Marco Tasinato wrote:
In this way clamav intercept the virus, exim4 reject the e-mail message
without notifying it to the receiver.
How can I enable clamav to sent an notification e-mail to the receiver
when clamav finds a virus and exim turns it down???
The more important question is
Paul Johnson wrote:
If you need a good example why trusting the From: header blindly like
it sounds like you want to do by making ClamAV do exim's job may be
found in the recent archives:
You're getting it backwards, Paul. He wants to notify the person the mail
is supposedly going to,
Maurice O'Regan wrote:
I would like to hear from and administrator who has such a
configuration, and is prepared to provide details of how to set it up.
If necessary, I am prepared to pay for a satisfactory level of assistance.
If that's the case why not hit guru.com?
--
Steve
Clive Menzies wrote:
After hanging back for a while, I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to
xorg a few days ago (amd64/sid) and all was hunky dory. A day or so ago I
also did a G4 (sid) and all is well.
This conversation prompted me to upgrade my laptop (Dell Latitude CPx) to
xorg. The
Ok, here's the problem I'm trying to solve. I have a laptop on which I am
running Debian pretty much 24/7. It is my work machine in that I try to
keep all productive work on that machine so if I ever need to travel I can pop
it out of it's dock, pack it up, and everything goes with me.
michael wrote:
I presume sshd is configured with
X11Forwarding yes
on your boxes?
Yup. Like I said, the SSH tunnel works fine as I was using it to write
the message. IE, right now TBird is displayed on the desktop from the laptop
through SSH. :)
Thanks for the sanity check,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Ok wrong authentication!? What't the hell's going on now? The
laptop's got the desktop's xauth cookie. The desktop has xhost wide open to
the entire world. The SSH tunnel is up and running fine; I'm using it right
now to write this! So what bloody freakin
michael wrote:
as bad or worse than [X]vnc?
Yes. XVNC isn't all that bad, really. Well, correction, TightVNC. I've
not used the base VNC in years. Anyway, TightVNC isn't all that bad. On the
LAN there's no 2-3s pause to redraw portions of Thunderbird that were
overlapped by other
Ron Johnson wrote:
Anyone know why kernel-source-2.6.x was renamed to linux-source-2.6.x
for 2.6.12?
If I had to hazard a guess it is because Debian has other projects (Hurd,
BSD) which have kernels which are not the Linux kernel.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm
Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
however, fails. No matter what password is entered, the system refuses to
let us in as root. The root-password can be changed without problem
when `su'-ed to root so the problem is not that it's mistyped at the
prompt or anything.
What does /etc/securetty say?
--
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
I just installed xfce4 in stable version. i noticed that the package
xfce4 has not a dependecy requiring that a X server is installed, is
it a bug or a precise policy?
I don't believe it is. There's nothing that says the display has to be on
the local machine.
--
Rajiv Vyas wrote:
I need XP only for MS Project 2003 and Dreamweaver. Need to use both
those software for a program I am doing.
Do they run under Crossover? If you only need 2 apps you could drop XP
completely if they do.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your
Ron Johnson wrote:
Whaddaya mean a while back? It's still in Sid...
Erm, based on me not being able to find it with locate. I figured it
had been subsumed into the shells like some other former external commands. :D
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink,
Tim Connors wrote:
It's not that clear!
It's clear enough for people who are interesed in finding an answer to be
able to do so. I agree it could provide more information. But that does not
mean it isn't clear.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm
Please don't CC, it is against list policy.
Ian Greenhoe wrote:
The difference between sufficient and clear is the difference between
Error: 2 and Error: Access denied. They both mean the same thing,
at least according to errno. :)
Y... And what's the difference between
Martin McCormick wrote:
Other directories seem normal. What could possibly be going
on here? Here is a listing of what is in bin. There is a file named
[ but that is the only strange thing in the listing and it is not
causing the behavior:
Well, I can't say why it is happening
Tim Connors wrote:
Or what about
automatically doubling each time it runs out of room, and starting again
(along with an appropriate warning message as to how not to keep doing
this)?
Kinda defeats the purpose of limiting the amount of space the process
uses. I mean which is better, a
Michael Marsh wrote:
I'd say the most optimistic explanation is that google is finding what
it's able to find while respecting site owners' wishes.
Which is, incidentally, more than MSNBot does. It slammed my forums for
months, several connections at a time. I put in a robots.txt to tell
Marty wrote:
I don't see what legitimate purpose it might serve, and I wonder if the
posters' wishes or search engine users' interests, or even public
interests, enter into consideration? I suppose not.
The public has no interest. As for a legitimate reason having constant hits
from
Marty wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
The public has no interest.
But google shareholders do? I hope that's not what you mean.
Nope. Simply pointing out that the public is an entity which in and of
itself has no interests. The public is a collection of individuals, each of
whom have thier
Marty wrote:
I wonder how SPI would respond to that statement.
Would be interesting, wouldn't it. I mean you are talking about a
collective of individuals who have decided that some software should be
funded. Just because they say it is in the public interest doesn't mean the
public wants
Marty wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
No, it's just some recent change that google made.
So you claim. And your proof is... what?
See my answer above.
What you gave was not proof. It was supposition based on your
observations on a *dynamic system*. IE, the same term used today
phyrster wrote:
Can anacron run hourly jobs?
Nope. Isn't that what cron is for?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
Hal Vaughan wrote:
People do things like that because they have the illusion they can control
others. It's a nasty habit, and it says more negative about the person doing
it than the person they are jumping on.
No. It's called letting people know they're being rude. Don't like the
askar k wrote:
In shorewall/rules I set up the line:
DNATnet loc:192.168.0.100 tcp 80
Is my setting correct? It doesn't work.
That sets it up so that any incoming connection from the zone defined as
net on tcp port 80 is forwarded out the zone defined as loc to
Robert Wolfe, MCP wrote:
When you click on Reply To All in gmail, it will cc the mailing list
address like this message.
And unless you trim the CCs out will violate list policy like you just did.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP
Nathaniel Homier wrote:
Does anybody know of an replacement that is as good as Azureus.
There isn't one. The only one that comes close is g3torrent.
Unfortunately the main author programs it for Windows and the person who does
the semi-regular Linux ports does some rather appalling things
Jacob S wrote:
There are not currently any ports forwarded from the firewall to this
computer and we do not have any access to the firewall to enable
something like this, either. What I am hoping is that I can have them
establish an ssh connection into my firewall with some software that
Branden Faulls wrote:
Following instructions at: http://koivi.com/exim4-config/
I added a transport to /etc/exim4/conf.d/transport/30_exim4-config_spamcheck
and a router to /etc/exim4/conf.d/router/850_exim4-config_spamcheck_router
I can say up front that something is amiss with those
Paul Stolp wrote:
I truly believe that man should be one of the first
programs a new user should get familiar with.
Agreed. Too bad that GNU doesn't go along with that. .
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main
Jacob S wrote:
What happened to humans being smart enough to make things look neat and
clean?
It went away around the time when humans stopped taking responsibility for
their own actions.
When I first came to this list, I observed how others posted, received a
few tips when I messed up
Stephen R Laniel wrote:
XML is chatty. But please: a few hundred extra megabytes
won't kill you. Not on hard disks that *start* at 40 gigs.
Now apply that to the providers that have to transport and store several
hundred thousand in a day.
The trouble is that everybody has different
Stephen R Laniel wrote:
This XML format would be no more of a burden on sysadmins
than HTML email or large attachments. Less, in fact.
Point being that any increase of message size cannot be blithely dismissed
at one level without looking at the impact on other levels.
The word
Stephen R Laniel wrote:
How many people do you think have 1.4-gig email
archives? Gmail's original 1-gig archive was supposed to be
enough for a lifetime.
Which is marketing talking, not technical realities. How many people do I
think have 1.4Gb archives? It's easier to ask me how many I
Stephen R Laniel wrote:
Speaking of netiquette (since the topic is top-posting,
which is supposedly a violation of some norm or other),
being a screamy dick in email is a violation. I'll only
respond to the un-angry folks.
Nope, not screaming. As I prefaced, since you clearly missed the
Stephen R Laniel wrote:
I get a few hundred messages a day, and I never delete any
mail other than spam. My archives over the last *four years*
total about 900 megs.
Happy for ya. My dad hasn't upgraded his email client in 5 years and has
mail going back 5 years beyond that. Just because
Stephen R Laniel wrote:
Well, yes: so that they wouldn't kill people. The
consequences of being unable to use a command line (which is
different from computer illiteracy -- being computer
literate means being able to use a web browser, word
processor, c.) are pretty minor, really.
Is it?
David E. Fox wrote:
You might check this posting[1] on Mandrake expert advocating highly
redundant rar files for the backups.
Let me point out I am a big fan of RAR. Have been for, what, well over a
decade now. However, some of what you're saying is untrue.
Also, with tar or gzip, you
Mal Beaton wrote:
rsync to get a complete picture of the system then rdiff-backup for
incremental changes. I actually keep a seperate old box with big disks
just for the backup. I like rdiff-backup as you can do such stuff as
restore this file as it was x days ago. Beats having to dig out the
Stephen R Laniel wrote:
I wonder if I may be so bold as to suggest the final word
about top- or bottom-posting. Here it is:
Nope. Here's the final word.
Your email program should be smart enough to customize to
your preference.
Pipe dream.
Email messages should look like so:
roberto wrote:
how to achieve this in vim?
vim can find matching braces, be they curley, square or parens. If I
recall correctly it is %. Python's declined my need for such matching. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key:
roberto wrote:
the problem are not braces, sorry, but just pattern because i'm currently
editing matlab files, so without braces...
Heh, without knowledge of what matlab source looks like I was presuming
there'd be braces in there somewhere. :D
Ok, what I've come up with. A quick
Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
... and I should have said.. and then use ~/dominik as your ~.
Don'tcha mean I should have said, chmod 700 ~
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~} pwd
/home/grey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~} ls -ld /home/grey
drwxr-xr-x 59 grey grey 2856 2005-07-04 03:51 /home/grey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~} chmod
Lee Braiden wrote:
root needs to be responsible, trustworthy, and trusted. Since root can do
virtually anything, it makes no sense to *try* to hide things from him/her.
The best you can do is to obscure things, so that root won't accidentally
find them out without trying to. If you don't
Lee Braiden wrote:
I'm not sure what you're getting at. The alternative of not having anyone
who
is trusted?
Yup. Imagine trying to install something when even root cannot write to
the install directories. That's what NT was like without admin privies on any
user.
--
Steve
John Kelly wrote:
And I see their $45 package only includes 15GB monthly transfer.
Velocity includes 400GB monthly transfer with their $69.95 package.
I like to read the fine print.
And the last time I had colo/VPS I was hard pressed to top 2Gb. That was
including the month where I
Paul Johnson wrote:
You haven't seen the series 2 tivos, or any of the hacks you can do to
an original tivo.
I certainly haven't and don't think it is relevant. In today's litigation
happy culture I would not want to have to rely on hacks of any box to provide
something it isn't supposed
Almut Behrens wrote:
(2) Install the new perl 5.8.7 in /usr/local and leave 5.6.1 as it is.
This is probably the safest bet. In your software that needs 5.8.0,
make sure you're calling the new version
This doesn't work to well with packages since the packages in question
could contain a
Stefhen Hovland wrote:
I am still recieving suboptimal usenet downloads from
news.giganews.com even after the 4mbps Comcast speed upgrade my city
went through a couple of months ago
What, exactly, is suboptimal pr0n downloads from giganews? 100kps?
200kps? 50kps? What makes you think
Bob Proulx wrote:
Samuel B Preston wrote:
I am trying to renew my subscription. Is this the place? How / why did the
renewal process go wrong?
You don't need to renew a scription to the debian-user mailing list.
When subscribed you remain subscribed until you unsubscribe from it.
See the
Mark D. Hansen wrote:
can anyone recommend a good hosting company that provides debian sarge
(either dedicated or virtual private server)?
Either tektonic.net or unixshell.com. Both are the same company, the only
difference being that unixshell.com is the for experts only Xen offering
that
Stefhen Hovland wrote:
Well, um, I used to be able to download pr0n at 400KB/s before the
comcast 4megabit speed for a good solid year and a half, and now since
the upgrade my speeds seem to be limited to ~200KB/s. Nothing else on
my end has changed
Any policy changes on Giganews' side?
Stefhen Hovland wrote:
Actually I did ask them this via their giganews.general newsgroup and one
of the staff members stated that they do not do any type of rate limiting
on any accounts, so that I believe shouldn't be the issue. I also was
wondering that myself..
Heh, ok. Just checking
fraz wrote:
How can I find libraries etc that were installed as dependencies, but
which currently have no dependants installed? IE the package that
caused apt to install them isn't installed anymore.
Personally I used aptitude for this. I simply marked the libraries branch
as Managed.
Kent West wrote:
I'm in America (USA to be specific), and I avoid math whenever I can.
It's calculators for me, whenever possible. :-)
Is it bad of me that I avoid calculators whenever possible and instead go
for a Python prompt? :D
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest,
steef wrote:
No message from ya so I presume you're wondering why he would be saying
there's a problem?
Illegal-Object: Syntax error in To: address found on mailgate.god.de:
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:gebruikerslijst
debian-user@lists.debian.org
He's partially correct and partially
steef wrote:
Vincent Lnngren wrote:
Actually, it refuses to defrag ext3 filesystems, because they have
unsupported features.
why would you do that for heaven's sake?
Vincent was replying to an old thread. Already discussed at length.
Check archives. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb
I am using GDM and have need for some things to start up and shut down
based on me logging into/out of my X session. I've done a basic check of
documentation but unless I am missing some DEEP MAGIC I didn't find anything
too fit the bill. I figured I'd ask here before I cracked open my
Jonathan Kaye wrote:
Hi Mitja,
Can you give us a hint?
1. What version of TBird?
Prime reason for some headers right there. ;)
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5
Because we're not playing Jeopardy.
Why is top-posting wrong?
Put up top for the top posters who are too lazy to do it right.
Hal Vaughan wrote:
It is not a strawman argument.
It is.
My point is that you have put yourself in a position to say, This is
right, you are making
Michael Martinell wrote:
Does anybody have any suggestions for this?
Erm, why the requirement for a web interface? That right there is the
killer because backup/restore is generally thought of an admin task which
implies to some degree having command line access on the box(es) in question.
Proofreading is a good thing. Why I never do it until the message is
delivered back to me is beyond me.
Steve Lamb wrote:
Point is that since it is a matter of technical detail, not moral nor
subjective as all points in favor of interspersing and against top/bottom
posting are *objective
Jacob S wrote:
It saved my life (well, several hours of it, anyway) when I accidentally
deleted all the mysql databases on my server. (Yes, it was a very stupid
mistake. Don't ask. :-)
Why do people always tease about a potentially humerous anecdote and then
tell us not to prompt for it's
Kent West wrote:
I say,, said Fred, that's a giant tuber!. - - Incorrect, but
technically more informative (or so I would think)
(*ducks*)
*tosses peanuts back at the gallery!*
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5
Kent West wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Proofreading is a good thing. Why I never do it until the message is
delivered back to me is beyond me.
...
and against top/bottomg posting ...
D'oh!
Meh, typos I'm less concerned about than sweeping generalizations I have
not confirmed (IE, all
Hal Vaughan wrote:
Actually, they are not as objective as one would think.
Statement with no backup, gotta love it.
Putting a few sentences together in reverse order is not a comparison to
top posting.
Yes, it is because that is exactly what top posting does.
There are many
David P James wrote:
On Thu 9 June 2005 22:12, Paul Johnson wrote:
The only time when top-posting is equal (not superior - equal) to
interspersed is under the following strict set of circumstances:
Even under those circumstances it isn't because most people don't
naturally do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A personal recommendation of your favourite window manager would be
much appreciated.
I'd say give XFCE4 a try. While I generally use KDE it wasn't practical
on my laptop w/only 192Mb of RAM. I tried different WMs and found most to be
either too bare bones, ugly
Paul Johnson wrote:
Modern mail readers include
reply-to-list as a basic part of standard functionality these days
(No, OE and Lotus Notes are not modern).
Neither is Thunderbird.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5
michael wrote:
I note that it seems that aptitude is recommended over apt for Sarge. I
was wondering if it's as str forward as just using aptitude from now on?
Pretty much.
eg I do not have to rebuild anything the first time i use aptitude (ie
it uses the same dpkg info as apt
Stephen Patterson wrote:
Either way (ssh or XDMCP) are much quicker than regular vnc.
As with all things, that depends. GTK2 applications would kill XDMCP on
my network (100mbit) so I switched to VNC and made sure to try each of the
encodings. Some of the encodings are slower over the
theal wrote:
But that will not tell me what is using swap only what is using a
resource. I need to determine what program or PID is actually causing my
swap to grow. I already know that it is growing, just don't know what is
causing it.
Uhm, is it growing uncontrolably or just growing a
Clinton V. Weiss wrote:
How effective is Dvorak in programming enviroments? Particularly Java,
are the key layouts any better?
Speed in programming is more a function of the language you use and the
tools with which you program said language. A cheap explination, whom do you
think
Rogério Brito wrote:
Not only Thunderbird, but other MUAs, independently of what platform you're
confined to use. That's the beauty of IMAP, IMVHO.
That's the beauty of properly implemented IMAP on the client side. I
remember back in my PMMail/2 beta test days ('94-'95?) trying to explain
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
Okay, at the risk of starting a flame war, it's still silly. Allowing
users to have 100,000 messages in a single directory is insane, and is
purely the fault of the administrator for not forcing users to download,
sort, archive, or otherwise deal with their mail in a
Erik Steffl wrote:
are you talking about pre-2k times only? I mean during last four years
imap support seems to be pretty good (and improving). Thunderbird
definitely isn't the first usable MUA, as far as imap support goes.
Nope. In the past few years I've tried Netscape, TheBat!,
Ron Johnson wrote:
Bull. Evo has always give the option to save Sent Drafts where-
ever you want to put them.
Yes, and where in my list did I say I tried Evo before 2003? You are
aware that I was expressing what I had personally verified, right? And you
are utterly incapable of
Michelle Konzack wrote:
OK, I have curently around 220.000 MAILDIR-Messages of the LKM in
my Folder on a FileServer which is a Sempron 2200 with 256 MByte.
Open the Folder with mutt takes around 57 seconds via NFS/100MBit
Ye, and if we were paying attention we'd see that I was talking
Erik Steffl wrote:
ok, so how come I was using mozilla email client since 2001/10/27 and
saving emails, moving to trash, saving drafts etc.? that qualifies as
past few years, right? BTW that's only with cyrus server (my current
setup), I was briefly using uw-imap before that and it worked
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
While I understand that maildir
allows you to isolate corruption to single messages instead of the
entire mailbox, I guess corruption just seems so unlikely that I
haven't worried about it. I'm sure it will bite me soon.
Strictly speaking mbox is no different.
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
This is a silly response. Maildir and mbox have different efficiencies;
it depends on what you're optimizing for. Maildir requires no locking,
and is more efficient for indivdual deletes;
It is not a silly response, it is factual. 500Mb of mail at an average of
5Kb
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
Squirrelmail seems to be extremely popular as a webmail client, so I
went with that. I chose Dovecot because it seemed pretty light-weight
and simple.
I'd say go with UW's IMAP server. It's not feature rich or perfect but
for home use it does the job.
michael wrote:
how do i decypher what the following HTML/javascript attempts (original
'write' was all one line)?
Personally, I used Python's urllib.unquote and got the following:
SCRIPT LANGUAGE=javascriptdocument.write('empty..');/SCRIPTscript
language=javascriptfunction dF(s){var
Jon Dowland wrote:
The fun is stopping a fork bomb, not starting one :-)
In the case of a Python thread bomb as described CNTL-C works nicely. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Hopefully, someone gets a chuckle out of this.
Bah, and to think I do that from time to time on purpose just to see how
far I can fork before the machine hangs. Last time was playing with Python's
threading. Decided to have a thread recursively start itself as
Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
And after 8 years using Linux all the time, I came to find the MS-land
rituals somewhat exotic (if unix filesystems take care of themselves,
why can't the so called New Technology File System?).
It can. NTFS is a dirivative of OS/2's HPFS. HPFS didn't have a
Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Ok, I get your message, but for my gratification, insight and knowledge
of Linux how do I get the programs to run without error and not distroy
my harddisk?
I'd say you're not getting the message.
You don't need to do it. Period. Full stop. There is no
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
On 2005-05-14, Ron Johnson penned:
Prettier??? Is that what's keeping your SO from using Linux?
Stereotype much?
Heh, I was wondering where the hell he came up with that one, too. Hehe.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm
Rich Rudnick wrote:
1. Reputable providers: Who do you use that you would recommend? UML
seems acceptable, since our load will be almost minuscule to begin with.
At least one static ip is a must.
I just recently obtained a VPS from Tektonic http://www.tektonic.net
and they have been great.
ken keanon wrote:
Starting with the maxim To beat MS you have to be as
good as, if not better than, MS, I am constantly
comparing the Linux I had installed with WinXP.
[snip]
What I find wanting in Linux is Device Management.
With plug-in, adding new devices to WinXP is a breeze
but not in Linux.
David Fokkema wrote:
I forgot: I bought a CanoScan Lide30 which I plugged into my laptop.
That was the hard part. The easy part was starting up gimp and selecting
'acquire' and clicking on my scanning device. It didn't even need the
install cd. Windows users were advised to first install the cd
Ron Johnson wrote:
Why do so many people persist in moving to deserts? It seems
really silly.
Better than California. 'sides, when you Oregonians decide to stop
huggin' trees to actually have a job market worth speaking and, oh, letting
people into your little communte lemme know, 'kay?
Dave Ewart wrote:
Not at all. US makes up approximately 5% of the world's population.
The arrogance of some in the US [1] who believe that only the US is
important, or that US == The World, annoys me.
[ Snip ]
The poster generalized about 300 million people. I wouldn't like to
generalize about
Rob Bochan wrote:
Are you a member of the 'scanner' group?
Nope. Added myself to it. Still no joy. Nothing in the /dev tree
appears to be chgrped to scanner. :(
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection
Ron Johnson wrote:
After you are added to a group, you must log out for the kernel
to see the change.
That did it. Thanks, Ron.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
ABrady wrote:
It won't help. I tried it and a few sanctimonious assholes decided
they're moderators and will do as they damned well please.
As opposed to you who thinks you're a moderator? Lemme put it this way;
why do you think those of us who do go off on tangents from time to time
Paul Johnson wrote:
Come on, Steve, you should know better. This is Linux, not MacOS. We
get the games.
Lemme know when ATI support gets to Linux so I can at least play City of
Heroes under Cedega. And natively, forget it. There's more to gaming than a
few FPS.
--
Steve C.
I'm attempting to get my Canon LiDE 20 scanner working. So far it works,
kind of. I can find it with lsusb. When I run xsane as a normal user it
cannot find the device. However when I run xsane as root it does find it.
xsane's help suggests this is because of a permissions problem on
Kent West wrote:
My personal opinion? Skip Testing and go straight to Sid. You have more
chance of breakage (although it's been very rare in my experience (about
3 years now)), but said breakage also tends to get fixed within hours
instead of 10 days. Same for vulnerabilities.
Or a nice
William Ballard wrote:
Plus we had forced bussing, which engineered a 50% white/black
distribution in every school. My idea of diversity is to see
as many black people as I see white.
Then here's a suggestion; tell 'em to stop killing each other and pump a
few more out if that's your goal.
1001 - 1100 of 2324 matches
Mail list logo
