Re: how many iptables rules can a VPS have

Hi, On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 06:04:34AM +0800, Northwind wrote: > I have been using a KVM vps with 2G ram, 2 cores. > due to fail2ban jobs, iptables in this vps has dropped 3000+ black IPs. > may I ask how max iptables rules the VPS can have? It depends upon the kind of rule but for a typical

how many iptables rules can a VPS have

Hello I have been using a KVM vps with 2G ram, 2 cores. due to fail2ban jobs, iptables in this vps has dropped 3000+ black IPs. may I ask how max iptables rules the VPS can have? does many iptables rules influence the networking performance? Thanks

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

Hi, On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:55:54AM -0700, Chip Smith wrote: > convention  as it pertains to the 127.0.0.1 iIP address is that it > is meant to be used for testing purposes on a whole. I am quite sure that plenty of production traffic goes over localhost network connections on millions of

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:49:58PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Greg Wooledge > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:40:38PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:13 AM Paul M Foster > > > >

Re: Off Topic - Rede das Operadoras sem senha

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 3:50 PM Paulo Correia wrote: > > Nem eu sei quantas operadoras e nvmo existem. > Você acredita que ir no Procon e falar que quero abrir contra todas as > operadoras vai resultar em algo? > No mínimo o Procon vai rir da minha cara. > A ANATEL é inerte a isso e só fala pra

Re: Bookworm: Weird Firefox issue

Hello, sometimes some cooperative sites had similar problems e.g MS's O365 or Oracle's support site. In these cases removing stored cookies and website data helped. In addition cache can be deactivated in FF Developer Console (Ctrl-Shift-k) in the tab "Network(ing)". Here you have a

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

Thr n convention  as it pertains to the 127.0.0.1 iIP address is that it is meant to be used for testing purposes on a whole. Moore information may be found in the links below. https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1085 https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1918 On 5/24/24 10:07, Paul M Foster

Re: Off Topic - Rede das Operadoras sem senha

Nem eu sei quantas operadoras e nvmo existem. Você acredita que ir no Procon e falar que quero abrir contra todas as operadoras vai resultar em algo? No mínimo o Procon vai rir da minha cara. A ANATEL é inerte a isso e só fala pra você cadastrar o seu número no naomeperturbe.com.br o que é

Re: Off Topic - Rede das Operadoras sem senha

Exato Leandro, os bancos se limitam a dizer que devemos seguir a cartilha sobre seguranca. Ocorre que ferramentas sao desenvolvidas crescentemente para recolhimento de dados e posterior ataques. Sem atribuicoes de culpa por falta de investimento em cyberseguranca, redes de comunicacoes

Re: Off Topic - Rede das Operadoras sem senha

Apesar de ir no STJ ser algo muito fora da casinha. E até concordar que eles tem outros casos mais urgentes a tratar. Mas, recomendo sim. No mínimo judiciário. Aprendi que um processo faz com que o governo ande. Mas, talvez antes levar esse caso a mídia fosse interessante, quem sabe todos

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:49:58PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:40:38PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:13 AM Paul M Foster > > > wrote: > > > > 192.168.254.30

Re: Off Topic - Rede das Operadoras sem senha

Onde está escrito "brincar" leia-se "binar". Corretor Maledeto Obter o Outlook para Android From: Paulo Correia Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 10:45:54 AM To: luigui ; debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Off Topic - Rede das

Thunderbolt i debian 12: Thinkpad x390

Bona tarda, Obro un fil nou per a mostrar els veus avenços. Aprofito per explicar les coses que m'he anat trobant per a les persones que encara no heu tocat aquesta tecnologia. Spoiler: Era el cable, però tot i això no acaba d'anar del tot la cosa # BIOS Anem per la part més de ferro. A la BIOS,

Re: Aliases and OpenSMTPD

On Fri, 24 May 2024 13:08:56 -0400 Paul M Foster wrote: > There is a colon in my aliases file. I just omitted it in the email. Don't do that. Always use copy and paste to convey the contents of a configuration file. Murphy only know what else you inadvertently left out or added. -- Does

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:40:38PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:13 AM Paul M Foster > > wrote: > > > 192.168.254.30 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite > > > 127.0.1.1 is traditionally used for the fully qualified

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri 24 May 2024 at 13:40:38 (-0400), Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:13 AM Paul M Foster > wrote: > > > > Folks: > > > > In my /etc/hosts file, there's a line: > > > > 127.0.1.1 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite > > > > I think Debian put it there. > > > > Later in the file, I've

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:40:38PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:13 AM Paul M Foster > wrote: > > 192.168.254.30 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite > 127.0.1.1 is traditionally used for the fully qualified domain name > (fqdn). So I would expect to see

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:13 AM Paul M Foster wrote: > > Folks: > > In my /etc/hosts file, there's a line: > > 127.0.1.1 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite > > I think Debian put it there. > > Later in the file, I've got: > > 192.168.254.30 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite > > So there are two entries for

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:22:13PM +0100, Joe wrote: > Long ago, lo used to be just 127.0.0.1, which is what most people would > try to ping to check localhost, and what appeared in /etc/hosts. There > is some subtle reason, which I used to know but have now long forgotten, > why Debian started

Re: Aliases and OpenSMTPD

Paul M Foster writes: [...] > If I send an email directly to pa...@yosemite.mars.lan from buckaroo, > it What does this mean? > > But it appears that OpenSMTPD doesn't consult this table unless explicitly > instructed to. According to man smtpd.conf(5), you can tell it to scan > through

Re: Aliases and OpenSMTPD

On Fri 24 May 2024 at 13:08:56 (-0400), Paul M Foster wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 06:40:09PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:45:56AM -0400, Paul M Foster wrote: > > > > > If I send an email directly to pa...@yosemite.mars.lan from buckaroo, it > > > arrives.

Re: Off Topic - Rede das Operadoras sem senha

Olá, On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 8:38 AM Paulo Correia wrote: > > > As centrais telefônicas, estão fazendo ligações se passando por qualquer > número. > Todas as operadoras tem que se unir para colocar senha na Rede, assim impedir > que isso ocorra. > Ou seja podem utilizar o seu número para fazer

Re: live-build: what do live-task-* do?

Hi, Hans wrote: > I am playing around with live-build. This package has its own specialized mailing list: debian-l...@lists.debian.org Have a nice day :) Thomas

Re: Aliases and OpenSMTPD

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:08:56PM -0400, Paul M Foster wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 06:40:09PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:45:56AM -0400, Paul M Foster wrote: > > > Folks: > > > > [...] > > > > > If I send an email directly to pa...@yosemite.mars.lan

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:23:55PM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2024 17:17:45 +0200 > wrote: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > If you operate mail servers, you must have a FQDN. .lan can't be > > > used for the global DNS stuff, so

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:22:13PM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2024 11:40:30 -0400 > Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:22:14PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > > Am 24.05.2024 um 17:17:45 Uhr schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > > > > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:49:18PM

Re: Aliases and OpenSMTPD

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 06:40:09PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:45:56AM -0400, Paul M Foster wrote: > > Folks: > > [...] > > > If I send an email directly to pa...@yosemite.mars.lan from buckaroo, it > > arrives. That means this config can do what it's designed to

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, 24 May 2024 11:40:30 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:22:14PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > Am 24.05.2024 um 17:17:45 Uhr schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > If you

Re: Aliases and OpenSMTPD

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:45:56AM -0400, Paul M Foster wrote: > Folks: [...] > If I send an email directly to pa...@yosemite.mars.lan from buckaroo, it > arrives. That means this config can do what it's designed to do, basically. > However, mails to "root" on buckaroo don't get to yosemite.

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:40:30AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:22:14PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > Am 24.05.2024 um 17:17:45 Uhr schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > If

live-build: what do live-task-* do?

Hello everyone, I am playing around with live-build. So I see several packages called "live-task-*" (for example live-task-xfce), but I can not see any changes in the live-build tree, when I install them or not. Checked through the manuals, but I found no information, what I have to do with

Re: Off Topic - Rede das Operadoras sem senha

No meu caso, recebo em media 4 a 5 ligacoes diarias de entidades que se dizem passar por bancos. Vc citou o principal, Anatel, orgao que precisa ser reestruturado e coresponsabilizado juntamente com tais operadoras. Tal inercia serve apenas para fomentar a criminalidade e desordem nas redes

Aliases and OpenSMTPD

Folks: This may require someone who's familiar with OpenSMTPD. I have a machine which does backups (buckaroo) and a desktop (yosemite) which is my main machine. When anacron kicks off the backup, it should create an email for root to detail what happened. Buckaroo is headless, so I want that

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:22:14PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > Am 24.05.2024 um 17:17:45 Uhr schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > If you operate mail servers, you must have a FQDN. .lan can't be > > > used for the

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:22:14PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > Am 24.05.2024 um 17:17:45 Uhr schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > If you operate mail servers, you must have a FQDN. .lan can't be > > > used for the

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

Am 24.05.2024 um 17:17:45 Uhr schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > [...] > > > If you operate mail servers, you must have a FQDN. .lan can't be > > used for the global DNS stuff, so set a proper FQDN that belongs to > > you. > > I think

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote: [...] > If you operate mail servers, you must have a FQDN. .lan can't be used > for the global DNS stuff, so set a proper FQDN that belongs to you. I think this is wrong in that sweeping generality. Cheers -- t signature.asc

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

Am 24.05.2024 um 08:05:43 Uhr schrieb Paul M Foster: > In my /etc/hosts file, there's a line: > > 127.0.1.1 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite > > I think Debian put it there. Should be there so the hostname is resolvable - even when not in DNS. > Later in the file, I've got: > > 192.168.254.30

Re: Off Topic - Rede das Operadoras sem senha

Então, vou dizer como descobri. Estou recebendo ligações de vários números. Alguns tem ZAP e pergunto pra pessoa se ela me ligou. Ela até mostra print do histórico de chamadas. Aí acabei descobrindo que as centrais telefônicas podem brincar (se passar por qualquer número) e que as operadoras não

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

Paul M Foster wrote: > Folks: > > In my /etc/hosts file, there's a line: > > 127.0.1.1 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite > > I think Debian put it there. > > Later in the file, I've got: > > 192.168.254.30 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite > > So there are two entries for the same (my) machine. Is

no more sound after upgrade (trixie/sid)

My notebook has Trixie for most packages, then some from Bookworm and a few form Sid. Pipewire used to output sound just fine until yesterday, when I upgraded the whole system via aptitude and rebooted. Until yesterday I also had rc-buggy in my sources-list, but then I removed it (before

Re: Synaptic Update Error

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 08:14:16AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > E: Release file for > http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/dists/bookworm-updates/InRelease is > expired (invalid since 1d 15h 6min 44s). Updates for this repository will > not be applied. Slightly worrisome. > deb

Re: Address 127.0.1.1

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 08:05:43AM -0400, Paul M Foster wrote: > Folks: > > In my /etc/hosts file, there's a line: > > 127.0.1.1 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite > > I think Debian put it there. Correct. This is the address that will be used if you don't have a static LAN address. > Later in the

Synaptic Update Error

During a routine update I got the error: E: Release file for http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/dists/bookworm-updates/InRelease is expired (invalid since 1d 15h 6min 44s). Updates for this repository will not be applied. /etc/apt/sources.lis entries are: # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux

Re: Off Topic - Rede das Operadoras sem senha

Gostaria de saber melhor sobre esse assunto. Acho que o zelo da credibilidade da lista compete a todos. Mesmo que seja algo noticioso, e' valido discutirmos. On 23/05/2024 12:55, Atenágoras Silva wrote: Pode explicar melhor o problema? Em qui., 23 de mai. de 2024 às 08:38, Paulo Correia

Address 127.0.1.1

Folks: In my /etc/hosts file, there's a line: 127.0.1.1 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite I think Debian put it there. Later in the file, I've got: 192.168.254.30 yosemite.mars.lan yosemite So there are two entries for the same (my) machine. Is this a problem? Specifically, could it cause

migrating grub from BIOS to UEFI loses /etc/default/grub

Hi folks, if I migrate from grub-pc to grub-uefi, then grub-pc.postrm removes /etc/default/grub on the final purge. grub2 doesn't provide much information in its man pages, but AFAICT /etc/default/grub is still processed for UEFI, so why is it deleted? Regards Harri

nologin: Attempted login by UNKNOWN

Bon dia, M'agradaria saber, si algú ho sap explicar o té referències, què és el què fa que s'enregistrin aquestes temptatives d'inici de sessió quan arrenca el sistema operatiu: $ sudo journalctl -b -p err may 24 08:54:23 system nologin[11802]: Attempted login by UNKNOWN (UID: 1) on UNKNOWN

Re: Will te UUID or blkid of a device change?

Hi, Hans wrote: > > I want to make sure, that the correct USB-stick is used. > > Thus I can do by using the UUID of the target stick like > > dd if=/path/to/myfile.iso of=UUID="123456-abcd-" David Wright wrote: > # dd of=/dev/disk/by-id/JetFlash_Transcend_4GB_JKNB2FYG-0:0 … …

Unidentified subject!

Suppression Envoyé depuis mon appareil GalaxySupprimer m. Briquet Jacques qui est décédé 

Unidentified subject!

Supprimer m. Briquet de votre liste Il est décédé Envoyé depuis mon appareil Galaxy