Quoting Linux-Fan (2020-02-13 21:40:13)
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
> > Quoting Linux-Fan (2020-02-13 20:29:47)
> > > having seen this recently on the mailing list, I am interested to
> > > try out `mmdebstrap` (as a replacement for `debootstrap`). The
> > > ultimate goal of my use of these
Linux-Fan writes:
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
[...]
Being such a simple invocation, I thought I must have made some rather
obvious mistake, because my command very much follows the manpage. I had
thought that the complex part would only come afterwards :)
I recommend to read section "MODES"
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
Quoting Linux-Fan (2020-02-13 20:29:47)
> Hello list members,
>
> having seen this recently on the mailing list, I am interested to try out
> `mmdebstrap` (as a replacement for `debootstrap`). The ultimate goal of my
> use of these utilities is to arrive at an image
Quoting Linux-Fan (2020-02-13 20:29:47)
> Hello list members,
>
> having seen this recently on the mailing list, I am interested to try out
> `mmdebstrap` (as a replacement for `debootstrap`). The ultimate goal of my
> use of these utilities is to arrive at an image suitable for booting an
Hello list members,
having seen this recently on the mailing list, I am interested to try out
`mmdebstrap` (as a replacement for `debootstrap`). The ultimate goal of my
use of these utilities is to arrive at an image suitable for booting an armhf
SBC (Banana Pi M2+ EDU). Existing (overly
On Vi, 17 mai 19, 22:04:32, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Hi
Hi Paul,
> Following on from Francisco post, I had been thinking about writing
> something about getting started for a while. So decided to just get on
> and do it.
>
> http://zleap.net/debian-getting-started/
>
&
good effort, and a much needed type of promotion
thanks
On 5/17/19 2:04 PM, Paul Sutton wrote:
Hi
Following on from Francisco post, I had been thinking about writing
something about getting started for a while. So decided to just get on
and do it.
http://zleap.net/debian-getting-started/
I
Hi
Following on from Francisco post, I had been thinking about writing
something about getting started for a while. So decided to just get on
and do it.
http://zleap.net/debian-getting-started/
I am trying to write this from my own view point of being new and
explain how I got started and how
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 08:24 +0300, Jarle Aase wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for the noise.
I started trying more of the suggestions in different forum threads
regarding this problem, and
aptitude install qtdeclarative5-dev
solved it.
That sounds like a dependency problem, be sure to file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have put aside some time this weekend to see what I can do with Qt
Quick.
However, when I try to compile the skeleton hello world application
Qt Creator makes when I create a new project, I get this error:
08:01:47: Running steps for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
Sorry for the noise.
I started trying more of the suggestions in different forum threads
regarding this problem, and
aptitude install qtdeclarative5-dev
solved it.
Jarle
On 05/23/2015 08:15 AM, Jarle Aase wrote:
Hi,
I have put
On Friday 02 May 2014 16:22:10 Thierry Chatelet wrote:
Hi list
Trying to install ledgersmb from sid I got error 404: no such file..., when
doing localhost/ledgersmb/setup.pl
I read the Debian doc a bit more and I found in file:
/usr/share/doc/ledgersmb/faq.html the following:
About
Hi list
I installed ledgersmb from sid package. I tried to connect to it using
localhost:ledgersmb/setup.pl as stated in many tutorial.I got 'not found'.
All tutorials I found are for ubuntu, none for debian. Anyway, I tried
changing the ownership of /usr/share/ledgersmb as stated in those
Am 2008-01-24 23:34:44, schrieb Martin Marcher:
aptitude install xen-linx-image-2.6-xen-amd64
no i'm not joking, those with the hypervisor and ioemu and i was set, I had
the 2 or 3 minor updates since etch release and all of those kernels worked
fine.
I am using the
Am 2008-01-24 21:02:02, schrieb Ted Hilts:
Also, I was talking about kernel versions higher than yours (up in the
twenties where yours was 18) and 32 bit. But whether the CPU is 32 bit
Sorry, but I am using the latest linux-image-2.6.23-1-xen-686 from
Unstable/Sid which I have tried to
Am 2008-01-25 12:11:35, schrieb Martin Marcher:
Any specific reason you need a newer kernel? (Again) I wouldn't do that on a
server machine. Also xen patches are always a couple of versions behind -
at least in my experience - so they only apply cleanly to the version
stated on xensource
Yes,
Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
I'm trying to get started with Xen.
Still trying to build a Xen kernel with or without the dfsg. Found
this though;
http://help.lockergnome.com/linux/build-XEN-make-kpkg-ftopict384180.html
Michael
Still trying to
Rick Thomas wrote:
I sincerely hope that the lack of Xen support in Lenny is a temporary
thing that will be fixed before the first Beta release. Does anybody
know what's the problem?
The problem is that xen is quite behind with kernels, afaik it's a HUGE
patch to apply and the most recent
Well, that's too bad.
Is this in any way related to the error messages I got when I tried
to do
aptitude update aptitude dist-upgrade
on my Xen/Etch test machine?
I'm particularly concerned about libc6-xen being marked broken.
For what it's worth, my other Etch machines navigated the
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Martin Marcher wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
I sincerely hope that the lack of Xen support in Lenny is a temporary
thing that will be fixed before the first Beta release. Does anybody
know what's the problem?
The problem is that xen is quite behind with kernels,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:59:49PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Martin Marcher wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
I sincerely hope that the lack of Xen support in Lenny is a temporary
thing that will be fixed before the first Beta release. Does anybody
know what's the
Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
I'm trying to get started with Xen.
Thanks!
Rick
I don't know if you've been here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect_setup_xen3_debian, but, I too am
trying to build a XEN enabled kernel using linux 2.6.23.9. This link
looked straightforward
Ted Hilts wrote:
Also, I was talking about kernel versions higher than yours (up in the
twenties where yours was 18) and 32 bit. But whether the CPU is 32 bit
debian stable highest version number is 2.6.18 so there is no way to get a
stable distro with a higher version number (stable as in:
On Jan 24, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Martin Marcher wrote:
Jozef Peterka wrote:
Hi all,
I might be rushing in to conversation, but I will try to install
Debian
Etch and make it Dom0 this very weekend. I really look forward to
it -
although with a little hope to success :)
Nevermind, I wanted
Hi all,
I might be rushing in to conversation, but I will try to install Debian
Etch and make it Dom0 this very weekend. I really look forward to it -
although with a little hope to success :)
Nevermind, I wanted wish you good luck with xen, and the important is
let everybody here know what
Jozef Peterka wrote:
Hi all,
I might be rushing in to conversation, but I will try to install Debian
Etch and make it Dom0 this very weekend. I really look forward to it -
although with a little hope to success :)
Nevermind, I wanted wish you good luck with xen, and the important is
let
Martin
My reply is at the very bottom.
Ted
Martin Marcher wrote:
Jozef Peterka wrote:
Hi all,
I might be rushing in to conversation, but I will try to install Debian
Etch and make it Dom0 this very weekend. I really look forward to it -
although with a little hope to success :)
Nevermind,
On Thursday 24 January 2008 17:13 Ted Hilts wrote:
Martin
What is the exact kernel version you are running on both machines and
what are their CPU designations? The problems in the past have not been
with the distribution but with various kernels. Did you compile your
systems from source
Martin
Thanks for your information, you will find my reply further down.
Martin Marcher wrote:
On Thursday 24 January 2008 17:13 Ted Hilts wrote:
Martin
What is the exact kernel version you are running on both machines and
what are their CPU designations? The problems in the past have
I'm trying to get started with Xen.
I've installed Lenny and a bunch of packages that looked interesting
and mentioned Xen in their descriptions. But there does not seem to
be a Xen enabled kernel available. Is Xen built-in to the Lenny
kernels, or what?
I plan to spend tonite with my
Rick Thomas wrote:
I'm trying to get started with Xen.
Thanks!
Rick
I don't know if you've been here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect_setup_xen3_debian, but, I too am
trying to build a XEN enabled kernel using linux 2.6.23.9. This link
looked straightforward and possible. I have not
Hi.
I'd like to get spamassasin going on my desktop (testing/lenny). Mail
enters this box via fetchmail which was configured to poll an imap
server. Exim delivers it to the users. The procmail package is installed.
Configuration of fetchmail was done by fetchmailconf, no special exim
tricks.
Rick
My response at very bottom.
Ted
Rick Thomas wrote:
I'm trying to get started with Xen.
I've installed Lenny and a bunch of packages that looked interesting
and mentioned Xen in their descriptions. But there does not seem to
be a Xen enabled kernel available. Is Xen built-in to the
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:52:57 -0500
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:42:02PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:04:00PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
running etch in console (no
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:42:02PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:04:00PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
running etch in console (no X);
I just want to take inbound
running etch in console (no X);
I just want to take inbound Email forward to exchange server only
email w/ valid recipients.
isn't there a document that says how to do this in less than 400
pages???
TIA
running etch in console (no X);
I just want to take inbound Email forward to exchange server only
email w/ valid recipients.
isn't there a document that says how to do this in less than 400
pages???
TIA
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:04:00PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
running etch in console (no X);
I just want to take inbound Email forward to exchange server only
email w/ valid recipients.
isn't there a document that says how to do this in less than 400
pages???
No. :)
It sounds like
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:04:00PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
running etch in console (no X);
I just want to take inbound Email forward to exchange server only
email w/ valid recipients.
isn't there a document that says how to do this in less than 400
pages???
I suspect this won't be
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:04:00PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
running etch in console (no X);
I just want to take inbound Email forward to exchange server only
email w/ valid recipients.
isn't there a document that says how to do this in
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:42:02PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:04:00PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
running etch in console (no X);
I just want to take inbound Email forward to exchange server only
email w/
On Nov 16, 4:50 pm, David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:04:00PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
running etch in console (no X);
I just want to take inbound Email forward to exchange server only
email w/
exim needs to do,
is filter forward valid inbound Email...
I read Doug's reply, and I'm not 100% sure what a smarthost is, but
don't think this is that application...
Andrew,
that config example looks ALOT closer to a quick getting started
manual than ANYTHING else i've seen!
I'll have to dig
On Nov 16, 5:00 pm, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:42:02PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:04:00PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
running etch in console (no X);
I just want
just
like an smtp-speaking MUA (thunderbird, sylpheed, what have you) and
it simply routes all mail through a host called a smarthost, further
upstream and that smarthost is the one that actually routes the mail.
that config example looks ALOT closer to a quick getting started
manual than
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:18:10PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 5:00 pm, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:42:02PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:04:00PM -0600,
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 19:24 -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:18:10PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 5:00 pm, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:42:02PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:32 PM,
On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your description of a mail hub does sound like what I want...
I'll see if I can download the source dist of the exim pkg... chk
into that that would be REALLY nice...
OK. I'll dig a little to see if I have copies of the config files
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:41:58PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will involve using LDAP to verify the recipients, since you're
using Exchange 5.5. This is actually a big improvement over how
Exchange itself deals with mail -- it
OK, I withdraw the question. Will find useful answers elsewhere or stay with
OpenOffice's DB (as I said, not all that bad!).
The flame war has gotten too ugly. I think we can argue about the merits of
one of the other programs with a bit more common courtesy and civility and
end the discussion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/07 12:26, David Baron wrote:
OK, I withdraw the question. Will find useful answers elsewhere or stay with
OpenOffice's DB (as I said, not all that bad!).
The flame war has gotten too ugly. I think we can argue about the merits of
one
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:53:52AM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
What a useless and boring discussion you have started Ron!! Do you have
to just be against everyone who thinks MySQL has at least some good
features too? I just dropped the discussion when realized that it goes
nowhere, but if
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:10:27PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
But you're coming from an angle where people know or must learn all of
that just before they're able to even start. Don't you see how not
having to learn that is faster for some people?
Ever have to share the road with
1. The one who should learn something is you, and not me. So, I would
suggest you to learn something basic about database concepts and I don't
care if you ever come back or not!
2. You do not have to involve yourself in any single topic you see in
the forum, specially if you are not asked to
? Where is your invitation to participate in this thread? The
original post that started this thread was a request for help getting
started with MySQL or PostgreSQL. I am subscribed to the list and
received the message. That's all the invitiation I needed.
3. If you have used credit card in stone
Danesh Daroui wrote:
5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
the date which is sent to the database is definitely correct before
inserting.
This is one of the most pathetic things I've ever
Danesh Daroui wrote:
5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
the date which is sent to the database is definitely correct before
inserting.
This is one of the most pathetic things I've ever
Danesh Daroui wrote:
5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
the date which is sent to the database is definitely correct before
inserting.
This is one of the most pathetic things I've ever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/07 07:54, Dan H. wrote:
Danesh Daroui wrote:
5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
the date which is sent to the database is
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/02/07 07:54, Dan H. wrote:
Danesh Daroui wrote:
5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
the date which is sent to the database is definitely correct before
for help getting
started with MySQL or PostgreSQL. I am subscribed to the list and
received the message. That's all the invitiation I needed.
Yeah really! Except this one, I don't like to see any answer from you to
my posts!
Sorry. Public place, public list. If you don't want
On Thursday, 01.02.2007 at 06:18 +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
About allowing corrupted data, it is not the responsibility of database
engine to verify if the data is valid or not since the database engine
only Manages data and not validate.
It depends what you mean by 'validate'. The
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
In that same document, they give the reason for doing so:
The reason for using the preceding rules in non-strict
mode is that we can't check these conditions until the
statement has begun executing.
Never expected to start a flame-war over this.
I need visual tools to set the stuff up and run it and they are not evident.
Actually, the OpenOffice database is not at all bad (except that it imports
empty spreadsheet items as blanks (NOT EMPTY, NOT NULL). It can be readilly
queried, reports
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:18:23PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
Never expected to start a flame-war over this.
Hey. We're here to help :-)
I need visual tools to set the stuff up and run it and they are not evident.
Hmm. I like to work from the commandline. If I find myself needing to
I've been debating whether or not to make a comment on this discussion,
but it finally got to me. I think you're being way too hard on MySQL
considering the fact that this question originated from the idea of
using a database backend for OpenOffice.org. Yeah, I didn't like MySQL
is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 12:16, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
I've been debating whether or not to make a comment on this discussion,
but it finally got to me. I think you're being way too hard on MySQL
considering the fact that this question originated from the idea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 07:31, Max Hyre wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
In that same document, they give the reason for doing so:
The reason for using the preceding rules in non-strict
mode
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 12:16, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
I've been debating whether or not to make a comment on this discussion,
but it finally got to me. I think you're being way too hard on MySQL
considering the fact that this question
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:16:18PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
(1) MySQL is shown to be faster in a single-user environment than
Postgres, especially with complicated SELECT statements
IIRC, this does not hold for transactional tables. So, we are back to
the if you don't care about your
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:37:39PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
The fundamental difference is licensing. If Windows was open source, I
certainly wouldn't bother disagreeing with them if they specified which
users would benefit more from Windows. And on that issue MySQL wins
because you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 17:03, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:37:39PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
[snip]
Yes, they were fast when computers were still slow. Unfortunately,
many people were willing to give up data integrity in exchange
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:16:18PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
(2) MySQL is a shorter learning curve for new users
What? In what way? Learning to develop against MySQL is no harder or
easier than learning to develop against PostgreSQL (besides the fact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 20:10, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:16:18PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
(2) MySQL is a shorter learning curve for new users
What? In what way? Learning to develop against
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:37 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 20:10, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:16:18PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
(2) MySQL is a shorter learning curve for new
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/01/07 20:10, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:16:18PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
(2) MySQL is a shorter learning curve for new users
What? In what way? Learning to develop against MySQL is no harder or
easier
Ron Johnson wrote:
That splatting noise is my hurl splatting onto the opposite wall.
Remind me never to hire you.
Are you sure you don't work for Microsoft? Or maybe you're an MCSE?
It's confirmed. You *are* an MCSE.
For that I may implement my next database with MySQL (instead of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 23:41, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
That splatting noise is my hurl splatting onto the opposite wall.
Remind me never to hire you.
Are you sure you don't work for Microsoft? Or maybe you're an MCSE?
It's confirmed.
I have an openoffice spreadsheet from which I want to generate two related
tables. I have tried most everything installed.
Stuff from OpenOffice will generate a database with table entries named by the
first line in the spreadsheet. This can, indeed, be queried, sort of.
I would like to get
On (31/01/07 19:17), David Baron wrote:
I have an openoffice spreadsheet from which I want to generate two related
tables. I have tried most everything installed.
Stuff from OpenOffice will generate a database with table entries named by
the
first line in the spreadsheet. This can,
David Baron wrote:
I have an openoffice spreadsheet from which I want to generate two related
tables. I have tried most everything installed.
Stuff from OpenOffice will generate a database with table entries named by
the
first line in the spreadsheet. This can, indeed, be queried, sort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/07 12:29, Danesh Daroui wrote:
David Baron wrote:
[snip]
MySQL is definitely best choice. If you have not still installed
latest version of MySQL do it as following:
Well, if you *insist* on starting a war, so be it.
MySQL is a toy piece
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:17:48PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
I have an openoffice spreadsheet from which I want to generate two related
tables. I have tried most everything installed.
Stuff from OpenOffice will generate a database with table entries named by
the
first line in the
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
How do I get started here?
First. Please do not use MySQL, unless you don't care about your data.
Please stop this MySQL vs. PostgreSQL bashing. Each has their place. If
users of MySQL don't care about their data, then I guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/07 16:50, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
How do I get started here?
First. Please do not use MySQL, unless you don't care about your data.
Please stop this MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 14:20, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/31/07 16:50, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
How do I get started here?
First. Please do not use MySQL, unless you don't care about your data.
Please stop this MySQL vs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/07 17:54, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 14:20, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/31/07 16:50, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
How do I get started here?
First. Please
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 15:27, Ron Johnson wrote:
You're talking to someone who's been a DBA for 10 years; you will
not win this argument.
Eh, so ya got three years on me. :)
j
--
Joshua Kugler
Lead System Admin -- Senior Programmer
http://www.eeinternet.com
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:50:14PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
How do I get started here?
First. Please do not use MySQL, unless you don't care about your data.
Please stop this MySQL vs. PostgreSQL bashing. Each has
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
In that same document, they give the reason for doing so:
The reason for using the preceding rules in non-strict mode is that we can't
check these conditions until the statement has begun executing. We can't just
roll back
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
In that same document, they give the reason for doing so:
The reason for using the preceding rules in non-strict mode is that we can't
check these conditions until the statement has begun executing.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:18:03AM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
Maybe MySQL is not the best database engine in the world but it is one
the best engines. I have worked on MySQL for several years and from four
years ago I have started to develop my own database engine inspired by
MySQL.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/07 23:18, Danesh Daroui wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
[snip]
Maybe MySQL is not the best database engine in the world but it is one
the best engines. I have worked on
I found the packages I needed to get gpgsm working with Kmail,
but gpgsm shows no keys; and gpgsm --gen-key gives me this error:
gpgsm: this function is not yet available from the commandline...
My google-fu has failed me... Help would be nice g
I do have gpg working with OpenGPG/Mime but not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I found the packages I needed to get kmail to see gpgsm; but I
can't figure out how to get gpgsm to generate keys... Gpgsm tells
me that gpgsm --gen-keys is not supported from the command line.
My google-fu has failed me, please help.
I /do/ have
On Thursday 25 November 2004 9:40 pm, Brad Sims wrote:
I found the packages I needed to get gpgsm working with Kmail,
but gpgsm shows no keys; and gpgsm --gen-key gives me this error:
gpgsm: this function is not yet available from the commandline...
My google-fu has failed me... Help would
I recently installed woody on a server and did all security updates. Works
fine, except for a few packages not included (eg. usermin). I'm just using
it as a mail/web/print server. Wouldn't use it as desktop.
Easy network configuration the debian way:
# apt-get install etherconf
#
Lian Liming wrote:
Andrew Konosky wrote:
Hello,
I started out in Linux with RedHat 8.0, then 9.0, and now I run Fedora
Core 2 on my primary computer. I have used the Knoppix cd a lot, which
I know is based on Debian, so I wanted to try out the full version of
Debian. I just installed Debian on
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:24:26 +0200
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have another problem with the installation with Debian 3.0.
The installer only support two filesystem type: ext2 and xfs. I
prefer ext3 and reiserfs. So it is not convience for me. I
choose ext2 for installation
Hello,
I started out in Linux with RedHat 8.0, then 9.0, and now I run Fedora
Core 2 on my primary computer. I have used the Knoppix cd a lot, which I
know is based on Debian, so I wanted to try out the full version of
Debian. I just installed Debian on my old computer, which was running
SuSe
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
