptables-firewall

2020-06-07 Thread Samuel Henrique
not a DD, anybody will be happy to extend it. Tell me if you're still having issues, Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: DD Ping: please review proxytunnel

2020-05-19 Thread Samuel Henrique
. Sven, you did a very good job on the package and I gave you DM permission so you can work on the new upstream release "v1.10.20200507" that happened a few days ago :) Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: DD Ping - New release for nmapsi4

2020-05-16 Thread Samuel Henrique
nds to ftp-master Guess you can do this one yourself now, happy uploading :) Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: DD Ping: please review proxytunnel

2020-05-16 Thread Samuel Henrique
to push changes, you can take this opportunity to also bump DH13. I believe that's all, you did a very good job with the package and I'll be happy to upload it after you solve these small issues. Thanks for your work. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: DD Ping: please review proxytunnel

2020-05-13 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hey, Sorry is taking me so long to review, but I will get to it before the end of the week, As usual, if someone has the time, feel free to do it before me. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: RFS: New dnstwist upstream version and bug fix (was: Test suite issue fixed for dnstwist)

2020-05-04 Thread Samuel Henrique
package, it's very interesting and I will try it out myself for some domains I own, the autopkgtest also leads to some interesting results, hahaha. Thanks for your work -- Samuel Henrique

Re: RFS: New dnstwist upstream version and bug fix (was: Test suite issue fixed for dnstwist)

2020-05-03 Thread Samuel Henrique
just ask someone to bump the expiration for you. -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Granting janitor bot direct commit rights ?

2020-05-03 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hi all, > Thus I'm really tempted to grant commit rights. > > What do you think? I think it's a good idea as well. -- Samuel Henrique

Re: DD ping [Brutespray]

2020-04-26 Thread Samuel Henrique
doing soon). > Thank you for your patience and your precious help Samuel. You're welcome, I'm happy to help. Package uploaded, keep up the good work :) -- Samuel Henrique

Re: DD ping [Brutespray]

2020-04-23 Thread Samuel Henrique
Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Maintaing proxytunnel through the team

2020-04-22 Thread Samuel Henrique
r you pick. Also, thanks for your inputs Marcos and Julian, Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: DD ping [Brutespray]

2020-04-22 Thread Samuel Henrique
why, but this case is very rare from what I've seen. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: DD ping [Brutespray]

2020-04-21 Thread Samuel Henrique
how to address it. 3) "I: brutespray source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.4.1 (released 2019-09-29) (current is 4.5.0)" Please take a look at the Debian policy upgrade checklist and bump the version to 4.5.0. Thanks for your work on the package! [0] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/rules-req

Re: Maintaing proxytunnel through the team

2020-04-21 Thread Samuel Henrique
it's not as precise as having the commit id. The package is also not building for me, and I believe it's a general issue, it's better if you take a look at that before we push it to the team's repo as you can freely mess with the git history for now. Thanks for your work, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: I'm a DM now, was: Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-3 ready for review and upload

2020-04-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
er with fingerprint 3DF5E8AA43FC9FDFD086F195ADF50EDAF8ADD585 Uploading samueloph-1585779012.dak-commands to ftp-master Done :) Feel free to ping the list, or me, if you have any trouble. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Our policy around gbp.conf

2020-02-09 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello all, On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 00:25, Samuel Henrique wrote: > > I ended up not doing it before the end of FOSDEM, but will do it soon (in > 7 days time), > > Thanks. It would be nice to have a script to configure our repositories >> with that kind of change.

Re: Our policy around gbp.conf

2020-02-08 Thread Samuel Henrique
date > https://gitlab.com/kalilinux/tools/packaging/tree/master/auto-update.d > > Feel free to re-use adapt and make it available in the pkg-security-team > repo: > That' s great, will do it. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Our policy around gbp.conf

2020-01-30 Thread Samuel Henrique
= False [dch] multimaint-merge = True Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

About your NMUs on pkg-security packages

2020-01-29 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Adrian, It's very likely that the pipeline never worked for them and that you were the first one to trigger it. I can't confirm right now but I would say don't worry about it. Regards

Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.1.0-1 ready for review

2020-01-23 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Sven, I believe you forgot to push the pristine-tar branch, can you do it? Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Our policy around gbp.conf

2019-12-30 Thread Samuel Henrique
. > +1, and it also hides the file from the salsa wgui, which is not that much of a big deal, but in an similar pro/cons scenario I would rather have it in debian/gbp.conf. [0] https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#skipping-the-whole-pipeline-on-push -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Our policy around gbp.conf

2019-12-30 Thread Samuel Henrique
e if I'm wrong. So the updated proposal would be (drop export-dir and cleaner): [DEFAULT] debian-branch = debian/master pristine-tar = True [buildpackage] sign-tags = True [import-orig] filter-pristine-tar = True [pq] patch-numbers = False [dch] multimaint-merge = True Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-3 ready for review and upload

2019-12-02 Thread Samuel Henrique
DM only one advocate is required, more is better, sometimes other people from the team might do it when they see your application, or you might ask them directly, but you already have the required number of advocates so you can start the process as soon as you want, it's your call now to wait or not :) Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-3 ready for review and upload

2019-12-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
should be DM/DDs already. PS.: If you've been contributing to the team for some time and you feel like you're ready to become a DM/DD, feel free to ping whoever worked more with you to discuss about it, sometimes we just overlook things and forget to ask people to apply. Regards, -- Samuel

Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-3 ready for review and upload

2019-12-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Sven, Uploaded, sorry for the delay. -- Samuel Henrique

Re: testssl.sh 3.0~rc5+dfsg1 in Debian

2019-11-10 Thread Samuel Henrique
upload. I will raise a thread on debian-legal next time I have some free time to see what people think about this. But it's sure that in a best case scenario at least d/copyright will need to be changed. Thanks for your work! -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request to review and upload snoopy_2.4.6-6

2019-11-10 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Aleksey, Thanks for working on this, uploaded. You forgot to add the hashtag to the closes entry in changelog, I did that for you. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: [request-for-help] o-saft maintenance and openssl

2019-11-05 Thread Samuel Henrique
this is feasible, or even if they don't have any idea about it. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: testssl.sh 3.0~rc5+dfsg1 in Debian

2019-11-05 Thread Samuel Henrique
same issue as o-saft, another ssl vuln detector, as it needs to have an old version of openssl to check for legacy stuff, otherwise it won't support them. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

[request-for-help] o-saft maintenance and openssl

2019-10-13 Thread Samuel Henrique
ntime, > actually it's the diff of o-saft and o-saft-dev :-) > > You may use it like: > env inst=/usr/share/o-saft INSTALL.sh --install --n > > Let me know if I should improve or adapt INSTALL.sh. > So yeah, we need to think about a way of having o-saft with support for all of the openssl things, and also probably split the package into a gui and a dev one. Thanks! [0]https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803259 -- Samuel Henrique

tomb (2.6+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1), please review and upload

2019-10-06 Thread Samuel Henrique
Uploaded. Regards,

Objections to enable salsa-ci in our packages?

2019-10-05 Thread Samuel Henrique
All done, yml pushed and pipelines enabled for all of our packages. I'm fine with it, but please make sure to skip the CI for the initial > push. Otherwise you will have grumpy salsa admins. They asked the python > team to not do this at all. (But python team has many more packages) > > >

Objections to enable salsa-ci in our packages?

2019-09-29 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hey team, If nobody objects, I will be enabling and pushing salsa-ci.yml to all of our packages soon. Cheers, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: tomb: Bug #935197 fixed, please review and upload new version

2019-08-24 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Sven, Uploaded, thanks for your work, and congratulations on being listed as an Author[0]. [0] https://github.com/dyne/Tomb/blame/187a627022f759f4f3b8b4fc1c07ccc2dc68ba03/AUTHORS.md#L31 -- Samuel Henrique

Fwd: reducing volument of KGB notifications on IRC

2019-08-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
ardent fan of viewing CI logs. > > fair enough. I noticed that the python team has two channels: > #debian-python for humans, and #debian-python-changes for notifications. > maybe we could do something similar? Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Tomb 2.6+dfsg1-1 not migrated to testing

2019-08-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Sven et all, After you sent this email somebody triggered a binNMU so now it should be all fine. I believe this happened because SZ Lin didn't make a source-only upload, and that is required for the testing migration now. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Help with t50 i386 non reproducibility, or, possible "march=native" like problem

2019-05-13 Thread Samuel Henrique
lsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/t50/commit/9b22426eb48a1564ca1415b3916ed2eebecbcc70 -- Samuel Henrique

Help with t50 i386 non reproducibility, or, possible "march=native" like problem

2019-05-12 Thread Samuel Henrique
ctive here is identify the source of the non-reproducibility on i386, in order to know if it's related to some cpu specific thing being changed at compilation time, which would consist of RC bug. Thanks, [0] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/t50.html . -- Samuel Henrique

mdk4 (0~git20181205-2) is not suitable for Buster

2019-05-12 Thread Samuel Henrique
is that mdk3 doesn't support 5.8Ghz AFAIK. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Upload to experimental for dnsrecon

2019-04-15 Thread Samuel Henrique
write one already but you will need two. I have some stuff from DebConf19 to work on during the following days. Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Upload to experimental for dnsrecon

2019-04-15 Thread Samuel Henrique
tures, today is the last day to request for bursaries (during the registration part). If not, you will have to find a way of getting one more DD signature before starting the process. Regards, [0]https://nm.debian.org/process/613/keycheck [1]https://debconf19.debconf.org/ -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload chkrootkit

2019-02-28 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Marcos, Uploaded, Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request review/upload recon-ng

2019-02-28 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Marcos, Sponsored, Thanks -- Samuel Henrique

Re: request for review upload: braa

2019-02-23 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Marcos, Upstream fixed two bugs in braa [0]. > The two fixes that I can see on the package aren't upstream's, one is yours and the other one is from Helmut, I'm assuming you mean these two. > Please review/upload. Done, Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload for snoopy

2019-02-23 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello, Uploaded, Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: cowpatty, aircrack-ng and arno-iptables-firewall: bpo9 tags missing?

2019-02-23 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Sven, I wonder whether there should be tags in our repository marking the > recent bpo9 uploads of cowpatty, aircrack-ng and arno-iptables- > firewall. > Yeah, I had forgot about them, all pushed now. Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: pyrit package

2019-02-04 Thread Samuel Henrique
check if this check is also failing on your machine? This is a blocker for migration to testing, so without fixing that, the package will not arrive to Buster. As the package has autopkgtests, it takes only 2 days to migrate to Testing, so as long as the upload is made until ~8th February it should be ok. [0]https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Using_autopkgtest Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of rhash 1.3.8-1

2019-02-04 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Aleksey, Uploaded, thanks for your work :) -- Samuel Henrique

Re: pyrit package

2019-01-31 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Marcos, Created: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/pyrit Please note that if you want to see pyrit on Buster, you only have some days left until the soft freeze. Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: radare2-cutter initial upload; possible radare2 update?

2019-01-23 Thread Samuel Henrique
I don't know if I will have time to, but if you feel like you could use some help, please let us know on the list and maybe someone can give a little hand. Considering we are close fo the soft freeze, I think radare2 would have to be uploaded very soon. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-2

2019-01-19 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Sven, I believe we should not backport 2.0.3-1 anymore but start to do so > with 2.0.3-2. > Perfect, uploaded. Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of recoverdm 0.20-6

2019-01-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello, Regarding the smoke tests you added, I think it would be better to declare >> them as "Restriciton: superficial"[0]: >> > Done. > Sponsored, thanks for your work! -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of galleta 1.0+20040505-10

2019-01-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Aleksey, On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:55 PM Samuel Henrique > wrote: > >> Regarding the smoke tests you added, I think it would be better to >> declare them as "Restriction: superficial"[0]: >> > Done. > Sponsored :) > This simplifies backpo

Re: Request for review/upload of galleta 1.0+20040505-10

2019-01-18 Thread Samuel Henrique
a side note, I'm not sure I know the difference between: > debhelper (>= 12~) > and > debhelper (>= 12) > If anybody could give me a light here, I appreciate :) Thanks for your work Aleksey, I will upload as soon as you add the tests restriction. -- Samuel Henrique

Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4

2019-01-15 Thread Samuel Henrique
complete have to leave > to you? Yep, that's the steps, feel free to do it and ping me once you want me to review and sponsor, please note that we can only upload after 2.0.3-1 hits testing. Thanks for your work Sven, Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4

2019-01-14 Thread Samuel Henrique
kaging flaws in > place. > Let's just backport 2.0.3-1. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of gpart 1:0.3-6

2019-01-13 Thread Samuel Henrique
org/pkg-security-team/gpart > As this package is currently being maintained by Eriberto and he is very active, It is better if he sponsor the upload. Otherwise, in case he doesn't have time in the near future, I can do it. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: RFS: arno-iptables-firewall/2.0.3-1 [ITA]

2019-01-13 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Everyone, Finally got some free time to review the package, I think everything is ok, I just did some little changes on d/copyright. Thank you everybody who helped review and test the package, and Sven for the packaging :) Uploaded. -- Samuel Henrique

Re: RFS: arno-iptables-firewall/2.0.3-1 [ITA]

2019-01-07 Thread Samuel Henrique
o a comment asking if that was needed, I didn't properly read the scripts yet but agree with you, we can remove that parts because they are for versions prior to old-old-stable. Feel free to remove them. Regards, [0]https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of libpff 20180714

2019-01-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Aleksey, I just noticed another thing, you can update d/watch now to follow github tags, the upstream started tagging releases recently. Could you please commit that? I'm not sure if it's worth another upload, but at least it will be already fixed on git. Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: RFS: arno-iptables-firewall/2.0.3-1 [ITA]

2019-01-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
work Sven. * Note that you don't have to be a DD or DM to review the package, everyone is welcomed and that's a good way of learning packaging, you also don't have to check everything, feel free to send checklists of the parts you checked and confirmed that are ok. -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of libpff 20180714

2019-01-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
on the email that this was announced), but there's a chance that's only gonna be a problem until we release Buster. Anyway that is not a problem as long as you're aware that you have to roll it back for backports, at least for now. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique

Re: Request for review/upload of libpff 20180714

2019-01-01 Thread Samuel Henrique
"Forwarded" tag[0]. Thanks for your work, and a happy new year. [0]https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/ -- Samuel Henrique

Re: RFS: arno-iptables-firewall/2.0.3-1 [ITA]

2018-12-31 Thread Samuel Henrique
, there should be a button to join the team on the wgui but I'm not familiar on where should it be, this can be solved later as you have access on the one I created now. I will probably be able to review the package tomorrow after reviewing Aleksey's libpff. Thanks for your work -- Samuel Henrique

<    1   2   3   >