Charlie a écrit :
I don't think apt-get safe-upgrade is possible [apt-get safe-upgrade
E: Invalid operation safe-upgrade]
He/she obviously likes the safe-upgrade option because it sounds
safe. Like nothing will break maybe?
AFAIK, aptitude safe-upgrade and apt-get upgrade do exactly the
On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:51:43 -0500 John Hasler sent:
Lisi writes:
Why are you mixing apt-get and aptitude in this rather strange way?
Is there a reason?
apt-get update and aptitude update do *exactly* the same thing.
But he is not doing the same thing, he is doing:
[quote]
apt-get
On Thursday 02 July 2015 18:37:21 Michael Fothergill wrote:
I added the non-free epiphet to the sources.list file and then did
apt-get update and aptitude safe-upgrade etc.
I failed to take this in before.
Why are you mixing apt-get and aptitude in this rather strange way? Is there a
Michael Fothergill a écrit :
But, I thought that if X windows can't work without a given package, even
if it is a non-free one, then once the sources.list file has the non-free
moniker present it then if you ran apt-get update and then aptitude
safe-upgrade it would automatically fetch it
Lisi writes:
Why are you mixing apt-get and aptitude in this rather strange way? Is there
a
reason?
apt-get update and aptitude update do *exactly* the same thing.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 2 July 2015 at 20:29, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 02 July 2015 18:37:21 Michael Fothergill wrote:
I had to do aptitude install linux-firmware-nonfree to get it installed.
It
is not automatic.
No, it is not. Upgrade doesn't know what new software you want to
Do you have this package installed? What does apt-cache policy
linux-firmware-nonfree say?
It says unable to locate linux-firmware-nonfree
ie it's not installed I guess
That message means that apt-cache can't find that package at all. If
you have recently added non-free to
On Thursday 02 July 2015 18:37:21 Michael Fothergill wrote:
I had to do aptitude install linux-firmware-nonfree to get it installed. It
is not automatic.
No, it is not. Upgrade doesn't know what new software you want to install!!!
I should read up on aptitude.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:11:19 +0100
Michael Fothergill michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Seeing an Xorg.0.log file from a normal boot would be good, plus the
complete dmesg output.
Cheers,
Sven
The Xorg.0.log file is found here:
http://paste.debian.net/237917/
[ 453.202]
Also, what does cat /proc/cmdline say?
It says:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.14-2-amd64
root=UUID=26e72a74-ba29-4936-b388-3876839bc56b ro quiet
Regards
MF
Petter
--
I'm ionized
Are you sure?
I'm positive.
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:25:37 +0100
Michael Fothergill michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Do you have this package installed? What does apt-cache policy
linux-firmware-nonfree say?
It says unable to locate linux-firmware-nonfree
ie it's not installed I guess
That message means
linux-firmware-nonfree package, in case you don't have this installed.
Do you have this package installed? What does apt-cache policy
linux-firmware-nonfree say?
It says unable to locate linux-firmware-nonfree
ie it's not installed I guess
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing
I'm running this chip with unstable and it boots fine.
Looks like testing and unstable are on the same X.org currently, but
unstable is using a newer kernel.
Also I see something in dmesg about kaveri firmware being loaded, which I
believe is provided by the
linux-firmware-nonfree
So you're still not getting modesetting. Are you sure you booted
*without* nomodeset on the kernel line?
The dmesg file was empty.
Strange.
Petter
I haven't tried the nomodeset thing yet.
My sources.list file looks like this:
#
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Jessie_ -
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:51:43 +0100
Michael Fothergill michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm running this chip with unstable and it boots fine.
Looks like testing and unstable are on the same X.org currently, but
unstable is using a newer kernel.
Also I see something in
On 06/19/2015 at 08:44 AM, Petter Adsen wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:25:37 +0100 Michael Fothergill
michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Do you have this package installed? What does apt-cache policy
linux-firmware-nonfree say?
It says unable to locate linux-firmware-nonfree
Seeing an Xorg.0.log file from a normal boot would be good, plus the
complete dmesg output.
Cheers,
Sven
The Xorg.0.log file is found here:
http://paste.debian.net/237917/
The dmesg file was empty.
Regards
MF
ctrl C etc does not seem to drop down a command line interface etc.
Try Ctrl + Alt + F1
^^
That should have been F2, sorry.
crtl alt f2 worked thanks
MF
Petter
--
I'm ionized
Are you sure?
I'm positive.
--
Climostat Ltd
Rm 5169
The Heath
don't recall you saying what graphics hardware you have but I think
it is a radeon? What is your lspci entry for it?
lspci | grep VGA
It is an AMD Kaveri box Radeon R7 200 series (APU)
http://www.eteknix.com/complete-amd-kaveri-review-a10-7850k-a10-7700k-a8-7600/
I have the A10-7850k APU
On 6/18/2015 7:48 AM, Michael Fothergill wrote:
don't recall you saying what graphics hardware you have but I think
it is a radeon? What is your lspci entry for it?
lspci | grep VGA
It is an AMD Kaveri box Radeon R7 200 series (APU)
On 16 June 2015 at 21:40, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-06-16 21:41 +0200, Bob Proulx wrote:
I fear the problem is the newer Linux KMS and DRM interfaces which
obsoleted a lot of hardware. I have been hit by that problem myself.
Whereas older kernels worked perfectly
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:44:22 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:09:31 +0100
Michael Fothergill michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16 June 2015 at 21:40, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-06-16 21:41 +0200, Bob Proulx wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:09:31 +0100
Michael Fothergill michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16 June 2015 at 21:40, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-06-16 21:41 +0200, Bob Proulx wrote:
Michael Fothergill wrote:
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??)
Check /var/log/dpkg.log for a trace of what was installed previously
and what was removed and what was recently installed.
I looked at this file - it is quite big; I need to think what files to
search for within it
I have made a pastebinit link to the dpkg.log file:
Michael Fothergill wrote:
I looked at this file - it is quite big; I need to think what files to
search for within it
I have made a pastebinit link to the dpkg.log file:
http://paste.ubuntu.com/11731677/
Looking only at entries related to the xserver and filtering out
status and
On 16 June 2015 at 21:40, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-06-16 21:41 +0200, Bob Proulx wrote:
Michael Fothergill wrote:
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
Note that it will log errors with EE at the front. This is where the
errors start:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Check /var/log/dpkg.log for a trace of what was installed previously
and what was removed and what was recently installed. I think it
likely your xserver driver was removed due to a conflict. Figure out
what had been running and install it again.
In order to reduce the
What errors are seen in /var/log/Xorg.0.log file?
I have copied the output here:
[15.096]
X.Org X Server 1.17.1
Release Date: 2015-02-10
[15.096] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[15.096] Build Operating System: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian
[15.096] Current Operating
Michael Fothergill wrote:
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
Note that it will log errors with EE at the front. This is where the
errors start:
[15.104] (II) [KMS] drm report modesetting isn't supported.
[15.104] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file
On 2015-06-16 21:41 +0200, Bob Proulx wrote:
Michael Fothergill wrote:
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
Note that it will log errors with EE at the front. This is where the
errors start:
[15.104] (II) [KMS] drm report modesetting isn't supported.
Was
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 16:35:16 -0600
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Michael Fothergill wrote:
I can boot in recovery mode but if I do that as root if I run
aptitude it doesn't download packages - I think there is no
internet connection being made.
That makes me think you are running
Michael Fothergill wrote:
I changed from jessie to stretch in my sources.list file and then did
Testing is a development track. It isn't released. Welcome to the
process of making the release. Remember that when running Testing or
Unstable that you are part of the development process. You
On Monday 08 June 2015 17:36:36 Michael Fothergill wrote:
Dear Debian Folks,
I changed from jessie to stretch in my sources.list file and then did
aptitude safe-upgrade.
It worked OK or so it seemed.
But then I decided to try aptitude dist-upgrade afterward.
That wanted to rehash the
Dear Debian Folks,
I changed from jessie to stretch in my sources.list file and then did
aptitude safe-upgrade.
It worked OK or so it seemed.
But then I decided to try aptitude dist-upgrade afterward.
That wanted to rehash the xorg-server video package and after doing it when
I boot up the
34 matches
Mail list logo
