On 2023-09-17, Greg Marks wrote:
>
> I am trying to use Ghostscript to resize PDF files to letter page size,
> but on certain files the output is not the correct size. As an example:
>
>$wget https://gmarks.org/abrams_anh_pardo.pdf
>
>$pdfinfo abrams_anh_pardo.pdf=
I am trying to use Ghostscript to resize PDF files to letter page size,
but on certain files the output is not the correct size. As an example:
$wget https://gmarks.org/abrams_anh_pardo.pdf
$pdfinfo abrams_anh_pardo.pdf
...
Page size: 539 x 737 pts
...
$gs -o
On Sun 08 Mar 2020 at 22:45:12 (+0100), Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Has this problem been mentioned in the BTS, you think? I found
> this [1] but no one seems to match this situation exactly what
> I can see (?)
>
> Can any of you guys reproduce it? I'm on buster [2] with
> imagemagick 6.9 [3]
No.
> c
Has this problem been mentioned in the BTS, you think? I found
this [1] but no one seems to match this situation exactly what
I can see (?)
Can any of you guys reproduce it? I'm on buster [2] with
imagemagick 6.9 [3]
command:
convert -composite bg.png fg.png -gravity center out.png
error mess
ling list is this one:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/
Above advice is sensible in general.
For this particular issue, look into upgrading _other_ parts of the
command chain than Ghostscript, however (as per my previous post).
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist
If the newer version (currently v9.50 in bullseye (testing)) would solve
the problem, then you may want to ask if someone could place this newer
version from bullseye into the buster-backports repository. Afterwards
you could install the backported version 9.50 from there without hassle.
This w
On 2020-03-08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> The solution is *not* to downgrade: It is a security-related change.
>
> The solution is therefore to fix the Postscript code.
>
> That said, if you insist on doing a potentially dangerous _workaround_=20
> then there's https://snapshot.debian.org/
>
Cou
Hello,
I have not tried this and do not use imagemagick directly (it is
installed as a dependance on my system): perhaps you can deinstall
imagemagick and install graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat instead?
(Sorry, Emmanuel, my mistake, I dit click on "answer" and sent tp you a
private mail)
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> The solution is *not* to downgrade: It is
> a security-related change.
OK, but here they say:
Debian Buster (10) just came into Soft Freeze stage, after Full
freeze it will be too late and this newly introduced bug will
not be fixed for Debian Buster ...
omp.png'
> @ error/convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/3258."
>
> I heard the solution is downgrade ghostscript but
> 'aptitude versions' only shows one version, 9.27 (or
> 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u3).
>
> Do I need to add additional sources or how do
> I downgrade to a version
It seems convert doesn't work on Debian Buster, I get an error for
this command
convert -composite $bg $fg -gravity center comp.png
namely this message: "convert-im6.q16: no images defined `comp.png'
@ error/convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/3258."
I heard the solution is d
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 8:01 AM Flo wrote:
>
> I recompiled the versions 9.24, 9.23 and 9.22:
> It changed from 9.22 to 9.23 . Does anyone has an idea what changed here
> such that the size of the pdf files are bigger?
>
> Flo.
I do not know much about ghostscript pdf c
I recompiled the versions 9.24, 9.23 and 9.22:
It changed from 9.22 to 9.23 . Does anyone has an idea what changed here
such that the size of the pdf files are bigger?
Flo.
On 09/28/18 23:54, Flo wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am using ghostscript to make pdf files smaller.
>
> T
Dear All,
I am using ghostscript to make pdf files smaller.
Three days ago I upgraded my system and now I am running 9.25 . However
the size of the pdf files increased significantly.
I guess a default value changed. Does anyone know about it. I'd like to
have it the way as it worked b
Hello Vaibhav,
Vaibhav Niku wrote:
> And 'Artifax Software, Inc' grants me the rights as set out in the GPL. GPL
> allows me to make any modifications I see fit, and _use_ the resulting
> software. I may choose to remove the lines which insert the copyright
> notice in all PS files.
Sure, but th
Vaibhav Niku writes:
> And 'Artifax Software, Inc' grants me the rights as set out in the
> GPL. GPL allows me to make any modifications I see fit, and _use_ the
> resulting software. I may choose to remove the lines which insert the
> copyright notice in all PS files.
Use, yes. However, if you d
Hello Claudius
> > Firefox is free software and you are free to modify it, either
> before or after you install it. I chose to modify it before I
> installed it. I modified it by removing the EULA. So there is no
> EULA, no agreement between me and the Mozilla Corporation, no
> contract.
On Sb, 22 dec 12, 16:35:45, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>
> The Mozilla foundation granted him the rights as set out in the
> license, and only these allow him to use the software. Last time I
> checked, this EULA was simply a reiteration of the license (i.e.
> Mozilla Public License) and some hints at
Hello Vaibhav,
please fix your mail client. It currently breaks threading (no In-Reply-To:
or References: header), CC’s people for no good reason (I am subscribed to
the list and do not wish to receive off-list copies, cf. [1]) and doesn’t
break lines sensibly (at about 80 characters).
Vaibhav Ni
Filed a bug-report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696539
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1356191986.55498.yahoomailclas...@web1617
Hello Claudius
I am not convinced that the notice is harmless. At any rate, since the GS code
is released as GPL, I am well within my rights to alter it as I suggested.
(But, IANAL.)
> Note that in some jurisdictions, not even
> such a notice is necessary in order to hold the copyright, nor doe
Claudius writes:
> Furthermore note that even though Artifex Software holds the copyright
> to parts of this file, it may well allow you to do whatever you want
> with your files.
It does. You just can't prevent anyone from making copies of the prolog
(oversimplified). The copyright on the rest
Hello Vaibhav,
Vaibhav Niku wrote:
> Hello all
>
> pdf2ps, which is a frontend to gs, inserts a copyright notice in all PS files
> it produces. I am using `GPL Ghostscript 8.71 (2010-02-10)'. Files look like
> this:
>
> %!PS-Adobe-3.0
> ...
> %%Creat
Debian
makes ‘Iceweasel’ out of ‘Firefox’ -- just so that Debian users don't have to
sign a EULA with Mozilla.)
Still, Ghostscript (in its present state) should not be a part of Debian.
Indeed, if signing a EULA is unacceptable, how much worse is having your code
copyrighted by a third
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:09:32PM -0800, Vaibhav Niku wrote:
> pdf2ps, which is a frontend to gs, inserts a copyright notice in all PS files
> it produces. I am using `GPL Ghostscript 8.71 (2010-02-10)'. Files look like
> this:
>
> %!PS-Adobe-3.0
> ...
> %%Cr
duces. I am using `GPL Ghostscript 8.71 (2010-02-10)'. Files look like
> this:
>
> %!PS-Adobe-3.0
> ...
> %%Creator: GPL Ghostscript 871 (pswrite)
> ...
> %%BeginProlog
> % This copyright applies to everything between here and the %%EndProlog:
> % Copyright (C)
Hello all
pdf2ps, which is a frontend to gs, inserts a copyright notice in all PS files
it produces. I am using `GPL Ghostscript 8.71 (2010-02-10)'. Files look like
this:
%!PS-Adobe-3.0
...
%%Creator: GPL Ghostscript 871 (pswrite)
...
%%BeginProlog
% This copyright applies to every
Hi all,
Because truetype font is somewhat obscure on screen, I wish to use
truetype as printing font while bitmap fonts for screen display. Can I
do that?
Thank you for any instructions.
Best regards,
Wu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Hi Tutty,
Thank you for your reply.
> What do you mean obscure?
I understand that bitmap fonts are lousy for 'zoom' screen display, but
in normal condition, bitmap fonts display more concrete on screen than
truetype fonts, and this difference may not be very notable for western
alphabet character
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:21:35PM -0700, Wu Kejia wrote:
> Because truetype font is somewhat obscure on screen, I wish to use
> truetype as printing font while bitmap fonts for screen display. Can I
> do that?
What do you mean obscure? If you use bitmap fonts for screen display,
you'll get a lou
Hi all,
Because truetype font is somewhat obscure on screen, I wish to use
truetype as printing font while bitmap fonts for screen display. Can I
do that?
Thank you for any instructions.
Best regards,
Wu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:16:08 -0400, I wrote:
> In my recently installed Etch system, ghostscript seems unable to find some
> common fonts.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:15:37 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty asked:
> Are you running gs and
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:16:08PM -0400, Steve Kleene wrote:
> In my recently installed Etch system, ghostscript seems unable to find some
> common fonts.
Are you running gs and do you have the gsfonts package(s) installed?
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
In my recently installed Etch system, ghostscript seems unable to find some
common fonts.
I'm trying to work with a big pile of lecture images I've made over the years
with Adobe Illustrator, and most of them fail now in gs. I made a test file
circle.ai that has just a black circ
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Thomassen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to convert a dvi2ps-generated file to TIFF, using
>
> $ gs -q -dNOPROMPT -dBATCH -sDEVICE=tiffg4 -sOutputFile=file.tif file.ps
Try -dNOPAUSE and -dQUIET
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
I'm trying to convert a dvi2ps-generated file to TIFF, using
$ gs -q -dNOPROMPT -dBATCH -sDEVICE=tiffg4 -sOutputFile=file.tif file.ps
For this to work, I have to press return for each page. I googled around a
bit and found out that the PostScript showpage command seems to be missing.
(Omitti
Cameron L. Spitzer schrieb am Montag, 23. Oktober 2006 02:02:
>> I'm trying to convert a dvi2ps-generated file to TIFF, using
>>
>> $ gs -q -dNOPROMPT -dBATCH -sDEVICE=tiffg4 -sOutputFile=file.tif file.ps
>
> Try -dNOPAUSE and -dQUIET
Thanks! I now also found it in the manpage, but I couldn't bef
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Thomassen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to convert a dvi2ps-generated file to TIFF, using
>
> $ gs -q -dNOPROMPT -dBATCH -sDEVICE=tiffg4 -sOutputFile=file.tif file.ps
Try -dNOPAUSE and -dQUIET
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
k
its a canon pixma MP-130 multifunction
i can't find it in any of the compatibility lists but i've read a bit
about postscript/ghostscript
and was wondering if the printer might be supported by these technologies
i don't know enough about postscript/ghostscript to be sure about the
i've read a bitabout postscript/ghostscriptand was wondering if the printer might be supported by thesetechnologiesi don't know enough about postscript/ghostscript to be sure about the
compatibilitylet alone how i would set the printer up once linux is installedif my printer will not work with linu
lists but i've read a bit
about postscript/ghostscript
and was wondering if the printer might be supported by these
technologies
i don't know enough about postscript/ghostscript to be sure about the
compatibility
let alone how i would set the printer up once linux is installed
if my p
Dear group,
I was wondering if anyone had advice on running ghostscript 8.51 on etch.
There doesn't appear to be a Debian package for this version.
I've downloaded the source (from ghostscript.com), compiled it, and
installed it in /usr/local. At first glance it seems to work OK. B
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:33:24AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Kenward Vaughan([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
...
> > answer by tracking several packages through the bug tracking system--
> > the errors have been reported by others, with means to correct them
> > (downgrading gs-esp, a
ve both an hp 1200
> ...
> > Additionally the Gimp no longer has a print choice in its menu. This
> > would seem to be related to the upgrade of gimpprint 4.2.7 to gutenprint
> > 5.something (which I am glad to see, but...).
> >
> > The CUPS log consistently shows a Ghostscript
s
> would seem to be related to the upgrade of gimpprint 4.2.7 to gutenprint
> 5.something (which I am glad to see, but...).
>
> The CUPS log consistently shows a Ghostscript error:
>
> daddy:~# grep -A 10 Error /var/log/cups/error_log
> D [07/Aug/2005:13:58:00 -0700] [Job 1822]
S log consistently shows a Ghostscript error:
daddy:~# grep -A 10 Error /var/log/cups/error_log
D [07/Aug/2005:13:58:00 -0700] [Job 1822] ESP Ghostscript 815.00: Error: Font
Renderer Plugin ( FreeType ) return code = -1
D [07/Aug/2005:13:58:00 -0700] [Job 1822] FAPIhook NimbusRomNo9L-Regu
D [07/Aug
On Jun 10 2005, Kirill wrote:
> The system is the latest x386 sid, first installed back in 2001 from a woody
> prerelease CD. All fonts are displayed just fine on screen in KDE. In KWord
> letter spacing is bad for some fonts, specifically Times New Roman.
If you intend to generate postscript and/
I am trying to set up an HPLJ 1012 to print from KDE apps (KWord, Konqueror)
using CUPS. I am getting most fonts messed up by ghostscript (gs-esp). I've
been struggling with it for a whole week now with very little progress so far.
I have very hard time believing that I'm the only one ex
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 11:35, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
> Hello
>
> ghostscript mailing list seems utterly dead, or my problem terribly
> stupid...
>
> i am still trying to get the aculaser C4100 (Epson) running, and since
> default debian ghostscripts don't support it d
Hello
ghostscript mailing list seems utterly dead, or my problem terribly
stupid...
i am still trying to get the aculaser C4100 (Epson) running, and since
default debian ghostscripts don't support it directly i tryed to compile
a ghostscript myself...
unfortunately it stops with the
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:00:26 +0100, Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
>
> In a fit of madness, I went on a spree of reconfiguration and
> reinstallation of font-related packages. Now, I've killed ghostscript.
Hi folks,
I still don't know what happened, but after the bludgeon of d
Hi folks,
In a fit of madness, I went on a spree of reconfiguration and
reinstallation of font-related packages. Now, I've killed ghostscript.
Here's the error I get, both on firefox and enscript-created postscript
files:
Error: /invalidfont in findfont
Operand stack:
F0 Times-Ro
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 12:54, Michael Graham wrote:
> Richard wrote:
> > Anyone here know where to seek help with a ghostscript or cups
> > problem?
> > [...]
>
> Have you tried asking on the cups newsgroups? Details here:
> http://www.cups.org/newsgroup
Richard wrote:
> Anyone here know where to seek help with a ghostscript or cups
> problem? I did try asking here but got no response (problem of
> ghostscript cropping A3 images to A4 - or maybe it's cups doing that).
> I have googled with no success and have no idea how to p
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 19:22, ognen wrote:
> Richard Lyons wrote:
>
> > Anyone here know where to seek help with a ghostscript or cups
> > problem? I did try asking here but got no response (problem of
> > ghostscript cropping A3 images to A4 - or maybe it's
of that
would cause cropping of A3 pages to A4
Richard Lyons wrote:
Anyone here know where to seek help with a ghostscript or cups problem? I
did try asking here but got no response (problem of ghostscript cropping
A3 images to A4 - or maybe it's cups doing that). I have googled with
Anyone here know where to seek help with a ghostscript or cups problem? I
did try asking here but got no response (problem of ghostscript cropping
A3 images to A4 - or maybe it's cups doing that). I have googled with no
success and have no idea how to proceed.
TIA
--
richard
-
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:17:03PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
} I've looked at the archives for AFPL and GNU Ghostscript, and it doesn't
} seem like very many people are there, except for a couple here and there
} exchanging patches on the AFPL list, and complete spam on the GNU list
I've looked at the archives for AFPL and GNU Ghostscript, and it doesn't
seem like very many people are there, except for a couple here and there
exchanging patches on the AFPL list, and complete spam on the GNU list.
I'm looking at using GhostScript to convert PostScript to PCL f
grays and more black. If I view my
> > LaTeX generated dvi files they look just as beautiful as they ever did.
>
> View the dvi files in what? converted to ps first, or via advi/kdvi?
>
> If you look in 'ghostscript' options in gv, what do you find for the
> antiali
s less grays and more black.
>
> This is a bug in gs which appeared sometime between 7.07 and 8.14. It
> drove me nuts too -- I upgraded to 8.14 in an effort to get better PDF
> handling and was quite disappointed to see the results, as you were. You
> can downgrade to GNU ghost
drove me nuts too -- I upgraded to 8.14 in an effort to get better PDF
handling and was quite disappointed to see the results, as you were. You
can downgrade to GNU ghostscript (gs package?), which is still at 7.07 in
the Debian archive IIRC.
xpdf seems to do better for me for viewing PDFs. You
ful as they ever did.
View the dvi files in what? converted to ps first, or via advi/kdvi?
If you look in 'ghostscript' options in gv, what do you find for the
antialias device? I presume that under gv options, anti alias is still
selected. Here's what my three ps programs give me:
oRead does not know how to render. But if I use ghostscript to
convert PDF (with EPS) to PDF, I get a new PDF file that A.R. knows how to
digest.
Thus:
fop GemBook.fo GemBook.pdf
gs -dNOPAUSE -dNOPLATFONTS -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=GemBook_pdf.pdf
GemBook.pdf
(Note: I tried without NOPLATFONT
s as well. (I can't remember all of
> them but IIRC, some gnome packages and some ghostscript packages were relevant
> ones among them.) In any case, ever since that, my fonts have been all messed
> up. Pretty much any text I see - from the text in the GDM login box through
> t
d to give
gnome-lokkit a whirl, and that's where my problems began.
Apparently, dependencies from the install of gnome-lokkit installed and
configged a whole lot of other packages as well. (I can't remember all of
them but IIRC, some gnome packages and some ghostscript packages were relev
hown.
Is there any simple way to make ghostview/ghostscript retain the
boundingbox setting for printing?
Thank you in advance.
Johan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With stable, from mozilla I'm printing out a Greek language web page
(i.e. http://www.debian.org/index.el.html) to a ps file and the try to
view it with gv, and most of the Greek letters are missing. Is there a
way to get this working? I think I have all the Greek fonts installed,
and still no
Hi all, Happy New Year.
Thought I'd finish out the year with one newbiesque question. At work,
I'm trying to print from my Debian box (woody) on a Lexmark Optra M412
(a postscript compatible laser printer) connected to a networked Windows
machine. I'm presently using apsfilter and lpr (although I h
Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear all,
>
> after having updated my system this morning, gv and gs report:
>
> GNU Ghostscript 7.05: Can't find initialization file gs_init.ps
>
> How can I solve this problem?
>
I explained the workaround in bug #17
Dear all,
after having updated my system this morning, gv and gs report:
GNU Ghostscript 7.05: Can't find initialization file gs_init.ps
How can I solve this problem?
Thanks for any hint!
wbr,
Lukas
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch
Wanna know anything about raw ip?
Join [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi all,
I downloaded and extracted msttcorefonts with cabextract as in:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/FDU/truetype.html
However, to use them for ghostscript, they need to be converted with
a perl script in:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Font-HOWTO/x346.html
The perl script won't work (giv
I'm using the Debian install of ghostscript (6.53) and the matching
> ghostview install, so this may not answer your query, but
> nevertheless
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:53:38PM -0700, Mike Fontenot wrote:
> >
> > I'm hoping someone can tell me how Gho
Mike:
I'm using the Debian install of ghostscript (6.53) and the matching
ghostview install, so this may not answer your query, but
nevertheless
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:53:38PM -0700, Mike Fontenot wrote:
>
> I'm hoping someone can tell me how Ghostscript
> (specifical
I'm hoping someone can tell me how Ghostscript
(specifically, gs-aladdin 7.04 (testing)) is
supposed to know where the ghostscript fonts
are located (i.e., the pathname to the directory
where they reside). Is there an environment
variable that is supposed to be set to that
directory?
Also
Philippe Marzouk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a 7.05 version available in Sid.
> Maybe you should try it.
Derek Noonburg has confirmed that my problem is
solved by the 7.04 version. I think the problem is
that the fonts have either been put in the wrong place,
or else
Can anyone tell me who is the current Debian maintainer of
ghostscript? Or how I can determine that information?
Google told me that, as of about a year ago, the Debian
ghostscript maintainer was Torsten Landschoff.
I sent him an email about a problem I'm having with
gs-aladdin 7.04
Hello Mike,
On Oct 24, Mike Fontenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Can anyone tell me who is the current Debian maintainer of
| ghostscript? Or how I can determine that information?
jason@inj ( jason ) 14:34$ apt-cache show gs
Package: gs
Priority: optional
Section: text
Ins
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:22:49PM -0600, Mike Fontenot wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me who is the current Debian maintainer of
> ghostscript? Or how I can determine that information?
>
> Google told me that, as of about a year ago, the Debian
> ghostscript maintainer was Torst
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:17:36PM -0600, Mike Fontenot wrote:
>
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Try gs-aladdin instead of ghostscript. It has a more-restrictive
> > license and is in non-free (the older versions are GPL'd and exist in
> >
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try gs-aladdin instead of ghostscript. It has a more-restrictive
> license and is in non-free (the older versions are GPL'd and exist in
> main). I don't know about woody, but sarge has 7.04.
It actually WAS gs-aladdin that
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The one in unstable is 7.05. I compiled it on my sarge system from the
> unstable source. BTW do you really mean woody? Potato is history
> ;-) Woody is now the stable distribution.
I really AM running potato (except for the fact that
I installed gs_aladdin from
Try gs-aladdin instead of ghostscript. It has a more-restrictive
license and is in non-free (the older versions are GPL'd and exist in
main). I don't know about woody, but sarge has 7.04.
Bob
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 02:14:37PM -0600, Mike Fontenot wrote:
>
> The versions o
On Wed, 02 Oct 2002 14:14:37 -0600
Mike Fontenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The versions of ghostscript in potato and in woody
> don't do an adequate job of converting postscript
> to pdf (for a postscript file that I produced using
> groff, with some eqn equations).
The versions of ghostscript in potato and in woody
don't do an adequate job of converting postscript
to pdf (for a postscript file that I produced using
groff, with some eqn equations). I've been advised
by Derek Noonburg that I need a newer version of
ghostscript: version 7.04 (potat
On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 09:52, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Thanks so much for the help.
>
> but still having some issues... ;)
>
> i have configured using apsfilterconfig.
>
> i try to print test page and recieve:
>
>
> unable to write to output, fd=0, count=1000: Bad file descriptor
Try giving g
Thanks so much for the help.
but still having some issues... ;)
i have configured using apsfilterconfig.
i try to print test page and recieve:
unable to write to output, fd=0, count=1000: Bad file descriptor
how bout that? any constructive comments?
so much for honesty ;)
On Tue, 2002-0
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:42:41PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Does anyone have any clues on how to print with hpijs?
Sure do.
> i have an hp photosmart 1115
I'm sorry.
> the documentation is scarce (or i am lazy)
The second is the correct answer.
--
Marc Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To U
Does anyone have any clues on how to print with hpijs?
i have an hp photosmart 1115
the documentation is scarce (or i am lazy)
thanks
-jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s"stdout=%stderr" -
>
> When I do this I get an Unable to open the initial device error, and
> gs quits.
Try adding -dIjsUseOutputFD to the gs command line.
>From the gs documentation (Devices.htm):
-dIjsUseOutputFD
This flag indicates that Ghostscript should open the ou
I am trying to put together a filter for Cups to ensure that my elderly
Postscript printer only gets given Postscript Level 1 commands. Following
advice on the Cups list I creates a filter as below:-
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/gs -sDEVICE=pswrite -s"OUTPUTFILE=%stdout" \
-dQU
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 04:40:36PM -0600, Jay Mallar wrote:
> Boy - I bit off a HUGE chunk here, and I need some help.
>
> I have an HP OfficeJet T45. From looking around, I found that HP has
> provided some drivers, but they depend on GhostScript. I don't know exactly
Boy - I bit off a HUGE chunk here, and I need some help.
I have an HP OfficeJet T45. From looking around, I found that HP has
provided some drivers, but they depend on GhostScript. I don't know exactly
what version of GhostScript I need to have, which makes this more confusing;
but I ha
Thomas Hessling wrote
>Hello everybody, I am using gnuplot to create EPS graphics which I
embed into my LaTeX
>documents. That worked fine so far, but since the 'apt-get upgrade'
last
>weekend I get the following error by GhostScript when trying to display
>those graphics: &
Milo Thurston wrote:
> I'm running Debian 3.0, and have run into a problem when viewing
> ps files with gv. This is typical:
>
>
> Error: /invalidfont in findfontGNU Ghostscript 6.51:
> Unrecover
Error: /invalidfont in findfontGNU Ghostscript 6.51:
> Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
>
> Operand stack:
> elvetica Font Helvetica 327098 Helvetica --nostringval--
> Courier NimbusMonL-Regu (NimbusMonL-Regu) NimbusMonL-Regu
> (NimbusMonL-Regu) NimbusM
Hello,
I'm running Debian 3.0, and have run into a problem when viewing
ps files with gv. This is typical:
Error: /invalidfont in findfontGNU Ghostscript 6.51:
Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
Operand stack:
elvetica
;-] )
> b) reinstall XFonts (quite large...if not using a fast inet conn)
Guess this won't help, cause GhostScript does not use the X11 fonts but
brings along it's own in the 'gsfonts' package.
> c) try to embed the fonts into the eps, well, not that elegantly
I have no id
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 00:43, Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> Yes, I got ghostscript working again by setting the GS_LIB environment
> variable in /etc/profile:
>
>GS_LIB=/usr/share/gs/6.51:/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts
>export GS_LIB
The problem is gone. Thank you very much!
Thomas
Thomas He?ling wrote:
> I am using gnuplot to create EPS graphics which I embed into my LaTeX
> documents. That worked fine so far, but since the 'apt-get upgrade' last
> weekend I get the following error by GhostScript when trying to display
> those graphics: "Erro
1 - 100 of 288 matches
Mail list logo
