On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 04:19:19PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 03:39:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
But... that's not actually supposed to be necessary. Quoting:
[...]
| The first partition has to be ext3 or fd, not swap because swap
| writes from first block and
Another poster brought up a good point: what would the disk size
requirements be for such a machine?
a
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 08:25:51PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
As a part of etch release qualifications [0], sparc must have at least one
(preferrably more) developer- and porter-
on the list are ready
to give me help when I need some.
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Filip Meuleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Andrew, Chris Mr [EMAIL PROTECTED];
debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 6:45 AM
Subject: Re
In that case, it is running a ultraSPARC-2 compatible processor made by
HaL (later bought by Fujitsu) and while it does run Solaris, because
Solaris has been ported to the processor (I helped port Solaris 8
to this processor back in the day as a contractor for Fuj), Linux
does not work on it. It
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:38:11PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I have here an SS20 which has run Woody reliably for an extended period. It
has
2x Ross 625 CPUs, PROM 2.25R and 256Mb RAM.
It runs single-processor 2.4.27 from Sarge reliably, but attempting to boot
SMP
gives an
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:46:06PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:45:33AM -0700, Ben Collins wrote:
Wow, let's just stretch the meaning to burden things even more. Needs two
buildd's, but wait two machines isn't
My spanish isn't so great, but I think I get the gist here. The problem
is that software raid sometimes is problematic on disks with sun disk
labels, so the installer just doesn't play along like it does on x86.
If you want to do this, you have to do it post-install, by hand, and I
recommend that
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 05:54:32PM +0300, Timo Aarnipuro wrote:
Hello
I have xfree86 with gnome running on Ultrasparc 2 (4X300MHZ smp)
platform. The system appears to be leaking memory.
here's top:
top - 17:45:38 up 7:28, 4 users, load average: 0.39, 0.20, 0.20
Tasks: 99 total,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 07:58:44AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is an old Sparc 2 here, happily running Woody with Apache
and Postfix.
Seems that a simple technique for upgrading to Sarge is to replace
every occurance of woody with sarge in /etc/apt/sources.list
and then update
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 02:27:47PM +0100, Tom Taylor wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to set up an Ultra 2 with s/ware raid 0 with the intent to
set LVM on the top . I know that LVM supports stripping itself, but I
would like to do it this way anyway.
The machine is a dual Ultra 2 (2x 296MHz/2MB)
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:05:33AM -0700, darin strait wrote:
Background:
I have an Ultra10. It does very light duty as my personal subversion
server and as a print server for the apartment. I would like to add
Questions:
Unless I'm mistaken, my Ultra10 will only hold 2 drives in addition
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:01:02PM -0400, Robert Wolfe, OpenSource Solutions
wrote:
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 02:31:36 +0100
John Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks I have a number of Sparc Station 5's coming soon will sarge run on
them? I think they have 450MB hard drives and 65Mb of
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:11:45AM +0200, mag wrote:
2005-07-25, h keltez?ssel 14.06-kor Blars Blarson ezt ?rta:
In my opinion, we should drop support of all 32-bit sparc systems from
Etch due to lack of people willing to spend the time to support them.
I have just decided to give a try to
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:26:51PM -0600, Eric Jorgensen wrote:
I've got an ss10 that's running woody, was dist-upgraded from potato. It
is in a remote facility running headless.
woody is obsolete
OK, I just wanted to say that to someone once. Things like potato,
hamm, etc. '... is
I think he needs to comment out the loading of the dri module in the
XF86Config file. This one is covered pretty extensively in past
threads, perhaps searching the archives would help.
a
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 02:18:11PM +0200, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
Have you tried afbinit?
Daniel van
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:40:51AM -0400, maccorin wrote:
hello.
I run debian on a headless U60 (serial connection to install). I would
really like to be able to access PROM through the serial cable without
having to reboot, but sending a break does not work as it should. I
have been
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:37:51PM +0200, Alex Bartok wrote:
Hello Kathleen,
Friday, July 23, 2004, 10:51:01 PM, you wrote:
KM No file system mounted on /target
KM Installation Step Failed.
KM However I still encounter the same problems when going back to the
KM GUI installer.
KM
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 08:14:01PM +, Michael Rex wrote:
Quoth Michael Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I mounted the share, copied a small file to it, everything went fine.
I copied a larger file (about 300kb), the process hangs and the latter
messages appear in syslog.
After some more
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:43:03PM +, nick macro wrote:
I am running Debain Woody 3.0 r3 on a Sun UltraSparc 5 with 128Mb RAM, 8Gbyte
hard disk.
I am running GNOME window manager.
I previously had the same problem on a Ultra 1 with 128Mb RAM, so I do not
think this is
a hardware or
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:10:36PM +0200, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
Hi,
Is there a raid patch available for recent 2.2 kernels ? The latest I
can find is for 2.2.20. Also, is there a version with 2.4 compatible
superblocks ?
I want to try 2.2 on my SMP Hypersparc SS20 (2.4 is only stable in
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:50:22AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian Sparc
Subject: Re: Ultra 5 install problem
snip
Now before you go bashing on
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:55:31PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Have a SS20 SMP machine now running unstable.
Schweet.
Video card is a cg6 IIRC. Having hand hacked XF86Config-4, I'm
nearly there but now can't find font fixed.
Uh, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you're
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:08:51PM -0800, Nicolas S. Dade wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:48:06AM -0800, Abe Olson wrote:
1. How do I add something to the default run level? I need afbinit to
run before X starts so I can have a fast(er) X experience.
Put it in /etc/rc2.d/. All those
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 08:32:40AM -0600, Alex Yung wrote:
Is your SBUS NIC a Happy Meal Ethernet card? hme is not compiled in the
Sparc32 kernel 2.4.21. Perhap, try this:
modprobe sunhme [macaddr=0x0,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x0]
You only need to specify macaddr if you want a different mac from
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:52:58PM -0600, Art Haas wrote:
Hi.
About a year ago I got a SparcStation 20. The machine has two internal
hard drives, each 1 gig. I put Debian Woody on it - worked like a champ
of course - and fiddled around with the machine for a while.
Unfortunately the disk
Before you turn off the PC that is connected to the Sun's serial
console, remove the cable from the sun. That way, the sun will stay
running and you won't have these problems.
a
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:38:26AM +0100, bath66 wrote:
Hello,
I'm using a Sun Ultra (sparc64) which is running
Have a look at the NFS-Root howto, and check out the packages nfsboot
and nfsbooted and maybe some parts of netboot (I don't think the boot
rom code in the latter will be of much use, and certainly isn't needed
for sun boxen). The howto has most everything, however. I was able to
put together a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:58:08AM +0100, Antonello wrote:
Hi there,
I was wondering if there's a way to restore data from a Linux/SPARC
formatted drive (ext3 filesystem with Sun disklabel and the like) using
a standard x86 PC for disaster recovery purposes.
Plugging the drive into the PC
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:16:24PM -0400, Heitzso wrote:
Eric Wong wrote:
I used very conservative optimizations, but nevertheless, it looks good
in some cases.
http://www.yhbt.net/normalperson/debian/html/benchmark.html
apt-fu and my modified pentium-builder available here:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:45:26PM -0500, Steven Wilcoxon wrote:
My experiances with dual and quad x86 systems that should blow an E4500 out
of the water have shown me that in multiprocessor applications, as the load
increases, the E4500 handles the loading much better.
My personal opinion
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:38:01AM +0200, Roberto Giorgetti wrote:
After your kind suggestions...
these are the actions that I performed to solve the random single
character file corruption I have been experiencing for about three
months in my Ultra 5 running Debian stable.
3.Frank Van
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:57:13PM +0200, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:29, Patrick Morris wrote:
Kent West wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/snert cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu : TI UltraSparc III+ (Cheetah+)
fpu : UltraSparc III+ integrated FPU
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:05:21AM +0200, Antonello wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:35:54 -0700
Andrew Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does mplayer use VIS? I know on my box that has mplayer (x86 ville) it
uses far more CPU with the SDL than when I specify xv as the video
output device
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:34:37AM +0200, Antonello wrote:
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 00:37, Martin wrote:
What sort of tasks? I can believe heavily FP intensive tasks (like
multimedia) are easier on an Athlon (even better on a PPC 9450 Iwould
have thought) but I find that the
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:15:53PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Just to double-check I installed kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 (no smp)
and everything does work fine under it. The same version of that
package, except with the added -smp, causes breakage.
Any chance you have one of the old
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:32:28PM -0700, MattW wrote:
I know this isnt a sparc processor question, but I thought
maybe it made sense to ask here, in more of a sun-debian
context than the main list Im just wondering if anyone
knows if the standard x86 debian will install on sun's x86
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 08:47:04PM +0200, Nathanael Camelot wrote:
Hi all,
We received at work a 6 CPU SunFire V880, and Solaris installation
isn't planned before mid-August. Would it be interesting for anyone
I try a debian install ?
It would be interesting to me. ~:^) You might note the
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:25:15PM -0500, Roy Bixler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 04:10:43PM -0400, Robert C. Mosher II wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:07, Roy Bixler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:40:20PM -0400, Robert C. Mosher II wrote:
I have been trying to compile a kernel to
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 11:07:44PM +0200, Philippe Sainte-Marie wrote:
Hi
I'm having troubles with my Ultra5 and RTL8139 PCI Ethernet card.
Here is what happens:
eth0 is integrated Sun Ethernet Adapter with local ip 192.168.1.42
01:01.1 Ethernet controller: Sun Microsystems Computer
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:03:06PM -0500, Chuck Brown wrote:
I am able to read the CD in my Windows2k machine and browse the directories.
Alas, I do not have another bootable Solaris CD to try. If you know where I
could get an image of one, I'll burn it to disk and give it a try.
Thanks!
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:02:52PM +1000, John Hedge wrote:
This comes under the heading of 'nice to have' so I wouldn't want anyone
to break stride in answering this problem but maybe someone has trodden
this path before!
Not to worry.
I have a multi-homed U1. 1 motherboard 10 base T nic
Sh-, the rack alone is worth $1. You could sell off the car battery
sized SCSI drives and recoup double your money! And the tape library
machine, well, what would be really cool is if you could convert it
to serve drinks rather than tapes. Talk about free beer! The total
capacity of the tape
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:06:04PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
Hey, all. I'm trying to broaden my horizons, so I've taken one of my infra-
structure machines that was running NetBSD and I've installed Woody on it.
One thing I notice right off the bat is that things are a good bit more
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:47:32AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:31:37PM -0700, Amit Mehra wrote:
Hi,
Few questions to the linux users who have worked on Sun Ultra 10
I have a Sun Ultra10 workstation(UltraSPARC-IIi 300MHz, 256 MB RAM) and
plan
to port a HPUX
Perhaps you have a problem with the way you built your kernel. I've had
a similar problem if I did something that changed things in between
doing a make vmlinux without doing a make clean first. Translation:
do a make clean before a make vmlinux and see if the resulting system
map doesn't work
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:20:14PM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
Assuming you've got a keyboard and monitor, hit Stop-A as it's coming
up, then type boot cdrom at the ok prompt.
If you are using a serial console, sending a break should do the same
thing.
Ben Reubenstein wrote:
The system
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 11:12:58AM -0400, Ben Pitzer wrote:
Andrew,
Thanks for getting back to me with this, as it seemed to be a good
possibility. Unfortunately, it isn't working. Apparently, ethtool doesn't
support QFE cards, only HME on Sparc systems. I have an HME on this system,
I
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 12:01:17AM +0100, James Ireson wrote:
Get a apple macintosh modem cable and a null modem adapter... Both
standard bits that you can buy pre-made
The apple macintosh modem cable I have has a DIN connector on one end,
looks just like a PS/2 connector. What will that work
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 08:29:10PM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote:
Hi!
I have a Sun Ultra1[0] here, and want to make a firewall out of it.
So I put in a second ethernet, SBus, 270-1881-02 rev 1 (AUI/BNC),
but the kernel doesn't seem to recognize it (eg only eth0 shows up
in dmesg[1]).
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 05:37:11PM -0400, Marco Rodriguez wrote:
On 3 Apr 2003, Dave Love wrote:
For interest, what's the big advantage of XFS over ext3, especially on
a system disk?
this may be a good reading:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfsm=104623484026425w=2
any way XFS
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:54:22PM -0800, Joshua Uziel wrote:
You both need to use the patch at
http://sparclinux.net/pub/patches/U1-hme-lockup.patch
* Shawn Wallbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030314 11:28]:
I have had many problems with hme's under both Debian and OpenBSD. I have
decided to
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:06:58PM -0800, P Ballasy wrote:
Hello all,
Being unfamiliar with Sun hardware and any Debian
distro, I have some specs to run by you all to see if
I should, in reality, dump the Solaris 5.7 OS on our
Sun Enterprise 250 and replace it with Debian 3.0.
Hardware
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:48:11PM +, Taras Ciuriak wrote:
William Law wrote:
Taras,
I had similar troubles with my sparc5-110. I found that the first
CD would not boot properly. I ended up resorting to boot floppies, then
changing media to the CD for the rest of the installation.
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 04:45:52PM -0800, Niall Parker wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Irvin Probst wrote:
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 21:55, Niall Parker wrote:
Unfortunately the system hangs after the Booting Linux ... prompt, no
further messages.
IPX are sun4c, so
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:03:48PM +0900, John Wood wrote:
anyone had success getting xine to run under woody
(xfree 4.1), with a cg14 (sx) framebuffer running
at 32bpp??
can it be done?
if xine requires xv (it doesn't iirc) it will not work since there is no
run xine-check. it will
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 02:39:10PM -0500, Scott Walker wrote:
so I bit (bite?) the bullet and downloaded debian and burnt it to cd.
I stuck it in the U10, and gave the ol' boot cdrom and got told where I
can stick it with this error message..
Rebooting with command: boot cdrom
Boot
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:12:05PM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
Sven Lankes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:14:22AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
Device FlagStart EndBlocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 0 2733 2077080 fd Linux raid
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:28:02PM -0400, Bill Meahan wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:11:21 -0400
philo vivero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead, I booted with the rescue image which, for whatever reason,
did a normal install. Here's what I did:
ok boot cdrom
. . . blah blah blah
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:10:42PM -0400, Bill Meahan wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:56:36 -0700
Andrew Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:28:02PM -0400, Bill Meahan wrote:
[snip]
exactly.
Well, what you are possibly talking about isn't about PC assumptions
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:29:49PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:37:23PM +0200, Robert Ian Smit wrote:
Sorry for starting a new thread. For me it's safer than adding
headers found in the archive.
Anyway, Ben Collins suggested:
apt-get --purge remove
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 12:07:36AM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
Problem: I'm trying to install Debian onto an old SparcStation 20 via
CDROM, but the disk doesn't boot.
Nothing is wrong with the SS20, as I've successfully loaded Solaris7
onto it in a fresh install. And when I put the
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:54:28PM +0200, Pieter-Paul Spiertz wrote:
Hello,
I'm doing a network install of Woody on my Ultra 5, and I hope to be able
to dualboot to Solaris 9, which is already on it. I have read some FAQs, but
I guess I have made a few silly false beginner assumptions.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:39:03PM -0300, Antonio Luiz Pacifico wrote:
Hello for all,
I'm getting the following problem.
I run Debian GNU/Linux on a Ultra 30. Until now I have been using kernel
2.2.19 and I did not have problems.
Today I downloaded the Kernel 2.4.19, compiled it and...
On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Christian J?nsson wrote:
I have a little problem here.
I had a SS20 (sun4m) system running debian 3.0 on a serial
terminal... Now I have just installed a TGX video card and hooked up a
real terminal and keyboard but I do not get to the login prompt.
The netinst image at ~bcollins doesn't work because it's looking for
.../images-2.88/rescue.bin, but there is no images-2.88 directory, only
images-1.44. Is there somewhere else that I should be getting this? I
must say that going to www.debian.org and trying to get any cd image
pointers for
Sageev George wrote:
While I've had some progress with trying to make my Ultra 30 print,
I've had no real success. What I have done so far is
adding the modules, parport_pc and lp. I have also
did MAKEDEV par, MAKEDEV parport, and MAKEDEV lp.
During the installation of the parport_pc
Mark Eichin wrote:
I was surprised that no one was really pushing qmail or sendmail.
Why were you surprised? qmail, while useful, isn't DFSG-free. And
sendmail is pretty much a legacy system :-) (Although in theory it
has improved, the phrase a security hole you could drive a
Andrew Sharp wrote:
Sageev George wrote:
While I've had some progress with trying to make my Ultra 30 print,
I've had no real success. What I have done so far is
adding the modules, parport_pc and lp. I have also
did MAKEDEV par, MAKEDEV parport, and MAKEDEV lp.
During
James Ireson wrote:
I've just moved a happymeal card over from my SS5 (where it was working)
to my IPX to try and create a multihomed box to solve some problems I'm
having with routing...
The IPX can see the card however I'm getting messages spewing to console
where the happymeal seems to
Christian Jönsson wrote:
After beating on the linux-2.4.19-preX for sparc32 SMP for a while,
I get the feeling that 2.4.19-pre10 is pretty ok. Furthermore,
the sparc32 cleanup being e-mailed to the sparclinux list seems to
further improve quality of the kernel on sparc32 systems.
I'd like
Ben Collins wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 01:05:14PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
Christian J?nsson wrote:
After beating on the linux-2.4.19-preX for sparc32 SMP for a while,
I get the feeling that 2.4.19-pre10 is pretty ok. Furthermore,
the sparc32 cleanup being e-mailed
Michael Mueller wrote:
On Monday 27 May 2002 04:51 am, Andrew Sharp wrote:
snip
You can remove the startup links for gdm with the command
# update-rc.d -f gdm remove
I tried this but I found that
# update-rc.d -f gpm remove
worked a little better :)
I've been mistyping gpm
Michael Mueller wrote:
When I power up my Ultra5 both gpm and xdm are running and they evidently do
not play nicely together. I telnet in to the Ultr5 from another system,
become root, and issue
$ /etc/init.d/xdm stop
$ /etc/init.d/gpm stop
Then I log in to my user account on the
Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:17:34AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:39:12PM +0200, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
I've found a bounce of problem using serial port with my SS20.
I've to try my Courier V.Everything, but for now i've not able to make
Christian Jönsson wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 06:06:31PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 11:50:44PM +0200, Christian J?nsson wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 04:38:59PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:35:49PM +0200, Christian J?nsson wrote:
Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
This is a -user question really, but I'll cover it real quick.
I kindof figured that, but since previous stuff I'd seen didn't cover
this situation (they suggested switching to another virtual terminal
but this is headless).
I got one of these dual athlon m/b from tyan (with 2 1.4GHz Athlons
and DDR memory -- talk about a sick fast machine) for a client (alas
not for me), and it had a feature where you can get the thing to do
the post/bios cruft onto the serial port instead of the keyboard/vga
port. It did kind of a
Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
At Mon, 11 Feb 2002 it looks like Bob Van Cleef composed:
Has anyone seen any indication of a sea change since the press release
stating the Sun was embracing Linux?
Hmm, well there have been actually two announcements in the last two
weeks that have raised
Eric Huiban wrote:
p.s. Any happy debianer playing with SBUS FDDI adapters (AMD AM79C830 +
sram + ATT FFDI xcvr) here ? I'm unsure that a so old stuff can be
used with Linux... :-)))
Er, no, but I've got an sbus card that says:
CDDI(tm)/MLT-3
on the external plate, and has status and
Tille, Andreas wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote:
What happens when you try the user level nfs server?
The nfs-user-server always worked like a charm and does now as well.
But I really thought it would be depreciated and wanted to try
nfs-kernel-server over and over again
MPfeifer wrote:
Excellent, so you have a work around ~:^) Seriously, the kernel
version will only give you better performance (depending on what the
processor is), and who really needs that? Anyway, this sounds like
what do you mean with depending on what the processor is?
does NFS
Tille, Andreas wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote:
Excellent, so you have a work around ~:^) Seriously, the kernel
version will only give you better performance (depending on what the
processor is), and who really needs that?
Performance and security. Well NFS is insecure
Tille, Andreas wrote:
This was my impression that something went really wrong inside the
kernel. UNfortunately I have neither time nor enough knowledge to
track down the problem into the necessary detail to file a reasonable
What happens when you try the user level nfs server?
a
Jonathan Amery wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Ok,
I go for 2.2.20, but still can't
2) - get raid stuff work, at least with 2.2.20 kernel shipped with potato
Debian distrib (when I'll come to have stock 2.2.20 run , I may try :)
Right - I've just been talking to the
Del Campo, Damian wrote:
I installed debian potato to a SS2 off of a CDrom. When the installation
reboots and starts the package installation, it can't mount the CDrom.
It says that the CDrom is not a block device. What does this mean?
Figuring that maybe my CD rom is problem, I watched
James A Morrison wrote:
When I first got my Ultra 5 and was using software from sunfreeware I
also had configure scripts indicate that gcc was a cross compiler. After
talking to the maintainer of sunfreeware, he concluded I must have been
missing some development libraries from sun because
Mike Renfro wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 05:39:52PM +0200, Loic Jaouen wrote:
Look at the /usr/local/pkg of your solaris box and tell me if you
don't see there: tar, openssl, gmake, gcc ... Just something to
take care of /usr/local/pkg and /usr/dangerous/pkg for generic and
Mike Renfro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 04:12:44AM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
What's wrong with Solaris' package system? I found in two seconds a
web site with a large number of the most common packages used in
linux and freebsd packaged for Solaris package system. They worked
Frank Stolze wrote:
Hi there,
I installed Debian 2.2r3 on a Sun Ultra 2 via a serial port console. After
that
I successfully used Debian via the serial port (except console-tools not
installing successfully).
Now I added a Sun monitor keyboard to the machine. I can boot Debian
Nah. The better question is do they have the CD? Of course, you
can download for free the Solaris 8.1 CD images from Sun's web site
and burn your own. Virtually all Ultra5s have a CDROM drive,
although I suppose it's possible someone took it off.
a
Patrick Morris wrote:
This is assuming,
Michael Hicks wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 03:58:17PM -0500, Michael Hicks wrote:
Why aren't any raid modules included in the official kernel packages
for UltraSparc?
Because most likely the ioctl's aren't written to support them on
Paulo Graça Rodrigues wrote:
Hello!
I have a sparc station 5 running Debian Linux, kernel 2.0.35.
My libc6 version is 2.0.105-2.
I need a ftpd server to install on that machine (I don't want
proftpd, just a simple ftpd).
I've looked in some ftp archives but all ftpd daemons need libc6
Ben Collins wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 09:32:18PM -0700, Jeff Wyman wrote:
The file I am copying is:
linux/arch/sparc/boot/vmlinux.o
It was my assumption that the kernel was placed in this location. The .o
extention did look suspicious to me, but as far as I know, this is where
Anton Blanchard wrote:
Try the solaris test again, Binkey, and this time use a filesystem
other than /tmp for the output. Try setting up a ufs-log file
system and see if the performance doesn't exceed that of linux.
I would think that Solaris tmpfs was faster than their filesystems
My dual processor SS20 works fine with the 2.2.19-smp kernel
package. You don't need 2.4 for that. And the sun4u package isn't
going to work on a sun4m machine anyway, even if 2.4 was working on
sparc32 machines.
a
Joël Soete wrote:
Hi all,
I found an old Sun Sparc20 station with dual
If it's an important part of your network, it doesn't seem to make
sense to risk significant down time and/or admin work to switch to
2.4.
Why are you so keen on moving to 2.4? It must be a very good reason
to risk destabilizing the machine.
If it was a small amount of extra work, it would be
Simon Read wrote:
If it's an important part of your network, it doesn't seem to make
sense to risk significant down time and/or admin work to switch to
2.4.
Three reasons:
My network is not a production network.
OK.
If it was a small amount of extra work, it would be done
isaac jones wrote:
Jason Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:47:22AM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
After quite a few aborted attempts, I finally got Linux running on my
SunBlade 100. Here's a brief outline of what worked.
Have you had any success getting
Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
:- Ben == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When the system boots, hit the STOP and A keys to get to an ok prompt.
Once there type boot cdrom. This assumes that your cdrom is SCSI ID 6.
Dumb question...
What if the cdrom is IDE? Is the boot code
ooh. perhaps this is what is wrong with 2.4.2 on my SS20, which
won't load from SILO. Memory is 512MB, which I believe is the
maximum config. Different problem, but the slink install wouldn't
work on the same machine because of too much memory, so back in
those days I was running --gulp-- RH
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
