Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-19 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 05:13:34PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > I can't imagine MATE terminal to implement its own escaping machinery. > They'll probably copy that of the Xterm, to stay compatible (although > these days you never know). > > So perhaps the OP gets away with pretending he has an

Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-19 Thread tomas
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 09:58:17AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 09:44:58AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > Ah yes, good old Debian /etc/skel/.bashrc at work. Presumably you > mean this section: > > # If this is an xterm set the title to user@host:dir > case "$TER

Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-19 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 09:44:58AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > I've no Mate terminal here (just plain xterm), but this fourth way is > the one Debian chose for me: the shell prompt (via the PS1 variable) > is the one working the magic. I guess Mate terminal works as Xterm > here. > > It's def

Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-19 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 06:49:15AM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > Is there a log where the previous version of Mate and mate-terminal are > written? It should be in /var/log/dpkg* assuming those didn't get rotated away. I've got files up to dpkg.log.12.gz dated Sep 28, 2020. Try this: zgrep 'upgra

Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-19 Thread tomas
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:23:06PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:14:39PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > My window manager is Mate Desktop. The terminal i most use is its own. > > And i use vim a lot, [...] > Vim has another setting called "titleold". If this is set to

Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-18 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:14:39PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > My window manager is Mate Desktop. The terminal i most use is its own. > And i use vim a lot, > After the upgrade, when i quit vim, the terminal title becomes empty, > instead of returning to the default title "Terminal". The real q

Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-18 Thread Dedeco Balaco
Em 18/09/2021 22:49, Jeremy Hendricks escreveu: > I apologize for assuming you upgraded from 9 to 11 directly (skipping > 10). It’s a common misconception that is acceptable. > No problem. Actually, my first try to update was directly from a not completely updated Debian 9 to the current Debian

Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-18 Thread Jeremy Hendricks
d the > > number of files that was opened with it, when it was launched. > > > > After the upgrade, when i quit vim, the terminal title becomes > > empty, instead of returning to the default title "Terminal". > > > > Why is this happening? A bug in Vim? In mate-terminal? Or in Debian > 11? > > > >

Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-18 Thread Dedeco Balaco
After the upgrade, when i quit vim, the terminal title becomes > empty, instead of returning to the default title "Terminal". > > Why is this happening? A bug in Vim? In mate-terminal? Or in Debian 11? >

Re: A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-18 Thread Jeremy Hendricks
tle > shows the name of the file currently being edited, and the number of files > that was opened with it, when it was launched. > > After the upgrade, when i quit vim, the terminal title becomes empty, > instead of returning to the default title "Terminal". > > Why is this happening? A bug in Vim? In mate-terminal? Or in Debian 11? >

A bug in Vim, in Mate Terminal or in Debian 11?

2021-09-18 Thread Dedeco Balaco
name of the file currently being edited, and the number of files that was opened with it, when it was launched. After the upgrade, when i quit vim, the terminal title becomes empty, instead of returning to the default title "Terminal". Why is this happening? A bug in Vim? In mate-termi

Re: Debian bug report closed or open?

2021-09-12 Thread Brian
On Sun 12 Sep 2021 at 18:26:57 +0200, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > Hi, > > 12 sept. 2021, 12:45 de bouncingc...@gmail.com: > > > Also, as an additional confirmation ... > > On the above bug page: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958402 > >

Re: Debian bug report closed or open?

2021-09-12 Thread l0f4r0
Hi, 12 sept. 2021, 12:45 de bouncingc...@gmail.com: > Also, as an additional confirmation ... > On the above bug page: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958402 > the second link is the package name "sudo", which goes to > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Re: Looking for guidance on reporting a bug on the roundcube package

2021-09-12 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Du, 12 sep 21, 07:54:32, Steve Dondley wrote: > > > Using free(dom) software sometimes require you invest resources in some > > other way, depending on the particular issue and how important it is to > > you ;) > > Agreed. But the package manager will have a much easier time than me at > naili

Re: Looking for guidance on reporting a bug on the roundcube package

2021-09-12 Thread Steve Dondley
Debian is interested in *all* issues affecting a user. The triager will help sort it out. If it is a Debian bug, the fix woudld be applied in unstable and work its way through the system. The same happens with an upstream fix. So would I just be wasting my time and everyone else'

Re: Looking for guidance on reporting a bug on the roundcube package

2021-09-12 Thread Steve Dondley
Using free(dom) software sometimes require you invest resources in some other way, depending on the particular issue and how important it is to you ;) Agreed. But the package manager will have a much easier time than me at nailing down the problem and do it in much less time. I've already sp

Re: Debian bug report closed or open?

2021-09-12 Thread Brian
On Sun 12 Sep 2021 at 20:45:13 +1000, David wrote: > On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 20:20, wrote: > > 12 sept. 2021, 10:00 de scdbac...@gmx.net: > > > l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > > > > > >> By the way, how can one see that a bug is closed and not open please? >

Re: Looking for guidance on reporting a bug on the roundcube package

2021-09-12 Thread Brian
On Sat 11 Sep 2021 at 22:40:32 -0400, Steve Dondley wrote: > First, thanks to everyone here and the Debian community, an amazing project. > > Running bullseye with package roundcube. I believe I have found a bug that > I'd like to report. > > I am using reportbug to repo

Re: Looking for guidance on reporting a bug on the roundcube package

2021-09-12 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Sb, 11 sep 21, 22:40:32, Steve Dondley wrote: > First, thanks to everyone here and the Debian community, an amazing project. > > Running bullseye with package roundcube. I believe I have found a bug that > I'd like to report. > > I am using reportbug to report it. Wh

Re: Debian bug report closed or open?

2021-09-12 Thread David
On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 20:20, wrote: > 12 sept. 2021, 10:00 de scdbac...@gmx.net: > > l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > > > >> By the way, how can one see that a bug is closed and not open please? > >> [1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958402 > &g

Re: Debian bug report closed or open?

2021-09-12 Thread l0f4r0
Hi, 12 sept. 2021, 10:00 de scdbac...@gmx.net: > l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > >> By the way, how can one see that a bug is closed and not open please? >> [1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958402 >> > I think you can recognize it by the "Done:&qu

Re: Debian bug report closed or open?

2021-09-12 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > By the way, how can one see that a bug is closed and not open please? > [1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958402 I think you can recognize it by the "Done:" header on the web page: Done: Marc Haber I see it in an old bug that

Debian bug report closed or open? (was: Will my reportbug report be seen?)

2021-09-12 Thread l0f4r0
Hi, 11 sept. 2021, 18:52 de a...@cityscape.co.uk: > It's your submission; you can close it, In fact, any user can clos > it. > By the way, how can one see that a bug is closed and not open please? For example, I know that the bug #958402 [1] has been closed because I rece

Looking for guidance on reporting a bug on the roundcube package

2021-09-11 Thread Steve Dondley
First, thanks to everyone here and the Debian community, an amazing project. Running bullseye with package roundcube. I believe I have found a bug that I'd like to report. I am using reportbug to report it. When doing so, I got this message: Your version (1.4.11+dfsg.1-4) of roun

Re: Unsure where to post a bug related to targetcli

2021-08-04 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, solon wrote: > > Seems to me that installing targetcli-fb should really also install > > and activate the at boot service by default? > I'm not really certain if this is the right package to > file a bug for, for the reasons I mentioned earlier. Well, an improvement

Re: Unsure where to post a bug related to targetcli

2021-08-04 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, filing a bug towards targetcli seems futile, as it is not packaged by Debian any more. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/targetcli brings me to https://tracker.debian.org/news/826155/removed-130pre41ga55d018-3-from-unstable/ which says "the following package(s) have been removed

Unsure where to post a bug related to targetcli

2021-08-04 Thread solon
Hello all, New to debian lists, though not to linux. Im unsure where and how to post a bug, or whether it really is a bug as I can't really find other specific debian cases of it and if it is a bug, I would expect more reports of the problem, I have an iscsi config setup with targetcli

Re: Read-only bug ?

2021-07-25 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
Hi, On 2021-07-25 4:36 p.m., to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 04:27:36PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2021-07-25 3:41 p.m., to...@tuxteam.de wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 03:36:32PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside >>> wrote: Hi

Re: Read-only bug ?

2021-07-25 Thread tomas
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 04:27:36PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi, > > On 2021-07-25 3:41 p.m., to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 03:36:32PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside > > wrote: > >> Hi ! > >> I'm doing a Debian partial mirror using debmirror. >

Re: Read-only bug ?

2021-07-25 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
Hi, On 2021-07-25 3:41 p.m., to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 03:36:32PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside > wrote: >> Hi ! >> I'm doing a Debian partial mirror using debmirror. >> After around 65%, it fails saying "can't write file is read-only". >> I unmount the parti

Re: Read-only bug ?

2021-07-25 Thread tomas
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 03:36:32PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi ! > I'm doing a Debian partial mirror using debmirror. > After around 65%, it fails saying "can't write file is read-only". > I unmount the partition. > Mount it back (external hard drive). > And now it goes

Read-only bug ?

2021-07-25 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
Hi ! I'm doing a Debian partial mirror using debmirror. After around 65%, it fails saying "can't write file is read-only". I unmount the partition. Mount it back (external hard drive). And now it goes great... Someone ever had a similar problem ? -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be w

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-28 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
Perhaps it should be said that personal use of gpg and the use that a system administrator makes of it and key-ing are different use-cases. So we might expect fewer assumptions to hold and greater mystery :-) On Sat, Jun 26, 2021, 1:53 PM wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 08:42:26AM -0400, Cindy

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-26 Thread tomas
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 08:42:26AM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: > On 6/26/21, Andrei POPESCU wrote: [...] > > Well, it makes perfect sense if you remember that "everything is a > > file", even if there are exceptions (e.g. network devices). > > > Hopefully I'm reading this right. While on di

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-26 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
On 6/26/21, Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> Andrei, thanks for having picked up my problem and having cared for the >> release notes to comment on it, and also for supposedly having motivated >> Julian Andres Klose to publish a very helpful blog post on the related >> subject. Brad Rogers here in the thr

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-26 Thread Marco Möller
On 26.06.21 11:54, Andrei POPESCU wrote: (...) Very good points, all appreciated. Feel free to suggest patches for it through bugs against the harden-doc package, or merge requests in Salsa if the Maintainer is accepting them. I'll do so. I decided, motivated also by observing how you are d

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-26 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 24 iun 21, 16:42:34, Marco Möller wrote: > On 21.06.21 07:58, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Du, 20 iun 21, 10:20:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > Package: release-notes > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, a...@packages.debian.org > > > > > > On Sb, 19 iun 21, 22:07:35, Marco Möl

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-24 Thread Marco Möller
On 21.06.21 07:58, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Du, 20 iun 21, 10:20:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote: Package: release-notes X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, a...@packages.debian.org On Sb, 19 iun 21, 22:07:35, Marco Möller wrote: Command apt-key and its man page say that apt-key is deprecate

Re: ifconfig stats ??? Wrong behavior OR BUG ?

2021-06-22 Thread David Wright
On Fri 11 Jun 2021 at 14:01:02 (+), Kanto Andria wrote: > First post here on this lists. I know about the the IP set of  commands, BUT > my concern is about the ifconfig one.I have 2 Debian 10 Buster systems and I > have the same behavior - reading the man page did not give the specific > o

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-20 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Du, 20 iun 21, 10:20:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Package: release-notes > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, a...@packages.debian.org > > On Sb, 19 iun 21, 22:07:35, Marco Möller wrote: > > > > Command apt-key and its man page say that apt-key is deprecated, but do not > > suggest an

Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-20 Thread Andrei POPESCU
Package: release-notes X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, a...@packages.debian.org On Sb, 19 iun 21, 22:07:35, Marco Möller wrote: > > Command apt-key and its man page say that apt-key is deprecated, but do not > suggest an instead recommended tool. It is only mentioned that keys would >

Re: ifconfig stats ??? Wrong behavior OR BUG ?

2021-06-11 Thread Andy Smith
s ? There is no way to tell that you didn't mean to look up a name in DNS. > Why the IP is reset to a public IP here belonging to OVH? That's what it resolved to. This is not a bug. The bigger issue here is that ifconfig has been deprecated for 10+ years and whatever you are trying

Re: ifconfig stats ??? Wrong behavior OR BUG ?

2021-06-11 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 02:01:02PM +, Kanto Andria wrote: > dada@Jradebian:~$ sudo ifconfig enp0s31f6 stats     There's no "stats" option to ifconfig, at least according to the source of version 1.60+git20180626.aebd88e. But what a quick test does show me, is that in my environm

ifconfig stats ??? Wrong behavior OR BUG ?

2021-06-11 Thread Kanto Andria
Hello, First post here on this lists. I know about the the IP set of  commands, BUT my concern is about the ifconfig one.I have 2 Debian 10 Buster systems and I have the same behavior - reading the man page did not give the specific options       dada@Jradebian:~$ sudo ifconfig enp0s31f6   

Fix Kali Linux command not found error [WAS Re: Bug reportin ]

2021-05-22 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 06:47:17PM -0400, Mohamud Ali wrote: > dictionory > Sorry, command-not-found has crashed! Please file a bug report at: > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting > Please include the following information with the report: > > command-not-found version: 0.

RE: Bug reportin

2021-05-21 Thread Larry Owens
command spelling?? L -Original Message- From: Mohamud Ali [mailto:khtos...@icloud.com] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 3:47 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Bug reportin dictionory Sorry, command-not-found has crashed! Please file a bug report at: http://www.debian.org/Bugs

Re: Bug reportin

2021-05-21 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 06:47:17PM -0400, Mohamud Ali wrote: > Python version: 3.9.1 final 0 > Distributor ID: Kali > Description: Kali GNU/Linux Rolling Please report this to your operating system's support team, not to Debian's user mailing list, or any other place.

Bug reportin

2021-05-21 Thread Mohamud Ali
dictionory Sorry, command-not-found has crashed! Please file a bug report at: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting Please include the following information with the report: command-not-found version: 0.3 Python version: 3.9.1 final 0 Distributor ID: Kali Description:Kali GNU/Linux Rolling

samba-ad install bug using bind9

2021-05-12 Thread Александр .
  I always use my guide to install samba. I wanna  add string to /etc/bind/named.conf >      include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf" but no this file in new debian version (last I add on 10.2) I added manually, > dlz "AD DNS Zone" { database "dlopen > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind

Re: Need help finding the right package under which to report a bug

2021-04-17 Thread Sven Joachim
my solution if you are novice). I would rather live with the warnings unless I actually had a GPU which needs this firmware. Don't know if you can actually buy these yet. > Look like the bug are the 5.10.0-6-amd64 kernel. No, it is in the firmware-amd-graphics package. A bug report aga

Re: Need help finding the right package under which to report a bug

2021-04-17 Thread Robbi Nespu
On 4/18/21 12:31 PM, Robbi Nespu wrote: I hope my guess is right. It on recently added on kernel up stream, I can see the log here https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/log/amdgpu -- Email : Robbi Nespu PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E

Re: Need help finding the right package under which to report a bug

2021-04-17 Thread Robbi Nespu
if you are novice). Look like the bug are the 5.10.0-6-amd64 kernel. -- Email : Robbi Nespu PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA PGP key : https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc

Need help finding the right package under which to report a bug

2021-04-17 Thread Joshua Brickel
I am using bullseye and when I perform an update (apt-get dist-upgrade) to the system I get get the following messages. I'm not sure if this is an intramfs-tools issue or a firmware-amd-graphics issue. I have the latest version firmware-amd-graphics installed. Processing triggers for initramfs-

Re: Not Sure Which Package to Submit Bug Against

2021-04-14 Thread deloptes
David Wright wrote: > On Tue 13 Apr 2021 at 00:49:48 (+0200), deloptes wrote: >> Kent West wrote: >> >> >> Perhaps you try locking the session of the first user and see what >> happens - if the second has access to the audio. > > It would also be interesting to know what happens when the first

Re: Not Sure Which Package to Submit Bug Against

2021-04-14 Thread Dan Ritter
Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > > The most interesting question to me: > Has doc or first-principles failed so badly that we resort to > experimentation again? Yes, in the sense that there are too many ways for this to legally exist to be able to say: "package foo is causing this, and you can either

Re: Not Sure Which Package to Submit Bug Against

2021-04-14 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021, 11:20 AM David Wright wrote: > On Tue 13 Apr 2021 at 00:49:48 (+0200), deloptes wrote: > > Kent West wrote: > > > > > I did some experimentation afterwards, and have discovered that if > > > Perhaps you try locking the session of the first user and see what > happens -

Re: Not Sure Which Package to Submit Bug Against

2021-04-14 Thread David Wright
On Tue 13 Apr 2021 at 00:49:48 (+0200), deloptes wrote: > Kent West wrote: > > > I did some experimentation afterwards, and have discovered that if > > user X mutes the mic, the mic then seems to be "owned" by user X, and > > no one and no OS can seem to unmute it. I was using the machine as > > u

Re: TDE Bug: what package responsible

2021-04-13 Thread deloptes
Dan Ritter wrote: > q4os appears to be a Debian derivative, so presumably they would > know better than we as to what is going on. I can't find a > mailing list, but I do see a forum at > https://www.q4os.org/forum/ > > I'm going to guess that they will want a better explanation of > the symptoms

Re: TDE Bug: what package responsible

2021-04-13 Thread Dan Ritter
John Hunter wrote: > Hi, > > [ 952jmdh ] > > I have just installed q4os-3.14-x64-tde.r4.iso as an upgrade to an existing > laptop. The installation (admin user) account has been estabished OK. When I > try to log into a proper user account (tied to my old work account) > tdestartupconfig complai

TDE Bug: what package responsible

2021-04-13 Thread John Hunter
Hi, [ 952jmdh ] I have just installed q4os-3.14-x64-tde.r4.iso as an upgrade to an existing laptop. The installation (admin user) account has been estabished OK. When I try to log into a proper user account (tied to my old work account) tdestartupconfig complains and goes tits-up. I have nev

Re: Not Sure Which Package to Submit Bug Against

2021-04-13 Thread tomas
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:49:48AM +0200, deloptes wrote: > Kent West wrote: > > > I did some experimentation afterwards, and have discovered that if > > user X mutes the mic, the mic then seems to be "owned" by user X, and > > no one and no OS can seem to unmute it. I was using the machine as > >

Re: Not Sure Which Package to Submit Bug Against

2021-04-12 Thread deloptes
Kent West wrote: > I did some experimentation afterwards, and have discovered that if > user X mutes the mic, the mic then seems to be "owned" by user X, and > no one and no OS can seem to unmute it. I was using the machine as > user Y, which is why I couldn't unmute it, and when I handed the > la

Not Sure Which Package to Submit Bug Against

2021-04-12 Thread Kent West
why I couldn't unmute it, and when I handed the laptop to the hardware tech, logged in as user X, bingo! He umuted it. I don't know if this would be a kernel package bug, or an X package bug, or a keyboard-input package bug, or an audio-package bug, or Any ideas? Thanks! -- Kent

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread deloptes
David Wright wrote: > AIUI you really want to avoid using accented characters or any sort > of composition in your username and password. The reason is that if > your computer gets set in any unexpected language setting (or unset), > you might not be able to login at all, and unable to correct thi

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread David Wright
On Sat 10 Apr 2021 at 19:11:15 (-0400), mcgarrett wrote: > > On April 10, 2021 at 5:53 PM laurent aerens > > wrote: > > > > Package: unknown > > > > Version: debian 9 - 10 > > > > Severity: minor > > > > When I type accent marks (¨^´`) in the terminal followed by a letter > >

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread David Wright
On Sat 10 Apr 2021 at 23:53:27 (+0200), laurent aerens wrote: > Package: unknown > > Version: debian 9 - 10 > > Severity: minor > > When I type accent marks (¨^´`) in the terminal followed by a letter > (that does not match with the accent) (for example ^ and the letter n) > nothing happens and

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:53:27PM +0200, laurent aerens wrote: > Package: unknown > > Version: debian 9 - 10 > > Severity: minor This looks like you're attempting to generate headers for a bug report, except that you're writing to debian-user rather than to the bug tr

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread mcgarrett
> On April 10, 2021 at 5:53 PM laurent aerens wrote: > > > Package: unknown > > Version: debian 9 - 10 > > Severity: minor > > When I type accent marks (¨^´`) in the terminal followed by a letter > (that does not match with the accent) (for example ^ and the letter n) > not

bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread laurent aerens
Package: unknown Version: debian 9 - 10 Severity: minor When I type accent marks (¨^´`) in the terminal followed by a letter (that does not match with the accent) (for example ^ and the letter n) nothing happens and the keystrokes get ignored. Typing an accent mark and a space allows you to

Re: Which package for bug report?

2021-03-27 Thread Leandro neto
. Contact me over the phone I don't teus this my isp +552122366155 +552121796156   i want them on jail for the rest of they life's what they did to me and other person here is unacceptable  Enviado via UOL Mail _ Assunto: Re: Which package for bug

Re: Which package for bug report?

2021-03-27 Thread riveravaldez
On 3/27/21, mshr wrote: > Hello, (...) > Despite turning bluetooth off, it turns itself back on after the laptop > wakes from sleep. > I'm using the plasma desktop, installed from the initial installation media. > What package should this bug relate to? Hi, I suppose you shou

Which package for bug report?

2021-03-27 Thread mshr
Hello, I'd like to report a bug for Debian testing (bullseye/sid). Despite turning bluetooth off, it turns itself back on after the laptop wakes from sleep. I'm using the plasma desktop, installed from the initial installation media. What package should this bug relate to? Thank you.

Re: Bug#977358: release-notes: document how to make the rescue mode usable if no root password is set (buster)

2021-03-21 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 21.03.2021 12:40, Andrei POPESCU wrote: [Bcc: debian-boot] Dear Debian-User subscribers, The Release Notes editor is asking whether this is still an issue for bullseye (i.e. if the patch to Debian Installer mentioned below was applied in the meantime). It will be a while until I get to chec

Re: Bug#977358: release-notes: document how to make the rescue mode usable if no root password is set (buster)

2021-03-21 Thread Andrei POPESCU
e systemd(1)). > > You might want to do the same for 'emergency.service' as well (or > instead), since this service is started *automatically* in case of > certain errors (see systemd.special(7)) or if you add 'emergency' to the > kernel command line (e.g. if you c

Bug report concerning file /etc/resolv.conf and Connman

2021-03-15 Thread Paweł Starzyński
Hello, I'm writing to you, because I don't know precisely what package is responsible for bug- connman?, iw?,openresolv? I've just installed Buster with mini.iso. Due to age of my PC and small resources I tried to make my install as slim as possible. So I went with Openbox and

Re: Bug: missing package

2021-03-15 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 21:20:39 -0400 Jude DaShiell wrote: > Why is frobtads missing from debian repositories? The frobtads package > makes it possible for those living outside of g.u.i. land to play tads > games on the console. frobtads is in Debian non-free, in Sid and Jessie: https://packages

Re: Bug: missing package

2021-03-14 Thread Nito
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 21:20:39 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Why is frobtads missing from debian repositories? Looking at the tracker, the package is held back by "failure to build from source" bugs, which are considered RC critical: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Bug: missing package

2021-03-14 Thread Jude DaShiell
Why is frobtads missing from debian repositories? The frobtads package makes it possible for those living outside of g.u.i. land to play tads games on the console.

Re: Kernel message: BUG: Bad page state in process kworker

2021-03-13 Thread Reco
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 03:01:45AM -0500, Michael Grant wrote: > > I'd say it is a Linode problem, unless you run custom kernel modules. > > It looks like a "memory" corruption to me and since it is virtualized > > system, > > you should check if host system is ok. > > Memory in quotes because thi

Re: Kernel message: BUG: Bad page state in process kworker

2021-03-13 Thread Michael Grant
> I'd say it is a Linode problem, unless you run custom kernel modules. > It looks like a "memory" corruption to me and since it is virtualized system, > you should check if host system is ok. > Memory in quotes because this issue could be also related to a storage > sub-system (local or network at

Re: Kernel message: BUG: Bad page state in process kworker

2021-03-12 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 13.03.2021 11:31, Michael Grant wrote: I'm seeing lots of errors like this in my kern.log on 2 of 3 of my deban Linodes running testing on Linode's provided kerne 5.10.13. Is this a problem in Debian or is this a Linode issue? Mar 12 19:32:18 strange kernel: [10849.820363] BUG

Kernel message: BUG: Bad page state in process kworker

2021-03-12 Thread Michael Grant
I'm seeing lots of errors like this in my kern.log on 2 of 3 of my deban Linodes running testing on Linode's provided kerne 5.10.13. Is this a problem in Debian or is this a Linode issue? Mar 12 19:32:18 strange kernel: [10849.820363] BUG: Bad page state in process kworker/0:3 pfn:

Re: Finding related package for bug report regarding display output

2021-03-12 Thread Andrei POPESCU
gt; address failed with -5 > > > I wanted to file a bug but were discouraged because one should name the > related package. Those who do not know the related package shall reach out to > the mailing list. > > So here am I. Could you please help me to find out which package is

Re: Finding related package for bug report regarding display output

2021-03-11 Thread IL Ka
> > > > since 26th of February I have problems with the DisplayPort outputs > > of my Lenovo ThinkPad T470p. If I use the notebooks output I can get > > one external monitor to function but daisy chaining does not work. If > > I use the output of the docking station, the external monitors do not >

Re: Finding related package for bug report regarding display output

2021-03-11 Thread Joe
iled with -5 > > > I wanted to file a bug but were discouraged because one should name > the related package. Those who do not know the related package shall > reach out to the mailing list. > > So here am I. Could you please help me to find out which package is > affected so

Finding related package for bug report regarding display output

2021-03-10 Thread Max Görner
. At boot, betwenen GRUB and disk encryption, there is a error message that reads relevant: [drm:drm_dp_send_link_address [drm_kms_helper]] *ERROR* Sending link address failed with -5 I wanted to file a bug but were discouraged because one should name the related package. Those who do not

Re: Preseed Bug or User Error?

2021-03-03 Thread john doe
On 3/3/2021 11:53 PM, Charles Curley wrote: On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:47:16 + Brian wrote: Major improvement, thank you! I did have to answer some questions on the way through, but did get a good connection. Good. As I tried to indicate, the priority at which d-i is run affects which questio

Re: Preseed Bug or User Error?

2021-03-03 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:47:16 + Brian wrote: > > Major improvement, thank you! I did have to answer some questions on > > the way through, but did get a good connection. > > Good. As I tried to indicate, the priority at which d-i is run affects > which questions are asked. Otherwise you get

Re: Preseed Bug or User Error?

2021-03-02 Thread Brian
On Tue 02 Mar 2021 at 10:45:54 -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:25:02 + > Brian wrote: > > > I wonder if this line is sufficient? Based on what works for me at > > priority critucal: > > > > d-i netcfg/wireless_show_essids select manual > > d-i netcfg/wireless_essid stri

Re: Preseed Bug or User Error?

2021-03-02 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:25:02 + Brian wrote: > I wonder if this line is sufficient? Based on what works for me at > priority critucal: > > d-i netcfg/wireless_show_essids select manual > d-i netcfg/wireless_essid string Curleynet2 > d-i netcfg/wireless_security_type select wpa > d-i netcfg/wir

Re: Preseed Bug or User Error?

2021-03-02 Thread Brian
On Mon 01 Mar 2021 at 16:27:48 -0700, Charles Curley wrote: [...] > ### Description: Wireless network type for ${iface}: > # Choose WEP/Open if the network is open or secured with WEP. > # Choose WPA/WPA2 if the network is protected with WPA/WPA2 PSK > # (Pre-Shared Key). > # d-i netcfg/wir

Preseed Bug or User Error?

2021-03-01 Thread Charles Curley
fails. I have the syslog files from both a sucessful manual configuration and from a failure, but have not attached them here. So, is there an error in my preseed file, or have I hit a bug in d-i? And if the latter, under what package should I file it? Preseed wireless interfa

Re: [BUG REPORT] luajit-2.1.0-beta3/jit/bcsave.lua:240: cannot convert 'nil' to 'unsigned short'

2021-02-24 Thread YunQiang Su
Ohh, this packages hasn't been update for so long. If no objection, I will upload the current git snapshot. Tiezhu Yang 于2021年2月24日周三 上午11:15写道: > > (1) Background > Source: luajit > Version: luajit_2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.3_mips64el.deb > Severity: important > Link: https://packages.debian.org/sid/lu

[BUG REPORT] luajit-2.1.0-beta3/jit/bcsave.lua:240: cannot convert 'nil' to 'unsigned short'

2021-02-23 Thread Tiezhu Yang
(1) Background Source: luajit Version: luajit_2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.3_mips64el.deb Severity: important Link: https://packages.debian.org/sid/luajit (2) Description of problem When I build bcc, there exists the following build error: [ 34%] Generating bcc.o /usr/bin/luajit: /usr/share/luajit-2.1.0-be

Re: authentication bug (or feature?) with multiple encrypted lvm2 volume groups

2021-02-23 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:19:03 +0100 Marco Möller wrote: > Obviously, the in Step 2 entered (wrong) password (for "A") is stored > and without further interactive consultation automatically used as > the input for the password authentication of "B". > Is this a

authentication bug (or feature?) with multiple encrypted lvm2 volume groups

2021-02-23 Thread Marco Möller
it is asked for the password of "B", I would enter it in a Step 8 correctly and consequently in a Step 9 the "B" would be opened. Obviously, the in Step 2 entered (wrong) password (for "A") is stored and without further interactive consultation automatically used a

Re: Looking for where to file a bug

2021-02-09 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:31:05AM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: > Joshua Brickel wrote: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > gsettings-desktop-schemas : Breaks: mutter (< 3.31.4) but 3.30.2-9~deb10u1 > > is to be installed > > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks

Re: Looking for where to file a bug

2021-02-08 Thread Sven Hartge
desktop-schemas : Breaks: mutter (< 3.31.4) but 3.30.2-9~deb10u1 > is to be installed > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused > by held packages. > Should I file this against dpkg or against a different package? There is no bug in any package here, a

Looking for where to file a bug

2021-02-08 Thread Joshua Brickel
Hi, I am running debian testing (bullseye). But something happened in the package manager such that I can no longer install packages. When I try I keep getting the following message: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gsettings-desktop-schemas : Breaks: mutter (< 3.31.4) but 3.30.

Re: If some package have serious bug and fixed on unstable and testing release, how long it will be available on stable release?

2021-02-01 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 05:08:50AM +, Robbi Nespu wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 07:55:30 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > So, your Subject as received by me, after I un-mangle it, reads something > > like this: > > > > If some package have serious bug and fixed o

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >