Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Richard Owlett
atsoever. Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* Is this a bug or a feature? If a feature, why? A (mis)feature. Any executable text file without defined shebang is a shell script. In this case - a syntactically invalid shell script. So it can be executed, but the child shell will exit immediately. I

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 31 October 2018 10:39:17 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 31 October 2018 10:31:40 Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 10/31/2018 09:18 AM, Curt wrote: > > > > On 2018-10-31, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > > Debian

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Curt
orrupted file. >>> When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. >>> Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* >>> Is this a bug or a feature? >>> If a feature, why? >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- When you have fever you are heavy and light, you are small and swollen, you climb endlessly a ladder which turns like a wheel. --Jean Rhys, Voyage in the Dark

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 05:27:58PM +0300, Reco wrote: > A (mis)feature. Any executable text file without defined shebang is a > shell script. Not quite. An attempt to execute a file that doesn't have a valid magic number in the first few bytes triggers an ENOEXEC from the execve(2) call. If this

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 31 October 2018 10:31:40 Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > On 10/31/2018 09:18 AM, Curt wrote: > > > On 2018-10-31, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > Debian 9.1 with MATE installed from DVD set. > > > > > > > > Due a non-repro

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 31 October 2018 10:31:40 Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > On 10/31/2018 09:18 AM, Curt wrote: > > > On 2018-10-31, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > Debian 9.1 with MATE installed from DVD set. > > > > > > > > Due a non-repro

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Reco
Hi. On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 10/31/2018 09:18 AM, Curt wrote: > > On 2018-10-31, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > Debian 9.1 with MATE installed from DVD set. > > > > > > Due a non-reproducible sequence of events, a binary executable was over > > >

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Richard Owlett
MATE launcher pointed the corrupted file. When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* Is this a bug or a feature? If a feature, why?

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Reco
gt; reason, the > resulting file was tagged as executable. Replace your HDD today, don't give it another chance to corrupt your data. > A custom MATE launcher pointed the corrupted file. > When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. > Including *NO ERROR MESSA

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Curt
utable. I want to predict immediately that this can of worms will produce the longest thread in the history of debian user. > A custom MATE launcher pointed the corrupted file. > When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. > Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* > Is th

Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Richard Owlett
. When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* Is this a bug or a feature? If a feature, why?

Re: Unable To Determine Proper Package For BUG

2018-10-15 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
ruption. next->prev should be prev > (0533875c), but was c2b0df70. (next=c2b0df70). > [ 6787.703475] [ cut here ] > [ 6787.703477] kernel BUG at > /build/linux-43CEzF/linux-4.16.12/lib/list_debug.c:25! > [ 6787.703578] invalid opcode:

Unable To Determine Proper Package For BUG

2018-10-15 Thread Jeff Rickman
I have a syslog capture of a BUG that I seem to routinely hit under specific circumstances. I have other details that might be of interest to whomever is interested in this BUG. For example, this is a fully updated Debian "buster" system with a ext4 (OS) and ZFS (storage array) f

Re: openssl 1.1.1-1: bug?

2018-10-05 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:41:44PM +0200, Pétùr wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot connect to WPA2 Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with > openssl 1.1.1-1 (in sid today). I can connect 1.1.0f-3+deb9u2 version > (stable). > > Is it a bug in openssl 1.1.1-1 or some ki

openssl 1.1.1-1: bug?

2018-10-05 Thread Pétùr
Hi, I cannot connect to WPA2 Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with openssl 1.1.1-1 (in sid today). I can connect 1.1.0f-3+deb9u2 version (stable). Is it a bug in openssl 1.1.1-1 or some kind of incompatibility between openssl 1.1.1-1 and my radius server? The error log with the 1.1.1-1

Re: Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Brian
iled. > > > > Would you please help me take a look? > > > > --Error Details-- > > > > Reported error: > > > > > > > > /550 5.0.350 Remote server returned an error -> 550 Unknown or archived bug/ > >

Re: Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Brian
On Fri 14 Sep 2018 at 21:29:41 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: [snip] > So if you do not feel entitled (or are not allowed) to send the > "unarchive" command, then consider to contact Ben Hutchings and to ask > about the forth-and-back in that bug. Nobody is disallowed from

Re: Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Richard Owlett
Remote server returned an error -> 550 Unknown or archived bug/ DSN generated by: BYAPR05MB4613.namprd05.prod.outlook.com Remote server: buxtehude.debian.org If the email receiver is not correct, please help me forward it to the right receiver. Thanks! -- Best Regards

Re: Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Yanhui He wrote: > I need to update a 3rd PR to Debian by sending mail > to 896...@bugs.debian.org, but it always failed. > 550 5.0.350 Remote server returned an error -> 550 Unknown or archived bug The bug tracker page https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896911 s

Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Yanhui He
Hi, I need to update a 3rd PR to Debian by sending mail to 896...@bugs.debian.org<mailto:896...@bugs.debian.org>, but it always failed. Would you please help me take a look? --Error Details-- Reported error: 550 5.0.350 Remote server returned an error -> 550 Unknown or arc

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-12 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 21:24:42 -0400 Ric Moore wrote: Hello Ric, >Works a charm for me, and has for years, BUT every once in awhile As it does for many, I'm sure. >the volume levels back up to 100%. Pulse rides on top of alsa, so alsa And that's a problem. Now, if sound goes wrong there are *

Re: bug

2018-09-12 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:28:02PM -0500, james wrote: > E: The value 'stable-updates' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as > such a release is not available in the sources > E: _cache->open() failed, please report. Please post here the contents of

bug

2018-09-11 Thread james
E: The value 'stable-updates' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources E: _cache->open() failed, please report.

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-11 Thread Ric Moore
On 09/10/2018 08:27 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:53:01 + (UTC) Curt wrote: Hello Curt, So uninstall it then in that unfortunate case--with extreme prejudice Time. Oh, and I can't be arsed to try PA in the first place. :-) Or are we dealing with the supernatural her

Re: [beginning OT] Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, September 10, 2018 09:37:28 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I could offer my program cdrskin as real example. > It is a cdrecord/wodim compatibility wrapper but exceeds both when it > comes to DVD and BD media. Thanks, for: * the useful example, and * changing the Subject: line appro

[OT] Re: Wrappers and emulation (was Bug#908349)

2018-09-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Reco wrote: > Wait. You're *the* Thomas Schmitt who wrote xorriso? Yep. I am the current developer of libburn, libisofs, libisoburn, cdrskin, xorriso. There were others involved, though. libburn was forked from a half-dead project in 2006. Not more than 25 percent of the code is still from t

Re: [beginning OT] Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:37:28PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Reco wrote: > > > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original. > > rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how > > to say

[beginning OT] Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Reco wrote: > > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original. rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how > to say what I want to say, let me try a made-up example. I could offer my program cdrskin as real

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:53:01 + (UTC) Curt wrote: Hello Curt, >So uninstall it then in that unfortunate case--with extreme prejudice Time. Oh, and I can't be arsed to try PA in the first place. :-) >Or are we dealing with the supernatural here (software from Hell)? I'm wary because of a

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Curt
On 2018-09-10, Brad Rogers wrote: > > The machine it does affect is the one that I routinely use, which has > been in use for longer than PA has been around. I /could/ install PA, > but am reluctant to do so, since sound works here ATM and I'm concerned > that installing PA may cause issues for m

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, September 10, 2018 05:49:01 AM Reco wrote: > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original. Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how to say what I want to say, let me try a made-up example. Suppose some piece of software is r

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:49:01 +0300 Reco wrote: Hello Reco, >On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: >> I've not been running apulse long, but so far, no crashes in Ff 62. >So upstream lies then. To quote apulse's README.md: Maybe, maybe not. It's only been a couple of da

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:43:39 +0300 > Reco wrote: > > Hello Reco, > > >Moreover, apulse causes Firefox to crash since Firefox version 58, as > > I've not been running apulse long, but so far, no crashes in Ff 62. So upst

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:43:39 +0300 Reco wrote: Hello Reco, >Moreover, apulse causes Firefox to crash since Firefox version 58, as I've not been running apulse long, but so far, no crashes in Ff 62. >apulse is a kludge, not a solution. That's as may be (I don't have an opinion either way). Sad

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread deloptes
Rob van der Putten wrote: > Does anyone know why ALSA is no longer supported? You mean supported by Firefox? I guess they decided PA is more easy to implement as default interface ... whatever underlaying audio system you use. I still could not understand why, but this seems irreversible.

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread Nicolas George
to...@tuxteam.de (2018-09-09): > Personally, I couldn't care less: I consider my browser's inability > to make sounds a welcome *feature*, so not having Pulse (which is my > default) just naturally takes care of that. Same for me. And apulse seems to work for me anyway. > Given the amount of pass

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > > Note: A reply in bugs failed. > > On 09/09/18 10:08, Marco Lucidi wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 21:41:11 +0200 Samuel Thibault > > wrote: > > > Unfortunately A

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > > Note: A reply in bugs failed. > > On 09/09/18 10:08, Marco Lucidi wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 21:41:11 +0200 Samuel Thibault > > wrote: > > > Unfortunately AIUI upstream has stopped supportin

Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Note: A reply in bugs failed. On 09/09/18 10:08, Marco Lucidi wrote: > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 21:41:11 +0200 Samuel Thibault > wrote: > > Unfortunately AIUI upstream has stopped supporting ALSA, so we are stuck > > with pulseaudio for firefox. > > Is there any particular reason for p

Bug#907640: compiz: Migrating to compiz-reloaded?

2018-08-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: compiz Severity: important Hello, The launchpad upstream for compiz has switched to light maintenance mode and will not make further development since Ubuntu has stopped using it. How do people feel about switching to compiz-reloaded? https://gitlab.com/compiz Basically they restarted

Re: How to file bug for installation images that don't boot

2018-08-15 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Tabor Kelly > How do I report this bug? In general, do what https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting prescribes. If you do not have a running system with program "reportbug", then scroll down to paragraph "Sending the bug report via e-mail". Main decision to take is th

Re: How to file bug for installation images that don't boot

2018-08-15 Thread Reco
eal > question is: How do I report this bug? Use plaintext e-mail as outlined by [1]. IMO bug should be filled against the "grub" or the "linux" depending on where boot process fails for you. Reco [1] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting

How to file bug for installation images that don't boot

2018-08-15 Thread Tabor Kelly
I have an Intel NUC8i7HNK which does not boot Debian Stretch, testing alpha3, or the latest testing nightly. I have gathered some pertinent triage information which I won't bore everyone with here. My real question is: How do I report this bug? Thanks, Tabor Statement of Confidentiality

Bind bug

2018-08-12 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there See; https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01639/0 I don't think not using deny-answer-aliases is really an option. Regards, Rob

Bug #862397 (thunar freezing) is closed, but I'm still hit. What to do?

2018-07-29 Thread Jaime T
HI all. I run a stretch (stable) xfce desktop, and I'm regularly hit by thunar (v1.6.11-1) freezing. I've found: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862397 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868704 but these have been closed since (apparently) the bug i

Re: Bug#900533: The most annoying bug ever: https://bugs.debian.org/900533 , fix it!

2018-07-24 Thread Andreas Ronnquist
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 17:19:42 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 18:55 +0300, Askar Safin wrote: - 8< - >> >> I am unable listen music using https://vk.com/audio anymore.

Re: Bug#900533: The most annoying bug ever: https://bugs.debian.org/900533 , fix it!

2018-07-22 Thread Phil Wyett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 18:55 +0300, Askar Safin wrote: > Recently Debian Stretch introduced the most annoying bug ever: https://bugs.de > bian.org/900533 ("chromium 67.0.3396.62-1: youtube video, gif's, html5, and > movies no longer

Re: Bug related to "USB"/unknown package

2018-07-03 Thread Benjamin Herwig
Hi Mike, Thank you a lot. Problem is solved. :-) Best greetings, thanks again Benjamin On 03/07/18 13:53, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:18:57PM +0200, Benjamin Herwig wrote: >> I encountered some strange USB behaviour (also others on the internet, >> for example >> https://ww

Re: Bug related to "USB"/unknown package

2018-07-03 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:18:57PM +0200, Benjamin Herwig wrote: I encountered some strange USB behaviour (also others on the internet, for example https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/what-does-cdc_acm-unknown-symbol-refcount_inc_not_zero-err-0-in-dmesg-mean-4175633136/) A

Bug related to "USB"/unknown package

2018-07-03 Thread Benjamin Herwig
/) Attaching an Arduino to my computer gives an errormessage (cdc_acm: Unknown symbol refcount_inc_not_zero (err 0)) and no /dev/ttyACM* is bound. This is completely new and I dont know of any failure from my side. Could you please assist me on how to file that bug? Thank yu for all your efforts, best

Re: Nvidia 340 driver bug

2018-07-03 Thread Pétùr
Le 02/06/2018 à 17:17, dekkz...@gmail.com a écrit : > > > This is a bug in the nvidia driver module. There is not much you can do > until it is fixed upstream. > > https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1031067/ > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=8992

Re: How to diagnose and report a bug

2018-06-16 Thread Richard Hector
On 16/06/18 01:30, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > >> In pcmanfm's address bar, [...] >> [...] >> Any recomendations on how to diagnose and report this bug? > > Since there is a package with name "pcmanfm", there is also a tracker page > f

Re: How to diagnose and report a bug

2018-06-16 Thread Curt
On 2018-06-15, Gene Heskett wrote: >> > >> > Obviously one test to attempt to corner the real culprit in this >> > affair would be to try another editor. How about gedit, for example? >> > Or have you done that already? > > Gedit can be dangerous to your mental health. At least recommend an > edi

Re: How to diagnose and report a bug

2018-06-15 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 15 June 2018 12:51:08 Curt wrote: > On 2018-06-15, Curt wrote: > > On 2018-06-15, rv riveravaldez wrote: > >> Hi, I've found this bug consistently on debian testing (updated): > >> > >> Steps to reproduce: > >> In pcmanfm's ad

Re: How to diagnose and report a bug

2018-06-15 Thread Curt
On 2018-06-15, Curt wrote: > On 2018-06-15, rv riveravaldez wrote: >> Hi, I've found this bug consistently on debian testing (updated): >> >> Steps to reproduce: >> In pcmanfm's address bar, type: >> ssh://user@ip >> Write password, Enter. >>

Re: How to diagnose and report a bug

2018-06-15 Thread Curt
On 2018-06-15, rv riveravaldez wrote: > Hi, I've found this bug consistently on debian testing (updated): > > Steps to reproduce: > In pcmanfm's address bar, type: > ssh://user@ip > Write password, Enter. > Navigate to the remote machine user's folder. > Ope

Re: How to diagnose and report a bug

2018-06-15 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, > In pcmanfm's address bar, [...] > [...] > Any recomendations on how to diagnose and report this bug? Since there is a package with name "pcmanfm", there is also a tracker page for it https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pcmanfm Registered maintainer contact is the

How to diagnose and report a bug

2018-06-15 Thread rv riveravaldez
Hi, I've found this bug consistently on debian testing (updated): Steps to reproduce: In pcmanfm's address bar, type: ssh://user@ip Write password, Enter. Navigate to the remote machine user's folder. Open, edit and save a plain text file with leafpad. Result: The file gets blan

Serious bug: pcmanfm-ssh-leafpad [howto diagnose]

2018-06-10 Thread rv riveravaldez
Hi, I've found this bug consistently on debian testing (updated): Steps to reproduce: >From the address bar of pcmanfm, type: ssh://user@ip Write password, Enter. Navigate to the remote machine user folder. Open, edit and save a plain text file with leafpad. The file gets blanked (no co

Nvidia 340 driver bug

2018-06-03 Thread Pétùr
Le 03/06/2018 à 20:47, floris a écrit : > Pétùr schreef op 2018-06-02 17:46: >>> This is a bug in the nvidia driver module. There is not much you can do >>> until it is fixed upstream. >> >> Thanks! >> >> I would like to use the nouveau driver waiting f

Re: Nvidia 340 driver bug

2018-06-03 Thread floris
dekkz...@gmail.com schreef op 2018-06-02 17:17: On 06/01, floris wrote: Pétùr schreef op 2018-05-31 16:20: I have a recurrent bug with the nvidia 340 driver. Here is the trace. Any idea is welcomed. Pétùr [6.748358] [ cut here ] snip f3 eb [6.749313

Re: Nvidia 340 driver bug

2018-06-03 Thread floris
Pétùr schreef op 2018-06-02 17:46: This is a bug in the nvidia driver module. There is not much you can do until it is fixed upstream. Thanks! I would like to use the nouveau driver waiting for the fix. However I an unable to boot X with the nouveau driver. I did: # apt-get purge nvidia

Re: Nvidia 340 driver bug

2018-06-02 Thread Pétùr
Le 02/06/2018 à 17:46, Pétùr a écrit : > >> This is a bug in the nvidia driver module. There is not much you can do >> until it is fixed upstream. > > Thanks! > > I would like to use the nouveau driver waiting for the fix. > > However I an unable to boot X with

Re: Nvidia 340 driver bug

2018-06-02 Thread Pétùr
> This is a bug in the nvidia driver module. There is not much you can do > until it is fixed upstream. Thanks! I would like to use the nouveau driver waiting for the fix. However I an unable to boot X with the nouveau driver. I did: # apt-get purge nvidia. # apt-get install --rei

Re: Re: Nvidia 340 driver bug

2018-06-02 Thread dekkzz78
On 06/01, floris wrote: Pétùr schreef op 2018-05-31 16:20: I have a recurrent bug with the nvidia 340 driver. Here is the trace. Any idea is welcomed. Pétùr [6.748358] [ cut here ] snip f3 eb [6.749313] ---[ end trace dc2afdad83c552e7 ]--- This is a bug

Re: Nvidia 340 driver bug

2018-06-01 Thread floris
Pétùr schreef op 2018-05-31 16:20: I have a recurrent bug with the nvidia 340 driver. Here is the trace. Any idea is welcomed. Pétùr [6.748358] [ cut here ] [6.748361] Bad or missing usercopy whitelist? Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object

Nvidia 340 driver bug

2018-05-31 Thread Pétùr
I have a recurrent bug with the nvidia 340 driver. Here is the trace. Any idea is welcomed. Pétùr [6.748358] [ cut here ] [6.748361] Bad or missing usercopy whitelist? Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'nvidia_stack_t' (offset 1

Re: appropriate package for bug report about qualcomm atheros attansic l1

2018-05-30 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 30 May 2018, Υπάτιος Μ. Μωυσιάδης wrote: > i want to send through email a bug report, for a bug that i think my pc has. > My problem/bug, is that i have a network card qualcomm atheros attansic l1 > gigabit ethernet (revb0) [1969:1048], that can't connect to the inter

appropriate package for bug report about qualcomm atheros attansic l1

2018-05-30 Thread Υπάτιος Μ . Μωυσιάδης
Hello, i want to send through email a bug report, for a bug that i think my pc has. My problem/bug, is that i have a network card qualcomm atheros attansic l1 gigabit ethernet (revb0) [1969:1048], that can't connect to the internet, through ethernet which is the only option. From

Re: Usability BUG - Which package appropriate?

2018-05-29 Thread likcoras
On 05/29/2018 05:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: >>> *HOWEVER!* >>> The first line stated "Emacs 26.1 is out, download it here!" >>> Bu [https://packages.debian.org/stretch/emacs] refers to >>> "Package: emacs (46.1)". >> >> And goes onto say that it's a metapackage that depends on emacs24; so, >>

Re: Usability BUG - Which package appropriate?

2018-05-28 Thread David Wright
On Mon 28 May 2018 at 15:03:09 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote: > On 05/28/2018 02:14 PM, Dan Purgert wrote: > >Richard Owlett wrote: > >>In another thread I asked for text editor recommendations to address a > >>Later someone else suggested emacs. > >>My mental image of "emacs" was of something for

Re: Usability BUG - Which package appropriate?

2018-05-28 Thread Richard Owlett
On 05/28/2018 02:14 PM, Dan Purgert wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: In another thread I asked for text editor recommendations to address a Later someone else suggested emacs. My mental image of "emacs" was of something for a 'dumb terminal'. I went to Synaptic searching for 'emacs'. Got a hit for a

Re: Usability BUG - Which package appropriate?

2018-05-28 Thread Dan Purgert
Richard Owlett wrote: > In another thread I asked for text editor recommendations to address a > Later someone else suggested emacs. > My mental image of "emacs" was of something for a 'dumb terminal'. > I went to Synaptic searching for 'emacs'. > Got a hit for a metapaqckage - *NO* associated hom

Usability BUG - Which package appropriate?

2018-05-28 Thread Richard Owlett
In another thread I asked for text editor recommendations to address a narrowly focused problem - making non-printing (one respondent called them "ink-free) characters obvious. I had specified a GUI editor. One person suggested geany. I checked Synaptic and found it was already installed. Syn

Re: Debian 9 t: Update Gstreamer Base plugins package to resolve a Gstreamer bug

2018-05-07 Thread Dinesh Iyer
Hi Henrique, Thanks very much for detailing the steps involved in getting this patch into a stable Debian 9 release. It looks like I have to do a bunch of testing before I file a bug to get this change into a stable Debian 9 release or even a backport. Regards, Dinesh On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 7

Re: Debian 9 t: Update Gstreamer Base plugins package to resolve a Gstreamer bug

2018-05-06 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 05 May 2018, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2018-05-05, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Fri, 04 May 2018, Dinesh Iyer wrote: > >> "You'll have to talk to whoever is providing you your older version of > >> GStreamer. They will have to backport the fix to that old version, but it > >> s

Re: Debian 9 t: Update Gstreamer Base plugins package to resolve a Gstreamer bug

2018-05-05 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2018-05-05, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 04 May 2018, Dinesh Iyer wrote: >> "You'll have to talk to whoever is providing you your older version of >> GStreamer. They will have to backport the fix to that old version, but it >> should just cleanly apply to the older versions." >>

Re: Debian 9 t: Update Gstreamer Base plugins package to resolve a Gstreamer bug

2018-05-05 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
x throughoutly, as applied to the Debian stable codebase: you'd get the current source packages for gstreamer in Debian stable, apply the required patches, and do a lot of testing to ensure it caused no regressions _and_ fixed the issue properly. Then you file a bug, severity important or above, w

Debian 9 t: Update Gstreamer Base plugins package to resolve a Gstreamer bug

2018-05-04 Thread Dinesh Iyer
Hi team, I develop applications that does multimedia I/O on Linux. I have noticed stalls on Debian 9 due to a bug in Gstreamer 1.10. The Gstreamer developers have acknowledged this as a bug and have fixed this for the 1.14 line of Gstreamer. As I use the Gstreamer that comes by default on the

Re: webalizer bug in debian jessie

2018-05-02 Thread deloptes
BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > Can not install 2.23.08-3 because it needs libpng16-16 This refers to Buster https://packages.debian.org/testing/web/webalizer either look for backport or recompile source on jessie

webalizer bug in debian jessie

2018-05-01 Thread BASSAGET Cédric
Hello, Referring to : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858602 I'm looking for the 2.23.08-2 version of webalizer, which is referred in this bug. Can't find it... Can not install 2.23.08-3 because it needs libpng16-16 which is not available in debian jessie reposito

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread Charlie S
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:09:44 -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez sent: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:18:01PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > > > > AFAIK it is still there untouched in git sources, as originally > > mentioned in the bug report > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread Brian
gt; > [...] > > > > > > It seems this issue is fixed upstream. Would you like to check that? > > > > > > > > Tone down. Apply Hanlon's razor generously [...] > > > > > This is not about systemd or some bug or something. This is

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 30 April 2018 10:09:44 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:18:01PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > > AFAIK it is still there untouched in git sources, as originally > > mentioned in the bug report > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:18:01PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > > AFAIK it is still there untouched in git sources, as originally mentioned in > the bug report https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896806 > > That aside, the question of whether it will ev

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread tomas
Apply Hanlon's razor generously [...] > This is not about systemd or some bug or something. This is about attitude. Exactly my point :-) On a more practical note: care to double-check whether the issue is actually fixed upstream? Cheers - -- t -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Vers

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-29 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 11:20:00PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 12:52:54 -0700 Don Armstrong said: > > > If there is a concern here, it's a privacy concern. Google's public > > statements regarding maintaining privacy and t

Bug in pdf display probably due to synctex update

2018-04-22 Thread Pétùr
uffers from the same bug? Any temporary solution before the fix? Cheers, Pétùr

Re: Update for i965-va-driver-shaders - Bug -

2018-04-13 Thread Jimmy Johnson
+0100 If that's the case then we have a bug. Package details state "depends on 1965-driver" and "enhances i965-driver" Cheers, -- Jimmy Johnson Devuan Jessie - KDE 4.14.2 - AMD A8-7600 - EXT4 at sda5 Registered Linux User #380263

nmtui bug

2018-03-29 Thread Jude DaShiell
I'd normally use reportbug to report this except nmtui is preventing that from happening. The version in use is on debian-mac-9.4.0 disk and I used that version since the system is too old for efi or uefi. I was able to edit my wifi connection and save the connection with all fields filled in

Bug with hack in bsdgames-2.17-26build1 - SIGSEGV when type 'i' after restoring a saved game - WITH A FIX!

2018-03-25 Thread Richard Henschel
Program hack core dumps when you restore a saved game and then enter 'i' to see Inventory.  The following patch to hack.o_init.c fixes the problem.  (Sorry if cut and paste changed tabs to spaces...)  I am running Ubuntu 17.10, but don't think platform matters. *** hack.o_init.c.old    2003-12

Re: Bug when installing texlive in debian 9.3 stretch.

2018-03-05 Thread Don Armstrong
t; dpkg seems to fail configuring a bunch of packages that are tex related. > > I tried to fix with >     $ sudo apt --fix-broken install > > But I got a similar output, which is bellow: This looks like a variant of https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832570 If I was

Bug when installing texlive in debian 9.3 stretch.

2018-03-05 Thread Gustavo Moitinho Trindade
/tmp/fmtutil.mCfb4czR Please include this file if you report a bug. dpkg: error processing package tex-common (--configure):  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of texlive-pictures-doc:  texlive-pictures-doc

Re: bug filing question: Gnome session crashes on resume from suspend or hibernate; Nvidia driver suspected

2018-03-02 Thread Peter Becich
I submitted this bug to the nvidia-driver package: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891960

bug filing question: Gnome session crashes on resume from suspend or hibernate; Nvidia driver suspected

2018-03-01 Thread Peter Becich
Hello, I am trying to determine which package to file this bug under. My login session is frequently lost when the computer resumes from suspension or hibernation.  The computer takes me to the Gnome login screen.  About one in two resumptions fail this way. Debian 9.3 kernel 4.15.0-1

Re: is this a bug of startx?

2018-02-19 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 03:20:11AM +, Long Wind wrote: > maybe few users still use startx? Depends on where you draw your samples from. If you consider "all Debian users", then you are probably correct. The vast majority of users probably use one of the Display Managers. If you consider "th

Re: is this a bug of startx?

2018-02-17 Thread David Wright
On Sun 18 Feb 2018 at 03:20:11 (+), Long Wind wrote: > maybe few users still use startx?at first i found some strange problems with > stretchand unable to run X > now i'm able to describe the problemafter i install twm , i can't run > startxthen i create .xinitrc: > xterm & > twm > and it sol

Re: libgparted bug.

2018-02-12 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 12 February 2018 17:29:58 David Wright wrote: > On Mon 12 Feb 2018 at 15:32:50 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 12 February 2018 13:44:04 Brian wrote: > > > On Mon 12 Feb 2018 at 08:17:23 +0100, deloptes wrote: > > > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > >> TDE has support channels. Pe

Re: libgparted bug.

2018-02-12 Thread David Wright
On Mon 12 Feb 2018 at 15:32:50 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 12 February 2018 13:44:04 Brian wrote: > > > On Mon 12 Feb 2018 at 08:17:23 +0100, deloptes wrote: > > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > > >> TDE has support channels. People there are far more likely to be > > > >> familiar with whee

Re: libgparted bug.

2018-02-12 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 12 February 2018 16:29:43 deloptes wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > usbmount has been disabled.  That would I think, have fixed the > > original problem that started all this hoohaw. > > > > My apologies to the list in that case. > > With full respect, Gene, we are glad it worked for you

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >