Re: is this a bug of startx?

2018-02-19 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 03:20:11AM +, Long Wind wrote: > maybe few users still use startx? Depends on where you draw your samples from. If you consider "all Debian users", then you are probably correct. The vast majority of users probably use one of the Display Managers. If you consider "th

Re: is this a bug of startx?

2018-02-17 Thread David Wright
On Sun 18 Feb 2018 at 03:20:11 (+), Long Wind wrote: > maybe few users still use startx?at first i found some strange problems with > stretchand unable to run X > now i'm able to describe the problemafter i install twm , i can't run > startxthen i create .xinitrc: > xterm & > twm > and it sol

Is this a bug?

2017-09-14 Thread Hans
e fix your file. kf5.kservice.sycoca: The menu spec file contains a Layout or DefaultLayout tag without the mandatory Merge tag inside. Please fix your file. Is this a bug? Or do I have to do something? Thanks for any answers. Best Hans

Is this a bug against ledgersmb? (was: getting started with ledgersmb)

2014-05-03 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On Friday 02 May 2014 16:22:10 Thierry Chatelet wrote: Hi list Trying to install ledgersmb from sid I got error 404: no such file..., when doing localhost/ledgersmb/setup.pl I read the Debian doc a bit more and I found in file: /usr/share/doc/ledgersmb/faq.html the following: About installat

Re: Is this a bug which should be filed?

2009-06-28 Thread Bruce Ward
On Sun,28.Jun.09, 13:54:35, Bruce Ward wrote: >> I have a machine with 2 IDE CD/DVD drives on the same channel. A >> DVD-RW is /dev/hdc and a Plextor CD-RW is /dev/hdd. I also dual-boot >> between an Etch installation and a Lenny installation; both standard >> GNOME desktops. >> >> The problem is

Re: Is this a bug which should be filed?

2009-06-28 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun,28.Jun.09, 13:54:35, Bruce Ward wrote: > I have a machine with 2 IDE CD/DVD drives on the same channel. A > DVD-RW is /dev/hdc and a Plextor CD-RW is /dev/hdd. I also dual-boot > between an Etch installation and a Lenny installation; both standard > GNOME desktops. > > The problem is that L

Is this a bug which should be filed?

2009-06-27 Thread Bruce Ward
I have a machine with 2 IDE CD/DVD drives on the same channel. A DVD-RW is /dev/hdc and a Plextor CD-RW is /dev/hdd. I also dual-boot between an Etch installation and a Lenny installation; both standard GNOME desktops. The problem is that Lenny will not detect a blank CD in the CD-RW drive. Et

Re: Is this a bug in Mplayer?

2008-11-11 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-11-11 23:58 +0100, Rico Secada wrote: > I am running Debian Lenny with kernel 2.6.26-1-686. I have not > experienced any problems prior. > > Today I wanted to watch a movie, and Mplayer crashed with a panic. > Following Mplayer crashes no matter what I try to play. > > Should I report thi

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-12 Thread James Stevenson
Mahesh M wrote: Hi, Once I tried using the deluser commmand and while trying to see how well it works, I tried the following command: deluser root And to my surprise, root was deleted. Is that good? Self-termination, suiside!!! I dont know if this is a bug, or if it has be

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-12 Thread Zach
You also must be careful with `unlink` :) From the package info for `irpas`: " Like all powerful tools, someone whom is terminally stupid could cause great damage when using these tools, so be careful." Zach -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-11 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:13:47 +0200 Nyizsnyik Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:05:26 -0400 > Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:12:10 +0200 > > Nyizsnyik Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:49:31 -0400 > > > Dou

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-11 Thread Nyizsnyik Ferenc
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:05:26 -0400 Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:12:10 +0200 > Nyizsnyik Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:49:31 -0400 > > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Once I tried using the deluser com

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-11 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:12:10 +0200 Nyizsnyik Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:49:31 -0400 > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Once I tried using the deluser commmand and while trying to see how > > > well it works, I tried the following command: >

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-11 Thread Nyizsnyik Ferenc
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:49:31 -0400 Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Once I tried using the deluser commmand and while trying to see how > > well it works, I tried the following command: > >deluser root > > And to my surprise, root was deleted. Is that good?

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-10 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:06:26PM +0530, Mahesh M wrote: > > Once I tried using the deluser commmand and while trying to see how well it > works, I tried the following command: >deluser root > And to my surprise, root was deleted. Is that good? Self-termination, > suiside!!! >

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-09 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
Hi! On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:06:26PM +0530, Mahesh M wrote: > Hi, > > Once I tried using the deluser commmand and while trying to see how well it > works, I tried the following command: > deluser root > And to my surprise, root was deleted. Is that good? Self-termination, >

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-09 Thread Rico Secada
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 22:06:26 +0530 "Mahesh M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Once I tried using the deluser commmand and while trying to see how well it > works, I tried the following command: > deluser root > And to my surprise, root was deleted. Is that good? Self-termi

Re: Is this a bug?

2007-06-09 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:06:26PM +0530, Mahesh M wrote: > Hi, > > Once I tried using the deluser commmand and while trying to see how well it > works, I tried the following command: >deluser root > And to my surprise, root was deleted. Is that good? Self-termination, > suisid

Is this a bug?

2007-06-09 Thread Mahesh M
Hi, Once I tried using the deluser commmand and while trying to see how well it works, I tried the following command: deluser root And to my surprise, root was deleted. Is that good? Self-termination, suiside!!! I dont know if this is a bug, or if it has been kept for some kind

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-26 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Friday 24 February 2006 17:06, Joey Hess wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > It didn't just remove an entry. Update-grub completely overwrites > > the file so any entries for kernels on other partitions are gone. > > ### BEGIN AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST > ## lines between the AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST mar

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-26 Thread Joey Hess
Hal Vaughan wrote: > It didn't just remove an entry. Update-grub completely overwrites the > file so any entries for kernels on other partitions are gone. ### BEGIN AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST ## lines between the AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST markers will be modified ## by the debian update-grub script exc

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-25 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Saturday 25 February 2006 06:26, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:19:19 -0500 > Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > > > Okay. That's easy and makes sense. But there is still a problem, > > but may be more with grub. I went through the man pages of grub > > and di

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-25 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:19:19 -0500 Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > Okay. That's easy and makes sense. But there is still a problem, but > may be more with grub. I went through the man pages of grub and did a > lot of research to figure out how to make the changes I needed. No

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-24 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Friday 24 February 2006 16:56, Justin Guerin wrote: > On Friday 24 February 2006 12:07, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > On Friday 24 February 2006 13:24, Justin Guerin wrote: > > > On Thursday 23 February 2006 18:23, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > [snip] > > > > You aren't given a choice of keeping your old grub

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-24 Thread Justin Guerin
On Friday 24 February 2006 12:07, Hal Vaughan wrote: > On Friday 24 February 2006 13:24, Justin Guerin wrote: > > On Thursday 23 February 2006 18:23, Hal Vaughan wrote: [snip] > > > > You aren't given a choice of keeping your old grub config file, > > because without an update, you can't boot the n

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-24 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Friday 24 February 2006 13:24, Justin Guerin wrote: > On Thursday 23 February 2006 18:23, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I posted earlier this week about some problems I had after doing: > > > > aptitude update && aptitude upgrade > > > > on a Sarge system. It required rebooting and was immediately > >

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-24 Thread Justin Guerin
On Friday 24 February 2006 11:51, Chris Lale wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: [snip] > > A couple of thoughts come to mind. I don't kow if they will help you. > > > > 1. Use > > > > aptitude update && aptitude dist-upgrade > > > > instead of aptitude update && aptitude upgrade. This will deal > > intell

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-24 Thread Justin Guerin
On Thursday 23 February 2006 18:23, Hal Vaughan wrote: > I posted earlier this week about some problems I had after doing: > > aptitude update && aptitude upgrade > > on a Sarge system. It required rebooting and was immediately unbootable > -- ON SARGE!!! This is the very stuff I am using stable

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-24 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Friday 24 February 2006 11:51, Chris Lale wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I posted earlier this week about some problems I had after doing: > > > > aptitude update && aptitude upgrade > > > > on a Sarge system. It required rebooting and was immediately > > unbootable -- ON SARGE!!! This is t

Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-24 Thread Chris Lale
Hal Vaughan wrote: I posted earlier this week about some problems I had after doing: aptitude update && aptitude upgrade on a Sarge system. It required rebooting and was immediately unbootable -- ON SARGE!!! This is the very stuff I am using stable to avoid! I lost a day tracking it dow

Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?

2006-02-23 Thread Hal Vaughan
I posted earlier this week about some problems I had after doing: aptitude update && aptitude upgrade on a Sarge system. It required rebooting and was immediately unbootable -- ON SARGE!!! This is the very stuff I am using stable to avoid! I lost a day tracking it down and finally found that

nmap build-depends on libpcap-dev causing problems - is this a bug?

2005-11-04 Thread Roy Hills
that libpcap-dev depends on libpcap0.7-dev, but libpcap0.8-dev does not satisfy this dependency. Is this a bug?  If so, which package is in error - nmap for specifying libpcap-dev, or libpcap-dev for not allowing libpcap0.8-dev to meet the dependency? I also note that the notes for libpcap-de

Is this a bug?

2005-06-16 Thread DC A
I'm trying to install debian sarge 2.6 kernel. But at the end of the installation during xserver-xfree86 I get an error saying: localhost kernel: usb 1-1 control timeout on ep0in localhost last message repeated 5 times .this message goes on and I can see exim setup screen broken. After

Re: Is this a bug in mutt or a malformed email?

2004-07-03 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:27:07PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:43:06PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > | A poster to a pigeon rescue group I'm on posts in > | multipart/alternative format, HTML and plain text. > | > | Normally, when reading his emails, mutt (woody, 1.3.

Re: Is this a bug in mutt or a malformed email?

2004-06-30 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:21:37PM -0600, CW Harris wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:43:06PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > > A poster to a pigeon rescue group I'm on posts in > > multipart/alternative format, HTML and plain text. > > > > Normally, when reading his emails, mutt (woody, 1.3.28-2) happil

Re: Is this a bug in mutt or a malformed email?

2004-06-30 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:43:06PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: | A poster to a pigeon rescue group I'm on posts in | multipart/alternative format, HTML and plain text. | | Normally, when reading his emails, mutt (woody, 1.3.28-2) happily | displays the plain text part and ignores the HTML. | | However,

Re: Is this a bug in mutt or a malformed email?

2004-06-29 Thread CW Harris
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:43:06PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > A poster to a pigeon rescue group I'm on posts in > multipart/alternative format, HTML and plain text. > > Normally, when reading his emails, mutt (woody, 1.3.28-2) happily > displays the plain text part and ignores the HTML. > > However,

Is this a bug in mutt or a malformed email?

2004-06-29 Thread Pigeon
A poster to a pigeon rescue group I'm on posts in multipart/alternative format, HTML and plain text. Normally, when reading his emails, mutt (woody, 1.3.28-2) happily displays the plain text part and ignores the HTML. However, when he quotes one of my PGP-inline-signed posts, and doesn't delete

Re: What is this? A bug in update-menus???

2004-04-08 Thread Haim Ashkenazi
John Foster wrote: > louiloui:/# update-menus > Unknown error, message=replacewith($string, $replace, $with): $replace and > $with must have the same length. > install-menu: /etc/menu-methods/freedesktop-desktop-entry-spec-dirs: > aborting update-menus[12361]: > Script /etc/menu-methods/freedeskto

What is this? A bug in update-menus???

2004-04-08 Thread John Foster
louiloui:/# update-menus Unknown error, message=replacewith($string, $replace, $with): $replace and $with must have the same length. install-menu: /etc/menu-methods/freedesktop-desktop-entry-spec-dirs: aborting update-menus[12361]: Script /etc/menu-methods/freedesktop-desktop-entry-spec-dirs retu

Zope still dead on install Is this a bug??

2003-09-23 Thread John Foster
I have been trying to install from Debian Sid a new (purged all of the old stuff) Zope & it simply does not work. I have had it running in the past but sometome ago lost interst in it. I now want to see how it stacks up (2 years later) as a CMT suystem. I can only get the same message that it's

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-18 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% "der.hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: dh> Am 13. Sep, 2001 Paul D. Smith so: >> I just asked on debian-devel. dh> Did you get an answer? Yep. Apparently apt isn't being pulled in because it would break other packages, like aptitude or gnome-apt, which don't have suitable updates for

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-17 Thread der.hans
Am 13. Sep, 2001 schwätzte Paul D. Smith so: > I just asked on debian-devel. Did you get an answer? ciao, der.hans -- # [EMAIL PROTECTED] home.pages.de/~lufthans/ www.DevelopOnline.com # Practice socially consious hedonism. Do whatever you want, # as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else. - de

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-14 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Unfortunately, it still hasn't migrated into testing, and when I tried >> to grab it from unstable it wanted to pull too many other unstable >> packages for me to be comfortable with. bn> What often works for me in a situation like that is to

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-14 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:18:12PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote: > %% Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > js> I think that, if it is a bug, it should be submited against apt, > js> since dpkg didn't seem to get to execute. > > Looking through the APT bug reports, I think this bug has b

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-13 Thread Paul D. Smith
I just asked on debian-devel. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> HASMAT--HA Software Mthds & Tools "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-13 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% "der.hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So, I have no idea whatsoever why APT 0.5.4 hasn't migrated into testing >> yet... dh> Does it depend on apt or something that uses apt to get the dh> correct results? No idea... dh> BTW, for the workaround, just taking unstable out of sour

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-13 Thread Jorge Santos
"Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > %% Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Looking through the APT bug reports, I think this bug has been fixed in > >> apt 0.5.4, uploaded to unstable around Aug 20. > >> > >> Unfortunately, it still hasn't migrated into testing, and

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-13 Thread der.hans
Am 13. Sep, 2001 schwätzte Paul D. Smith so: > %% Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > js> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html > > I'm stumped. > > According to the excuses, there's no reason for APT to not be moved to > "testing", as long as it doesn't depend on br

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-13 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Looking through the APT bug reports, I think this bug has been fixed in >> apt 0.5.4, uploaded to unstable around Aug 20. >> >> Unfortunately, it still hasn't migrated into testing, and when I tried >> to grab it from unstable it wanted to

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-12 Thread Jorge Santos
"Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > %% Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > js> I think that, if it is a bug, it should be submited against apt, > js> since dpkg didn't seem to get to execute. > > Looking through the APT bug reports, I think this bug has been fixed in > apt

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-12 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: js> I think that, if it is a bug, it should be submited against apt, js> since dpkg didn't seem to get to execute. Looking through the APT bug reports, I think this bug has been fixed in apt 0.5.4, uploaded to unstable around Aug 20. Unfortunately,

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-11 Thread Jorge Santos
"Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > %% Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > js> Similar problem with my setup, thanks for the work around. > > Do you have the same setup WRT the apt.conf and preferences files, too? > > Maybe I will submit a bug. I'm not sure whether to file

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-11 Thread Jorge Santos
Similar problem with my setup, thanks for the work around. Check my message from yesterday. jorge santos

Re: apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-11 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: js> Similar problem with my setup, thanks for the work around. Do you have the same setup WRT the apt.conf and preferences files, too? Maybe I will submit a bug. I'm not sure whether to file it against apt or dpkg, though... I guess dpkg. -- -

apt-get problem workaround... is this a bug?

2001-09-11 Thread Paul D. Smith
Well, I finally fixed, or rather worked around, the problem I've been having with apt-get upgrade and dist-upgrade failing with all sorts of obscure, bizarre errors for over two weeks now. Maybe my setup was broken, or maybe something in the latest APT, etc. is broken... can someone with a deeper

Re: Is this a bug of potato (2..2.15-2000-06-07)

2000-06-15 Thread Nate Bargmann
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 07:49:33AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > I've experienced quite a few problems with setserial interacting badly > with pcmcia modems. You could also try removing the setserial package, and > rebooting (have to reboot to get rid of setserial's changes). This makes > all my lapt

Re: Is this a bug of potato (2..2.15-2000-06-07)

2000-06-15 Thread Ben Collins
> working fine, but the pcmcia modem card can't ppp dial-out > > (no dial tone, but can bring up the /dev/modem device), > > than I downgrade to installed the slink 2.1R5, everything is > > alright, I can dialout to my ISP now (exactly same configuration > > and process a

Re: Is this a bug of potato (2..2.15-2000-06-07)

2000-06-15 Thread Nate Bargmann
bring up the /dev/modem device), > than I downgrade to installed the slink 2.1R5, everything is > alright, I can dialout to my ISP now (exactly same configuration > and process as install the potato). > Is this a bug of potato-2.2.15-2000-06-07 or only my > system's problem?

Is this a bug of potato (2..2.15-2000-06-07)

2000-06-15 Thread Alex Kwan
ng is alright, I can dialout to my ISP now (exactly same configuration and process as install the potato). Is this a bug of potato-2.2.15-2000-06-07 or only my system's problem? Thanks!

Is this a bug of hwclock or did I misunderstood the man page?

1999-12-12 Thread Shaul Karl
I tried to adjust the system clock by [10:24:52 /tmp]# hwclock --hctosys [09:15:21 /tmp]# [09:15:27 /tmp]# hwclock --show Sun Dec 12 09:15:39 1999 -0.396524 seconds Which is no good because I have the hardware clock set to UTC while I want to use my local TZ. There for I issued [09:15:38 /tmp

Re: wdm and xdm co-exisitng - is this a bug?

1999-05-30 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On 20 May 1999, Jan Vroonhof wrote: > Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The thing is, that you could manage :0 with xdm, :1 with wdm and XDMCP > > with gdm or such. So the packages don't conflict in a traditional > > sense. But looks like all of them try to manage :0 and there

Re: wdm and xdm co-exisitng - is this a bug?

1999-05-20 Thread Jan Vroonhof
Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The thing is, that you could manage :0 with xdm, :1 with wdm and XDMCP > with gdm or such. So the packages don't conflict in a traditional > sense. But looks like all of them try to manage :0 and therefore there > is this mess. Wouldn't this be s

Re: wdm and xdm co-exisitng - is this a bug?

1999-05-20 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "DM" == Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DM> Is this a bug with either of the packages? If so, which one? xdm DM> and wdm seem to co-exist well as regards to things like depends. The thing is, that you could manage :0 with xdm, :1 with wdm and XDMCP with

wdm and xdm co-exisitng - is this a bug?

1999-05-20 Thread Damon Muller
er have an /etc/X11/options file, so I cant use that to stop one of them starting. I couldn't see any obvious options in ?dm.options that did something equivalent. Eventually I just deleted /etc/rc2.d/S99xdm - it's a bit klunky, but it seems to work. Is this a bug with either of the pa

Re: Problems with NFS (is this a bug?)

1998-10-02 Thread Dale E. Martin
Jose Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > I've been using Debian 1.3.1 at my work for sharing my local SCSI disk > with NFS. Everything worked ok until I upgraded to Debian 2.0. I did not > changed anything in config files. My disk is shared with a Sun Solaris > 2.5.x and 4 PCs (Debian

Problems with NFS (is this a bug?)

1998-10-02 Thread Jose Rodriguez
Hi! I've been using Debian 1.3.1 at my work for sharing my local SCSI disk with NFS. Everything worked ok until I upgraded to Debian 2.0. I did not changed anything in config files. My disk is shared with a Sun Solaris 2.5.x and 4 PCs (Debian Hamm). When activating NFS things work ok for a while

Is this a bug? was: Re: broken ncurses?

1998-03-31 Thread Britton
I had the same experience as Mr. Mills. I manually deleted a broken ncurses link /usr/lib/libncurses.so.3.4 I think it was, and the ld-related warning which used to come up on 'dpkg --install ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-8.deb' dissapeared. dselect now works again. This problem began with the libc6 upgra

chfn -f : permission denied. Is this a bug?

1997-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Why doesn't chfn let user's change their full name? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~>chfn Changing the user information for joey Enter the new value, or press return for the default Full name is Joey Hess Room Number []: Work Phone []: Home Phone []: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~>chfn -f "Joe

Re: installing emacs 19.34---is this a bug?

1996-09-29 Thread Mark Eichin
could you be more specific about what you're actually seeing? The "postinst" script does not, in fact, delete anything... -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

installing emacs 19.34---is this a bug?

1996-09-26 Thread alan davis
Installing emacs the debian way? Every file in the lisp directory was installed twice, then the second copy deleted when the set up was completed, by the installation script. It was necessary to have 8 more megabytes free for installation than was actually needed by emacs!

Re: OS/2 HPFS File System - Is this a Bug? + a note for the list maintainers

1996-08-22 Thread Jim Worthington
> > /dev/sda5 id 7 OS/2 HPFS > > > > /dev/hda2 id 17 Unknown > > > > > > Has anybody else observed the two different identifers for HPFS > > filesystems? Is this a Bug? Linux produces some error messages when > > mounting the id 17 filesyste

Re: OS/2 HPFS File System - Is this a Bug? + a note for the list maintainers

1996-08-21 Thread Martin Str|mberg
ring > the installation process. It is also a primary partition. > > The HPFS partition type (id 7) was created by OS/2 Warp after > installation. Note that this is an extended partition. > > Has anybody else observed the two different identifers for HPFS > filesystems? I

Re: OS/2 HPFS File System - Is this a Bug?

1996-08-14 Thread Jim Worthington
Daniel Lynes wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:42:13 -0400, Jim Worthington wrote: > > > /dev/sda5 id 7 OS/2 HPFS > > /dev/hda2 id 17 Unknown > > >The Unknown partition type (id 17) was created by OS/2 Warp fdisk during > >the installation process. It is also a primary partition. > > I ha

Re: OS/2 HPFS File System - Is this a Bug?

1996-08-14 Thread Jim Worthington
Shaya Potter wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Aug 1996, Jim Worthington wrote: > > > I'm running OS/2 Warp with HPFS on several of my drives. > > > > I noticed that Linux 1.1 fdisk reveals two different file system > > identifiers for these > > HPFS partitions: > > > > /dev/sda5 id 7 OS/2 HPFS > > /de

Re: OS/2 HPFS File System - Is this a Bug?

1996-08-13 Thread Todd Tyrone Fries
it? If you are, and linux's fdisk says it only 1 or 2 MB large, then I > would just remove it from your /etc/mtab and /etc/fstab files. your suggestion doesn't hold water considering below he says it complains but mounts the filesystem id 17 fine. > > Has anybody else observed t

Re: OS/2 HPFS File System - Is this a Bug?

1996-08-13 Thread Shaya Potter
gt; The HPFS partition type (id 7) was created by OS/2 Warp after > installation. Note that this is an extended partition. > > Has anybody else observed the two different identifers for HPFS > filesystems? Is this a Bug? Linux produces some error messages when > mounting the

OS/2 HPFS File System - Is this a Bug?

1996-08-13 Thread Jim Worthington
g the installation process. It is also a primary partition. The HPFS partition type (id 7) was created by OS/2 Warp after installation. Note that this is an extended partition. Has anybody else observed the two different identifers for HPFS filesystems? Is this a Bug? Linux produces some