Craig Dickson wrote:
I don't know what PSE Pro is; does it really work only on 1.3? You can't
use 1.4.1? What I've done for a few things is use 1.4.1 with the
j2ee.jar from 1.3 (since AFAIK there is still no jdk1.4-ee). I haven't
found this to cause any problems.
i have the same problem. but
Craig Dickson wrote:
Is there some apache module that will notice various IIS exploits in
real time, look up the proper contacts and report it to the
corresponding abuse contacts automagically?
In some circles, that would be too easily mistaken for a DDOS attack tool.
assuming that the
Gregory Seidman wrote:
Is there a policy reason why there is no xv package, or is it just that no
one has bothered to package it?
do you mean xview? i think xv is the old name.
cu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:22:12PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Hi people,
> This feels like a stupid question but I've failed to find the answer
> anywhere, so here goes.
[long text cutted]
i think these error messages are printed by the klogd.
$ man klogd
[...]
-c n Sets the def
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:59, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> apt-get install procmail. Then, in your ~/.procmail/rc.recipe file,
> make sure you have something like:
>
> ## filter all mail through SpamAssassin ##
> :0 fw
> | spamassassin -P
i would suggest to replace the spamassassin wit
> Did anybody experience something similar?
i am also using the latest mutt and i have no problem. maybe you can try
strace to identify the problem. try to run a
$ strace -f -o mutt.log mutt
and take a look at the last few lines where the segfault happens.
HTH
cu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
u wrote:
>BTW, why don't people put their public keys on key servers like
>pgp.mit.edu? The keys would be propagated to other servers anyway; the
>ones in pgp.net. I believe that would make our lives a bit easier; one
>definition of keyserver in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf, we could retrieve others'
>pub
Am Mon, 2002-10-07 um 23.39 schrieb David Grant:
> I'm having a bit of trouble getting Apache to work in Woody. I can
> reach it from http://localhost:8080, but I can't get to it from
> http://:8080. I've allowed incoming connections to the web port
> 8080 using Guarddog, and I'm fairly posit
Am Mon, 2002-10-07 um 22.33 schrieb Michael Heironimus:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:17:26PM +0200, Fred wrote:
> > -How do I solve this ? Echoing a different max number ?
> > is it a definitive solution (how about the next boot) ?
>
> I'm not sure why you have so many files open, but yes, you ca
Am Mon, 2002-10-07 um 22.36 schrieb Michael Heironimus:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 08:47:31PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> > I noticed today that not everything responds to SIGTERM anymore...
> > SIGKILL, SIGSTOP and SIGCONT still work, but SIGTERM does not.. in some
> > cases.
>
> I don't
Am Son, 2002-10-06 um 13.45 schrieb Seneca:
> > is there somewhere a mirror which contains also a j2se 1.4 version? and
> > possibly j2ee 1.4?
>
> Well, if it doesn't matter if you have to manually install, take a look
> at the contents of:
>
> ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/bl
Am Son, 2002-10-06 um 02.13 schrieb Jaye Inabnit ke6sls:
> Thank you. I just sent a reply to another response questioning where
> j2se-common was! Anyway, I modified the apt link to:
> deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian
> woody non-free main
> and it work
Am Don, 2002-10-03 um 20.37 schrieb stan:
> I'm trying to check out the IO preformance on one of my Debian GNU/Linux
> boxes, and it does not seem to have iostat. s there a package I need to
> install to get this, or is this done a different way in Linux, than classic
> UNIX?
goofy@igate:~$ apt-c
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:59:15AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
>> Is it possible to change the -name option of a current xterm or rxvt?
>> How?
>
> You can't change the command-line options for already running processes.
> But if what you want to do is to change the window title, then: yes.
may
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 05:48:23PM +, Lourens Steenkamp wrote:
> Why am I learning Debian with a view to switching??
> I am truly tired of RPM based systems ...
yep
i have started to use linux with suse (the first german distribution)
long time ago. than i have changed to redhat. and after
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 15:14, Tom Massey wrote:
> * Anand Parikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 22:49]:
> > Next I set up the Linux HD as A (active) and Win98 HD as B (standby).
> > I can boot up with Linux, but with Win98 the system just hangs, no error
> > messages. How can I fix this problem?
>
Am Son, 2002-09-22 um 22.36 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > i explictly grant permissions on demand and after some checks. i dont
> > give everyone access to a specific resource. so for security reasons the
> > exe-permissions should used really carefully. its like a opt-in into my
> > "security realm"
Am Son, 2002-09-22 um 22.36 schrieb Debian User:
> Ok, I am learning this umask util. I'm confused, if you set the umask,
> is that for any new file created on the linux system, or just the files
> in the paticular directory that the umask command was run in?
>
> This isn't listed on the man
Am Son, 2002-09-22 um 22.05 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 09:54:14PM +0200, Gottfried Szing wrote:
> > and for setting default permissions you can also consult the umask
> > functionallity. but i think this is very dangerous to turn x on by
> > default.
&g
Am Son, 2002-09-22 um 21.34 schrieb Debian User:
> I set up a Web Server here on my Debian Box.
>
> Question, is there any way to set a default file permission on a certain
> user folder inside the /var/www/ folder.
>
> I want to setup accounts for users to upload web files, but the problem
>
Am Fre, 2002-09-20 um 09.58 schrieb Adrian von Bidder:
> To my knowledge, although Release files are signed, packages are not,
> and not even the Release file signatures are usually checked.
>
> :-/
>
> So, theoretically, the need for trusted downloads exists today. Or the
> need for the securi
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 02:05:44PM +0200, Alex Polite wrote:
> I'm having problems with a "Too many open files" error.
>
> I've increased the /proc/sys/fs/file-max to 10 and the count in
> /proc/sys/fs/file-nr is no where near that.
>
> Further googling tells me that there is also a "open fi
Am Mit, 2002-09-18 um 23.52 schrieb Colin Watson:
> Always check the bug tracking system first.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/coreutils
>
> Note that the bugs filed about this have been closed by a newer version,
> which will be turning up on mirrors real soon now.
yep, thats true. today the mi
hi
i hope someone can help to fix my small problem regarding
apt-upgrade. today i have upgraded with (slightly
reformatted output)
igate:~# apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back
analog ash fileutils gsynapti
24 matches
Mail list logo
